Hmmm, so maybe this "run and gun" offense might actually work in the NBA?
I have been on record for a few months now in saying that the 2009/10 Rockets will win no more than 35 games this year. And I'm sticking by that statement for the moment. I'm also sticking to my proclaimation that Luis Scola will be a 20/10 player this year and a borderline all-star. For he's a badass, you see. No matter how rough the season might get, I will always have a reason to attend games, watch them on TV and generally root for the Rockets simply because of guys like Scola (and Battier, and Brooks, and Landry and... well... you get the idea). I just don't see how the Rockets will compete for 82 games over a long grueling season without the services of Yao Ming or the 2003 version of McGrady.
Now, in contrast, Lee thinks the Rockets finish 41-41 (which may sneak them into the playoffs in any other year/conference). I just don't see how that will happen given that most of the teams in the West are rather tall in the frontcourt, while we may be starting Chuck freakin' Hayes at center. 6'5" on a good day Chuck Hayes. Same guy. Hey, I like Chuck. He plays hard. I just like winning more -- and by that I mean I wish we had a legit 7' player on our roster to at least be a reasonable facsimile of a center.
Cue David Andersen? He had quite the 12 minutes on the court last night. He could score; he could rebound; he even blocked a shot (though since it was against Candace Parker's husband, I'm not sure that really counts)!
I watched most of the game against the Spurs and some of the fourth quarter last night against the Celtics (hey, South Park was on, leave me alone!) If the Rockets can play a similar up-tempo style, pass the ball well and make open layups - the 41-41 idea may not be so far-fetched. Then again, "making open layups" while a simple concept, has never been a strong suit of any Rockets team for the last 15 years. Or do I need to link to McGrady's attempt in Milwaukee... or Luther Head's inability to make a layup in warmups (true story)... or any Rafer Alston highlight?
So, yes, while it's just pre-season -- the effort and results of the first two pre-season games have been rather inspiring. Jermaine Taylor looks like a legit NBA player. Chase Budinger (however it's pronounced) might be able to fill the Matt Bullard role that Steve Novak never quite got a handle on. Sorry, Tom. Aaron Brooks and Kyle Lowry remain one hell of a good 1-2 punch at point guard. Lowry can even rebound a little bit, which is going to be HUGE for the Rockets. The team has been one of the league's best defensive rebounding squads in the NBA for years - mostly thanks to JVG - but this year will likely be a struggle there. When your starting frontcourt is 6'9, 6'5" and 6'7" it means the boys will have to get rather creative on the rebounding front.
Bullard and Worrell are right... the Rockets are going to give you hustle and effort and play very, very, very uptempo basketball. They have no other choice. Unless they want to be the Clippers. Fortunately for us, our guys care.
Your 2009-10 Houston Rockets: It's going to be interesting.
0 recs |
31 comments
|
Comments
It wasn't Novak's fault - you know that.
It was, uh, just a bad situation for such a, um, talented player… right?
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
by Tom Martin on Oct 8, 2009 12:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Oregonian here...
I love your team, 41-41 is reachable. The rockets are going to be coming into most games as an underdog, the press will probably not give them that much respect, but this lack of respect fuels players with heart… and your team has that. I hope the Ariza trade works out well, I think it may, you still have an elite defender in the wing, plus now you have a kid on the rise that has valuable winning experience in the championships.
I went to UofO while Brooks was there and all the talk was about the ease at which Hairston and Bryce played… Brooks would be mentioned, but never as the reason the Ducks played well… It’s becoming pretty apparent who was the better player back then.
I hope this is not seen as trolling, I honestly wish your team well and will watch plenty, rooting away. Portland lost to you guys last year, but I’m glad it was to the Rockets as opposed to anyone else. We gained experience in playoff atmosphere and you all learned how to win in the playoffs.
Good luck this season
by Oggbog on Oct 8, 2009 2:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I've got nothing but respect for Portland fans.
You guys continuously impress me with your humility, pride (w/out the arrogance) and basketball knowledge. The series between the Rox / Blazers this spring was great to watch and I think we’ve got a nice little rivalry to build on as a result of it. Best of luck to your bunch in the 09-10 campaign (unless we’re playing ’em).
