The Dream Shake: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: ACC Power Rankings: 2.8

Game 9 Recap: Stop Making Sense

This post was originally going to be called "Thank You For Sending Me An Angel," but Battier's 4th Quarter surge just wasn't enough.

More photos » Rich Pedroncelli - AP

This post was originally going to be called "Thank You For Sending Me An Angel," but Battier's 4th Quarter surge just wasn't enough.


Following the loss to the Mavericks, I criticized the prevailing wisdom about the Rockets (can't create, so they have to be "scrappy," and so they'll fail against teams with superior "talent"). Fortunately (I guess), that wisdom probably won't be deployed following this loss.

The Rockets were the more talented team coming into this game. On paper, they were the superior defensive and offensive team. Yeah, the Kings had played well over their past few games, but anything can happen in three games. So what happened tonight?

 

I think many will look at the boxscore, see that Tyreke Evans had another good game, and be tempted to place this game at the feet of an emerging rookie/hopeful star. Really though, the difference in this game was Beno Udrih. He shot extraordinarily well tonight (and he's having a hot start to the season, as well), dropping 4 threes and 22 points on the Rockets. Nocioni hit some tough shots, the Kings got to line more, and Jason Thompson continued his drive towards an all-star career. The good parts of the Kings produced like they should have, and the bad parts contributed far more than they typically do.

Star-divide

For the Rockets, the bench was practically dead. The trio of players that they have come to rely upon - Lowry, Landry, and Budinger - did virtually nothing through three quarters, and only Lowry began to get anything going in the 4th. Just a pathetic output from what has thus far been an offensive dynamo (if I were a superstitious man, I'd blame Xiane for jinxing Landry on Wednesday. Oh, wait! I am a superstitious man. WTF, Xiane?!).

To put it simply, the defense was just bad. The Rockets failed to box out (Jason Thompson had nine [9!] offensive rebounds) for most of the game, and I don't know if that was the result of just great play by the Kings or an attempt by the Houston players to get back on the fast break prematurely. Sure, the defense generated nineteen turnovers, but a -19 rebounding deficit is no way to win a basketball game. The offensive output of Udrih, Nocioni, Udoka, etc. could also be seen as part of a general defensive collapse, though I'm inclined to put those in the "luck" category. Shit happens, after all.

This is the type of game the Rockets must win. They can play the great teams fairly even, but they have to beat the bad teams if they want to play in the postseason. And the Kings are a bad team. Now, I'm sure that statement is going to piss off some Kings fans reading this, but I really don't care. The Kings are not a good team, and this should have been a win (easy or not) for the boys in red, but their failure to play to the offensive level we've come to expect this season cost them the game. As Morey "tweeted' (Christ, I loathe that word) post-game:

Good teams don't win close [games],they avoid them. Had to build a lead in the 1st half when they had 12 TOs to survive their wild makes late.

And that's exactly it. The interaction here between luck, defense, and offense is tough to see. I can't tell you what was ultimately most to blame for tonight's loss, only that all of these played a part. Offense was not up to par, particularly against a team that came into the game ranked 25th in defensive efficiency. Defense was awful, roughly 0.1 pts/possession worse than the Rockets' average. And the Kings just hit all of their shots. But, had any of those things changed, I think the Rockets could have pulled this one out. That's not the point, however. As Morey says, a good team makes sure that they don't need that one thing to turn around for them: they make sure that they're in a position to win.

Just a bad game all around. Regroup, adjust, and come back strong.

Three Up:

Shane Battier - Took over in the 4th quarter, and we haven't seen this type of scoring output out of the NSAS since the Mother's Day Miracle. 23 pts on 11 shots.

Luis Scola - It's tough to write good things about anyone on the frontcourt, given the rebounding deficit, but Scola turned in a pretty good performance: 20 pts and 9 rebounds. For a while he was just abusing people in the post, too.

Trevor Ariza - Went cold after the first half (that has seemed to happen a lot, actually), but 28 pts, 6 rebounds, 5 assists, and 5 steals is a wonderful contribution. As the steal numbers suggest, he was super active in the passing lanes. And he garnered more comparisons to a "young, healthy" T-Mac from the Kings' announcers (totally unwarranted, if you ask me, though it's a nice sentiment).

