The Dream Shake: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

NBA Playoff Picture: Houston Rockets honing in on the second seed in the Western Conference

The Rockets may not have stayed healthy this year, they may not have won 60+ games, and they may not ever have the services of Tracy McGrady again, but if I told you that they would be the number 2 or 3 seed in the Western Conference, you would have jumped for joy, right?  I'm saying that not only is it possible, but that I would give it a better than 60% chance.  Let's analyze the games left for each team and we'll do so in alphabetical order of the top 8 other teams and then analyze the Rockets final games.

Dallas_medium

Dallas Mavericks
 (Mavs Moneyball SBNation site)


43 - 30

5

Lost 2

9

 


The Dallas Maverics have done just enough to keep a lead over the Phoenix Suns to this point, but their 5-5 streak in their last 10 leaves something to be desired for Mavs fans.  I think they'll close the season out strong.  Dallas has two back to back situations, but both are favorable.  Miami comes to Dallas after what should be an easy win for the Mavericks in Minnesota and Minnesota comes in after Dallas takes a short trip to New Orleans.

Dallas_medium

With a 6-3 final record, Dallas would finish at 49-33.  That's about on par with their season to date and has them winning a few playoff type games.  The one game I'm not as sure about is the final game of the season, but the Mavericks are not getting to a position to have home court advantage and the Rockets will be fighting for the number 2 seed.  I see that going the Rockets way.

 

 

 

 

Jump to see the remaining contenders.

 

Star-divide

 

Denver_medium 
Denver Nuggets
(Pickaxe and Roll SBNation site)


48 - 26

0

Won 3

8


The Denver Nuggets are a hard team to figure out.  They are playing very well as of late, going 8-2 in their last ten and climbing into a virtual tie with the Rockets for 3rd place in the West.  I'm not buying what they are selling though and think they will slp to end the season.  

Denver_medium

The Nuggets are too up and down for my taste and with 2 back to backs in a row, I see them losing some games.  Losing a game to a poor team like OKC could happen, mostly because I think they will drop at least one game they shouldn't and I think that game the Nuggets will be a looking ahead to the Lakers.  There are simply too many guys that are not mentally tough on this team in my opinion and only one that you know is in Billups.  Going 4-4 may look a little out of place with their latest 8-2 streak, but that's the way I see it.

 

 

 

Los_angeles_medium 
Los Angeles Lakers


58 - 15

0

Lost 1

9

 


The Los Angeles Lakers have first place sewn up, but I think Kobe Bryant is on a mission.  This isn't a team that is just going to give up too many games down the stretch.  The Atlanta Hawks loss was the one I was pointing to when I started writing this as a focus point and I don't see that changing.  Sadly since it took two extra days to write, I don't look like Nostradamus. 

Los_angeles_medium

An 8-1 finish is the run the Lakers should finish on, with the only question marks being Houston and Utah at the end.  The Lakers own the Jazz much like the Jazz own the Rockets.  That one could go either way though with the Lakers potentially shutting it down for the final game before the playoffs but that is not Phil Jackson's typical MO.  This will likely be a statement game for the Lakers going into the playoffs.

 

 

 

 

 


New_orleans_medium 
New Orleans Hornets (At The Hive SBNation Site)


45 - 27

2.5

Won 1

10


I make no apologies for it, but the Hornets are my second favorite team.  Chris Paul and David West are great players and work hard at being better.  They're built for the playoffs and I expect them to start playing like it down the stretch. With a huge win over San Antonio on March 29th they are on their way. 

New_orleans_medium

Finishing  8-2 will take some work.  The Hornets will have to beat Utah, meaning Chris Paul will need to step it up even further and outplay Deron Williams.  That game is at home, and thus on the road for Utah (14-21 on the road), so the hurdle is much smaller.  The big question mark is in San Antonio, but the Hornets have gone 2-1 so far against the Spurs.  New Orleans plays a Dallas team twice that they match up extremely well against.

 

 

 

 

 


Phoenix_medium 
Phoenix Suns (Bright Side of the Sun SBNation site)


40 - 34

18.5

Lost 3

8



They were in the thick of the hunt until they  decided to lose 3 games in a row.  Not even a 5-5 stretch by the Mavericks has helped them.  And there is virtually nothing short of a Dallas collapse that will get them in the playoffs, and even then they'd have to basically go undefeated.  It's not going to happen.  But, for humor sake, and since the next closest team is 33 games out of first place, we'll put them here.