Oh and please kick the crap outta the Lakers at every turn.
by Texan_Dawg on Oct 8, 2009 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Failblazers are irrelavent.
As are the Jazz.
by HereCuzImBored on Oct 8, 2009 3:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i watched most of last night's game
and my thoughts were:
dorsey, taylor and andersen should go to the d-league for a non-descript amount of time. i don’t know if andersen can go to the d-league, but i think 2 months of extra practice time will help him get used to the toughness and athleticism of the NBA game. he could come back and be a solid role player, and eventually fill the role of legit backup center without being named Mutombo.
Dorsey is really, really raw still, and despite his summer league rebounding clinic, he doesn’t seem like he can really deal with bench front court players, let alone the likes of starters. Sure, it was the 2nd preseason game, but if he’s been in the gym as much as sources like the chronicle claim he has been, then things are looking grim in the short term.
Taylor could be good, but takes too many shots and falls asleep on defense, a lot like Wafer did (but Taylor is a more egregious offender). Once again, 2 months or so in the d-league could really help round out his game.
On Budinger – i think he could be much more of a player than Novak was. Does anyone else think he sort of plays like rip hamilton? he is really great off a curl screen, and is just constantly moving. I’m really excited to see what he’ll become, and we have the coaching staff to turn him into a great player.
Pops is also pretty raw, but looks like he might make the team right off the bat. I can’t remember who’s the point and who’s the 2 (temple and conroy), but it looks like whoever the 2 is will get that backup guard spot.
-
Landry is looking great, and Scola [in 2 games] hasn’t seemed much different from the player he was last year, which is kind of a bummer. but it is preseason, so can’t write off improvement from him yet.
Lowry and Brooks are both looking great. Hayes is being a lot more active on the offensive end, which we’ll need in order to help Scola from being doubled on every post play.
Ariza is looking good, he had a bad shooting night last night, but everyone sort of did (I think we shot 38 percent or so). The biggest issue now is staying in front of your man – sure, Battier and McGrady will help on that front, but Ariza is gambling a lot on steals, and all of the young players let guys blow past them quite a bit. The lateral quickness of this team, as of now, isn’t there, and hopefully ricky caught this.
Wafer . . . again. (Marv Albert, HOU v. CLE Feb 2009)
-one of the FEW at Toyota Center who has the Wafer jersey
by olivarezq1 on Oct 8, 2009 3:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Scola has been
working on going to the left. He actually made a basket with a left handed layup vs the Spurs – something he did only a handful of times last year.
If he can add that to his game, he will be a MUCH more complete offensive player.
"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018
by Artest4Prez on Oct 12, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh
and depending on how things in dallas, new orleans, phoenix and utah pan out, i see this as a 48 win team if McGrady comes back by December. call me crazy, but it’s definitely possible
Wafer . . . again. (Marv Albert, HOU v. CLE Feb 2009)
-one of the FEW at Toyota Center who has the Wafer jersey
by olivarezq1 on Oct 8, 2009 3:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
48 wins? for realz?
You win the joke of the day.
(what’s that… you were serious?!?!?) :-)
by grungedave on Oct 8, 2009 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
he’s a lot closer to the real result than you are. Like, A LOT.
Your friendly neighborhood Dream Shake mod.
by Only_A_Lad on Oct 8, 2009 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
yes, very much so
you simply CANNOT evaluate this team in a vacuum – doing so can very easily lead to seeing a 30 some odd win season, but when you couch your assessment of how well this team performs within the state of the other teams they play the most, i think it’s more than reasonable to see the rockets hitting the 46-50 W mark. it’s all about match-ups.
Wafer . . . again. (Marv Albert, HOU v. CLE Feb 2009)
-one of the FEW at Toyota Center who has the Wafer jersey
by olivarezq1 on Oct 8, 2009 4:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you on that...
But teams the Rockets have traditionally dominated (Memphis, Minnesota, OKC) are now going to be bigger and taller… and the size discrepancy will be quite noticeable.
by grungedave on Oct 8, 2009 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You seem to have a size hangup...
Other than LA and Portland, what other teams can throw 3 guys at 7ft or thereabouts, with tons of talent, at Houston? Yes, we’re going to have some disadvantages, but one way to keep up defensive intensity against a bigger opponent is to have a deep bench, and God knows we have that.
