The Dream Shake: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Recap: Rockets fail to capitalize in the paint, lose big in Utah 99-86

Yao_foul_medium

Last night's game was filled with frustration.  So many opportunities, and so many missed opportunities.  Let's forget referees for a second, because to be honest, with the exception of a few calls in the third and fourth quarters, the officiating wasn't nearly as poor as it usually is in SLC.  I want to look at one period in this game in particular, that being the period in which Von Wafer and Kyle Lowry entered the game in the third quarter.

At the 2:43 mark in the third quarter, we were down by six.  Enter Kyle and Von, something that I had eagerly awaited to happen.  Last time around, when we were losing to the Jazz on March 4th, Lowry sparked a comeback by himself, drawing four fouls in the process.  That didn't happen last night.  At all.

Let's look at some of the plays that occurred from the 2:43 mark in the third to the 7:58 mark in the fourth, when Wafer and Lowry were taken out:

1:21 Kyle Lowry misses layup

1:04 Kyle Lowry misses 23-foot three point jumper

10:53 Von Wafer offensive goaltending

9:23 Von Wafer offensive foul (Kyle Korver draws the foul)

8:56 Kyle Korver blocks Von Wafer's 5-foot jumper

8:37 Kyle Lowry traveling

8:18 Von Wafer misses layup

A few notes on each play:

  • 1:21 - Missed layups plagued us.  Killed us.  I don't know how many we missed; maybe 15-20?  Granted, a few of the put-back attempts should have been called fouls, but nevertheless, we couldn't buy a layup.  Aside from the abundance of clanked jumpers, our missed shots in the paint explained our poor shooting percentage, as we actually shot our three pointers quite well.
  • 1:04 - Lowry took two threes this game, and only one of them was a wide-open shot.  Based off of his play with the Rockets thus far, it was unlike him to take an ill-advised shot when we severely needed points and could have gotten a better shot.
  • 10:53 - Offensive goaltending happens.  I can't fault hustle in this case.
  • 9:23 - This began a string of mishaps on the fast break.  While I appreciate Von Wafer's determination to get to the hole and score, it wasn't smart to try to go 1 on 3 to the basket.  While his quickness allowed him to beat  the first two defenders on the break, he was out of control by the time he went up for the layup and was called for charging.  I do think it was a bad call, as Korver was moving/falling before the contact, but Von should have pulled it out and extended the possession.  Quick, one-shot possessions and turnovers on those possessions hurt us more than anything.  Our will to score and try to regain the lead was evident, but our comeback attempt was poorly executed.
  • 8:56 - Again, Wafer tried to take on two defenders on the break, and was blocked by Korver.  Another possession wasted.
  • 8:37 - Another fast break attempt, another turnover, and another possession wasted.  And a partridge in a pear tree, while we're at it.
  • 8:18 - Von ends our fast break goose-egg with another missed layup.  At this point, we have fallen behind by 11 points, 82-71.  Had we shown any patience on offense and either gotten the ball inside or moved the ball to find an open shot, we could have kept the game closer.  We made a small run at the end of the 4th quarter, but we were already down too much at that point to complete the comeback.

The Jazz had twelve blocks.  Five on Ron Artest.  For all of the troubles that the Jazz had in terms of scoring points in the paint, they made up for it with paint defense.  Artest's intensity and strength was met with a tough Ronnie Brewer, who I consider to be the Jazz's MVP of this game.  He ignited the crowd (albeit an annoying, whiny crowd) with a few dunks and hit 8 of 9 free throws. 

My only beef with the referees in this game is rooted in the free throw disparity.  The Jazz shot 25, while we only shot 14.  Many of the fouls that were called on us were with the body.  The Jazz did a good job avoiding bumps, but the arms were a-swinging.  Mehmet Okur fouled Luis Scola twice on that ridiculous 5-offensive rebound possession we had.  Milsap had a few arm-chops.  I thought we could have shot at least six more free throws, and I think a few body calls at the end against us could have been no-calls.  While the referees did not by any means change the outcome of the game, there were some problems.  And that's all I have to say about that.

We also got three-pointer happy.  26 threes in a game?  While we hit 10 of them, many of those three-pointers were quick shots early in the possession.  It wasn't smart for us to jack up all those shots the way we did.  Ugh.

Jump for the rest of the recap...

Star-divide

Jazz_photo_medium

Couldn't resist...

Three Up:

Shane Battier -- Shane was money from behind the arc, going 4-7 from three while scoring 18 points.  It wasn't his best game defensively, as Kyle Korver/Ashton Kutcher/Hilary Swank went to work on him early.  But we would have never been in this game without Shane's contributions.  He was the only one who could get it going on offense.