Phoenix_medium

As you can see, not much faith has been put in the Suns.  They took too long to play ball in the way the team was built to play, and allow an astonishing 107 points a game to their opponents.  Letting D'Antoni go was epically ignorant and has not worked.  Instead they reverted back to playing his style without him. 

 

 

 

 

 


Portland_medium 
Portland Trailblazers (Blazer's Edge SBNation Site)

 


46 - 27

1.5

Won 2

9


Going into the season that the Trailblazers were poised to be much improved team.  Not many believed they could potentially win their division however.   Sitting one and a half games back of Denver, they have the ability to do just that.  Portland boasts the 4th best home record in basketball, but as is typical of a young team, they are 16-20 on the road.  Home court is going to be a necessity to get out of the first round. 

Portland_medium

A 6-3 record to end the season would be a strong statement, but likely wouldn't be enough to overtake the Denver Nuggets for first place.  It's still possible, but Portland is going to need to find way to not lose to a bad team while looking ahead to the playoffs.  They'll likely not do that though and lose to a team like the Clippers after a huge home win over the Lakers. 

 

 

 

 

 

 


San_antonio_medium 
San Antonio Spurs (Pounding the Rock SBNation Site)


48 - 25

0

Lost 1

9


The San Antonio Spurs have been the measuring stick for teams for a decade.  They have found a way to play through numerous injuries and somehow be in position to be the number 2 seed in the West.  They are 26-11 at home and 22-14 on the road, I like that kind of consistency.  

San_antonio_medium
 

Closing the season out strong will be important to the Spurs, but given their road record it might no weigh as heavily on their minds.  With that being the case, they will have a mentally easier time finishing strong. 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Utah_medium 
Utah Jazz (SLC Dunk SBNation Site)


45 - 27

2

Won 1

10


Before you read further, I know that I have a bias towards the Utah Jazz.  That bias may have something to do with the record I came to with them,  but I really tried to be unbiased.  They area terrbile road team at 14-21 on the season and have gone only 6-4 over their last 10 with 3 wins and 4 losses on the roard in that stretch.  Those wins came over Toronto, Atlanta and Oklahoma City, not exactly a murder's row. 

Utah_medium  

Coming to a 5-5 record was just the logical conclusion.  I have them winning their 4 home games and going 1-5 on the road.  Even then I'm saying they beat a Denver team that beat them by 20 the last time the Jazz visited Colorado.  They can beat New Orleans and Dallas on the road, but I don't think they will.  They cannot beat San Antonio or Los Angeles on the road. It is really as simple as the Utah Jazz are a bad road team.  Not a mediocre road team, a bad one and they face 6 playoff teams on the road to end the season.

 

 

 

 


Houston_medium 
Houston Rockets


48 - 26

0.5

Won 1

8


The Houston Rockets have gone 7-3 over their last 10 and 16-4 since the All Star Break.  Without Tracy McGrady they have exceeded my expectations to a large extent.  And I'll get this out of the way, the Rockets would be better with a 100% healthy TMac, but are better now without a 60-70% McGrady.  They are also better without Rafer Alston, no matter how you want to look at that.

Houston_medium

The Rockets could, and really should, finish with a 55-27 record.  They are better than every team they face besides the Lakers who they play on the road and the Magic who they get at home.  This would be identical to last season finish, but without the 22 game winning streak.  A 7-1 finish does include a few big road wins in Phoenix and Dallas but this team is up to the challenge.  The Rockets match up well with both teams and have road wins at both locations already this season.  We're going to see on Wednesday exactly where the team stands to end the season.  A win in Phoenix will get them continuing to trend in the right direction.  A win in Los Angeles would make my head explode with possibilities.

 

 

Final Standings

Final_western_conference_standings_medium

That's right folks: 

Los Angeles wins the Pacific

Denver wins the Northwest in the third tie breaker

  1. The Nuggets have gone 2-1 to this point against Portland but I project the series to go to 2-2 
  2. Currently the Nuggets are 9-3 in the division, with my projection of them going 11-5.  The Trailblazers are 7-5 currently and get to 11-5 with my projection
  3.  Those ties would take the teams to the third tie breaker, best conference record.  The Nuggets are 30-15, projecting to finish 33-19 and the Trailblazers are 24-19, projecting to finish 30-22.  Effectively they have no chance at winning the 3rd tie breaker. 

And last, but not least, the Rockets win the second tie breaker to take the 2nd seed.

  1. The Spurs and the Rockets are locked at 2-2 on the season against each other
  2. Currently the Rockets are 8-6 and the Spurs are 9-6 in the division.  With projected Rockets wins over the Mavericks and Hornets and Spurs loss to the Hornets, the Rockets would take the division with a 10-6 record to the Spurs 9-7

If the Spurs get a win over the Hornets and a loss elsewhere, the third tiebreaker is better winning percentage against teams in the conference.   Right now both teams stand at 31-14 in conference.  The fourth tie breaker is wins against playoff eligible teams in your conference.  The Rockets are 12-11 with 4 games against conference playoff teams left and the Spurs are 10-13 with 3 games against conference playoff teams left. 

And that's right folks, this scenario has the Rockets playing the Jazz in the first round.  Let's toss out a little prayer and hope that the Jazz can find a way to win a couple of more road games, or at least lose a couple of home games.  I assure you, I don't want anything to do with the Jazz in the first round of the playoffs.  They are not a better team overall than the Rockets, but head to head they are the better team. 

I've seen a few people do this analysis in the Fan Posts section.  If anyone else is interested, let's put them all in the comments here.  You can go into as little depth, or as much depth as you want.  If you have done it in Fan Posts, that's great!  Just toss a link to it in the comments here.  I'm very happy to have anyone and everyone doing Rockets analysis and previews/recaps in Fan Posts, keep up the great fandom!

0 recs  |  Comment 32 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

A very likely scenario....

I just hope that with all this days off, Rick Adelman has devised a strategy to beat the Jazz, you know work on your biggest weakness!

by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on Mar 30, 2009 5:21 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I would be shocked

if things turned out this way exactly. There are too many variables and it’s just too unpredictable. I do think that this is probably a little too easy on Houston and especially too hard on Denver…but overall I’d say it’s pretty reasonable. As reasonable as most predictions that could be made right now, at least.

by Neopergoss on Mar 30, 2009 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hm.

i need to fix some of the series records. b/c i wrote it on 1 hour of sleep. but i think the matchup situations are pretty on the point
http://www.thedreamshake.com/2009/3/26/810911/rockets-playoffs

by Air Korea on Mar 30, 2009 6:17 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The Beast awakens with a monstrous post!

Good work, sir.

"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak

by Tom Martin on Mar 30, 2009 6:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Adelman's found some guy he used to know in Portland...

Who’s going to whack D Wiliams’ knee with a big piece of rebar. Rick says the guy has experience, and will do a better job the second time around.

All joking aside, the Jazz are just a crappy matchup – no wing players to neutralize, a SF pretending to be a C and shooting 3s, shooters at every spot, and for my money, the best all-around PG in the NBA. There, I said it. D’ron is the best PG in the NBA, overall. Are you happy Utah? Of course its widely known that the Jazz also have atrophied testicles as a result of all that flopping, and Williams is going to have to live with that the rest of his life.

That said, we can still beat them – Utah, in general, can be fouled out. Boozer isn’t particularly special, and can be neutralized. If you can limit Williams, perhaps by attacking him whenever possible, Utah is beatable. A more integrated attack from Brooks and Lowry could keep Williams out of the game.

The drive and dish or the pass out from Yao is one key, another is maintaining defensive discipline, and the final thing is hoping we don’t have soccer refs officiating the series. Take just one in SLC, and we win it.

Who would I rather play – Dallas, New Orleans, Portland, Denver, Utah, in that order.

Dallas – Has no answer for Yao. Only Nowitski can create offense. Can be ground down due to a weak bench. Kidd can be horribly exploited by Brooks/Lowry. Only Dirk is a superior player at any position in this series. I think Dallas will give LA more trouble than they would give Houston for reasons I won’t go into here. As a shooting team, though, they are capable of getting hot and burying anyone, just not over a long series.

New Orleans – I thought last year’s team was something of a mirage. Paul makes his supporting cast look better than it is. Fatal team depth. Paul can’t quite beat Houston by himself, and that’s what it will take. Attacks from Houston’s PGs could help offset CP. Scola and Landry can run wild with the defensive focus being on Yao. Win against SA notwithstanding, Houston is a bad matchup for NO. I worry somewhat over Paul’s longevity in the NBA, as he takes an Iversonian beating most nights.

Portland – PDX’s main weakness is youth. This is a contending team from 2010 on out. Right now, though, Roy is the main spark to go with oodles of seemingly random talent across the board. LA, Houston and Portland have the deepest benches in the West. Portland’s problem there is that no one is clear what all that talent is FOR just yet.

Aldridge can be pushed around, and fades out of physical battles. Oden is playing scared of everything it seems – injury, failure, celebrity, etc. Roy is the true threat, and is ALMOST enough on his own. Multiple games against the Rockets D will either see him rise to a new Kobe/D Wade/LeBron level, or disappear until next year.

Ultimately, Portland can’t handle Yao, and can’t score enough on the Rockets to win a series this year.

Denver – Possibly the most emotion driven squad in the West. If they get on top of a team, they can pile it on like no other, if they get down, they can look simply awful and concede games in the first half. Karl is not exactly a steadying influence. Is there a better pure SF than Melo? Pierce maybe. Playing at altitude gives Denver an advantage. If they get home court in their first series, look for them to win it.

Denver poses several matchup problems for Houston, like Utah they have a big, scoring, PG and fantastic athletes across the board. Capable of fielding a big, physical front court that can hamper Yao with constant fouling, etc.

Utah – Houston’s bete noire is covered above.

LA – the one team where having a 100% TMac is probably crucial. Houston has no real answer to LA’s megawattage, Battier’s famous D excepted. Depth at every spot, and a couple of stars at other positions. LA is the most TV-friendly matchup for the NBA, so unless David Stern begins making noises about the China market, expect fouls to be called when defenders first form a thought about covering Kobe. There may be a rule enacted so that all opposing players begin games against LA with 3 fouls by the time you read this.

On the plus side, no team is as capable of throwing a series because of petulant ego-fueled fits. It’s not just Kobe. If LA gets its sulk on, no one, not even the refs, can save them.

As an aside, I’d like to compile a book of Phil Jackson’s backhanded compliments -it would be the size of the LA yellow pages. It’s hard to believe someone can be as unfailingly snide and nasty as he is. Why people think he’s wise and wonderful is beyond me.

by Xiane on Mar 30, 2009 6:39 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

wrong wrong wrong
There, I said it. D’ron is the best PG in the NBA, overall. Are you happy Utah?

How many times does this have to be said:

Chris Paul is leaps and bounds better than every other PG in the NBA. (note: in the past few weeks, Williams has improved his shooting significantly, so the comparisons between Nelson, Williams, and Harris are probably a little off. From a few cursory checks, I’d still rather have Harris, but I’d still take Nelson over either were he healthy.) It’s not even freaking close.

I suppose you were probably kidding about that, but it needs to be said just in case some poor schmuck comes in here and leaves misguided about the true Prince of Point Guards and Duke of Dimes.

by Only_A_Lad on Mar 30, 2009 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm

I wouldn’t take Harris or Nelson over Williams – I would take Paul of course. I’m not as familiar with Nelson though. I do worry about Paul’s career being shorter. Also my impression is that Paul’s D isn’t that great, and some of the other PG’s close the gap somewhat there, but it could be that he fills the scoresheet in so many ways that it just doesn’t matter.

by Xiane on Mar 30, 2009 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also my impression is that Paul’s D isn’t that great

He leads the NBA in steal percentage this season, and did so last season, as well. And while you might think that means Paul is a “gambling” defender – always out of position and attempting to generate turnovers but frequently getting burned – most of the defensive metrics out there show him as one of the best defenders in the league. Paul leads every point guard in almost every single category out there.

Harris’ numbers might be coming from being a great player on a bad team, but I’d still probably take him over Williams. His assist percentages aren’t as great, but that might be because of the quality of players around him. The numbers I’ve seen indicate he’s better at driving to the basket and getting to the foul line, and I like that.

Nelson is a real surprise, but he was having a great season before his labrum tear. If he comes back and does what he was doing, I sincerely think he’ll be the best PG in the East.Nelson’s value – like Harris’ value – comes from being a very efficient scorer. While Harris does that by going inside and drawing contact, Nelson does it by having a fantastic outside shot.

It really depends on your team needs. Paul and Williams are typical distributor point guards, Harris and Nelson are scoring point guards. Maybe Williams’ numbers improve if he’s given more of a scoring role (Williams only takes about 24% of his team’s shots while on the court, compared to guys like Harris and Tony Parker, who take close to 30%). But, theoretically, that should mean that his shooting percentage numbers should look a lot better right now.

