Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Friday Afternoon Dream Links

I've been filling out my all-star ballot for the past few days (personally, I agree with the sentiment that voting should begin much later in the year, but them's the rules; besides, Chuck Hayes isn't going to mount his all-star campaign all by himself), and I've come across a strange thing: the west doesn't really have any deserving centers on the ballot. That's partially because (as TBJ noted a few days ago) the NBA chose to not include Chris Kaman, who is having a great season.

Well, that's what I thought before I started looking at the stats, anyways. Andrew Bynum is having a pretty good season. He's averaging 19.2 pts on 61% True Shooting, and he's pulling down 10.4 rebounds per game. Those are all-star quality numbers. Not otherworldly or anything, but still very good.

I think a lot of us decent people non-Laker fans tended to get sick of the hype surrounding Bynum. As Lee put it prior to the game against LA, now that he's doing well it's not an issue, but we all were tired of fans speaking about him as if he were an all-star quality player, when his contribution on the court was clearly far below that. Now that he's starting to reliably play like an all-star, I'm willing to buy into the hype a little - he's good, and he still has room to grow.

Matt Moore over at Hardwood Paroxysm echoes that sentiment:

People always confused what it is I’ve said about Bynum. I’ve complained that he has poor work ethic and is immature. I’ve stated that he’s not the center everyone says he already is. Not that he can’t get there, but that he wasn’t there already. This sounds like some sort of revisionist history, but I assure you, not even I, in my seething hatred of everything Laker, could look at Bynum’s size, length, and touch and not say "there’s something there." But versus the talented players on other teams I tend to tout, Bynum was already given the attention, the hype, the standing. He was ranked at #24 by Ziller before he’d done anything. He was talked about as an All-Star simply based on projections. And I hated that. Because there were a lot of other centers who were working harder, playing better, doing more for their team than Bynum. And that speaks to the folly that is my unwavering support of the idea of fairness.

Well, guess what. It’s totally fair to say the kid’s an All-Star now. 

On the other hand, Dave Berri at WoW questions the prevailing wisdom surrounding Bynum (as well as Jordan Farmar):

What about Bynum and Farmar?  Well, both have improved.  But despite the numbers reported at the start of this column, neither is back to what he was in 2007-08.  After seven games here is what each player has done:

Andrew Bynum after seven games (okay five games) in 2009-10: 0.181 WP48 in 200 minutes

...

Let me close by noting that the analysis of 2009-10 is obviously based on a very small sample size.  Bynum could change his overall performance with one great game (or decline quite a bit with one really bad performance)... All that’s being said at this point is that if people were hoping to see the Andrew Bynum from 2007-08, that Bynum hasn’t appeared yet (and of course, Bynum has already missed two games because of injury — which is a completely different story).

Whatever. I voted for Stoudemire yesterday, anyways.

More links after the jump.

Star-divide

Kevin Pelton weighs in on the Hornets' decision to fire Byron Scott, and he thinks that this move should help the Hornets regain some lost ground.

We have little idea of Bower’s Xs and Os ability, and I would certainly feel more comfortable if Floyd was not prominently involved. However, one consistent trait when GMs are asked to coach their own teams is that they tend to play guys they’ve drafted. If Bower simply does that, the Hornets have a chance to get better. I still believe there’s enough talent on the roster–if only because of Chris Paul, who is having an MVP season–to not only make the playoffs but contend in the Western Conference. Last year’s study of midseason coaching changes showed they were best done by past playoff teams early in the season. By making a move now, New Orleans has given itself a chance to right the ship before it’s too late.

----

LeBron James will switch to #6 next season in honor of Michael Jordan (this seems odd to me - usually players select the same number as an idol to honor them), and he thinks the rest of the league should retire #23, too. Obviously, that wouldn't really affect the Rockets, but it's an interesting idea... for me to poop on!

I can't stand the idea of a league-wide retired number. Baseball retired #42 in honor of Jackie Robinson, sure, but Robinson, in addition to being a great second baseman, was a symbol of something remarkable that transcended athletics. Jordan was the greatest player in NBA history (so far, anyways). But he did not help break down the color barrier in American sports. The honor just doesn't seem appropriate to me.

----

As you may be aware, rumors have circulated for a while that the Maloofs are contemplating moving the Kings. The key to get them to stay in Sacramento would be a new arena, and Sactown Royalty looks at the critical issue in any bid to build a downtown arena: funding.

----

While you're checking out that particular expose, take a look at Tom Ziller's investigation into why the Kings have played better after Kevin Martin's injury.

----

This one's a bit on the long side, but it's a good one: FreeDarko argues over whether it's worse to be a Warriors fan - devoid of hope for any future - or a Knicks fan - bewildered at the incompetency of your favorite organization over the past two decades.

Being a Knicks fan has come to resemble illness. I have never had meningitis, but it's been described to me as an inflammation of the membranes that run along your brain and spinal cord. Other parts of my body have been inflamed. It can be awful--the pulsating pain, the swelling, the knowledge that something deep down is horribly wrong (at least for a moment). That's what it is like to be a Knicks fan--the anger and incredulity painfully gnaw away, and the root causes seem so remotely situated that you are left hopeless.