We don’t know that much about Andersen, but assuming what we think about him is true, how many centers are a bad mismatch? 4, 5? In the whole league? There are some bad matchups for us at PG, but I don’t hear you worrying about those, only the lack of 7 footers (and isn’t 6’10 really close enough in most cases).
If the Red Nation apparatchiks start talking about a Five Year Plan, I'm out of here.
by Xiane on Oct 8, 2009 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
size matters
I have a major hangup on our overall size. Rebounding isn’t all about being tall, but it sure helps. A lot.
Minnesota can throw big bodies at us (And Big Al already kills us), Memphis has long, lean, athletic guys now (Arthur, etc.)… Dallas plays the same style as us yet is taller. Dirk is licking his lips.
I’m just concerned.
by grungedave on Oct 8, 2009 6:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not the size of the dog in the fight, its the size of the fight in the dog.
Just ask Mike Vick. But I digress.
Honestly, I understand your concern, but until Minn and Mem show signs of becoming cohesive teams in any sense of the word, they just don’t worry me. It’s rare that one star can beat us, too. To be fair, Minnesota did show such signs as the season wore on, but my general feeling is that every team in the whole west is a nightmare for somebody.
Everyone has their kryptonite teams, ours just happen to currently be really tall teams. With Yao it’s teams with really mobile centers and PFs with outside shooting ability. Without him, it’s very tall teams.
But look at what we CAN do. Houston punishes lack of discipline, and sloppiness, more severely than about any other west team except SA, for example. We can now exploit slower guards and have answer at PF for all but a few teams and can shut down not one but two wing players to a large extent. We have some intriguing young scoring options, and we have the possibility of TMac, the real freaking TMac, returning. The real TMac was a player that struck terror into the hearts of the opposition, if he’s back to that level, or even close, Houston is scary without Yao.
If the Red Nation apparatchiks start talking about a Five Year Plan, I'm out of here.
by Xiane on Oct 9, 2009 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have a major hangup on our overall size.
Size is, ultimately, only an issue for the individual. What matters for the team is whether or not the player is a good rebounder, and it doesn’t matter too much how he gets the rebound (by out-leaping, -reaching, or -muscling opponents). All that matters is that he gets it.
Chuck rebounds. Scola rebounds. Landry rebounds (particularly on the offensive glass). It doesn’t matter that they’re not particularly tall – their combination of other skill more than makes up for it.
Your friendly neighborhood Dream Shake mod.
by Only_A_Lad on Oct 9, 2009 12:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
55 wins this season
I’m not worried. Scola will easily have a 20/10 season. Aaron and Lowry don’t need Run and Gun to shine. Boston forced us to play half court all night and we beat them(even with their starting lineup in for half the game. McGrady will be back at
thanksgiving and will play like a healthy superstar in the last year of a contract. Yes, Dorsey is a bit rough and foul prone, but he’s capable of 15 rebounds before fouling out. Buddinger is the real deal and he rebounds almost as well as he shoots. Battier will be shooting a lot more threes with Yao gone and will average 13 points a game AND continue to play stifling defense. Landry will come into his own this year. AND Hayes learned how to shoot free throws this summer. 55 wins.
by tpm 53 on Oct 8, 2009 8:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
it's possible
though right now the probably outcome is closer to 45-50. if everything goes well we could do 55, and the biggest IF is t-mac returning and lighting things up
by lawlruschang on Oct 8, 2009 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: size, our rebounding ability and the W/L scenario
First, on the rebounding issue:
We are terribly small up front, with a dude a foot shorter than yao and an unproven, temporarily (maybe permanently) soft aussie who is not known for banging in the post (which is why i suggested he go to the d-league for a little while earlier), but we have a relatively huge mid-court (SF/SG combos) with a couple guys who can jump out of the gym.
