Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Austin Rivers' Buzzer Beater Finishes Off UNC

Thoughts on McGrady's Possible Return

You know, it's amazing to me that some people can take a good thing and make it seem... dirty. In case you weren't paying attention: Tracy McGrady sent an e-mail to Yahoo! Sports claiming that he will be ready to return to the Rockets' starting lineup on the 18th (the game against Minnesota); Morey has stated that the Rockets won't let him play until after the next full practice on the 23rd (the next game after that is against Dallas on the 25th). There, you're all caught up.

Star-divide

Now, some people have made the case that this is demonstrative of a key disconnect between McGrady and the Rockets. That's certainly a possibility, and after the series of miscommunications surrounding T-Mac's knee surgery in February it has a lot of credibility. Other seem to think that this is evidence of McGrady's continued attempts to sabotage the Houston Rockets, because, as we all know, he is some sort of Victorian melodramatic villain hell-bent on tying Rick Adelman to the railroad tracks, luring Daryl Morey to the scene, and destroying them both through some crazy scheme.

By far, the thing that has most annoyed me over the past nine months of Tracy McGrady talk has been the half-assed textual analysis going on. Those trying to find evidence of McGrady's malevolence parse sentences from any available interview, desperately twisting vague comments into support for whatever they want.

It has been almost a year. Let's stop doing this. McGrady will be making his return to the court at some point in the next month or so, and that's really all there is to it. Any attempt to divine McGrady or the Rockets' intentions from partial quotes is largely moot at this point.

With that in mind, let's tackle some of the major issues surrounding Mr. McGrady's impending return.

First, the most pressing question revolves around T-Mac's actual ability. What can we expect from post-microfracture? If he is healthy "again," what does that mean? The answers to those questions are basically unknowable until McGrady gets on the court again. Reports look good, but that doesn't really mean much. And if we're honest with ourselves, we know that unless McGrady can return to pre-'07-'08 form, he is not much of an upgrade over what we have now.

Second, what does Adelman actually do with Tracy? McGrady's e-mail (or at least how it was reported) suggests he expects to be a part of the starting lineup upon return, but we all know that seems either unlikely or undesirable. It has been almost a year since McGrady last played competitive basketball, and well over a year since he last played quality basketball.

When McGrady is healthy (and it has been years since he was last healthy for any meaningful length of time), his skillset is unique and invaluable. He's a premier scorer, has excellent court vision and ball control, and he rebounds effectively. And if he feels like it he can defend at an elite level, too.

But we have no idea of what we're going to get when McGrady returns. So perhaps the expectation (on the part of both McGrady and the fans) should be that Tracy starts off on the bench, switching out with Ariza while he gets back on his feet. After that...

Well, that's a larger question, isn't it? If he's an elite player again (unlikely, but possible), then he's an obvious starter. The issue will probably be a lot dicier than that, however. More than likely, McGrady returns to a level roughly equal to his '08 season: good, but not great, and not any better than a lot of other wings in the league. Then the Rockets are left with a starting-caliber swingman with a massive contract and a large (deservedly so, I think) ego. How do you handle that?

I'm sure this is a frustrating post to read. It's a frustrating post to write. Simply put, there are no answers here, and there won't be any for a few more weeks. It's all questions, and damn few of them are new ones. It's the same crap we've been dealing with for the last nine months. But there's a sense of immediacy here - the conclusion is imminent.  "Stay tuned" is all I can tell you.

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I might be a bit biased

However, I hope McGrady starts soon. Maybe not right away but soon. I was thinking of getting Battier off the bench and putting McGrady in with Ariza.
If McGrady were to come back on the 18th I think it’d be great for the team, that is if he really is that healthy. The little blurb about a little knee pain bothers me. Anyways, I think having T-Mac back on the 18th would be great looking at the schedule. If he could play some time in the games w/ the Timberwolves, Hawks, and Kings, I feel as if he would have a good chance of contributing to the team. The three days rest after that help a lot too.

If all works out, In Tim Grover we trust?

by T-Mackin on Nov 9, 2009 10:53 PM CST reply actions  

If Adelman can get Tracy to run the offense like its been being run

then I am all for Tracy returning as soon as possible. That being said, I dont think he should return until after the first full practice, November 23rd.