Aaron Brooks -- I wasn't impressed with Aaron's performance until I looked at his box score.  20 points?  Nice.  No turnovers?  Nice.  For all of the quick, ill-advised shots I saw Aaron take tonight, he made up for it by scoring on the following possession.  If only he could have done it late in the game.

Luis Scola -- He didn't take a shot in the first half.  Not one.  And yet, he still managed to go 10/12 with two steals.  Someone get Luis the ball before I run onto the court and do it myself.

Three Down:

Kyledrive_medium

Kyle Lowry -- Lowry became selfish tonight, and whenever a subpar shooter is selfish, things like 0 for 6 from the field happen.  I do appreciate the aggressiveness, but it wasn't used wisely.

Ron Artest -- Ron took some bad, ugly shots, and when he drove, he didn't go up strong with his legs.  Brewer owned him in the paint.  His defense on Brewer wasn't very good either.  It was just a really bad game for him.

Brent Barry -- Bones went 0-3 from deep.  That pretty much sums up his night right there.  I could have put Von here, but I already ragged on him.

Stats of the Night:

Offensive Rebounds: Rockets 13 - Jazz 3.  We failed to convert on all but two of those second chance opportunities.

Rebounds: Rockets 52 - Jazz 42

Field Goal %: Rockets .348 - Jazz .447

3-Pointers: Rockets 10/26 - 4/14

Turnovers: Rockets 12 - Jazz 8

Assists: Rockets 19 - Jazz 23

Free Throws: Rockets 12/14 - Jazz 19/25

Blocked Shots: Rockets 6 - Jazz 12

Carl Landry:

We needed him.  He wouldn't have won the game at the rate we played, but he could have done some good against Milsap.  He can also finish inside, something we didn't do (for the 1000th time).  To state the obvious, I'm hoping Carl comes back really, really soon.

Next Game: Saturday vs. L.A. Clippers.  We must win this game.

0 recs  |  Comment 10 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

All is not lost, some comforting thoughts

-As badly as we played last night we’re still only trailing San Antonio by 0.5 games for the 2nd spot in the West. San Antonio plays IN Atlanta tonight, against a Hawks team that has played tremendously at home. Go Hawks!
-Utah has 7 games on the road left, all of which are against teams with records above .500 and in my opinion it’s doubtful they’ll finish higher than a 6 seed in the West. Hell, they could even drop to 7th or 8th, and if Phoenix beats them twice perhaps Phoenix could even bump them out of the top 8 (WISHFUL THINKING anyone?!) They’ve been AWFUL on the road this season and barring some kind of a miracle, they’ll continue to lose. Now all we have to do is avoid a first-round matchup with them and hopefully let San Antonio play them.

by UHoustonFan on Mar 25, 2009 12:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

it's pretty obvious . . .

. . . that Utah will get bounced early if they drop to 7th or 8th. What makes the Western Conf. race so fun is that each team seems to own or hold their own against a few teams, while having exposed weaknesses against another. (Like Dallas and Golden State two seasons ago) Houston is tough. Landry makes them so much tougher inside. No team wants to face them in the playoffs, not even the Jazz.

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Mar 25, 2009 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

tough loss

The Rockets might have had a chance to beat Utah if Lowry and Wafer would have stopped trying to create a “fast break” when nothing was there. If I recall correctly, 3 or 4 possesions in a row, rather Lowry or Wafer would speed down the court by themselves and miss contested layups and 5-7ft floaters. SLOW DOWN!!!! Utah played great transition defense and neither Wafer or Lowry recognized it.
The Rockets play their best basketball when the tempo is slow. Lowry and Wafer need to develop patience in order for the Rockets to win in the playoffs.

by BdoFiFtY81 on Mar 25, 2009 5:37 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

About the fouls

well, on the 5-offensive rebound play (it was 5, right?)… I think both teams got away with fouls there. How many per team? I’m not sure. But they could’ve blown the whistle a couple of times if they wanted to.

As for the FT discrepancy, I think some of it had to do with the Jazz attacking the hoop a bit more. Not by much, I don’t think… but based on the Rockets’ shooting percentage, it really seems like they were settling for jumpers more than attacking the hoop. That, or they really missed a ton of lay-ups.

Have to ask… do the Rockets normally shoot that many treys every game?

by UtesFan89 on Mar 25, 2009 8:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

No

Houston doesn’t usually shoot that many threes. This post points out quite well where Houston lost control of their own offense and thus the game: when Lowry and Wafer went haywire on 1 on 3 breaks and the like.

I thought that was honestly a very weird game – relatively few whistles for outright flops (a welcome rarity in Utah) and lots of streaks. Milsap tried an egregious flop early on, and when the refs showed a complete lack of interest, the Jazz more or less stopped doing their trademark “feather in the wind” defense.

 I honestly believe the NBA must go to a Yellow/Red card system for “out of game” fouls – it would be like flagrant 1/2 but would cover flopping as well. Get 2 yellows and just like soccer, you’re out the next game- Red means out current game and the next. I think that’s the only way to stop creeping Euro-ism/Jazzism in the NBA. And no one would dare flop in the playoffs…

The Jazz had one more hot streak at the end, and that was more or less the story. Also when Okur and Kirelenko are both hitting 3s at the same time there isn’t much we, or many other teams, can do about it. LA can shut that down, with their mobile big men, Portland might, SA can neutralize Okur, and Dallas could probably put Nowitski on Okur as Okur is basically a SF like Dirk anyway.

In my mind, though, the real point of separation isn’t Okur, or Boozer or even flopping, its Williams. Boozer is merely above average at his position, he’s not Duncan. The fact that Milsap can equal his production doesn’t mean that Milsap is awesome, it means that any competent PF can thrive in the Utah system.

 Okur is a slow SF pretending to be a center to create matchup problems – Orlando exposed that particularly well. The other players simply aren’t worth much without Williams to get them shots. Boozer can be forced into a 8/22 night fairly easily without Williams. Basically, no other Jazz player can create his own offense. Any team that shuts down Williams will beat Utah – that’s easier said than done. Barring injury or premature aging, he’ll be the best Jazz player of all time, which is good, because so far he’s shown signs of resisting become an odious sack of shit like Stockton or Malone.

by Xiane on Mar 25, 2009 8:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yao

is not mentioned?

Bobby G is Sexy

by BobbyGian92 on Mar 25, 2009 8:43 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

i didn't even notice that

but, i do these recaps based off of what I saw. I think the point that “We need to get the ball to Yao” has been worn down a bit, and while he wasn’t good this game, I think he got hacked a bit as well. He didn’t stand out at all, for good or bad reasons. But I should probably at least mention him next time around.

"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak

by Tom Martin on Mar 25, 2009 9:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yao didn't really get the ball enough to be mentioned.

He shot well. He passed out of double teams well. He followed his assignment on D, and got some nice blocks inside. He got called for a couple of phantom fouls, as usual. It’s rarely Yao’s fault when we lose.

Our PG/SGs along with whatever Artest is, got out of control, or we could have easily fouled Boozer, Milsap and Okur out, by using Yao.

 Okur is a matchup problem on D for him, as he is for any slow center. As we know, mobile big men like Howard, Bosh or Gasol pretty much neutralize Okur, while not being able to stop Yao, for a weird rock-paper-scissors effect.

By the way, I know our hosts here hate Kirilenko, for good reason, but I’ve always thought he’d be an excellent complement to Yao, like Camby would be. Excellent help defender/weakside shotblocker would essentially close the middle to all but a few teams. Given how Utah seems to hate Kirilenko and LAC hates Camby…

by Xiane on Mar 25, 2009 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kirilenko and Camby

I always believed that we should’ve went after Camby when we had the chance last year. We are still missing a great rebounder with more size. I know Camby is only 6’ 11" and getting older, but he still has the ability to dominate the boards. Plus i don’t think age is an issue for Houston since we still have Mutombo around. What are we suppose to do if this is really Mutombo’s ‘last season’? Who do we have (with size) to back up Yao? The 6’ 9", Joey Dorsey? Since Camby doesn’t really look to shoot too often, he could be a perfect fit for our team. Yao and Camby starting would be ridiculous. Scola could be just as effective on the second team.

I really can’t imagine us going for Kirilenko. It kind of goes against everything we believe in. We can’t do a deal with Utah EVER (unless it’s a huge win/steal for us).

by Mejeh on Mar 27, 2009 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Camby would be a great backup

But the Rockets can’t afford him

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Mar 27, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Dream Shake: Dedicated to all things Houston Rockets. Past, present and future. Expect criticism, commentary and shameless promotions to get Robert Horry into the Hall of Fame.
Start posting about the Rockets »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

John6_small
"McGrady can be had, but it will cost Knicks."
Small
T-mac acting up again?
Small
End of the Road for Rockets and TMac?
Small
Houston B.A.L.L. Squad : on the rise
Small
What ever happened to Francis?
Small
Iverson dilemma continues: When will it end?
Rox_small
Battier vs Gay? Check this out
Scan1_small
NBA Power Rankings: Week #4
340x_small
My New Rockets Blog
Akeem_olajuwon_small
Pops Mensah-Bonsu cut!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBN Hoops Twitter


Daryl Morey Wannabes

Kurt-avatar_small grungedave

Img_4429_small UofTOrange

Img_0142_small Tom Martin