4 wings at 6’ 8" (battier, mcgrady, ariza, budinger [don’t give me ‘well mcgrady’s not here BS because he’ll be here soon enough, and budinger will make the team, i don’t doubt that]) who are pretty solid athletes, who can post up (mcgrady can, battier can, and ariza is showing signs of willingness to do it [he did it a couple times in the SA game]) and have had pretty decent rebounding numbers. That makes a difference. Dave, your counter is going to be that the 7-footers will box out, but when you don’t have to worry about their back-court moving in for the ball (most back-courts with big, big men go to sleep on getting the ball), you have a mob of players running at the rim looking for that rebound. On top of that, big wings are typically more agile, thus giving them an advantage at cutting under in order to get the ball. To pad my argument, we also have a solid rebounder in Scola, and once again, if Andersen can toughen up, he could be good for 5-7 rebounds a game off the bench or in the starting line-up. Sure, those rebounding numbers (from the wings) will have to go up sans a freak of nature at center, but the fact of the matter is that they will.
Oh, also, if we can get Andersen to develop a solid pick-and-pop game (which is what he’s been mostly showcasing during the preseason), that draws big men away from the basket (if that shot becomes consistent). Another way out / another way for our big wings to get to the basket before slower, post players. Sure, Sheed Okur and Gasol trump that style of play, but it at least opens up the area around the basket for fast cutters, and Andersen is said to be a great passer. . .
Where points are going to come from, who we are gonna need to count on
Once McGrady suits up, he will be able to once again become the point forward that would’ve made this team so great this year if yao were here (with ariza instead of artest) – a guy who can score when you need him to, but is, by far, the best distributor on this team. The problem is that he’s not here, however, if you remember how the Rockets played with McGrady sans Yao (the streak to the playoffs), you will remember that we were an almost unstoppable team on 2 conditions – first, that Mac had his legs under him, and second, that our PG’s were making their shots. That’s where the beauty comes in: when McGrady is being the play-maker he is so good at being, that creates shots for everyone else on the team because otherwise, he’s gonna be making the shots (if all the reports from Chicago are true). The truly great part is we have guys on this team who are going to knock down those shots – Brooks is a fantastic shooter, Ariza is a fantastic shooter, Battier is a solid shooter, and Scola has 10x the game now than he did during the streak. Like it or not, he will be running the show, and Adelman’s offense will run really smoothly through McGrady as the facilitator. We will be a better team than we were during the streak because we’ve gotten better at virtually every position since 2008 (Landry and Hayes have also improved on the offensive end). Points are not going to be an issue, so long as McGrady can run the show for at least one more season.
In short, the points are gonna come from everyone – instead of relying on one or two guys to toss the ball to with 30 secs on the clock and being down by 2, we will have a lot of guys who we can pass it to, and just hope that McGrady is the passer. Your counter might be, “Well, what do we do when McGrady isn’t 100% in a game,” etc, but it’s not like Brooks and Lowry are incapable of passing and moving the ball, it’s just that McGrady is the best on the team at it.
On the season predictions
Posts like ‘we can win 55 games’ are futile and vacuous (not trying to be rude) – we can also win 82 games, but we have to take probability and match-ups into comparison. To address some specific posts:
At TPM53
-Without McGrady, Scola is not going to be this 20/10 player everyone dreams of because the defense will just key in on him. He is not flying under the radar anymore, he got his primetime showcases in the playoffs after Yao went down, and teams will adjust.
-Boston did force us to play halfcourt, but they also had Sweetney in the game quite a while, and some players arguably worse than him. You cannot use preseason games to gauge our ability to win, only to gauge the quality of players in relation to who they’re guarding / being guarded by.
-Dorsey is more than a bit rough, and he might get 15 rebounds collectively in 30 games, if that. You’re dreaming if you think he can pick up 15 rebounds before fouling out if he was allowed to start.
-Battier will not have as many open 3’s without Yao (although McGrady could change that), will probably not average 13 with both Mac AND Ariza in the mix (if he doesn’t get traded, look for maybe 9 points / game from Battman), and I’m interested in seeing how well he holds up as he gets older.
55 wins is a little over the top, Most guesses are either something ridiculous like 55, or something equally ridiculous like 35 – I’m telling you, look for 46-48, depending on how soon McGrady comes back (the later he returns, the lower the number).
Look for this team to probably fall to 8-12th in the league defensively, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the offensive output ends up top 10 (if McGrady comes back strong, he is my control on this experiment).