 

Three Down:

The Bench Troika - Let's just throw Lowry/Landry/Bud in here together. Not a pretty game for any of them. Whatever; it's bound to happen sometimes. Let's pray it never happens all at once like that ever again.

Everyone - BOX. OUT. I was watching the Hornets game before this, and Emeka Okafor gave a nice preview of the rebounding strategy I'd see used against the Kings: lightly place your arm near the opposing player, as if to say, "Please don't try to force your way past me or anything, my delicate sensibilities might not be able to handle it!")

Fate - I know Durga was just punishing me for hubris when I kept calling Udrih a "shit player" and he kept raining threes.

0 recs  |  Comment 18 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Actually the rebounding thing is -27, I think.

by VBG on Nov 14, 2009 1:01 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

54 (+ 10 team rebounds) to 37 (+ 2 team rebounds)
64 to 39.

It’s next to impossible to win with that big of a difference.

by VBG on Nov 14, 2009 1:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

sigh ... disappointing

but we knew there would be nights like this. I guess our unfamiliarity with their players and the way they play NOW was the one that did us in.

by RoxBeliever on Nov 14, 2009 1:06 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I apologize.

I won’t write such things in the future.

If the Red Nation apparatchiks start talking about a Five Year Plan, I'm out of here.

by Xiane on Nov 14, 2009 3:05 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Ummm, I don't want to get bashed for this and he had a good game but..

don’t you think that we tried to go to Scola too much in some stretches? It just seemed to me that whenever he would try to post up, he wouldn’t pass anymore, even when he was still outside the paint. Maybe Sacramento anticipated that.

by suzaku on Nov 14, 2009 3:06 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Taking SACs too lightly

We know talent and skill wise were better than them.. thats why we were caught by suprise when our opponent taking advantage on that. But then again , we have to maintain our composure, consistency and heart regardless of what team we are facing. No let ups. Bounce back Houston! Win more Ws! We can do it!

by CONAIR on Nov 14, 2009 4:05 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Did Ariza really go that cold in the second half?

Adelman benched him for some minutes and when he was on the court I noticed a number of times he was open and didn’t get the ball. I think if they had kept giving him opportunities he might have stayed hot.

by OremLK on Nov 14, 2009 4:35 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

It was a tough game to watch

We didnt really capitalize on all their turnovers and ive noticed some of the players have been hesitating way too much causing the clock to run down and it slows down the ball movement, which doesnt really help us

by Rockets4LIFE on Nov 14, 2009 9:34 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I wasn’t able to watch the game last night…

… due to having to work. But by the sounds of things, I guess I should be happy I missed it.

I did copy the game and had planned to view it sometime today. Upon reflection, I think I’ll pass, though. 3 hours of watching them struggle against a team they should have probably beaten is bad enough to see LIVE, but watching it on tape?

Nope… forget it. Although, this loss doesn’t shock me as badly as it seems to shock certain other people here. Lately, the Kings have been playing well over their heads. Still, this is the type of team the Rockets should still beat most of the time. I guess last night qualifies as the “some of the times” Houston doesn’t beat that lesser opponent…

I had to stop arguing with drunks, Steeler fans, and all other fools.
It was making my brick wall jealous...

by steeler-hater on Nov 14, 2009 10:38 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

This is where we suffer

When your starting center plays 32 minutes and only gets 5 rebounds… that’s not good. The Rockets can hustle and be aggressive, but they have to secure defensive rebounds to win. Doesn’t matter if it’s against the Lakers… Sacramento…. or Memphis. If you don’t own the defensive rebounding stat, you lose.

by grungedave on Nov 14, 2009 10:54 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

That and

about 12 shots (mostly layups) just rolling off the rim. Again and again, and again.

If the Red Nation apparatchiks start talking about a Five Year Plan, I'm out of here.

by Xiane on Nov 14, 2009 6:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

hey anyone with some insight into whats going on with araon brooks?

he seemed like he was focul point of offense and gonna get around 9 assists a game. hes kind of been mediocre stats wise past few games (even the recenent 20 point game) he was low on assists…

i havn’t seen the games recently, so is he actually struggling or is it something else?

by mandoman10 on Nov 14, 2009 1:57 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Brooks twisted ankle

Brooks twisted his ankle against Dallas. It’s prob pretty tender and may be causing Brooks to be a little lesss aggressive.

by Tisbee on Nov 14, 2009 2:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think some people may have too high of expectations for Brooks…

… they think he will get a lot of points and assists every game. But that just ain’t gonna happen. Brooks is a good player but he ain’t Chris Paul or Steve Nash. I do think as he gets more experience he will have less games where he struggles but at this point I do not foresee him becoming the next Chris Paul or Steve Nash. If that ever does happen that would be great. But it is way too early to predict…

I had to stop arguing with drunks, Steeler fans, and all other fools.
It was making my brick wall jealous...

by steeler-hater on Nov 14, 2009 2:05 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Kings fan here

Meh. Not upset by you calling the Kings a bad team. Conventional wisdom says you’re right. But they aren’t nearly as bad as they were cracked up to be:

1. Don’t underestimate the value of a real live NBA coach. We haven’t had one since we had the guy you’re lucky enough to have now. Players like Udrih, Hawes, JT can’t be judged on what they did under the previous “regimes.”

2. Tyreke is a legit future superstar. Why can’t he be DWade? No reason.

3. I don’t know if you look 1-10 at who played last night, you can say that the Rockets have a clear talent advantage. Hayes, Landry, Scola is not a very athletic big man rotation (I like them all)

4. Ariza is not a #1 option on a good team.

5. Budinger is a spot shooter. Give me Greene or Casspi over him on upside.

I like your team and will root for them, just not against us.

You lost on the road, and the Kings aren’t that bad. Playoffs? Probably not. But we’re no MInnesota or New York (not this year)

Yeah, we hit some lucky shots that helped in the end. But the last 3 years those have been going against us. The worm turns.

Good luck.

by lchristmas on Nov 14, 2009 2:55 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

2. Tyreke is a legit future superstar. Why can’t he be DWade? No reason.

Doesn’t have the finishing ability yet, and he seems to have a better shot from behind the arc. Besides, let’s wait to crown “legit future superstars” until, say, they play a little more than 200-odd minutes in the NBA. He looks great, though.

3. I don’t know if you look 1-10 at who played last night, you can say that the Rockets have a clear talent advantage. Hayes, Landry, Scola is not a very athletic big man rotation (I like them all)

I have a hard time understanding what, exactly, people mean when they say “talent” when talking about NBA players. Do they mean pure athletic ability? Or (and this is how I use the term) do they mean quality?

Top to bottom, the Rockets have players who are generally above-average contributors. They’re efficient defenders (though Yao’s absence really hurts the team defense) and shooters. In other words, they are good basketball players.

Can they run and jump as fast and as high as the Gerald Greens of the world? No, but Gerald Green is a terrible basketball player, and any team using his services is hurting their effort to win games. Athletic ability does not win games. The fact that a team can score and keep the other team from doing so wins games. That’s primae facie obvious, but the fact is that a lot of basketball fans and writers just don’t get that.

And, when I look at the Rockets, the only King I think is better right now is Martin. Others (Thompson, Evans) I think are good, but not significantly better on balance than the main contributors on the Rockets.

So, to me, it seems obvious that the Rockets are more “talented.”

5. Budinger is a spot shooter. Give me Greene or Casspi over him on upside.

I’m sorry you haven’t seen him on other nights. Dude shoots very well off the dribble.

by Only_A_Lad on Nov 14, 2009 3:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Bud can also jam…

I had to stop arguing with drunks, Steeler fans, and all other fools.
It was making my brick wall jealous...

by steeler-hater on Nov 16, 2009 11:15 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Dream Shake: Dedicated to all things Houston Rockets. Past, present and future. Expect criticism, commentary and shameless promotions to get Robert Horry into the Hall of Fame.
Start posting about the Rockets »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Tis' The End?
Sonic_brian_small
That's right NBA, keep kicking us while we're down
250px-batman_lee_small
PEYTON MANNING THE CHOKE ARTIST!........2 ANSWERS FOR 2 ROCKETS PROBLEMS
Small
Three way trade
Small
Joey Dorsey Should be the starting center
Small
Aaron Brooks = All Star
Small
A better deal?
Small
CRAZY TRADE BUT DM MAY?!!!
Small
No Rockets in all star Weekend
Lulu_small
Sixer and Suns Talking swap Amare and parts for Iggy and Dalambert

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBN Hoops Twitter


Daryl Morey Wannabes

Kurt-avatar_small grungedave

Img_4429_small UofTOrange

Untitled_2_small Tom Martin