Rockets/Lakers - one team can play better in Game 2. And I'm not talking about the Lakers.
The mainstream NBA media frustrates me. A lot.
If you watched the game and (like me) weren't smart enough to put it on "mute" you'd have heard 48 minutes of Doug Collins and the other guy talking about how the Rockets are playing "the perfect game, but the Lakers are only trailing by 3" blah blah blah. In actuality, the Rockets were far from perfect, and the Lakers were not nearly as bad as Phil Jackson would want you to think.
To wit:
The Rockets committed 16 turnovers. Most of them of the "careless pass" variety. To borrow from the tennis lexicography, these were "unforced" turnovers. Though Kyle Lowry starting a fast break in the backcourt, running into Ariza and giving the ball back was a nice one, too. Granted, the Rockets have had problems with turnovers all year, so this is neither new nor surprising. But it's naive to think the Rockets cannot find a way to take care of the ball in Game 2 (and at home in Games 3 and 4). Turnovers - like drugs - are bad, Von. Mmmkay?

In contrast, the Lakers committed 13 turnovers themselves. Not that Los Angeles is happy with that number, but a lot of those turnovers were because the Lakers tried to force the action and the Rockets would not let them into the painted area. There's good reason to believe that the Lakers might improve on this number, but not by a very large margin. The Rockets are not going to change to a matador defense anytime soon.
Also, here's some shooting stats for the Rockets: Battier 1-5 (0-4 from deep), Scola 4-9 (0-0), Von Wafer 0-2 (0-0), Brent Barry 1-3 (1-3), Even Yao Ming's 9-17 effort was not all that fantastic and he missed a handful of easy hook shots or layups at the rim. Further, the Rockets overall made all of 5 three pointers. In 18 attempts. For the regular season, the Rockets averaged over 8 made threes in just over 20 attempts a game. Translation? The Rockets can do better -- much better -- shooting the ball. L.A. is not noted for its defense. There is ample room for improvement by the Rockets here.
Once again, we cannot ignore the Lakers' shooting woes. I do not expect L.A. to go 2-18 from behind the line again. However, if Derek Fisher and Trevor Ariza are deemed to be their primary long-distance weapons, that number really isn't much of an anomaly. Fisher has lost a step and Ariza is simply not as good as he looked in the Utah series (where he made more than 50% from deep).
Further, Kobe shot 14-31. This should not be a surprise. The Rockets WANT Kobe to be a shooter and not a distributor. If Kobe focuses on getting his, then Odom gets bored, Gasol gets pouty and Bynum gets into foul trouble. This is what Shane Battier and the Rockets will call a recipe for success. It's a two-step process. (1) Make Kobe shoot the ball (no layups), and (2) Keep a hand in his face. Like this:

Meanwhile, the Rockets bench has got to contribute a bit more. Von Wafer was non-existent. Now that he realizes the Lakers (and Vujacic) are not going to let him get a 10 foot headstart like Portland did... he can adjust. And he will. Von will be a factor at some point.
Kyle Lowry, Carl Landry and Chuck Hayes played huge on defense. Lowry and Landry can be a bit more consistent on offense though. Just another area for improvement. When Landry played the Lakers in January, he was a dunking machine who went for 20+. I know he's still not 100%, but he's playing tentative. If he's able to trust his leg and play above the rim again, the Rockets immediately can counter whatever Lamar Odom can do.
Finally... and most importantly... the Lakers procured an astounding 12 offensive rebounds last night. Twelve! Most of them because the Rockets front-line got lazy and did not box out. LaMarcus Aldridge is not in this series, gang. Gasol, Odom and Bynum are going to crash the class. You absolutely must box out. And yes, I am looking at you Yao. You, too, Luis Scola. No freelancing anymore. Put a body on a man. I do not want to see the Rockets get out-rebounded in this series again. There's no reason the Rockets can't win the rebounding battle each game.
All that said, the Lakers are going to play much, much better on Wednesday. Be ready for the emotional run. Once that subsides (and it will as the Laker trademark is "lethargy" after building a lead), attack. And then attack some more. At no point should Aaron Brooks think that anyone on the Laker roster can stay in front of him or stop him from going to the basket and wreaking havoc with the Laker defense.
(I know there is one person who I have intentionally not called out. That would be Ron Artest. Ummm, Crazy Pills... you just keep doin' your thing. No need for you to solicit any suggestions from the peanut gallery. Love the new 'do, btw.)
