The Dream Shake: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Reasons to believe the Rockets can play even better in Game 2.

I've seen a lot of words tossed out this morning regarding the Rockets' Game 1 performance:

"perfect" (no, that was only Yao.  And only the 1st half.)

"overachieved" (mostly this is wishful thinking by Portland.)

"surprising" (It shouldn't be.  Aaron Brooks can and will play that well again.)

"these refs suck" (okay, that was just the chant in Portland last night.  Their anger is misplaced.)

"dominant" (this one I will agree with.)

"mistake" (this would be Joel Przybilla thinking he can guard Yao one-on-one.  Yao has already ruined this theory.  Thanks for making Yao angry, Joel.)

Game 1 is now over and the Rockets (and the Blazers) simply need to forget about it, make any necessary adjustments and move on.  Get ready for Game 2.

That said, there are many reasons to think that the Rockets can actually improve on last night's performance.  Contrary to what Richard Justice thinks, last night was far from perfect for the Rockets.  Consider this:

1.  Yao Ming picked up his 4th foul with 6:30 left in the third quarter last night.  Yao also picked up early fouls in the first and second quarters.  Yao was dominant AND in foul trouble.  Imagine the damage Yao can (and will) do when Brandon Roy's off-the-ball flops are not called as cheap fouls against Yao.  Yao playing 36 minutes will be better for the Rockets than Yao playing 24 minutes.

2.  Yao only took 9 shots.  Nine.  Yes, he made them all (he's good, you see), but Yao Ming should be shooting 20-25 times a night in the playoffs.  I cannot wait to see the final box score after Yao puts up a 18-25 effort in Game 3 at home when Portland isn't able to get him off the floor.

3.  The Rockets didn't even need the services of Chuck Hayes.  Chuck will be a factor in this series still.  Last night, however, Luis Scola took it as a personal responsibility to keep LMA away from the basket.  If Aldridge makes an adjustment, so will the Rockets.  Enter Mr. Hayes.  LaMarcus is going to have a rough night again.

4.  Carl Landry was a non-factor.  Five fouls, a missed layup and a missed 15-foot jump shot.  Landry is a MUCH better player than this.... gunshot wound or not.  Ask Utah how much of a game-changer Landry can be... or just watch the most recent "memorable moment" NBA playoff commercial.

5.  Von Wafer had a bad night.  He's kinda streaky.  We all know this.  But if/when ABZ has a rough game, you can best be sure that the Baron will be more than willing to pick up the offensive slack.  I cannot wait to see the exuberation from Wafer once he finishes his first rim-rattling dunk in the playoffs.  He's quite the excitable type.

L3739923_medium 

6.  Shane Battier was ice cold.  But for a 3 minute span in the third quarter, Battier was mostly absent from the Rockets' offense.  He finished 1-5 and did not make any of his trademark "corner 3s" in this game.  He even took a highly ill-advised three from about 28 feet when the Rockets were on a run.  I never knew Battier to be the type to try a "heat check" shot... in Game 2, he'll make those.

7.  Kyle Lowry wasn't needed.  Portland seems to think that if Aaron Brooks doesn't repeat his big Game 1 that they are okay.  What they seem to forget is that most of ABZ's points came when the game was already decided.  In a close game, Coach Sleepy can just put in Kyle Lowry to run a more efficient offense.  And Lowry is a bulldog on defense.  It's nice to have options.  It's even nicer when you can "save" those options for Game 2 and not completely show your hand.

8.  The Rockets gave up 15 offensive rebounds.  FIFTEEN.  If the Rockets can get back to being a lock-down defensive rebounding unit, Portland may not break 80 points in Game 2.  Defense and rebounding will win this series.

9.  Brent Barry made only one shot.  Granted, it was a sweet dunk, but he's better known for his dagger 3s right now.  In a close game, Barry could be a calm veteran presence.  Or he could make a behind the back pass to no one in particular.  Either result wouldn't surprise me.

10.  The Rockets only forced 10 turnovers.  By the time the Rockets had a 20 point lead, they had only created 5 turnovers.  Imagine if the Blazers get the least bit sloppy with their offensive possessions?  Turnovers lead to easy points.  In contrast, the Rockets had 15 turnovers which led to a lot of Portland's easy points.

So, yes, Portland... the Houston Rockets can play better.  Much better.

To paraphrase what Joel Przybilla said about Yao before Game 1...

BRING ON GAME 2!!!

0 recs  |  Comment 149 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Battier's "Heat Check"

It wasn’t ill advised. There were about 29 seconds left in the quarter (or half, I can’t remember quite when it was). Anyways, he had an open look and made sure the Rockets got the final possession, which I believe was the one where Brooks went coast-to-coast. Obviously you wish he was a few feet closer, but I think it was a smart play.

by seanbergmanrules on Apr 19, 2009 10:40 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

There were 34 seconds left

and it was timed so that Portland didn’t get the ball down the court until there were 25 seconds left, so we got the ball back with 11 seconds left. Perfect two for one play. We didn’t make the second shot, either, but it was still good thinking.

Time to galvanize

by jack_ on Apr 19, 2009 11:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If it was Kobe shooting that

I would’ve thought he was an arrogant prick (who am I kidding, he’s an arrogant prick anyway) but as it was Battier (who I like), and given the way the game was going for Portland, I was pleased to see Houston’s shots coming from 5 feet behind the three point arc.

1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21... I know...

by FibonacciSequence on Apr 20, 2009 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

from an outsiders view,

Novak and Orange do a much, much better job then you…

Brandon Roy’s off-the-ball flops are not called as cheap fouls against Yao.

completely retarded statement.

Great win. Portland fans are feeling everything buy the good things right now, and that doesn’t look to be changing. Yao was very Impressive last night, I’ve sorta taken him on as a favorite player to root for this year, and feel fully vindicated, just ashame it has to come at the expense of my baby Blazers. Post game, Yao was classy and humble. If the Rockets beat Portland, I will root for them a championship.

http://janean.mybrute.com/

by Screen Name on Apr 19, 2009 10:41 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

please explain

How is that “completely retarded”?

1. Roy flopped.
2. It was off-the-ball and away from the play.
3. It was a cheap foul.

logic, ftw.

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

grunge -

you guys earned bragging rights, but in the first half, Roy put up 14 shots and only three of them were jumpers. Of the other 11 drives to the hoop, he only earned one trip to the line. I’d say the one Yao call you are moaning about was a makeup call (and, there was a makeup for that on the very next play down against Pryz).

Even the most passionate Rockets fans realize that they can’t count on scoring 100+ to win. The truth is that they are more likely to lose than win a game where they give up 90 (and I’m guessing that you would agree with that). The question is whether or not the Blazers were “cold” or whether or not the Houston D can keep holding Portland in the 80s. If they can, they are the better team. If they can’t, we’ve got a long series ahead.