...on a similar note: the Crawfish Boxes and Battle Red Blog have some great commentary going on. Check them out.

----

Last, I leave you with two videos: Dwyane Wade's fantastic dunk over Anderson Varejao, and (courtesy of ClutchFans) Carl Landry's salute to Dikembe Mutombo.

 



Poll
Should #23 be retired league-wide?
Yes
37 votes
No
87 votes

124 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If they are gonna retire MJ’s number league-wide (as LeBron suggests) then…

… why doesn’t the MLB do the same for Babe Ruth? He is widely considered to be the greatest baseball player that ever lived. Same goes for Gretzky in hockey.

I had to stop arguing with drunks, Steeler fans, and all other fools.
It was making my brick wall jealous...

by steeler-hater on Nov 13, 2009 1:07 PM CST reply actions  

errr...

Gretzky’s number IS retired for all NHL teams.

by jack_ on Nov 13, 2009 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Loving these link posts, matt

keep it up

The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak

by Tom Martin on Nov 13, 2009 1:15 PM CST reply actions  

I think that retiring MJ's number is ridiculous.

MJ was great, probably the best, but not so transcendent that an argument couldn’t be made for another player. He was certainly the most marketed (and marketable) player, but since when do you retire numbers for that?

If you must compare the NBA to the NHL, I would say that Gretzky was easily the only person that ever dominated hockey that way, while at various times others (notably Wilt and Russell) dominated basketball at the same level that Jordan did.

I guess I’m kind of insulted because this comes on the heels of MLB retiring Jackie Robinson’s number, which makes more sense because of the historical significance of him playing. MJ had little significance other than being really good.

If they must, why not make 23 stand for something like #10 in soccer? Isn’t it kind of like that already? I remember on my HS basketball team, first pick of numbers always went to 23 (and then 34!). Since that was usually the most respected player, 23s legacy continues without putting it in the rarefied air of league-wide retirement.

by Moondebah on Nov 13, 2009 1:40 PM CST reply actions  

I like your idea of the 23 being like the #10 in soccer.

And it already is that way in the NBA – 23, 34 and a few others are “special” numbers.

As a side note, I didn’t immediately understand that my Latin American soccer coach was paying me a big compliment when he didn’t assign 10 at first, and then gave it to me mid season. When he said “That’s Pele’s number” I understood that it was special. I still have that kids #10 in a box somewhere.

So I imagine that doing the same with the 23 NBA would be a better thing that saying – “no one should ever wear this again, because no one will ever be better”. Who knows, maybe someone WILL be better than MJ. No one thought you could break Ruth’s HR record either.

Unquestionable Jordan was a great NBA player. Let his team retire his number. He didn’t play for MY team, and he’s not exactly an ambassador of goodwill for the NBA these days. Jordan has gotten, and will continue to receive plenty of accolades, without us building a freaking shrine to his memory throughout the league.

It’s not like Jackie Robinson, all he did, he did for himself, not others – and I detect a note of “And you can equally expect to do the same with MY number one day!” from LeBron.

If the Red Nation apparatchiks start talking about a Five Year Plan, I'm out of here.

by Xiane on Nov 13, 2009 2:16 PM CST up reply actions  

And one more thing

Great link to the Calvin Murphy video. Being a Houston fan can be frustrating. You can have a pantheon player, but nobody notices it. In my mind the only guy Murphy’s size who was better is Kevin Johnson (58% career True Shooting, 58%!). Paul may change that, but he’s going to have to have a long, long career. Calvin was better than Thomas, Iverson, and even Archibald, if you want to believe some of the advanced stats.

If the Red Nation apparatchiks start talking about a Five Year Plan, I'm out of here.

by Xiane on Nov 13, 2009 2:37 PM CST reply actions  

Because, no way was Johnson 6'1"...

If the Red Nation apparatchiks start talking about a Five Year Plan, I'm out of here.

by Xiane on Nov 13, 2009 2:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Dream Shake: Dedicated to all things Houston Rockets. Past, present and future. Expect criticism, commentary and shameless promotions to get Robert Horry into the Hall of Fame.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
Trading for an All-Star
Images_small
No Sympathy For Teams With Injuries
Small
European NBA Scout Compares Vassilis Spanoulis To Jeremy Lin - Says Jeff Van Gundy Did Not Give Him A Chance
417645_122115147913687_122115027913699_63363_1431084468_n_small
Houston Rockets Re-Brand
Small
Free Agency and Draft Hopes
Images_small
Best Wishes For Jordan Hill
Images_small
With the 14th and 16th pick, who would you take?
Small
My dream offseason (quasi realistic at least)
Tricampions_small
GET UP ROCKETS
Sonic_brian_small
Chin up Rockets fans, all hope isn't lost

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBN Hoops Twitter


Editor

Twitter_small Tom Martin

Daryl Morey Wannabes

Kurt-avatar_small grungedave

Img_4429_small UofTOrange

Cat_small Only_A_Lad

Guide04_small Xiane

Screenhunter_01_dec Mike Kerns

Crabtree_small ak2themax

Awesome_small BD34

Tds_small Patrick Harrel