Budinger finds niche, playing time while Taylor forced to wait
Rick Adelman has always run a skin-tight eight to nine man rotation. Meaning that if you aren't one of those eight or nine players, you'll be seeing nothing but garbage and scrap time. Back in September, I had Jermaine Taylor cracking that rotation ahead of fellow rookie Chase Budinger.
Oh, how the tables have turned.
Not only has Budinger cracked the rotation, but he has become a sharpshooting assassin and an integral part of the offense in just his first seven professional games. Remember, this is the same kid that 32 teams passed over once, and 11 passed over twice. Think anyone might be regretting that decision?
Meanwhile, Taylor, who appeared to have all the tools necessary to find playing time immediately, has been riding the pine. Nothing about Taylor has changed from day one. He's completely healthy. He hasn't been sent to the doghouse. As far as I'm aware, Taylor really hasn't done anything wrong.
However, the circumstances surrounding the Rockets have changed. Once a team thought to be searching for offense, Houston has had no trouble in putting the ball in the basket. While this is a good thing for the Rockets, it doesn't help Taylor's cause for playing time.
Jermaine is of the Tracy McGrady mold. He's a pure scorer, someone who can fend for himself easily, but perhaps too often and too exclusively. Conventional wisdom says that Houston needs a guard who can isolate and carry a team. But there's two problems with this statement pertaining to Taylor:
1. He's no Tracy McGrady. Of the same mold, yes. But of the same caliber? Not even close.
2. If the first seven games are any indicator, the Rockets don't need a pure scorer to isolate and find offense for himself.
Thus far, the "system" offense has worked, that being the brand of offense that basically says, "If you're open, take a good shot. If not, move the ball until you find someone who is. And for God's sake, try not to do too much, because that will defeat the entire purpose."
Consider the Rockets as a puzzle. Who fits better, according to the above statement? Exactly. Chase Budinger.
For the purpose of checking up on predictions, as opposed to gloating, here's what I wrote about Budinger before the season began:
What to expect in 2009-10: Plenty of jump shots. Chase is a perfect "system" player. He's big, athletic, and can shoot the ball well. If you send him through screens and get him open, he'll knock down the jumper. But Bud Light isn't quite as good on the isolation, as he has a tendency to be a bit soft on the drive. Luckily, Budinger won't be asked to do such things. He'll be fighting to see any minutes, but he picked the right year to be a Rocket - any scoring will be welcome. If he can find a niche on the team, he'll play.
It was a pretty bland statement, I suppose, but it's ringing true isn't it? Budinger has found his niche, as a shooter and as a source of offense on back-cuts and on the break. He isn't being asked to dominate the ball. It's been a perfect fit, as he is averaging 10 points per game and is shooting 42 percent from deep. It hurts to say this, but he's making my boy Steve Novak look like s--t.
Don't forget to give some credit to Adelman for Budinger's immediate successes. He's the one who told Chase something along the lines of, "If you have any room at all, shoot. If you don't shoot, you're going to be benched." Nothing fuels a shooter more than a green light with a penalty if it's not taken advantage of.
For now, it is Bud Light who has been the rookie standout. Taylor will continue to wait, especially with McGrady's impending return. Perhaps at some point, he too will find a unique purpose on the roster. In Houston, there's always an injury waiting to happen.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm only really making the comparison since we just played Memphis...
but Budinger’s per minute stats are eerily similar to Rudy Gay’s this season. They’re almost dead even in points, rebounds, shot attempts, and turnovers, and they have nearly identical FG% and 3pt%. The only differences are that Gay gets more steals and blocks, while Bud Light gets about twice as many assists. Oh, and the fact that Chase is a rookie.
Not to mention that sometimes...
he makes me think that his handle is better than Ariza’s
And I thought Taylor would start
Oops!
Here’s the big question.
Suppose McGrady isn’t re-signed and the Rockets don’t sign a top FA wing. Would we be too upset w/starting Budinger and Ariza? I’ve held since SL that Budinger will be the Rockets 6th Man,but if he continues to develope…
This yr is gonna be a great ride and I’m going to enjoy it,but just for a moment a couple of thoughts on 2010.
If Budinger continues to develope and Taylor gets his bearings and shows he can get and make shots in the NBA the 2010 Rockets could be:
Yao,Scola,Ariza,Budinger,Brooks
Hayes/Andersen,Landry,Battier,Taylor,Lowry.
That’s not a bad couple of units-if. The starters have the potential to all ave about 14-16ppg,w/Yao maybe getting 20ppg. The bench has get-up-and-down ability and a steady defensive vet in Shane. Looking at this group perhaps the 2010 FA money will be spent keeping the players and maybe a tall back-up C.
a tall back-up C?
With Yao, Anderson, Hayes, Scola, and Landry, we already have 5 above average (or 4 if Anderson doesn’t pan out) PF/C’s. Why pay for someone who’s never going to see the floor?
Why?
Because you can’t guarantee Yao will play 82 games :(
Because Hayes could get in foul trouble and it’d be nice to have someone else who could play D.
Because the Lakers have Bynum and Gasol,the Blazers have Oden and Aldridge.
If/when Yao comes back
I see reduced minutes in his future. That is what he needs anyways if he ever wants to play 82 games.
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
I'd still go with Landry and Scola in that situation
The point is, it’s hard enough to find playing time for two good players at the same position. 6 players at 2 positions is getting a little ridiculous.
What you’re suggesting is that we find a guy talented enough that we’d rather put him on the floor than Landry or Scola but only for the times when Yao is hurt and we can’t play Chuck. Sure it would be nice, but do we really want to spend significant money to sign a guy like that?
Now, I could see Morey spending a pick on a big man.
TMAC
Trade him for Emeka Okafor
get it done before his poison infects the team!
(or Brooks Loez)

by 

