Wafer . . . again. (Marv Albert, HOU v. CLE Feb 2009)
-one of the FEW at Toyota Center who has the Wafer jersey
by olivarezq1 on Oct 8, 2009 10:18 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
whoops
into consideration, not into comparison
Wafer . . . again. (Marv Albert, HOU v. CLE Feb 2009)
-one of the FEW at Toyota Center who has the Wafer jersey
by olivarezq1 on Oct 8, 2009 10:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
uhhhhhh
Where’s the variable about “McGrady returns at the end of January and is traded in February”? Because that is the far more likely scenario.
by grungedave on Oct 9, 2009 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
because there’s no possible way to know how that would affect the team. That depends entirely on who arrives in return.
Besides, the “most likely” scenario is always “no trade occurs.”
Your friendly neighborhood Dream Shake mod.
by Only_A_Lad on Oct 9, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not necessarily
Many people here keep saying that the “real” T-Mac or the “old” T-Mac will return. I doubt this, but let’s assume arguendo that they are correct…
do you not think Morey will sell-high on a rejuvenated McGrady the first chance he gets? We all know McGrady won’t be a Rocket this time next year. Morey isn’t dumb but there are plenty of dumb GM’s out there who would sell a first born for the “old” version of T-Mac.
so… either way…. McGrady shouldn’t be considered a factor in a theoretical 50 win season, because he either (a) won’t be healthy enough to help, or (b) will be trade bait the moment he shows any amount of promise.
by grungedave on Oct 9, 2009 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you misunderstand me
I don’t mean that he probably won’t be traded because he’s going to be great or anything (though I certainly hope so) or that he’ll be bad. My point is that any trade occurring is relatively unlikely simply because trades in general are fairly rare, and this is especially true when attempting to move a $22 million contract.
And, again, you assume (assert) a hell of a lot, Dave. None of us knows if McGrady factors into future plans. Morey may (correctly) see that the 2010 free agent market isn’t all it’s cracked up to be, and that perhaps McGrady is the Rockets’ best bet going forward, albeit at a lesser price.
Your friendly neighborhood Dream Shake mod.
by Only_A_Lad on Oct 9, 2009 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think anyone can accuse me of being starry eyed about McGrady
But what I’m hearing makes me more hopeful than I’ve been in what feels like forever when it comes to Tmac.
Will he be the same as he was at 25? Of course not. But he’s never, ever, been known as a conditioning fiend, as a guy who sought to refine his body and make it function better. He’s always been one of the top athletes in the world without doing that, so why would he? Well, he’s had to change, and I think he has so much to motivate him to embrace changes that he’s going to be great. The caveat is if healthy, of course.
I’m on record playing MD here saying his microfracture was about as little as you could do and call it microfracture, and that makes a difference. His knee wasn’t rebuilt. He wasn’t virtually crippled before the surgery. It was much less bad than that.
He’s now with an absolutely respected trainer, and that makes even more of a difference in my mind. I believe in the injury cascade, in being out of balance with no core strength – I’ve seen the kind of work Tracy is doing, at a much lower level even, make profound changes in seriously injured people. I’ve seen it do much more for a hurt friend than several back surgeries ever did.
So what can TMac 2.0 be? Well, he still has the unblockable jumper, and he doesn’t need screens and other set up to get it. He still has the passing ability. If motivated, he’s a very effective defender. He’s still a really tall SG. So will he have the ability to drive? Not to dunk for the highlight reel, but to score from a drive. I think he will. Will he hold up? That, I don’t know.
I think we’ll see him sooner rather than later. I think he’s going to be effective – his remaining career is going to be shaped by this season. He HAS to produce to remain a star. When talking about the best NBA players, well, Tracy is no longer in that conversation, and I think it KILLS him. He HAS to produce to get paid again, and not get a “prove it” deal. He HAS to produce to show that he can still anchor a team. He HAS to produce if he’s ever going to be featured in Vogue.
If he can do that before the ASB he becomes an incredibly value trade chip, too.
Maybe he’s just going to collect a king’s ransom this year, and more or less call it a career as a marquee player. But right now, based on what I’m hearing and reading, I don’t think he will.
