Playoff Perspective: Portland Trail Blazers
"Playoff Perspective" provides a look at the Rockets' possible playoff opponents from the opposing blogger's point of view. Each team, from Dallas to LA (as the chances of us playing Phoenix aren't very probable), will be represented. On today's edition, Ben Golliver of the fantastic SBN blog Blazer's Edge gives us his take on a Rockets-Blazers first round match up.
What advantages do you think the Blazers would have over the Rockets in a playoff series?
I like Brooks vs. Blake. Ranking the point guards of the likely Western Conference teams you've got an elite group (Paul, Parker, Williams, Billups), a solid group (Kidd, Fischer) and then the dregs (Brooks, Blake). No disrespect to Brooks; I like him as a player. Blake just gets abused by everyone else on the list. Drawing Brooks would be a relative advantage for the Blazers (despite the fact that he will be able to get into the lane at will) because of his limited playoff experience and overall skill set.I look at the Blazers' 4th quarter execution as a potential advantage over the Rockets. Brandon Roy is just itching to blow up during this year's playoffs and I like the ball in his hands with the game on the line more than I do anyone on the Rockets' roster, by a good margin. Also, Outlaw, Rudy, Blake and Aldridge have delivered at various times this year. There's a lot of good options there and a lot of guys with chips on their shoulders looking to make a name for themselves.Although this borders on fluff, I like the mentality that the Blazers will bring into any playoff series ("nothing to lose") compared to the Rockets ("we're going to blow this again, aren't we?"). Of course, Charmin-soft Peace Corps Volunteer Tracy McGrady will be in street clothes so I guess that nullifies this potential advantage.
The Rockets' perimeter defense, defensive intensity and size in the post work to negate some of the things the Blazers do best. The Blazers' offense runs at peak efficiency when Brandon Roy is getting foul calls and LaMarcus Aldridge has time and space to operate. Artest and Battier body up on Brandon and cause him more trouble than almost anyone. The Rockets also have a lot of guys to throw at Aldridge. Scola, in particular, gives the Blazers trouble.Yao, of course. The guy's calf is bigger than my waist. I've measured. Oden, in the spotlight, will probably struggle.I also think Adelman over McMillan is a disadvantage for the Blazers.
Greatly, of course. As of this writing the Blazers are 30-7 at home, 16-20 on the road (only 1 road win against a WC playoff team... a miracle comeback in New Orleans after Chris Paul went down injured).Given their youth and lack of playoff experience, the Blazers are unlikely to win a playoff series this year; I would be shocked if they won one without home court advantage. This has been a team and a season full of surprises, however.
The Rockets would be a fine draw for the Blazers. It would certainly be an intense series. One of life's great pleasures is watching Yao Ming fall down so I would welcome the matchup if only for the chance to see that happen. I think it would go deep -- at least 6 games. Regardless of who had home court advantage I would pick the Rockets to win due to the Blazers' lack of playoff experience and struggles on the road.
1 recs |
20 comments
|
Comments
as long as we don’t have to match up with the lakers until conf finals, i’ll be happy. i really feel we can beat any other team in the first 2 rounds (it would be ideal to finish at the 3 or 6 spot, win that series and play the spurs (the probable 2 seed) in the second round, also a series i think we can scrape out in 7). lakers, we could even take to 6, hell maybe even 7 games, but being in the conference finals will maybe get this team some long overdue espn time, and subsequently bolster the overall image of the team (which is the difference-maker in things like close-game foul situations, etc).
by olivarezq1 on Mar 29, 2009 10:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
do you really think the rockets will
get to the conference finals and take the lakers to 7games? I would be surprised if they make it past the second round.
.
by JTDuck22 on Mar 31, 2009 7:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
uh...
Ranking the point guards of the likely Western Conference teams you’ve got an elite group (Paul, Parker, Williams, Billups), a solid group (Kidd, Fischer) and then the dregs (Brooks, Blake)
Derek Fisher is a smaller Rafer Alston with better discipline and less defensive ability. On the whole, he’s marginally better than our friend Rafer. And I’d take either Brooks or Blake over Fisher in a heartbeat.
I look at the Blazers’ 4th quarter execution as a potential advantage over the Rockets. Brandon Roy is just itching to blow up during this year’s playoffs and I like the ball in his hands with the game on the line more than I do anyone on the Rockets’ roster, by a good margin.
That’s the main thing the Rockets are missing this year. There’s no one on the perimeter I’d trust in the final seconds of a close ballgame (and, indeed, most of us here have been pleading for everything in the 4th quarter to go through Yao). McGrady was that guy for the Rockets over the previous four seasons, and his absence will be felt badly in the playoffs. But that just means the Rockets have to adjust to those situations, giving the ball to Brooks (NOT ARTEST).
by Only_A_Lad on Mar 29, 2009 11:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
hm
me personally. i’d take fisher b/c of his experience. experience goes a long way in the playoffs.
and depending on the situation, i’d prefer the ball into yao’s hands or ball movement. i don’t want the ball to stay in one person’s hands. it tends to lead to a contested jumper. rockets have to trust each other. if the ball can’t get to yao, move the ball around some. the rockets have already proven that with good movement, it turns out in a win. and when the ball isn’t moving(as it usually does in the 4th quarter) the other team either comes from behind or extend the lead) it ends with a loss.
by Air Korea on Mar 29, 2009 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Completely Agree
Fisher is incredibly overrated in my book. I’d take either of our PG’s over him.