Touche on game one. Now the Blazers are the underdog.

"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.

by Gekko Mojo on Apr 19, 2009 7:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Of the other 11 drives to the hoop, he only earned one trip to the line"

Yeah, but he made about 7 of them. That’s cuz we weren’t fouling him.

Time to galvanize

by jack_ on Apr 19, 2009 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not fouling him is an understatement

Early on the Rockets weren’t even guarding him inside 8 feet. Artest was getting destroyed with all the picks being set (not fouled, just disrupted his movement enough to get Roy free) and no one was picking him up.

Clearly this changed when Battier moved over to guard him, which is what I want the rest of the series

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 20, 2009 7:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

there was contact on every drive ...

… and the refs were calling that contact on the other end. the Rockets had three and-1’s in the first quarter alone. obviously, it didn’t cost us the game. however, there was an issue especially in the first quarter.

"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.

by Gekko Mojo on Apr 20, 2009 7:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's called playoff agression

The Rockets had it, the Blazers didn’t. It IS a contact sport, minimal stuff is let go. I really want a Blazers fan to rewatch that game and then realize that you are being revisionist/upset over nothing. In the first quarter the Rockets were taking it right at the Blazers. When Roy was going to the basket he was literally untouched on many of them. You are allowed to have contact in the league, you aren’t allowed to foul. The Rockets were doing the former, not the latter

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 20, 2009 7:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

disagree. I acknowledge that ...

… in quarters 2-4, the game was officiated equally bad on both sides. However, in the first quarter, it is hard to argue with the three “and-1’s” on Houston’s side and none on the Blazers side despite a balance of shots in the paint.

In the end, its not the point. The real question is whether or not the Blazers can regularly get their score in the high 90’s the rest of the series. If they can’t, Houston will have earned a shot at the Lakers. If they do, their odds of winning each of those games is higher than the Rocket’s based on a full season’s worth of data available.

"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.

by Gekko Mojo on Apr 20, 2009 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Getting to the paint

Is not in itself evidence of a foul.

by Xiane on Apr 20, 2009 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wrote that with a lot of other words earlier

But it’s just a moot point. I don’t agree and I do not understand in any way how Blazers fans thought they got a raw deal in that game

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 20, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blazers fans seemed bitter all game

did anyone else notice that they booed on the opening tip. and they also booed when roy was walking off the court after he got hurt. This may just be me, but arent you supposed to cheer when one of your players gets injured and then walks off?? (i know they were booing the refs cause they wanted a call even though there wasnt one to be made, it was incidental contact, but im still surprised they didnt cheer their star player off the court when he was hurting.)

Game 1 108-81 Rockets

Rockets lead series 1-0

by TexasHoosier on Apr 20, 2009 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

After losing a game because of an off-the-ball flop,

that just happened to be in the same spot both times, we know whats “retarded” and whats as dave said “logic”

Gimme some sack lunch

by SackLunch on Apr 19, 2009 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

let's see if we can go over what happened for you,

since you apparently weren’t watching the game.

Yao starts moving into the low post, where he makes incidental contact with Roy. Roy promptly falls down, and the refs call the offensive foul.

Either ya boy is the least coordinated, least sure footed, most fragile superstar ever, or he flopped.

by Only_A_Lad on Apr 19, 2009 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

flops happen

I think Scola pulled one in the game and got the call as well. Overall, I think Houston got the benefit of more questionable calls than Portland did, though in a game like this it didn’t matter at all of course.

I actually think Yao could have been given more fouls tonight. In the 2nd quarter, after he had 2 fouls, the refs let him get a way with a couple of them that could be called before finally hitting him with his third. It’s not that I think they should have been called, but they were calling the game very tight at the other end, so it seemed only logical.

The aggressive teams usually gets the whistles, and that was certainly the case tonight. All I ask for is that whether the refs call the game tight, or “let them play”, that they do it the same on both ends. In the early going, it didn’t seem like they were. After the first quarter it didn’t matter, as Houston was completely outplaying Portland in eveyr aspect of the game.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 19, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

if you want it that way

Let’s say the officials blow the whistle every time a Portland defender puts two hands in Yao’s back. They called Deke for doing this against Oden, but that call has NEVER been made against Yao. If they did call it straight up you suggest, the game would never end and Yao would be shooting 50 free throws a night.

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the refs did suck last night

I was at the game and felt the refs gave a HORRIBLE performance last night.. on both ends of the floor. Flops were offensive fouls, random points of incidental contact during charges were blocking fouls, and full on hacking and bashing were play ons..

I don’t know if the foul disparity was even or not, but that was a really poorly officiated game. I have no doubts Portland will come back and play harder, but I really hope that NBA officiating goes over the lack of anything like consistency in how fouls calls were given so that both teams can just play the damn game without having the guess at what dumb refs will do next.

Bring on Game 2!!!

"Slum dunk? You just go to the rim, and crush.. crush the ball in the rim."
- Nic Batum

by idoltime on Apr 19, 2009 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How come you are conveniently overlooking...

… the charge that Yao attempted to take later in the game. there is no way Brandon Roy, giving 100 lbs and a foot in height, moving at half speed is going to send Yao to his backside like Yao tried to make us believe. Flopping is not an issue.

"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.

by Gekko Mojo on Apr 19, 2009 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Flopping is not an issue"??

I dont know your context when you are saying this, but if youre saying flopping is not an issue in the nba, it is. All of these bad calls people are talking about are brought on by the flopping era. Refs have a much harder time these days seeing fouls because the athletes are bigger, faster, and stronger, and because players fake fouls. It makes real fouls harder to see and is ruining the game

Game 1 108-81 Rockets

Rockets lead series 1-0

by TexasHoosier on Apr 19, 2009 10:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Try a playoff series with Utah.

Then see if you still feel that way about flopping.

by Xiane on Apr 20, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the Blazer's know all about Utah.

they are in our division and they were a prime playoff foe in the better years of the franchise. Given all the other mistakes any team makes in a given game, its hard to see how flops every really impact the outcome.

"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.

by Gekko Mojo on Apr 20, 2009 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is a fallacious argument.

There is no way to know that mistakes, or basketball play within the rules, would determine the outcome of a game unless we get a game free of flopping. Flopping leads to points, possession changes and the unavailability of key players due to foul trouble, despite the reasons for the foul trouble being completely spurious. How can you say that has no effect on the outcome of the contest?

What about a tie game, with just a few seconds left. Let’s assume that no one has flopped at any point so far. Player A dribbles down the court, Player B moves somewhat near him and then BAM! flings himself to the ground, simulating the result of an offensive foul. The refs, being human, are fooled and call a foul on Player A, even though a video replay shows no contact between A & B. Player B gets free throws, makes them both and his team goes on to win.

Mistakes, or basketball playing WOULD have determined the outcome of our sample game, but for the actions of Player B. Now non-basketball actions are determining the end result. How can you possibly say that the results of flopping are statistically insignificant? This isn’t a far-fetched example – in our example basketball play, or mistakes, produced a tie game. The non-basketball element, flopping, in fact was instrumental in determining the outcome.

by Xiane on Apr 20, 2009 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

unless the Rockets never flop...

… then the incidents will even out over time. If they don’t flop and yet they know that doing so changes outcomes of games (your argument, not mine), then they are idiots for trying to adhere to some sense of nobility in exchange for losing basketball games. Which is it?

"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.

by Gekko Mojo on Apr 21, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

dont tell me

you’ve never sent a guy heavier than you onto the floor in a game of basketball… because we all have. its called shift in momentum when a moving object A collides with inert object B.
i’d also like to point out the blocking foul yao recieved when fernandez ran over him after yao had his feet set a foot outside the circle for at least a second. would you call that flopping too?

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure but...

I doubt I could knock Karl Malone down with anything short of a battle axe, even moving at top speed. And yet, a flea’s fart could topple him in an NBA game. A solid whack with a Q-tip would send him sprawling. What’s the physics for that?

by Xiane on Apr 19, 2009 11:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that

is a different story for another day

by hardgay on Apr 20, 2009 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If he sees it coming, of course you can't

Yao was already set. You could tell he didn’t try to do anything because he didn’t know Fernandez was going to jump into him. He though Fernandez was going up and then BAM right into his chest.

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 20, 2009 7:23 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

By the way,

I am willing to TRY to knock Karl Malone down, and out, with a battle axe. If someone will arrange this I promise to engage in a strenuous training regime beforehand.

As long as I am shielded from any repercussions- I’ve got a family to think of.

by Xiane on Apr 20, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Novak and Orange do a much, much better job then you…"

I agree

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 11:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You make good points

but you also have to realize that if some or all of those improvements happen, other things that went extremely well tonight won’t repeat themselves. It is very very rare for a “perfect storm” to happen with all players playing their absolute best in the same game.

Yeah, Landry and Battier could play better. You could keep us off the boards more. Yao could pick up less fouls, Wafer could hit some shots. But at the same time, it’s unlikely to expect Yao goes 15-15 combined again, or that Brooks can’t miss, or that Artest plays as controlled and smartly as he did tonight, or that Portland decides again to play 1 on 1 offense all night and nobody hits a shot.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 19, 2009 12:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think the point of the post was that the rockets will have a perfect game. I think the point was that regression on the rockets part alone is not going to make game 2 close, because regression on the part of ming and brooks will likely be met by improvements from wafer, battier and landry. I think the point of the past was in response to the idea that the rockets did everything perfectly, and game 2 will be closer because that won’t happen again. This post was merely pointing out that the rockets had a lot of players underperform, and were still able to play as well as they did.

by seanbergmanrules on Apr 19, 2009 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh

And Yao has had perfect games before… this isn’t “new”. He even did it earlier this year.

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rockets could play better.

BUT…so could Portland. We didn’t win 54 games by chance. And yes we DID suck bigtime last night.

My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.

by OCBlazerFan1 on Apr 19, 2009 12:28 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Blazers Fan Here

I’m glad you guys allow swearing over here at dream shake cause……

Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck.

I’m also a Ducks fan and always knew Brooks would be the man if he got the chance. He embraces a challenge like no one I’ve seen. And congrats to Yao for hitting ONE HUNDRED PERCENT. Too bad teacher doesn’t offer extra credit.

I’m not going to complain about refs because you guys are excellent at giving just enough contact and played almost the perfect game.

Again, thanks for allowing me to swear. BEdge can have kind of tight assholes about it sometimes, I’m glad yours are more loose.

PLEASE DON’T BAN ME FOR THAT. IT’S ALL IN GOOD FUN. NOTHING BUT RESPECT.

Life is hilarious.

by SolGoode on Apr 19, 2009 12:54 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You're defnitely right about BEdge being full of tight, sensitive assholes

I love how those guys have no idea how to even react from this serious ass-kicking. Welcome to the playoffs!

by goingforthecorner on Apr 19, 2009 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just don't understand

How everyone seems so shocked by it. We all knew Houston was the team we least wanted to meet in the playoffs. Don’t get me wrong, I think BEdge is a world-class sports blog with excellent depth in reporting, but did we really think it was going to be easy?

I honestly thought we could take anyone but Houston, right down to the Lakers, in a series.

If I’m a Houston fan though the only thing that makes me nervous is the fact it was a blowout, particularly when you have to play the same team again and you know they’ll be adjusting the defense.

Life is hilarious.

by SolGoode on Apr 19, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We feel for you

We had to play Utah two years in a row. Ugh.

Time to galvanize

by jack_ on Apr 20, 2009 1:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

uncalled for

try visiting Blazers Edge before making such a statement. It was a bad loss for Blazer fans, and it seems predictable with such a contingent that theres going to be alot of angst vented. However, nothing in the commentary on BE that I’ve read depicts anyone as tight, sensitive, or being a-holes.
Most of the commentary is genuine about the Rockets outplaying our team and outclassing them.
Look in the mirror.

I AM A PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS SUPPORTER.

by bow4meow on Apr 19, 2009 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We all know how awesome Blazer's Edge is

It’s one of the pinnacle’s of sports blogs

That said, there were WAY too many people whining about officiating

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 19, 2009 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd disagree ...

… not because they were not whining about officiating (of course we were, we are fans for the team that got crushed), but there can be no such thing as “too much whining” on a FAN blog!

"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.

by Gekko Mojo on Apr 20, 2009 7:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just want it to be rational

Whining is fine, when it’s justified, but it clearly wasn’t. I’ve talked to 4 bloggers of other big sites, none of them thought there was anything wrong with the officiating. And one of those guys is a freaking Jazz fan

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 20, 2009 7:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmmm, lets see now....

.

You’re defnitely right about BEdge being full of tight, sensitive assholes

So that would define this guys fanpost on Blazers Edge as ……….?

I AM A PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS SUPPORTER.

by bow4meow on Apr 21, 2009 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

we've all been reading BE

I read the first 300 or so post-game comments last night.

they all boil down to:

1. The Rockets will never play that good again (maybe, but also wishful thinking)
2. The refs screwed us. (no, get over yourselves and welcome to the playoffs)
3. I hate {player name} (be it Scola for being “dirty”, Yao for being too tall, Artest for being a “bully”, etc.)

that’s why some people are annoyed with the comments at BE. It’s a great blog and has many great (and overly-polite) commenters… but you’d all be better off just forgetting about Game 1 and focusing on the next 3-4 games.