If the Red Nation apparatchiks start talking about a Five Year Plan, I'm out of here.
by Xiane on Oct 9, 2009 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
52-30 record. I'm calling it now.
I realize that 41-41 is probably the safe bet, however I’m going to be the outsider here that, of all places, considers the Rockets to still be a playoff contender. And not just any contender but a 4-7 seed contender!
It sort of ashames me that there is so little confidence in Scola, Landry, Brooks and company that this blog predicts at BEST 41-41? Really? After we took the fakers to 7 games? The ONLY team in the West to do that throughout the entire playoff run last season? REALLY?
Sorry, but I predict a great team this year, highly underestimated and verily capable of keeping a respectable record until T-Mac returns. Then it is game time.
52-30. 5th in the West. Calling it now.
by jasonmicron on Oct 8, 2009 10:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If the team doesn't get buried early...
If the team doesn’t get too far below .500 by time McGrady comes back in late Nov-and barring any injuries-the Rockets should use their relatively easy middle schedule to go on a roll and climb into Playoffs.(Historically,surround McGrady w/3pt shooters and he’ll get you into Playoffs. Advancing,well…)
I’m really worried about the Center position,but I trust Morey will trade for a serviceable body before it’s too late. I imagine Andersen will be better towrds end of season just like Scola and Landry were their rookie seasons.(And I still think Andersen is Landry’s replacement.)
I agree Taylor should spend time in D-League,but who takes his spot on roster till T-Mac returns? The Rocket Gd/SFs are Ariza,Brooks,Battier(starting to show age),Lowry(do we want to see him logging major minutes at the 2?)Budinger and,and,and…..
One advantage the Rockets have is that none of the Western Conf teams that missed the Playoffs last yr play any D. They may score,but at end of games they will lose because they can’t get stops.
Rockets win 7-8 out of first 20,then win 36 or so rest of way for @44/45 wins.
by Tisbee on Oct 9, 2009 12:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree to disagree
The Rockets faithful don’t care if they win or lose; we just enjoy watching them represent. Jk.
Rockets will surprize all u know-it-alls pundits, Go Rockets!!!
by Buster Domes on Oct 9, 2009 8:31 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think...
REALISTICALLY…With the implement of this up tempo offense, the rockets has went from winning 20-30 games to barely missing the play-off’s, in my book. We not gonna get in, but we will be fighting for that last spot. Depending on how much gas our youngster have left in their tank, at the end of the season, and if Rick play them how they’re supposed to be played, we might sneak in…but that’s a big might. If T-Mac comes back playing like life is on the line & he has something to prove, then we’ll get htat 8th spot. If not…we barely miss it.
by Head on Oct 9, 2009 11:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Rockets will make it to the playoffs! Here is why.
I predict that this Rockets team will make it to the playoffs for this reason.
Rockets have a number of smart, basketball players who play hard, and are coached by someone who has shown an uncanny ability to get the most out of his players. Shane Battier, Luis Scola, Chuck Hayes are defensive minded players, and they possess excellent basketball IQ. While I am yet to see any evidence of Ariza demonstrating excellent basketball IQ, he is a good defender at the wing. So, that gives at least four legitimately good defenders among the potential starters. The success of David Anderson throughout his career in multiple European teams also points to someone with good basketball IQ (although still needs time to learn the NBA game). So, on the defensive end, they should better than most expect. The hole left by Yao’s abscence is indeed huge, but it is not something that can not be overcome.
Landry, and Ariza are athletic players, and the combination of Brooks/Lowry will get the job done at the point by committee. With a decent 9-10 man rotation, balanced offense with scoring well distributed across all players, I think the Rockets can give many NBA teams a headache. There will be teams that will try to exploit the hole in the center repeatedly, and will punish Rockets. There will be times, when the Rockets will mightily struggle to put the ball in the basket. But, I think this group of hungry Rockets will be a well coached team, that will make any opposing team pay for their sloppiness.
Barring a major breakdown in the team chemistry with any of the players/coaches, I think this Rockets will be entertaining to watch, and will surprise many teams. They will set a trend in the NBA that other teams will soon try to copy. I am optimistic!
Kari
by Kari on Oct 9, 2009 6:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

