There’s no one on the perimeter I’d trust in the final seconds of a close ballgame (and, indeed, most of us here have been pleading for everything in the 4th quarter to go through Yao).
While I understand the need for a proven perimeter scorer late in games, I think it’s really just been poor execution down the stretch. We really should have two options in late game situations 1) Double screen across for Yao to free him up on the block. 2) Aaron Brooks pick and roll with Yao or Scola.
If teams insist on double-teaming Yao, we still should be able to get a wide open shot through some ball movement. Where we’ve run into the trouble is the late-game dribbling black hole known as Ron Artest. Hopefully this full week or practices has put some sense into him.
by oelayat on Mar 30, 2009 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ps i think statistically, given the suns embarrassing loss to the kings, we [since we’ve played so many more games than everyone else this far into the season] have clinched a playoff berth, according to nba.com
by olivarezq1 on Mar 30, 2009 2:10 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Id definately
take fisher over brooks but only for the playoffs. fisher has more experience and knows how to make the clutch shot, something the rockets are lacking this year. fisher is a smarter point guard at this point in their careers and would help the rockets alot in the playoffs. i would rather have brooks for the future though cause i think hes gonna have a better career than fisher overall.
Waiting for the day Houston gets some sports respect.
by TexasHoosier on Mar 30, 2009 11:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I have to respectfully disagree
take fisher over brooks but only for the playoffs. fisher has more experience and knows how to make the clutch shot, something the rockets are lacking this year.
I absolutely loathe people’s fascination with Derek Fisher. He’s a 38% career three point shooter, which is good not great, and had a few solid years playing alongside Kobe and Shaq (and now Kobe again). His seemingly large collection of clutch shots is most attributable to 1) Large collection of high leverage playoff games 2) Playing alongside two of the best players of the last decade. Yes, he had to make them, but there are plenty of players who can shoot 38% on wide open threes and play good defense (Rafer Alston comes to mind).
Him and Rafer are pretty much a wash, with Derek Fisher being a little better shooter and Rafer being a bit better attacking the rim and distributing the ball. There’s a reason the Lakers let him go in 2004 when someone decide to finally pay him a bit. He’s not that good…
by oelayat on Mar 30, 2009 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't you trade Raefer?
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
by hobobob on Mar 31, 2009 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rockets would beat Portland in 6
and that’s being generous towards the Blazers. If only we could actually play them…
by goingforthecorner on Mar 30, 2009 3:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah,
it’s totally not like the Rockets would play the Blazers in the first round if the playoffs started today. Oh, wait…
L.A. Lakers1w
San Antonio2
Denver3
Houston4x
Portland5
Utah6
New Orleans7
Dallas8
by Only_A_Lad on Mar 30, 2009 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Playoff seeding is really wacky in the WC this year.
We probably won’t know until the last night of games.
I have to say, that as much as I thought our early schedule was abusive and horrible (and it was), this 2 week vacation at the end of the year is pretty nice. The Clippers were like a scrimmage.
I hope the team is getting lots of rest in and that Landry is healing up well.
by Xiane on Mar 30, 2009 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh, I know
the point was the “if only we could play them” comment seemed to be another round of pessimism from him, and that there’s a pretty good chance the Rockets will play the Blazers.
The only things for certain in seeding right now is:
1) The Rockets will be in the playoffs
2) The Rockets (and everyone but the Lakers) will not be #1
by Only_A_Lad on Mar 30, 2009 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too bad you could only get the weak second, Ben, for the interview
He’s very good taking pictures of players shoes and critiquing pre-game music (if you like that kind f thing), but he’s no better than your run of the mill internet poster (that is to say, bad), when it comes to NBA evaluation and knowledge unfortunately. Good luck to the Rockets in the playoffs unless you do end up playing the Blazers of course :-)
by R11 on Mar 30, 2009 7:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
C'mon. He's rawer than Dave, but his chops are getting meatier every day
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
by hobobob on Mar 31, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's too bad
that based on your recent comment history you seem to get a kick out of bagging on somebody who is not only an excellent writer, but works his butt off to make BlazersEdge as good as it is. If you don’t have anything nice to say, then don’t say it at all.
…..
And I, for one, am not wild about the prospect of matching up with the Rockets. You guys have not one, but two elite wing defenders to throw at Roy; our offense really, really struggles when he’s not facilitating easy shots for other players. Artest has given him fits in the past as a King and as a Rocket. I can only hope that Artest’s propensity for terrible offensive possessions neutralizes the impact he’ll almost certainly have on the defensive end. Yao is a tough matchup for us even with two legitimate centers, and Brooks/Alston are both cat-quick and can slice and dice any of our point guards. And Landry/Scola/etc. will make life tough on the boards, which is where the Blazers frequently overwhelm their opponents. I’d rather play the Jazz OR the Nuggets over the Rockets…anyway, best of luck to y’all.
The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.
by BlazersOrBust on Mar 31, 2009 4:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm in agreement with everything you said, especially the first part.
best of luck to you all as well.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
by Tom Martin on Mar 31, 2009 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Would be a good matchup
#10 Pryzbilla the Vanilla Gorilla
by Hookah_John on Mar 31, 2009 2:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Blazers win this series in the playoffs
Man standing on toilet is high on pot.
by babar1 on Mar 31, 2009 5:52 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs