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I did

but i got immediately labelled a “troll” for asking why the fans where chanting refs suck instead of wondering why the home team never showed up.

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

speaking of tight, sensitive assholes and the freedom to curse...

last nights game made me feel like the rockets had bent us over without lubrication, proceeded to rip our asses off of our backside, and then hand it to us and ask why we didn’t say thanks..

"Slum dunk? You just go to the rim, and crush.. crush the ball in the rim."
- Nic Batum

by idoltime on Apr 19, 2009 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rockets fans have loose assholes?

Sick

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 11:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can't expect us to play any better than Game 1

I’m guessing this post was a little sarcastic, as you’re nitpicking on our mistakes (Brent Barry only made one shot… OH NOES!).

Portland was shell-shocked, but I expect them to rebound and actually give us some competition. But first they have to wake up and realize playing Yao 1-on-1 isn’t going to work.

by goingforthecorner on Apr 19, 2009 1:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

the post is reactionary

It’s a reaction to everyone saying the Rockets will certainly regress in Game 2.

Everyone overlooks that the Rockets had a LOT of flaws in the first Game… with the way Portland played, Houston could have won by 40+.

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lets just say

that the things that they did better than normal far outweighed the things that they did worse than normal.

so, on the whole, they played a much better game than they normally do, Portland played a much worse game than they normally do. Put the two together and you have a blowout.

It’s much more likely the Rockets play worse than game one on the whole, than they play better than game one on the whole. That’s the point

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 19, 2009 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

how about

we just say that its even more likely the Blazers will play better in game two than in game one?

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

absolutely

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 19, 2009 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i can agree with that

The Blazers have really surprised me this season. I’m sure they’ll do better in game 2.

However, my personal prediction is still Rockets in 6. I had picked Portland to win last night. I figured they’d be fired up and ready to make a statement in the playoffs. Man was I wrong. I thought the Rockets would steal game 2 and the teams would just win at home the rest of the way to 6 games.

Now I still think it will go to 6 games, but with Portland winning Tuesday and the home teams winning out down the stretch.

Then Rockets out in 5 in the Semis vs. the Lakers (out in 7 on the off-chance the Jazz actually accomplish a miracle).

by jasonmicron on Apr 19, 2009 6:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Quite a lot of these reasons don’t add up if you think about it.

1 and 2: One of the reasons Yao took only nine shots was because he was so dominant. First, because he made everything he took, Portland had to overplay him, making it very difficult for him to get shots off. This isn’t a bad thing, of course, since overplaying him means needing to underplay others, thus freeing them up. In fact, I think that if Yao played a worse game, he wouldn’t have been covered so tightly and he would’ve been able to get more looks and thus more shot attempts. Second, yes, he was in foul trouble, but since the game was such a blowout, he didn’t even need to play in the fourth quarter. Yao having to play 36 minutes would mean that the game wasn’t a blowout, and as such would be worse than Yao only needing to play 24 minutes.

7. If it’s a close game, that would mean Houston didn’t play as well, either on the offensive end or on the defensive end), as they did in this game.

8: Portland is the best offensive rebounding team in the NBA by a sizable margin, and they shot poorly yesterday. Since them shooting poorly is is what you want, it’s going to be difficult to prevent them from getting offensive rebounds.

10: Portland is the second-slowest team in the NBA in terms of pace, slow and patient. The combination of such a slow pace and their pretty good care with the ball (eighth in the league in fewest turnovers adjusted for pace) means that you’re not going to make able to force many turnovers. On the other hand, Houston did indeed commit an awful lot of turnovers yesterday considering the pace, and that certainly can be improved upon.

by Perfundle on Apr 19, 2009 1:22 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

yes, but

No defense can keep Yao from shooting more than 9 times. It’s not possible. The only one who can stop Yao is Yao himself.

I expect Portland to play better (particularly their bench), hence the expectation of a closer game. That doesn’t mean the Rockets will play “worse”.

For as good as Portland is on the offensive glass, Houston is in the top 3 in defensive rebounding. They just didn’t show it as much last night… not that they needed to.

and Portland can play as slow as they want, the Rockets still need to force turnovers.

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Technically, no defense can keep Yao from shooting more than 9 times. But if a defense decided to surround him with 5 defenders, what do you think is the better option, Yao forcing up a shot, or passing to one of his four open teammates? You play the percentages, and from what I’ve read of the game so far, that’s exactly what happened in the third quarter (not four-on-one guarding but passing out of double teams). Also, someone else who can stop Yao is his coach, by pulling him out for most of the second half because it was such a blowout.

I’m going to say right now that Houston won’t be able to play as well as they did in this game. An efficiency of 1.281 PPP is rather hard to improve upon.

You say that the Rockets still need to force turnovers, but you also hope that Portland gets sloppy on offense, which isn’t really about forcing turnovers. Besides, trying to force a lot of turnovers isn’t necessarily smart. It means going for steals, jumping the passing lanes, etc; in other words, gambling on defense. It can lead to turnovers, but it can also lead to blown assignments. There’s nothing wrong with Houston’s mode of defense, which involves more fundamental positioning, proper defensive posture, and a minimum of fouling (least number of fouls per game in the NBA); it all adds up to being the fourth best defense in the NBA, even though they force the third-least turnovers.

by Perfundle on Apr 19, 2009 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Damn son

You know your stuff…
On a side note, does anyone else here wonder if Adelman has even tried to counter Yao-fronting over the past half season? I mean fronting Yao and doubling him from the back SHOULD leave someone open. How the rockets never seem to find that person confuses me. Any thoughts appreciated.

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know Portland is efficient, but

A young team in the playoffs is going to be prone to turnovers. Rockets need to take advantage when the opportunity presents itself.

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 5:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Quick Question

why the hell is our game the only game 2 on nba tv. does anyone even pay for nba tv?!

53-28 T-3rd in West

by Optical Delusion on Apr 19, 2009 1:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

better than last year

i believe a lot more of our games were on nba tv. anyways there should be links online, or if youre in houston, should be on upn/my20.

by fiddycent on Apr 19, 2009 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Houston

every game in Houston will be broadcast on KTXH (Comcast 4 or 304… all in HDTV)

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wait - channel 20 has HD???

KTXH – Channel 20, 20vision, whatever.

Since when did they get HD?

I was watching Saturday’s game on ESPN and it wasn’t until late in the 4th I saw Bill at the announcer desk and realized I could have been listening to him (and pretending to hear witty rebuttals from Calvin Murphy like I like to do in my head). It’s probably a good thing though, every time I hear Bill say something like “Yao is having a perfect game” then Yao would have probably started shooting bricks.