So, if I’m constructing a team like the Rockets, then I’d probably take Nelson – he passes well, but you don’t need him to get assists on every possession, you need him as another scoring threat. A lot Rafer’s efforts were essentially wasted on the current Rockets, because they didn’t need really need all the assists coming from one dude, and he wasn’t a scoring threat, so he could be left open on the perimeter with impunity. Chris Paul is a good choice, too, of course, but his range is more limited. Perhaps that’s how best to think of the two current Rockets’ PGs: Brooks is our poor man’s Nelson, getting assists but more important on the perimeter, while Lowry is our (very) poor man’s Paul/Harris – getting inside, creating contact, and distributing more.

It comes down to this: Paul and Nelson contribute two very different styles of play. Harris and Williams are like Paul, but they’re nowhere near as good, and Harris is the better inside scorer. So, for me, it’s 1) Paul 2) (and it’s a distant second) Nelson 3) Harris 4) Williams 5) Probably Parker

by Only_A_Lad on Mar 31, 2009 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

PG Rankings

1. Chris Paul – I don’t take arguements, he’s the best, frankly, it’s not close
2. Deron Williams – And remember I hate the Jazz, but I can recognize greatness
3. Tony Parker – I can’t believe anyone thinks Harris is better than him right now. Parker has stepped his game up even further
4. Devin Harris – Took off this year and the Mavs will regret that trade forever
5. Billups – Playing like a kid again, but he’ll drop off next year
6. Nelson – It’s laughable that someone thinks Rafer could unseat him next year.
7. Nash – Noticeable drop off, but still can control a game like no one but CP3
Everyone else

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Mar 31, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

More from me, aren't you excited?

Utah’s schedule really surprised me. It seems they’re facing the scheduling they normally enjoy in reverse. If their home opponents weren’t so weak, they could go 3-7 from here on. I’d love to see them finish 8th and play LA.

by Xiane on Mar 30, 2009 7:02 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I do dare to dream

If they fell to 8th I would laugh for a month

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Mar 30, 2009 8:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

shit

I wouldn’t stop laughing for a year if they choked away a playoff spot.

by Only_A_Lad on Mar 30, 2009 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ain't gonna happen Bitches.

We bleed True Blue.
www.truebluejazz.com

by CB Jack on Mar 31, 2009 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly, what's your predicition for the final 9?

I didn’t have time to ask but had planned to

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Mar 31, 2009 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I mostly agree with this, I did an analysis of my own a few days ago

Overall I think this is pretty accurate. The main things I think will transpire differently though are as follows:

I think New Orleans will lose at Dallas and at San Antonio (or maybe just one of those two games) and therefore Portland will jump them in the standings (Portland in 5th, New Orleans in 6th)

I hope upon hope that Houston will come out at the 2 seed spot but I see us finishing 3rd or 4th just because I feel Denver is making a push towards the finish line and I think San Antonio will finish strong too. If we finish 4th and play Portland in the first round that’d be a pretty exciting matchup (Houston would win 4-2 I feel)

An upset in Los Angeles would be SWEET…!!

by UHoustonFan on Mar 30, 2009 11:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

what makes me salivate

is the Orlando game at home. Rafer’s Return. We get the edge in the point guard battle, for sure (with apologies to the Lad and Corner). I wonder what the fan reaction will be like.

That being said, I see us finishing 3rd and getting Utah, of course. A 4-3 win ending in Houston might rank up there in the top 5 playoff series won by the Rockets, just due to our history with them.

I think Porland and Denver are two teams we can beat. I know everyone talks about how much bigger Chauncey is than ABZ (he is), but Aaron has played Denver well, and Ron and Battier can contain JR Smith and Melo. Just sayin’…

How many Biletnikoffs does he have? NOT TWO!

by ak2themax on Mar 30, 2009 11:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I hope we don't play Utah

..Not because I’m afraid (we can beat those bastards) but because I’d like to see us play somebody DIFFERENT for once!

by UHoustonFan on Mar 30, 2009 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope

Rafer tries a “Rafer” at some point, only to Yao serve him a Spaldingburger.
That would be awesome.

by Chuck DeBruce on Mar 31, 2009 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i said this in the last thread, rockets need to finish at the 2 or 3, if they do that, we have a very good shot at facing the lakers in the conference finals.

