Well, that sucked
From agony to ecstasy to agony again, that wraps up last night for me. At least the last 1.9 seconds. Oddly enough, the foul call lost the Rockets the game. Brandon Roy was a hero for his team for making the foul even though he thought he was the goat. Without it, the game would have gone to a second OT as time would have expired as the ball went through the basket. Instead, the clock stopped on the whistle. I do contend that there is no way that there were .8 seconds on the clock there. I also contend, as does any sane person, that you can’t catch, turn around, set and shoot in .8 seconds. You can catch and release, but not turn around set and shoot. I’m not a sore loser though (okay I am, but that’s not the point), that was a hell of a shot from Brandon Roy to end the game.
First off, let me preface this rant with something: I like Chuck Hayes, a lot actually. He has been outstanding on the defensive side of the ball for a good while. I also like him as a person as he seems like a good one. I hope he is not hurt, as we need him to back up
I would also like to take a minute to say that I do greatly appreciate that Rafer Alston did not play much in the 4th quarter. Aaron Brooks was wrecking the Blazers D, and while Rafer had a solid game, playing the hot hand is the proper way to go. So I still don’t get why we play Brooks there but not Scola, or even Landry (though he did end the game with 5 fouls).
Tracy McGrady had a very strong game. I hate picking on him, but that jumper towards the end of the game was atrocious and he tried more than once to pass to Chuck Hayes down low. Other than that, all around good game. His defense was borderline very good. His offense was great, finding ways to take it to the hole without sacrificing his body more than a few times. I don’t even remember seeing him wince at all during the game, and I believe that is a good sign for his health overall. Or maybe Crazy Pills took him aside Plus, I love bearded Tracy McGrady, I think it brings out the best in him.
This game is over, time to prepare for the defending Western Conference champs.
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
Chuck's defense
Here’s what I saw: as you say, Scola and Landry weren’t playing bad defense; Aldridge was on fire.
HOWEVER, when Chuck was put in, Aldridge stopped getting the ball, stopped hitting shots. That said, as good as Scola was offensively, I still would have put him back in, at least until Aldridge started killing us again.
by jack_ on Nov 7, 2008 12:31 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
UofTOrange
Was it just me, or was this game pathetically a mirror image of the Texas vs Texas Tech game?
We came back, only to lose at the very end due to a horrible defensive breakdown. Ugh I can’t take this anymore.
by goingforthecorner on Nov 7, 2008 12:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
It was indeed
Luckily in the NBA you have the playoffs unlike the NCAA Division 1
by UofTOrange on Nov 7, 2008 2:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
chuck was crucial last night
Chuck absolutely should have played as much as he did. He took LaMarcus out of the game. Period. Luis was getting destroyed. Chuck did the destroying. He doesn’t need to score (at least he shouldn’t) when Yao, Tracy, Ron, and Aaron are on the floor. His defense was fantastic and he was one of the main reasons we got back in the game. Before he came in we could not get a stop. Reggie Miller was totally wrong and I remember saying as much. People need to stop hating on Chuck and realize how ridiculously good he is at what he does. Without chuck we lose that game by 8 or 10 and LaMarcus has 35. It is that simple.
He shouldn’t play more than Luis and Carl every game but last night he had to. They aren’t near the caliber of low post defender that the Chuckwagon is.
by clutchcity on Nov 7, 2008 4:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
dude
Are you going to post this same comment in every thread?
by grungedave on Nov 7, 2008 4:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you dont have to be rude
im just standing up for Chuck. Someone has to.
by clutchcity on Nov 7, 2008 4:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't mean to be rude... but...
I appreciate you defending Chuck, but you don’t have to say the same thing in four different posts. Chuck has value, we just disagree on how his value compares to Scolas.
by grungedave on Nov 7, 2008 4:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
PLUS
Even if we assume that Chuck is the greatest defender of all time…
that still does not explain why he was on the court for the final two possessions on offense when we were coming out of a time-out. There is NO excuse for Rick to be asleep on that.
by grungedave on Nov 7, 2008 5:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 