Any way – good job on that Comcast. I have U-Verse and unfortunately I don’t think we get KTXH in HD. :-\

by jasonmicron on Apr 19, 2009 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have it on HDTV

Yeah, Channel 20 is HDTV on Comcast 304. For realz.

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 9:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

I think the final two games last season were on nbatv. major pain in the ass.

Find a sports bar to watch the game.

by Only_A_Lad on Apr 19, 2009 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, Im in Arizona so that’s what im gonna do

by Optical Delusion on Apr 19, 2009 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

NBA TV

Now that’s some R E S P E C T !

by Xiane on Apr 19, 2009 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not really

it’s where the NBA shoves the games that ABC/ESPN won’t buy.

by Only_A_Lad on Apr 19, 2009 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As a rockets fan

I seriously wonder if the Referee’s in the league realize that you don’t call a 330 pound man the same way you call 250 pound centers. It always bothered me that guards always got away with that extra step on drives, but when Yao does that in the post – automatic travel. Then the refs feel bad about calling offensive fouls on him because his defender is playing him with 2 hands (hello? automatic foul?) and lets Yao get away with hipchecking opposing guards, which then prompts people to think that Yao gets away with fouling. I would much rather the refs not try to play the guilt/remorse game and just call it consistently. Like maybe the reason Yao is hitting 8 jumpers in a row isn’t because he’s cheating… maybe he just got better? And if he fouls someone on D, just call it, it does nobody any favors by letting him get away with those. That said, I do respect the jobs referees have done this past year (excluding Finleys 3pointer 5 seconds after the shotclock expired) at calling rockets games.

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 4:14 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

THANK YOU!!!

I wanted to beat the hell out of the refs last night. It HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LOSING THAT GAME OR EVEN THE BLAZERS!!!!!

I get so damn pissed when refs do such a shitty job that they have to keep throwing make up calls out there. I hate it. I’m a basketball fan first and foremost.. the Blazers are my team, but I want to see good basketball and refs need to step it up for the damn playoffs. I know this would have been a 20+ victory no matter what but the refs did suck (for both of us!!) and they deserved every bit of the ‘refs suck’ chant that they got.

If you can’t call the game consistently for all players, all teams, and all points in the game. then just stop calling fouls and let the players bash each other’s heads in. I don’t pay to watch refs make shit up and get lost out there.. I pay to watch basketball players play goddamn basketball!!!

"Slum dunk? You just go to the rim, and crush.. crush the ball in the rim."
- Nic Batum

by idoltime on Apr 19, 2009 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

Make up calls should be illegal.

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In defense of the Blazer's fans whining about the refs...

I think the other thing that has to be realized is that a lot of fans (us included) that have spent the whole season watching a legitimately good team refuse to admit that their team just didn’t show up for the most important game of the year.

Remember us after every close playoff loss of the last two years? Granted, the Jazz are a bunch of flopping bitches and deserved what they got this year, but I remember being like ‘if this call went our way, or the refs just gave us a damn break we could have won that series’. Given some posterity, I realize EVERYTHING would have to have gone right for us to take it (health, breaks from refs, taking Jazz fans out early, etc.)

I think the guys over at Blazers Edge are just fans of a good basketball team that got inexplicably outplayed (I mean, come on, WE weren’t expecting a blow out), and they’re trying to justify it. We’d be doing the same thing. Thats what good fans do.

by flipasta on Apr 19, 2009 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I start to see where BE fans are coming from...

but as it has been pointed out many times both here and in BE, this game wasn’t close enough to be dictated by any one or several calls. I admit the rockets got away with contact on several occasions, but one could point out some flops (or flop attempt by Joel) for the other side. I think when it comes down to it, the Blazers team weren’t focused on this game. They were still in euphoria from just being in the postseason. There was some indication of this after the last loss to the rockets this season (same day blazers clinched playoffs), Roy said something along the lines of “this loss doesn’t matter, because I’m happy we’re in the playoffs”.
If it were the Rockets that got blown out, I would probably whine about the refs, but I would also be pissed at my team that didn’t show up. Well for tuesday i full expect to see the 54-win team that beat the Lakers during the regular season, and I hope it will be a close match regardless of the outcome.

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea...

the refs shouldn’t have called the game the way they did, I’m glad there is some agreement there. it is completely likely that some early bad calls threw the Blazers out of sync. From that point of view.. i really understand the temptation to blame the refs. If it wasn’t for the calls, maybe the momentum would have gone a different way. Maybe it would have been an entirely different game..

But people who watch playoff basketball know that every team of every era (except jordan’s bull who i will never admit were treated fairly) will hit games and even a whole series where they are not going to get calls they think they should get. PLAY THROUGH THEM!!! DO NOT LET THE REFS DICTATE THE GAME!! GET UP AND PLAY!!!

And.. to my boy’s credit.. despite some on the court complaining (something EVERY nba player has to do at some point so please don’t give me the roy is a whiner line anymore), at least no one was whining after the game. They manned up, accepted responsibility, and it will be for game 2 to show whether it will make a difference.

"Slum dunk? You just go to the rim, and crush.. crush the ball in the rim."
- Nic Batum

by idoltime on Apr 19, 2009 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've read some interviews etc.

No one on Portland was whining or making excuses. Roy was heading into Kobe/Duncan territory in the game though, and that’s not a good place for a young star to be. He hasn’t earned the special face yet.

by Xiane on Apr 19, 2009 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

perhaps

I agree that Roy was not whining, merely frustrated that he was one of the few Blazers that were mentally prepared for this game. However I politely disagree that the early calls changed how the Blazers played. While it is true that the playoffs are often a much more physical game compared to the regular season, i’m sure the Blazers have been at the receiving end of tough, physical D w/ no calls during the regular season as well. This may just be my bias, but it looked like Roy was aiming more to get the foul as opposed to just scoring. The refs seemed to “let em play” and the rockets took advantage of it before the blazers did.

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that could be

I think it was both. The Blazers are a multiheaded beast. I think that Roy came out with the mindset to be aggressive. He is our superstar in the making, but he maybe skidded closer to the line of trying to make fouls happen than trying to make plays happen. I’ll buy that.

But I think some of the other Blazers came out like normal thinking that they had gotten used to tough basketball and then were hit faster and harder than they expected. I think we saw an extension of the road woes that the players not named Roy (or usually Aldridge) have been facing most of the season. The team tried to listen to good advice about not settling for jumpers early but between not expecting the types of non-calls that they were getting being unable to match the intensity or physicality.. and well.. yea.. we all saw the game.

Your last point is dead on and it’s why I think Oden started having one of his better showings in awhile. His main problem was related to fouls and he suddenly realized that he could possibly get away with a few more things. Good for him realizing it. I hope LMA gets it by game 2 because that is the guy we need.

"Slum dunk? You just go to the rim, and crush.. crush the ball in the rim."
- Nic Batum

by idoltime on Apr 19, 2009 7:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh man

I’m hoping LMA doesn’t turn it on because Scola seems to struggle defending sweetshooting big men who can fade. But yes I do believe that the blowout was not an accurate indication of the talent levels of both teams, and the stars were pretty much aligned for it to have been such a lopsided game. If Oden can come off the bench and continue to dominate Deke, I’d say the rockets will have no answer to that while Yao is on the bench.

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

like ive said on BEdge

yao will play more in a non blowout, which means less time for deke, which means we have no idea how oden would play in a closer game going up against yao more than deke.

Also, why does everyone think LMA just had an off game? Couldnt it partly have been scola playing good defense?? And if LMA does get it going, Hayes will play more because he has had success defending LMA in the past.

Game 1 108-81 Rockets

Rockets lead series 1-0

by TexasHoosier on Apr 20, 2009 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah.

I honestly don’t know what I would be saying in their shoes.

The best thing, in my opinion, would be to say “Wow. That sucked. Forget it, and get them next time.”

Here’s the problem. The BE people seem to be very analytical though (which I am mostly on board with) but it can lead to some sort of error feedback loop.

“The stats say this CAN’T happen.”
“But it DID happen.”
“Does not compute!”

And smoke starts pouring out of their ears. Better to let out a few expletives, keep your chin up and go get a nice microbrew or glass of pinot noir.

by Xiane on Apr 19, 2009 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We're talkin' Portland here.

Microbrew.
Pinot Noir.
And tons of a certain Canadian export.

by Xiane on Apr 19, 2009 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha touche

i actually wouldnt mind living up there, i hear its beautiful and the people are pretty cool. i dont think it has the cultural diversity we got down here though.

by flipasta on Apr 19, 2009 5:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's portland

Great beautiful place to live with decent people who happen to be (on average) more white than most major cities..

not that ethnic diversity is the only measure of cultural diversity, but it does affect you when you move here from socal

"Slum dunk? You just go to the rim, and crush.. crush the ball in the rim."
- Nic Batum

by idoltime on Apr 19, 2009 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not more white ...

… but definitely less black & Latino. Portland has a heavy influx of Asian immigrants that contribute to its definition of diversity. White is Minnesota.

"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.

by Gekko Mojo on Apr 20, 2009 8:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

good point

Living in San Diego for most of my life, it really feels like it is WHITE. That is.. in San Diego, white is a minority subpopulation in the majority of neighborhoods. Asian, Latino, and A-A are all heavily represented throughout the city.

But visiting Minnesota (and Montana or even non-cities in Washington, Portland, Idaho) made me feel better about the diversity of Portland than I had when I first moved up.

"Slum dunk? You just go to the rim, and crush.. crush the ball in the rim."
- Nic Batum

by idoltime on Apr 20, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought it was

Pinot Grigio. I’m not much of a wine connoisseur though.

1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21... I know...

by FibonacciSequence on Apr 20, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

nope

read the archives. I blamed McGrady for games 1 and 2 last year.

I even called him an Initech Employee.

I never once blamed the refs.

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 5:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok so we didn’t steal homecourt but rather took it by force. Now it’s time to stay humble and knock down the blazers in game 2 with dominance.

by o_oholycrap on Apr 19, 2009 5:28 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

yea

what we do NOT want to happen in game 2 is to be served a portion of our own humble pie

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Flawed logic
  1. Yao didn’t play extended minutes or shoot a lot because Yao dominated in the time he got. While he will do more damage with more time, that will also indicate a much closer game and many less opportunities for others, not simply additional points for the Rockets. Can’t account for this improvement in a vacuum.
  2. While various Rockets may have played below average, the Blazers would also dominate using this reasoning. Every Blazer except for Roy (very inefficient) and Oden (garbage time) struggled. Are they all expected to do better too? There’s no way to tell for either team. Any player can heat up or go cold next game due to changes or luck.
  3. A low turnover rate and a high offensive rebound rate are two trademarks of the Blazers this season. Therefore, it’s unreasonable to expect that the Rockets will be able to easily disrupt the Blazers in game 2. That would be like us saying: “The Rockets played good defense. What if we don’t allow them to do that next game?”

The bottomline is, it’s not logical to argue this way because your points are all theoretical and can apply in reverse as well. I’m not saying they will. With all the game adjustments, new psychology, and random chance, game 2 is going to be completely different, regardless of which team wins. This sort of observation about the previous game helps little in prediction.

by amitp06 on Apr 19, 2009 7:30 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

dude... chill

This is a blog. It’s all theory. I don’t have a crystal ball or a time machine.

I merely pointed out areas the Rockets can actually improve. Simply to point out that it was NOT a perfect game. The logic is not “flawed”… you simply are applying it wrong. Yes, the Blazers will play better. Yes, Yao will miss a shot at some point. Yes, the Blazers are efficient on offense (but not that efficient). Calm down. There are 5 more games to go before your season is over.

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not trying to be heated at all

I was just pointing out how one of these posts can be done for any game from either perspective.. I just don’t see the point of it. If someone was stupid enough to honestly think the Rockets played a truly “perfect” game, and you wrote this whole post to correct them, then sorry I wasted my time. You’re obviously correct that the Rockets had areas for improvement just like every other team/game in the history of sports.
It just sounded like you were implying that they will improve using this reasoning, which IS flawed logic. Yes, blogs are all theoretical, but it should be based on analysis of the play, not “what ifs” from the previous games. Otherwise, we get a post that basically boils down to “If we make more of our shots, get to play our good players more, and disrupt the other team better, we will improve next game.” You’re sure of Rockets in 6 eh? Reasonable prediction.. I have Blazers in 7. Looking forward to Tuesday.. hopefully the Blazers can catch a little momentum this time and have the Rose Garden explode.

by amitp06 on Apr 19, 2009 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

heat it up bubba sparxxx!

I believe this article is merely to debunk the belief over in BE that “there is NO way the rockets can play this well again in game 2”. I repeat, this is not a declaration that Yao will go 12-12 in game 2, or ABZ will put up 30 next time. I think grungedave is saying that we could likely improve in other parts of the game (less TOs, more bench points) for Tues. and play just as well even if we’re not shooting 60% from the field. I don’t see how any of this should be infuriating for the average blazer fan, because nowhere in this post does it say that the Blazers will play worse or anything along those lines…

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 11:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't see a lot of that at BE

I feel like you guys get more of the Blazer trolls here, giving you a worse impression of what we think. After all, the ones who like to trash talk are more inclined to come (although that includes some good posters too). Anyway, there was nothing infuriating, I was just pointing out what I thought was wrong with the article. Many people do the same with our Dave at BE.

by amitp06 on Apr 20, 2009 12:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well i did

Sorry I forgot to press prnt scrn for you. But the point in this article is basically that 2 of our bench guys (landry and wafer) and battier, all of whom regularly contribute offensively, basically did nothing on offense in game one. Also Yao took half the game off. It doesn’t mean those 3 will pour in 30 in game 2 or that Yao will play 48 minutes, its just an observation of where the Rockets will improve on in game 2. I really don’t think its even up for debate.

by hardgay on Apr 20, 2009 1:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think there are aspects of the game

that the Rockets will improve on (Battier’s performance, bench scoring, so on) and things that may not be as great as they were in game 1 (Yao’s perfect shooting, Brooks scoring at will). Before I get hated on, just know that my whole point is that I think the Rockets will bring the same kind of heat in game 2, even if the heat sources are not the same as in game 1. What really matters most is if Portland makes their adjustments and decides to come ready to play this time around. My hope is for a competitive game first, and if that happens, then for the Blazers to make the plays necessary to win the game. The latter won’t happen without the former though, no doubt about it.

And for the record, I didn’t have a problem with the officiating in game 1. Refs rarely decide the outcome of a game (unless Tim Donaghy is involved) and even then usually only in the waning seconds, such as Finley’s after-the-buzzer three pointer.

1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21... I know...

by FibonacciSequence on Apr 20, 2009 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Finley...

Omfg i still can’t get over that one. Its just not right. I remember during the rockets/mavs series a while ago Finley had a late game steal while “standing out of bounds”. Mavs won.

by hardgay on Apr 20, 2009 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I saw it repeatedly, just like I saw that it was all on the officials

And even when someone said “The officials didn’t lose that game for us” it was followed by “But it changed how we played and could have hurt us and made us lose”

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 20, 2009 7:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not fair to judge the fanbase through gameday threads or individual fans

Many stupid things are said in the heat of the moment, especially on BE because of the sheer volume of comments. Also, people who put up reactionary fanposts blaming the game on officiating were refuted by the more reasonable majority. Others even went further and set the record straight. The point is, we both know there will be many more complaints from the losing team (I even saw a couple Rockets fans here complain after the WIN), but that doesn’t mean anything. It’s just the nature of being a fan.

by amitp06 on Apr 20, 2009 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How was I "judging the fanbase"?

I have stated repeatedly that I think Portland fans are great.

But it’s silly for y’all to act like a large group of you aren’t incorrectly whining about the officials or saying that the Rockets can’t play that well

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 21, 2009 6:23 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I linked to it

Richard Justice of the Chronicle said the Rockets played “perfect”
BE commenters have been saying for a day now that the Rockets can’t possibly play better

this was a response to that. Was I that vague in my intro?

by grungedave on Apr 20, 2009 12:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I noticed the link

I didn’t read the article, but I assumed any real sportswriter wouldn’t mean that literally and was just exaggerating. It was an impressive performance, but the BE commenters and writers who claimed that are flat out wrong. Either they weren’t being literal or they need to watch more basketball.. if you felt there were enough people who honestly believed the Rockets couldn’t play as well or better, fair enough. That’s a valid reason, but many (maybe this only applies from an outside perspective?) will see the implication that the Rockets will only do better next game. Different views I guess.

by amitp06 on Apr 20, 2009 12:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure even Rockets fans

think Justice is a legit writer.

by hardgay on Apr 20, 2009 1:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is a very good writer

He’s one of the best at baseball in the world. Basketball is third down his list of knowledge and it’s clearly not his focus. My only problem with him is that he will never admit that he was wrong. He’ll write an article and then the next week write the exact opposite of that article after proven wrong, but I’ve never once seen him say he was incorrect or that he had changed his mind in print.

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 20, 2009 7:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, you're reading and reacting to him.

For a newspaper guy that’s “Mission Accomplished”.

by Xiane on Apr 20, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's just so unnecessary

He would get the same response, except I’d go out of my way to read him so in all actuality I’d read more

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 20, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, game 2 will be different.

But there is nothing wrong with noting some things to improve upon.

The Dream Shake - Where Brooks > Alston happens.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak

by Tom Martin on Apr 19, 2009 10:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What is that thing in Przybilla's shorts next to Yao's knee

It’s obviously not that.

"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak

by Tom Martin on Apr 19, 2009 9:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

is that a blocking foul?

or are you just happy to see me?

by Only_A_Lad on Apr 19, 2009 10:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you are...

so looking in all the wrong places…

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Flashlight

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

how about cell phone?

i mean, why not? right?

The Dream Shake - Where Brooks > Alston happens.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak

by Tom Martin on Apr 20, 2009 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No pockets?

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 20, 2009 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's gonna tweet to his fan base after every Yao score.

Sample transcript:

“Dear Mom and Blazer’s Edge – Yao is really tall. I forgot that.”
“Dear Mom, and Blazer’s Edge – Yao schooled me AGAIN. Cheers – JoelyP”
“Dear Mom and Blazer’s Edge – This is getting ridiculous.”
“Dear Mom – Did that “Guard Yao 1 on 1 stuff make the media? I hope not. Joel.”
“Dear Mom – Ok this is just funny. Like, dude hasn’t missed. At all.”
“Mom? Did you unsubscribe too?”

by Xiane on Apr 20, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe a wallet?

that would explain how he gets away with flop attempts.

by hardgay on Apr 20, 2009 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Poor Portland

I can’t believe poor officiating, even for just the first 5 minutes, can throw your players off so much.

If that is true what I have read over and over in this thread, then we will feed scola the ball and let him flop away. After 5 minutes you will be so frustrated that we can throw in Barry and the chuckwagon as our main offense and still win.

PS. I told you Blazers the other day that Yao would play great because you guard him with big men. Now you know why.

by texasag on Apr 20, 2009 9:01 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

it's simple

The Portland fans simply can’t wrap their head around the fact that they might actually be facing a superior team…. so stuff like the refs, and flopping and all sorts of extraneous excuses have permeated their thought process. Because there is no way the reason is simply “the Blazers are overmatched”.

Yes, I know it is early in the series, but the Rockets are now 0.6 seconds away from being up 4-0 on the Blazers this year… that’s not a coincidence (sample sizes be damned).

by grungedave on Apr 20, 2009 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yep

it’s all about matchups in the playoffs. I really like Portland to beat any team in the West other than LA and Houston. LA because, well, they are good. Houston not because they are necessarily a better overall team than Portland is, but because the matchups skew heavily in Houston’s favor.

I went into the last night of the season hoping for Houston to win, because I knew it was unlikely Houston and San Antonio would both lose AND Portland would win. When Dallas came back to beat Houston, I was just begging the CP3s to hold on to that lead in SA so we would have a shot to actually play the stinking Hornets in round 1 – what a dream matchup. But no, James Posey forgets how to make free throws, New Orleans forgets to how to defend a 3 point shot, and next thing you know we are playing Houston. talk about going for a high to a low in about 10 seconds.