i CANNOT wait for rafer to return! anyone want to buy me tickets so i can throw something at him? WOULDN’T IT BE AWESOME IF ORLANDO IS DOWN BY 2 AND HE MISSES THE CLUTCH FREE THROWS JUST LIKE HE DID AGAINST THE LAKERS IN JANUARY??? fucking asshole.

by olivarezq1 on Mar 31, 2009 2:07 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

well

i don’t care who we play.
odds are we’ll play one of these teams.
portland, new orleans, or utah.
and i don’t mind playing any of those teams.
but i think our best chances of winning the series are in that order. portland, new orleans, utah.
most likely we’ll have home court advantage against those teams. and with the exception of the hornets, they’re all below .500 on the road.
portland
we match up very well against them. shane battier or ron artest to neutralize brandon roy and nick batum. steve blake is a below average point guard so abz will exploit this. aldridge will meet his match with scola who may not be as athletic, but definitely has the better skill set. yao ming will have a physical battle with pryzbilla. but will dominate that matchup. only to face greg oden who brings even more defensive intensity. my only worry is that yao might get into foul trouble. portland is a young team, they might win a game or two but the rockets win this series hands down.

new orleans
if chris paul was only 6 inches taller and a bit slower. they’d be pretty identical to portland but less of a threat due to injuries. since that didn’t happen, it’s just a matter of how much can abz/lowry ease the dominance of chris paul. b/c lets be honest, he’s going to dominate the game. yao ming will equal or surpass cp3’s dominance by destroying tyson chandler/hilton armstrong. luis scola will equal david west, ron artest and shane battier will shut down their wing players while adding some much needed offense. i don’t think this series will be a high scoring game so every point counts. due to injuries to some key players, i doubt they will all return 100% healthy and playing 100% of their potential. i will say rockets 4-2.

utah
arch rival. our kryptonite. the jazztards. whatever you want to call them. i just have a strong feeling we’re going to play them again b/c….that’s just how it is. the mavs will never win a championship. rafer alston will never be good. the rockets play the jazz. that’s just life. i like watching these games though. they’re intense and exciting. and from all the past history, you know both teams will give 100%. the home court advantage favors the rockets greatly. yao favors the rockets greatly. karma favors the rockets greatly. with the matchup with deron williams. look above at the matchup with chris paul. pretty much the same thing. ron battier both did a bad job on defense the last game. don’t look for this to happen again. ronnie brewer will not get good looks. cj miles. heh. no comment. carlos boozer is not that good. luis scola can equal his output but also bring hustle and intangibles that boozer can’t. okur is not that good. it’s just matchup wise, he causes some problems. which can easily be fixed. yao will cause foul trouble for the jazz big men b/c they just can’t guard him. rockets 4-2. i see them winning once at SLC.

by Air Korea on Mar 31, 2009 2:25 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

This sounds too optimistic.

Don’t get me wrong. Last week, I predicted almost exactly the same thing. But now, I see us as the third seed. We still have six games with teams above .500, and going 5-1 on those is unlikely. Meanwhile, the Spurs play above .500 teams only four times and will take the Hornets game more seriously after their recent loss @NO.

That said, I really believe the Jazz is going 7th or 8th. Six games on the road, with four back-to-backs, I’ll go with 4-6 at best. They almost dropped a home game to the Knicks yesterday, for god’s sake! They suck and they know it.

by Chuck DeBruce on Mar 31, 2009 10:23 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

How good is each team?

I was going to make this into a separate fanpost, but I figured this would be a better place to put it. The simplest (and ironically the most accurate) method for evaluating the quality of an NBA team is simply Point Differential adjusted for pace. More simply, this is just net points over 100 possessions. Historically, this has shown the best predictor for both regular season records and success in the playoffs.

Here’s the top nine teams in the West ranked by adjusted point differential:

  1. L.A. Lakers- 8.1
  2. Portland- 4.9
  3. San Antonio- 4.5
  4. Houston- 3.9 (See Below)
  5. Utah- 3.6
  6. Denver- 3.6
  7. New Orleans- 3
  8. Phoenix- 2.5
  9. Dallas- 1.9

A few quick comments right off the bat: The Lakers are by far the best team in the conference (more on them later). Portland, in 2nd place, is quite a ways back but still very good. They are going to win a playoff series if they can get home court in the first round. I’ve seen plenty of people around here hoping for a first-round series with them, but I definitely am not one of them. While they are one of the better matchups for us in that they play a traditional center and have an elite wing scorer in Roy, they are still a really good team. San Antonio is also very good, despite not having a healthy Manu for most of the year. Despite this, I don’t think they are much better than their point differential shows. Last year, for instance, they were a +5.4- I can’t imagine their a better team than they were last year.

New Orleans and Denver, however, are less good. Both have outperformed their expected records. I hope we get one of them in the first round.
Also, you can see, Phoenix is a little bit better than Dallas, but given the several roster shakeups they’ve had this year, I’ll abstain on making any real comment on Phoenix.

The two wildcards for me are Utah and Houston. Utah has not had its stars healthy until very recently, yet are still fifth in point differential. They haven’t had enough games together for me to make a statistically significant argument about their quality, but I’ll conjecture they are very, very good. One thing that hurts them in every playoff series, however, is their absurdly high foul rate. They will NEVER win an NBA title as long as they continue to foul at the rate that they do, unless they are absurdly BETTER than every team in the league. It’s ridiculous how much more they foul than every team in the league. A foul is the worst result of a defensive possession, and yet Sloan hasn’t picked up on that yet- he teaches his teams to slap, grab, etc and it kills them in the playoffs every year. I, for one, will lose no sleep over this. (Utah sucks!)

Finally, on to the Rockets. For me, this is where it gets quite interesting. If you take the full-length season for the Rockets, they are good but not great. However, if you take the portion of the season since the Rockets lost McGrady was shut down and traded away Alston, the Rockets are an impressive +7.7, which puts them nearly at par with the Lakers. While the sample size is small, it’s all we really have in evaluating the Rockets as they are constructed now. Additionally, our strength of schedule over that period is quite reasonable. On the same note, the Lakers have significantly regressed since the Bynum injury, going from an exceptional +8.7 to a still very good +6.0. While I’m not saying we are better than the Lakers, I’m saying it’s much closer than NBA pundits think, especially considering current constructions of the team.

All in all, I think we have a very good shot come the playoffs. We are definitely better than Dallas, New Orleans, and Denver- I think we beat any of these teams handily in the playoffs. Second, I think we are slightly better than San Antonio and Portland, but a series with either team would be too close to pick a winner. Utah is the wildcard here, as it’s difficult to judge how good the are- I think they are really, really good. They would a lot better if they didnt’t foul so much. Finally, I think a series with LA would be tightly contested, and we probably have the best shot of any Western Conference team of knocking them off.

by oelayat on Mar 31, 2009 4:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

well

with the lakers you have to realize that majority of the games they bench their starters in the 4th quarter. allowing the final score to seem closer than it really is. while the rockets. have to actually play the entire game. so the differential would work on every team but the lakers.

by Air Korea on Mar 31, 2009 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's completely irrelevant with Point Differential

Are you saying the Lakers bench their starters when the game is still close? That’s an absurd statement. Adjusted point differential ALWAYS predicts one or two best team in the league. Since 1998, the 97-98 Bulls, 98-99 Spurs, 99-00 Lakers, 04-05 Spurs, 06-07 Spurs, and 07-08 Celtics all won both point differential title and the NBA title.

Here is one great article comparing wins versus point differential and a few title winners…Looking at that graph I really don’t know anyone can refute the importance of point differential as a predictor of wins and how good a team is. Like everything in life, the NBA has random noise, teams overperform or underperform their real level, winning (or losing) more games than they should. Over an extended time period, however, such as the ten year period in that article, things revert back to the team. With that in mind, point differential is a MUCH better indicator of playoff success than wins.

by oelayat on Apr 1, 2009 4:47 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

no

that’s not what i’m saying. but what i’m saying is that the lakers don’t have that many close games. thus they bench their starters whereas most of the other WC teams have a lot more close games. i’m not saying the point differential is completely irrelevant for the lakers. i’m just saying that it should be a little higher. i do agree, higher point differential-better team generally.

by Air Korea on Apr 1, 2009 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kobe's playing 36 minutes per game

from what I’ve seen, most of the other star perimeter players play about 38 minutes per game. Do you really think – adjusted across the whole season – that two extra minutes of Pau and Kobe in a few blowout games is going to mean all that much?

That’s the key: across the whole season, a few blowouts don’t matter. Beyond that, plenty of teams in the past have been just as (if not much more) dominant than the current Lakers, and adjusted differential does just as good a job of predicting their record. It’s not really an issue

by Only_A_Lad on Apr 1, 2009 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

While I can see an argument being made for the small sample size I mention post-Bynum

Random noise like that is worth very little when calculating point differential over the course of a long season. Every team has games that enter into garbage time-maybe the Lakers have a few more, but it’s definitely negligible.

I think the more interesting question is how good the Lakers really are post-Bynum’s injury (rather than how accurate their point differential is) and how good the Rockets are as currently constructed. My main point is I think the gap between the Lakers and the Rockets is much, much smaller than it was (and then most people would assume).

by oelayat on Apr 1, 2009 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

great article
Another funny note that can be tested using this numbers is the theory that “Defense wins championships”. The best offensive per 100 team has never won the title over the last 10 years. Meanwhile, the 98-99 Spurs and 04-05 Spurs won the titles while playing the best regular season points per 100 possessions defense. So, defense did win infinite times more championships than offense over the last 10 years, it was not as if playing the best regular season defense in the league guaranteed anything more than a 20% chance of winning it all in a given season. In the future I would like to test the adage that “rebounding wins championships”, but I’ll have to gather the data for that study at a later date.

A lesson that maybe the Suns (and now the Knicks) should probably learn.

by Only_A_Lad on Apr 1, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I agree completely

It’s fine that the Suns and the Knicks play at a very high pace under the D’Antoni system. It produces incredibly efficient offenses, mostly due to the collection of high percentage shots taken in transition. However, as that article (and history in general have shown), you cannot win a title in the league without also being a top team in defensive efficiency (points allowed per 100 possessions).

So, pace is really not the issue here- you can still be an elite defensive team and play at a very high pace by just making the other teams less efficient in its scoring. NBA games are just a matter of possessions- you want to score on your possessions as efficiently as possible, but also equally important, you need to prevent your opponent from scoring the efficiency on per possession basis. The total number of possessions is pretty much irrelevant.

It seems like the Suns caught onto this notion last season, but I’ll go out on a limb and say that signing a 36-year old Shaq to improve your defense was probably not the right move, especially given how much it hurt them offensively as well.

by oelayat on Apr 1, 2009 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also

After watching Portland absolutely dismantle Utah last night, I’m feeling quite confident about them winning at least one round in the playoffs. They’re a terrific team. Utah, on the other hand, remains impossible to figure out. They’re an elite team at home with an outstanding +10 point differential, and a lottery team on the road, with a -3.5 point differential. For a reference point, a +10 point differential team would win roughly 66 games, a -3.5 point different team, would win 31. All teams have some difference between home/away splits, but no other team even comes close to Utah.

Anyone have a reason behind the enormous difference? I can’t seem to find a comparable example in recent NBA history. I would guess it has something to do with the discrepancy in their foul rate, home and away, but I’m not really sure where I could find that data.

by oelayat on Apr 1, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Love that scenario!

No one wants the Rockets to take second seed more than me, but it’s just not likely. They’ve been playing over their heads lately, but Artest will undoubtedly revert to his habit of not running the plays the coach calls and the Rockets point guards are just not there yet. I keep telling myself that many of the great point guards in the NBA took several years to really pick up the pro game, so there is still hope for Brooks/Lowry. In my blog, www.RicksRockets.com, the prognostication is clear. Once again, probably lose in the first round. Under no circumstances can they get out of the second.

Here’s to me being wrong!

by ricksrockets on Mar 31, 2009 11:19 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Dream Shake: Dedicated to all things Houston Rockets. Past, present and future. Expect criticism, commentary and shameless promotions to get Robert Horry into the Hall of Fame.
Start posting about the Rockets »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
End of the Road for Rockets and TMac?
Small
Houston B.A.L.L. Squad : on the rise
Small
What ever happened to Francis?
Small
Iverson dilemma continues: When will it end?
Rox_small
Battier vs Gay? Check this out
Scan1_small
NBA Power Rankings: Week #4
340x_small
My New Rockets Blog
Akeem_olajuwon_small
Pops Mensah-Bonsu cut!
Small
Mutombo joins NBA as ambassador
John6_small
Since Bright Side of the Sun got their preview up first...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBN Hoops Twitter


Daryl Morey Wannabes

Kurt-avatar_small grungedave

Img_4429_small UofTOrange

Img_0142_small Tom Martin