I have always supported Tracy and his abilities as long as he is healthy. He can be a great player and provide our team with a much needed consistent scorer if, and only if, he doesnt disrupt the current flow of the offense. IMO, the current team is better than a team with a healthy, selfish T-Mac, but I dont think he will be selfish. This is a contract year for McGrady and he will want to show that he can be a team player and is still the same offensive player he has been.

by TexasHoosier on Nov 9, 2009 10:56 PM CST reply actions  

When McGrady returns...

I agree for a couple of games or so he comes off the bench. Then,assuming he can still play,he moves into starting rotation in place of Battier.
I also expect the team to try and keep McGrady’s minutes to @ 30 a game.
After a few early proving I’m back gun-fests,I expect McGrady to settle into role of playmaker and only try to really score in 4Q. I’d like to see McGrady in the PF Hi-Post in Adelman’s System.
I also believe we’re going to start seeing Shane get more minutes at the 4 when the Rockets match up against teams going small w/a tweener at the 4,esp if Andersen continues to struggle w/his shot.

I too would prefer McGrady came back against Dallas,as the 4 games in 5 days might be too much to come back for.

by Tisbee on Nov 9, 2009 11:08 PM CST reply actions  

I too would prefer McGrady came back against Dallas,as the 4 games in 5 days might be too much to come back for.

This is an excellent point. That’s going to be a brutal stretch, and it might be best for both Tracy and the Rockets as a whole if he either rests or plays very limited minutes during that time.

by Only_A_Lad on Nov 9, 2009 11:11 PM CST up reply actions  

just saying but...

It doesn’t strike you at all as “weird” that McGrady keeps reporting his own news outside the context of the team to third parties…?

I mean, before you spout off to Yahoo or SAS or ESPN or anyone… shouldn’t you at least clear it with your coach and GM – and maybe even the guy who signs your paycheck?

Do you think this kind of miscommunication would ever happen with Scola or Battier or even Yao? No. This is what really irks me about Tracy McGrady. I’m sure he’s ready to go and play because the team looks like it is having fun, but he still has people to report to and he doesn’t have the discretion to determine his own timetable for a return. It’s not always about him.

by grungedave on Nov 9, 2009 11:51 PM CST reply actions  

I’m sure he’s ready to go and play because the team looks like it is having fun, but he still has people to report to and he doesn’t have the discretion to determine his own timetable for a return. It’s not always about him.

I’m sure he’s ready to go and play because he wants to play basketball and he feels up to it. But enough mind reading.

No, it doesn’t particularly bother me that he has his own timetable (we all do, and good on him for wanting to get started earning his pay), nor does it bother me that he announced this on his own. He said (or, rather, he’s paraphrased as saying) he’ll be ready by the 18th. What does that change? Who does that hurt?

He announced to the basketball world that he feels ready, and that doesn’t bother me one bit.

by Only_A_Lad on Nov 10, 2009 12:02 AM CST up reply actions  

okay, fine no mindreading

……… but again, if Yao were coming back, we’d have quotes from Battier and Scola and Chuck about how they are excited for the big fella to come back. At least some reaction from teammates.

…. after McGrady’s announcement yesterday? Not a word from anyone. Specifically Shane. Rather damning.

by grungedave on Nov 10, 2009 9:44 AM CST up reply actions  

well

you’ll note that Woj’s article was published relatively late, as were the Chron.com articles. Perhaps nobody was asked – everyone is in Dallas, after all. All that is said is that Morey declined to comment further until the Rockets commented officially.

And in any interview where the question is raised, Shane/Luis/Landry/AB all give the typical “Gee, we wish we had him right now because he’s a great player blah blah blah” response expected.

But that’s the sort of “textual analysis” thing I’m talking about. Yeah, I’m sure a lot of McGrady’s teammates are still pissed about whatever. Others, by all indications, don’t appear to be. I’m not going to try to uncover some hidden meaning here.

by Only_A_Lad on Nov 10, 2009 9:52 AM CST up reply actions  

look,

this whole thing just strikes me as overblown, and Justice is participating in that.

This event, to me, seems pretty simple: McGrady says he feels like he can play on the 18th, but Morey and the team want to wait and see. This isn’t any different from, say, a week ago, when Chase Budinger made a similar comment: Chase felt like he could play against the Lakers, but Adelman said he’d sit out. Where was the outrage?