That said, I called this series a tossup before it started and I think that’s a fair assessment. Houston is not vastly superior to Portland, but they do have strengths and weaknesses that line up very favorably with our strengths and weaknesses, and for this year, they own some intangibles too. Portland is capable of winning the series against them, but they would have to do a lot of things well, and hope Houston does a few things poorly. Clearly NONE of that happened in game one.

Game two is now a must win for Portland. Lose it, and they will be lucky to avoid a sweep. Win, and we are likely heading to at least 6 games.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 20, 2009 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rockets will fall to Earth in Game 2

Reasons to believe the Rockets can play even better in Game 2:

1 – Earlier in the day Saturday Yao had to deal with the removal of a pesky eyelash from his left eyeball
2 – Aaron Brooks’ coffee was only luke warm Saturday morning
3 – Rick Adelman’s internet connection was slow the night before

Come on Houston!! Your team just beat down the Portland Trailblazers by nearly 30 points in a thorough wire-to-wire asskicking before a deafening crowd in hostile territory…And you still think you can play better? And you are accusing Portland fans of wishful thinking when we suggest that perhaps you overachieved a bit?

Let’s be honest. Based on the way the Rockets played Saturday night any reasonable observer could conclude that they are the best basketball team ever assembled. That they are as dominant a force as ever stepped on the hardwood. And that they will likely sweep their way through every series on their way to the Championship.

On the flip side, the same observer could conclude that the Trailblazers will never win another game and that they do not deserve to be on the same floor as the Rockets.

However, based on my experience (and yours too if you are honest), the NBA playoff winds can shift on a moment’s notice turning what appeared to be a juggernaut into a demoralized litter of whipped puppies in a heartbeat. And vice versa.

Only time will tell if that will happen in this series but one thing is for sure. Yao Ming will miss a field goal attempt or two; Aaron Brooks will prove himself to be Aaron Brooks; Someone other than Brandon Roy will become more than the shadow of himself that made an appearance Saturday night…and this will become a competitive series.

To expect your team to improve upon that performance is not fair — or reasonable. If they can even approach that level of play again during this series I would be extremely surprised. So Houston fan, enjoy the victory your team earned Saturday night. Indeed, bask in it’s glorious warmth. Because starting Tuesday, your team will go back to being the Houston Rockets and my team will once again become THE PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS. And we will grind this thing out in 6 or 7 games.

(Notice, I did not mention the refs even once. They helped set the tone of this game in favor of Houston, but they were not the reason Houston kicked our asses.)

by mlsinpdx on Apr 20, 2009 3:19 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You are missing the point that has been explained in the comments here over and over

What he is saying is that while the Rockets may come down to earth in the areas you mentioned, they had plenty of things to improve on in other areas. So the entire point is that it’s not on the Rockets to “Fall to Earth” it’s on the Blazers to not play so poorly.

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 20, 2009 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it's actually both

The Rockets played a much much better game than they would on average.
the Blazers played a much much worse game than they woudl on average.
Those two facts combined equal a 30 point road blowout.

Going forward:
It is highly unlikely the Rockets will play that well overall again this series. yes, certain parts of their game may improve, but will be more than offset by a “fall to Earth” in other areas.
It is also highly unlikely the Blazers will play that poorly again this series. I cannot think of a SINGLE thing they did better than their average in that game. Not one. It is completely improbable that that will occur again.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 20, 2009 10:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously? How are y'all not getting the point of this post still?

We freaking KNOW that. We’ve said it ourselves.

The POINT is that it is on the Blazers to playbetter, and not the Rockets to play worse. There are numerous items that the Rockets CAN/WILL improve on and a few that they WILL/SHOULD fall back on.

Oden played much better than average. There you go, there’s one

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 21, 2009 6:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the post said that the Rockets can play better in game two

It didn’t say “they can play better in certain areas but not as well overall”. THAT is the counterpoint I’m making here.

I agree with you, it is absolutely most definately on the Blazers to play much much better. If they do that, they can also be almost guaranteed that the Rockets will not play as well as they did in game one. Those two things combined should make game two competitive.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 21, 2009 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Omg...

How many times will we here this “the refs set the tone in favor of houston” crap. Get this straight… David Stern probably can’t even point out where Houston is on the map (but he does know where cleveland and LA are). There’s no rational explanation as to why the referees would “favor” houston at ALL, especially with stern in the audience. They called it exACTLY as they always do in the playoffs… and while the Rockets got into playoff gear, somebody on the Blazers staff forgot to do their homework and the team as a whole came out flat. Ever wonder why Mcmillan didn’t mention it either postgame?

by hardgay on Apr 20, 2009 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the first 6 minutes

Portland was getting called for tick tack stuff. Houston was allowed to play more physical. But since Portland didn’t come to play, and quickly panicked and lost themselves, none of this mattered. But it did happen.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 20, 2009 10:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are wrong

There were not “tick tack stuff” called on the Trailblazers. You are being bitter. There is another game tonight, I hope you come back with this same argument tomorrow

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 21, 2009 6:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

if I had the game on DVR still, I could point you to a couple of the tick tack calls. Like I said, it didn’t matter at all, it certainly had NOTHING to do with the outcome of the game. But I watched the game twice. It was there.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 21, 2009 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But Adelman's connection WAS slow!

He didn’t notice though, because he was catching trout in his teeth.

by Xiane on Apr 20, 2009 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anyone remember the last time Yao went 9/9 from the field?

by brianfbb on Apr 21, 2009 4:04 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

yeah

Earlier this year… in February I think.

by grungedave on Apr 21, 2009 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Perfect from field this year: 2 for 12 agasint Miami January 17
He also went 13 of 15 against Cleveland on Feb 26.
I both those games he missed free throws however.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 21, 2009 1:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

12 for 12 that is

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 21, 2009 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Dream Shake: Dedicated to all things Houston Rockets. Past, present and future. Expect criticism, commentary and shameless promotions to get Robert Horry into the Hall of Fame.
Start posting about the Rockets »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
T-mac acting up again?
Small
End of the Road for Rockets and TMac?
Small
Houston B.A.L.L. Squad : on the rise
Small
What ever happened to Francis?
Small
Iverson dilemma continues: When will it end?
Rox_small
Battier vs Gay? Check this out
Scan1_small
NBA Power Rankings: Week #4
340x_small
My New Rockets Blog
Akeem_olajuwon_small
Pops Mensah-Bonsu cut!
Small
Mutombo joins NBA as ambassador

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBN Hoops Twitter


Daryl Morey Wannabes

Kurt-avatar_small grungedave

Img_4429_small UofTOrange

Img_0142_small Tom Martin