Just because it's true
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
by Scrumtrulescent on Apr 22, 2008 5:01 PM CDT reply actions
The only cure is to win it all. Something these two jackasses never did. Thank God!
by grungedave on Apr 22, 2008 5:03 PM CDT reply actions
So, 98 percent of all basketball fans know the two championships have asterisks next to them.
And you know (whether you want to admit it or not) that had Jordan decided not to take some time off, he would have eight rings. You know that.
So, hold on to your asterisk-tainted past. Whatever.
You ready for 0-3? I smell a blowout. Can't wait for your emotional reaction.
by Anonymous on Apr 22, 2008 8:22 PM CDT reply actions
In the same years that the Houston Rockets won the Championships - I don't recall the Utah Jazz taking the year off and not playing.
So, shouldn't YOU be embarrassed for not sealing the deal when Jordan didn't play?
the Rockets owned the mid 90's Bulls by the way. Check basketball reference for proof. We went 5-1 against the '91-'93 Bulls.
by grungedave on Apr 22, 2008 8:51 PM CDT reply actions
by Amaar on Apr 22, 2008 9:13 PM CDT reply actions
by Anonymous on Apr 22, 2008 9:22 PM CDT reply actions
Dipshit
by Amaar on Apr 22, 2008 9:55 PM CDT reply actions
Please go and create your own blog at www.dipshitsthoughts.blogspot.com and write about the NBA there. We don't need your poorly though out comments on our respected NBA blogs. If you're such an "NBA fan" prove it by creating a blog and allowing us to make ill advised comments under the protection of the username Anonymous. You suck dude.
Sincerely,
CB Jack
by C.B. Jack on Apr 22, 2008 10:48 PM CDT reply actions
by Anonymous on Apr 22, 2008 10:53 PM CDT reply actions
and which superstar is classless?
also i honestly think if the bulls had made it both years, the rockets would have lost in 94 and won in 95
by andre on Apr 22, 2008 11:29 PM CDT reply actions
I'm not sure the Bulls would have beat those Rockets teams. I'm split. Jordan was definitely in his prime, but the Bulls had - and never did (unless you count O'Neal and we all know he sucks shit) - a true, dominant center like Hakeem.
We'll never know. But one thing we do know - the Rockets got two rings and my Jazz have none. Until we get that Spurs sort-of toughness, that killer instinct, we won't. It pains me to say, but since I've been a Jazz fan since 1985 and have weathered everything, I have the right to say what I want.
by Fredo Teabaggins on Apr 23, 2008 1:18 AM CDT reply actions
http://thedreamshake.blogspot.com/2008/01/jordan-v-hakeem-who-wins.html
every team has an opponent they match up poorly against. For the Bulls, it was the Rockets.
Problem is, for the Rockets, it was Seattle. Who was in our Conference. Oh, well.
by grungedave on Apr 23, 2008 7:41 AM CDT reply actions
And the statute of limitations is until Utah wins a championship.
Plus, that picture strangely comforts me.
by UofTOrange on Apr 23, 2008 8:16 AM CDT reply actions
by Fredo Teabaggins on Apr 23, 2008 12:41 PM CDT reply actions
Just get the brooms out.
by The Golden Griff on Apr 23, 2008 2:57 PM CDT reply actions
by andre on Apr 23, 2008 3:27 PM CDT reply actions
Something to remember about the Bulls. They weren't totally dominant in the Finals. That's what made Jordan special. They won anyway.
The Hakeem Rockets beat who showed up. It wasn't the Bulls. And as TDS has pointed out, who was going to stop Hakeem? "Medical" Bill Cartwright? Luc Longley? Any of a half dozen truly horrible Chicago centers?
How about this - Jordan gets to be an icon because he never had to get his ass kicked by Houston. Prove that isn't true.
by Anonymous on Apr 25, 2008 2:17 AM CDT reply actions
by Anonymous on Apr 25, 2008 2:18 AM CDT reply actions

by 






