The difference between these two cases is: (1) Scale; (2) The presence of McGrady.

(1) strikes me as largely meaningless, and not really why anyone is getting outraged over this. (2), I think we all realize, is the basis of all this. And that strikes me as – frankly – stupid. It’s an attempt to thrust this pre-created narrative of McGrady vs. “the Team” on what seems to me to be a fairly mundane event.

Mind reading:

Problem is, Tracy McGrady was being ignored. Tracy doesn’t like being ignored. Tracy likes center stage. He’s the NBA’s highest-paid player at $23.4 million, but money doesn’t buy attention.

That’s a possible reason for what McGrady did, but I think he just made a public statement about how he feels. It’s what he does. He’s a prominent player in the league, and frankly this is no different from him telling Feigen or whoever the same thing.

Nonsensical interpretations of events:

There are a lot of misunderstandings with McGrady. He didn’t really pick the Lakers to beat his teammates last spring. He didn’t really loaf in a couple of games last season. He didn’t really yank his teammates and coaches around with his constant coming and going.

by Only_A_Lad on Nov 10, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions  

We are, after all, entitled to speculate as to motivation.

Pointing out that we don’t really know what someone is thinking could be applied to every situation where someone’s actions are being analyzed. It’s true, and so what? Since we can’t read minds, and since people often seek to mislead with their statements, why not?

Otherwise all discussion fails for lack of proof.

If the Red Nation apparatchiks start talking about a Five Year Plan, I'm out of here.

by Xiane on Nov 10, 2009 3:28 PM CST up reply actions  

There's a difference between analysis and hypothesis

and blind assertion. One involves evidence and reasoning, the other does not.

Do we have reason to believe that McGrady is making a statement because – as Justice contends – he hates being out of the spotlight and he craves attention? No. Justice is just a shitty reporter, that’s all.

by Only_A_Lad on Nov 10, 2009 3:44 PM CST up reply actions  

To put it another way

I speculate that Yao is motivated not by a desire to play basketball, nor by any lust for money, but because playing international basketball gives him access to a great source of human victims for his vampirism. My speculation is unimpeachable, of course, because we are all entitled to our own opinions.

No, we can’t read minds (that’s my point) and people do often use words to deceive, but you’d better have good reason to believe what you say, particularly if you are alleging that someone is deceiving.

The problem is not that people are analyzing McGrady’s statements – it is that they are doing a terrible job of it, projecting pre-formed notions and narratives onto fairly simple statements.

by Only_A_Lad on Nov 10, 2009 3:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I have more evidence about Yao.

I mean, you just can’t miss a guy that big in cape turning into a bat. The cape is gigantic, the bat was HUGE. It spoke Cantonese. It was Yao. He’s a vampire.

If the Red Nation apparatchiks start talking about a Five Year Plan, I'm out of here.

by Xiane on Nov 10, 2009 4:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Well

I think we can ascribe motivations in any number of ways, and if there is historical evidence to believe one thing or another, that’s how we form our opinion.

Is Justice’s assertion consistent with what we know, or rather have generally determined, about McGrady? I’d say no.

I’d say it’s simply natural to want to return to your profession, particularly if things are going well for your coworkers. Nothing nefarious there. Also, it’s possible to have some sympathy with McGrady, who has seen his name taken off the NBA marquee with alarming speed, and perhaps malice.

If the Red Nation apparatchiks start talking about a Five Year Plan, I'm out of here.

by Xiane on Nov 10, 2009 4:00 PM CST up reply actions  

don't look them in the eye, just keep on walking...

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4643120

“Coming off that surgery, you’re not going to have the quickness you had before,” Adelman said. “He’s done OK. But he has a long way to go.”

Elsewhere, McGrady fans are interpreting Adelman’s above quote into meaning a close return.

1 + 1 = a window.

by wayno on Nov 11, 2009 1:20 PM CST up reply actions  

T-Mac return might affect team chemistry

Remember how the team used to stand still and watch T-Mac go to work, although that was when Adelman was still implementing his system. Also, not to mention that Ariza is in a 5 yr contract, he IS our future…

Does anybody else fear T-Mac becoming the next Iverson???
A star turned diva that won’t settle for a lesser role in a younger team…

by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on Nov 10, 2009 10:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Not that I'm the best candidate to defend McGrady...

but in the scheme of egotistical stars with attitude problems, reporting his own news first and getting the dates wrong is pretty tame. He’s still not going to play until Adelman sends him in, and unless his bench pouting translates into an unfocused, team-harming performance (and how would we be able to tell? Zing!) then I see little harm in it other than minor disrespect for your manager.

In fact, the only reason that his bout of logorrhea pissed me off last year was because I felt it hurt his trade value. Same deal with why I’m glad to see him back in action this year.

by Moondebah on Nov 10, 2009 12:02 AM CST up reply actions  

One positive of having McGrady back now.

The D-League season is starting up soon, and one of the reasons I’m glad to have McGrady back regardless of his contributions to the team is that it gives us an extra man in uniform. I’d much rather have Dorsey and Taylor playing minutes with the Vipers than sitting on the bench after layup drills. Not sure if the Rockets will do that, without McGrady on the inactive list by default it at least gives them flexibility.

by Moondebah on Nov 9, 2009 11:54 PM CST reply actions  

I would think that T-Mac would have enough sense not to…

… rush back too quickly, considering this is his contract year. He needs to show that he is healthy and that he can still play at a high level.

If he ‘s not really ready to play yet, then it will hurt him next offseason when he tries to get that next big fat long term contract I’m sure he wants…

I had to stop arguing with drunks, Steeler fans, and all other fools.
It was making my brick wall jealous...

by steeler-hater on Nov 10, 2009 7:24 AM CST reply actions  

McGrady switched to #3 in the offseason

to promote his new documentary. Its about Darfur and titled 3 Points. Its also to promote his Darfur Dream Team Campaign. Apparently he went to Darfur in 2007 to shoot it and has made a pretty big difference there.

by TexasHoosier on Nov 10, 2009 1:19 PM CST up reply actions  

i forgot all about that....

but I hoped Rockets didn’t throw his locker away, or let Brian Cook took the spot instead…. HAHA!!!

don't bully me, i am from the D(etroit)!!!

by wanderboy on Nov 10, 2009 3:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Only_A_Lad

Thank you for looking at this with a level head. <3 no homo

by T-Mackin on Nov 10, 2009 4:43 PM CST reply actions  

If the Mavs game was any indication....

we need his abilities. We need a go-to-guy when everyone can’t shoot to save the game.

Plus, all that talk of rebuilding and this year being for development for next year and all that stuff seemed to disappear these past few days. Somewhere along the way, we all went back to the “we want to win now” mode. Its probably because the recent success, made us think we can take anybody on and we CAN. We just need that missing piece, and it could be T-mac. Give it a chance, we have nothing to lose. Afterall, we weren’t supposed to be winning this season, as lot of people said before the season ,including some people here.

by suzaku on Nov 11, 2009 1:26 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Dream Shake: Dedicated to all things Houston Rockets. Past, present and future. Expect criticism, commentary and shameless promotions to get Robert Horry into the Hall of Fame.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hunter-s_small
Blazers Fan Here: Kevin Love Is A real Jerk!
340x_small
Anyone Here Interested In Wilson Chandler?

Recent FanPosts

Guide04_small
Love requited - Greg Smith Signs with The Rockets
Small
So you are an NBA owner and have 60 mil in cap space THIS year….
Yaoface_small
I'm just gonna leave this here
340x_small
Would You Do a Martin-Noah swap?
Megaman_small
KAMAN
Rockets_small
Whats wrong wit da rockets...
Small
Beasley discovers hidden basketball talent to help Wolves take down Rockets 120-108
Images_small
Rockets Interested in Kaman??
Small
2012 Free Agents: It's Never Too Early For Plan B

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBN Hoops Twitter


Editor

Picture_47_small Tom Martin

Daryl Morey Wannabes

Kurt-avatar_small grungedave

Img_4429_small UofTOrange

Cat_small Only_A_Lad

Guide04_small Xiane

Screenhunter_01_dec Mike Kerns

Crabtree_small ak2themax

Awesome_small BD34

Tds_small Patrick Harrel