Where nobody knows your name
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
WE DID. HIS FANS! Don't go ragging on Deron for something he didn't say.
Oh and by the way, Rockets suck.
Have a nice day.
by C.B. Jack on Apr 30, 2008 3:04 PM CDT reply actions
by Eric on Apr 30, 2008 3:37 PM CDT reply actions
by UofTOrange on Apr 30, 2008 3:42 PM CDT reply actions
That or you have go go gadget ears...
If he said it then I take my previous comment back.
But for real...pompous cooment on McGrady's part.
by C.B. Jack on Apr 30, 2008 4:17 PM CDT reply actions
by UofTOrange on Apr 30, 2008 4:23 PM CDT reply actions
The Rockets would have been better off winning by 5, trust me!
by sterica on Apr 30, 2008 4:41 PM CDT reply actions
So I thought I would provide a little history lesson...
1993-94 vs San Antonio
Game 1 4/28/94 Jazz89 SA106
Game 2 4/30/94 Jazz96 SA84
Jazz win series!
1994-95 vs Houston
Game 2 4/29/95 Jazz126 Rckts140
Game 3 5/03/95 Jazz95 Rckts82
1996-97 vs Chicago
Game 2 6/04/97 Jazz85 Bulls97
Game 3 6/06/97 Jazz104 Bulls93
1996-97 vs LA Lakers
Game 3 5/08/97 Jazz84 LA104
Game 4 5/10/97 Jazz110 LA95
1997-98 vs San Antonio
Game 3 5/09/98 Jazz64 SA86
Game 4 5/10/98 Jazz82 SA73
1997-98 vs Houston
Game 1 4/23/98 Jazz90 Rckts103
Game 2 4/25/98 Jazz105 Rckts90
2006-07 vs Golden State
Game 3 5/11/07 Jazz105 GS125
Game 4 5/13/07 Jazz115 GS101
2007-08 vs Houston
Game 5 4/29/08 Jazz69 Rckts95
Game 6 5/2/08 Jazz? Rckts?
by sterica on Apr 30, 2008 5:05 PM CDT reply actions
in 1994 Utah eventually its ass beat by Houston.
in 1995 Houston did the trick again.
in 1997, Chicago had the eventual pleasure.
in 1998, Chicago again. Ask Bryon Russell, he remembers.
in 2007, San Antonio beat you down and it wasn't close.
Yeah, that was a fun history lesson! Let's do that again sometime!
by grungedave on Apr 30, 2008 5:09 PM CDT reply actions
I agree that the Jazzers are preparing a J-Slo style beat down on Friday. Don't forget your knee pads Rockets...We know you won't.
Dave did the Anonymous Jazz troll scare you out of accepting anonymous comments?
by C.B. Jack on Apr 30, 2008 5:16 PM CDT reply actions
Besides, how hard is it to get a google ID and a fake name?
by grungedave on Apr 30, 2008 5:20 PM CDT reply actions
by C.B. Jack on Apr 30, 2008 5:33 PM CDT reply actions
by grungedave on Apr 30, 2008 5:34 PM CDT reply actions
We've lost 3 of 5 at 60% of our starting roster. We've won 2 of 3 with 80% of it. The Jazz is having to work pretty hard to beat Houston without Yao. I can't imagine we'd be having the same trouble if the Jazz were without Boozer or Williams.
Also, I'm proposing a new name for A Kirelenko. AK-47 is too macho and tough.
Here are a couple of suggestions:
The Heliflopter
Crybaby
The Weeping Stick
3rd Ugliest Jazz Man
Please add your own.
by Xiane on Apr 30, 2008 6:34 PM CDT reply actions
http://youtube.com/watch?v=pRfUXYwloIU
by Amaar on Apr 30, 2008 9:44 PM CDT reply actions
by hill2500 on Apr 30, 2008 9:53 PM CDT reply actions
Allow me to clue you in on something, Jazz fan, your backs are against the wall and your best player is doing EXACTLY the thing you have been harping on T-Mac about for this entire series. Funny how that has backfired, tards.
Oh, and don't get me started on your brand of basketball. Dirtdre Kirefloppo and Memet Flopkur out front told us that. Lets be clear on this, nobody likes Utah but Utah. They are an unappealing team. They are the butterscotch candy that is always the only left uneaten in the candy dish.
Every time I think of the Utah Jazz, I am always sitting on the pooper. Coincidence? I think not.
by nonsequitter on May 1, 2008 9:22 AM CDT reply actions
by RKD5 on May 1, 2008 11:49 AM CDT reply actions
by sterica on May 2, 2008 9:51 AM CDT reply actions
by Kyle on May 2, 2008 10:00 AM CDT reply actions
Come on now, it's more like 52-57
by UofTOrange on May 2, 2008 10:26 AM CDT reply actions
Since we're setting the cutoff that a Jazz "blowout" is 12 points as sterica said, let's look at some other Jazz blowouts and the following games in the playoffs during the same timeframe. For some reason, these were left out of the earlier post:
2006-2007 vs San Antonio Western Conference Finals
Game 4 SA 91 Utah 79
Game 5 SA 109 Utah 84
2002-2003 vs Sacramento Western Conference First Round
Game 4 Sac 99 Utah 82
Game 5 Sac 111 Utah 91
2000-2001 vs Dallas Western Conference First Round
Game 4 Dallas 107 Utah 77
Game 5 Dallas 84 Utah 83
1999-2000 vs Portland Western Conference Semifinals
Game 1 Port 94 Utah 75
Game 2 Port 103 Utah 85
Game 3 Port 103 Utah 84
(Note: Utah did beat Portland 88-85 in Game 4 before losing in Game 5)
(Note2: In the first round, Utah lost Game 3 to Seattle by 11 and then lost again in Game 4 by 11 before winning in Game 5, doesn't fall under 12 point rule though)
1998-1999 vs Portland in Western Conference Semifinals
Game 6 Portland 92 Utah 80
No game 7
(Note: Oops this doesn't count, how's this get in here)
(Note2: In the first round the Jazz lost by 11 to the Kings in Game 2 and came back the next game and lost by 3. Again, doesn't count)
1997-1998 vs Chicago NBA Finals
Game 3 Chicago 96 Utah 54 (ouch)
Game 4 Chicago 86 Utah 82
1996-1997 vs Houston Western Conference Finals
Game 3 Houston 118 Utah 100
Game 4 Houston 95 Utah 92
1995-1996 vs. Seattle Western Conference Finals
Game 1 Seattle 102 Utah 72
Game 2 Seattle 91 Utah 87
1994-1995 vs Houston Western Conference First Round
Game 4 Houston 123 Utah 106
Game 5 Houston 95 Utah 91
(Note: This is my favorite one since sterica used Game 2 and Game 3 earlier. Hey, guess where Game 5 of this series was?)
1993-1994 vs Houston Western Conference Finals
Game 1 Houston 100 Utah 88
Game 2 Houston 104 Utah 99
Um, so basically, after blowout losses, the Jazz are 7-10. Wow, scary. If you throw in 11 point losses counting as blowouts, the Jazz are 7-13. Wow, impressive. Man, the Rockets should be quaking right now.
by Ray on May 2, 2008 2:01 PM CDT reply actions
The Jazz would be 7-12 if you count games after losses by 11 points or more in the playoffs since 1993-1994, not 7-13 as the previous post suggests. I apologize.
by Ray on May 2, 2008 2:13 PM CDT reply actions
