0 recs |
79 comments
|
Comments
ouch
an LMA diss.
Nevertheless, well played game. Go rockets!
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
by Arby on May 5, 2009 1:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Aldridge is actually a very good offensive rebounder
Its his defensive rebounding that stinks.
by jksnake99 on May 5, 2009 1:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
First two comments from Blazer fans
man, that’s awesome. Go Rockets…. for now.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
by hobobob on May 5, 2009 5:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right now everything is fuzzy
And only hindsight will give me the clarity I seek.
Is Game 1 this series like Game 3 for the Lakers, when the Jazz beat the Lakers, and everyone said it was because the Jazz played great and the Lakers played horribly. Jazz fans took that as a slight and pointed to all the ways their players could have played better, but looking back, the “it’s not you, it’s me” theory for the Lakers looks like it wasn’t far from the truth.
So I’ll wait and see how this plays out.
by Gils_Keloids on May 5, 2009 1:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Game 3, at home, down 2.....
Compared to an asskicking on your home court in GAME 1.
by texasag on May 5, 2009 9:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not comparing the game situation
I comparing the fact that hindsight will be 20/20.
If the Lakers go on to win the series, all this proud talk will have been futile.
If the Lakers lose the series, well, you were right, and you can think you know everything!
by Gils_Keloids on May 5, 2009 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too True...
The Rockets could also have a horrible game on offense, it has happened before. I say we pack our bags and just defend our home-court.
By the way, I appreciate the love Blazer fans but your references to your team are getting annoying. Nobody wants to hear bout how Roy is better than Kobe or how Alridge > Odom or Gasol.
Dave, can we get a Ruminations from the bench – Joey Dorsey does Hollywood? thanks
by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on May 5, 2009 1:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nicely done
www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer
by UofTOrange on May 5, 2009 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously?!
Roy better than Kobe?!? Aldrige better than Gasol or Odom?!? If that was true…the Rockets would’ve lost the first round my friend!!!
To all the Rockets fans that ACTUALLY think they have a chance at winning this series…GIVE ME A BREAK! I can appreciate being a fan of your hometown team, but I am seeing WAY too much thought and breakdown put into yesterday’s game. So they won a game and are up 1-0. FYI…they now have 3 more to go. Again, I understand, be happy! you guys just won on the homecourt of who is likely going to the NBA finals.
If anyone heard before the game, Kobe missed Sunday’s practice and refrained from his routine pre-game warm-ups and shootaround for fatigue reasons. That might have had just a LITTLE to why he shot so poorly and was seemingly sluggish for 3/4 of the game. The Rockets played VERY well last night and, yes, turned the ball over 17 times, with no avail to the Lakers since they couldn’t convert anything…Bynum (still trying to play with that hampering knee brace) was out of the game with early foul trouble which caused a huge difference with the flow of the Lakers offensive AND defensive strategy for Yao and Co.
by C Peezy on May 5, 2009 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We have more than just a chance at winning this series
Hey man, it’s YOUR TEAM who is in the hole 0-1
It is YOUR TEAM who couldn’t hold serve on your home court last night
It is YOUR TEAM who has the most to lose in this series
It is YOUR TEAM who is feeling the pressure
The Rockets not only can win this series, they have a great chance to do so. I don’t know if you’ve read the statistics on Phil Jackson’s teams..it’s something like when Phil’s teams win GAME 1, Phil is 42-0 but when they LOSE Game 1, Phil is 6-8
Also, overall when playoff teams win game 1, their record of winning the series is 78%
I would say that history and statistics give the Rockets a hell of a chance!
by UHoustonFan on May 5, 2009 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Blah blah…excuse for why Kobe played poorly…blah blah
blah blah…my team can’t adjust when players get in foul trouble..blah blah…
blah blah..blame knee brace for some odd reason…blah blah blah
Seriously?
A game 1 win on the road is huge. You know this. I know this. Does it mean that the Rockets will automatically win the series? No. Does it mean we have an advantage right now? Damn right. And we didn’t play very well. If we played very well this would have been a 15 – 20 pt blowout. We played good. I still think this series is going to be tough. The Lakers weren’t number 1 in the western conference for nothing. They are the best team out there. Anybody who thinks this first win is some type of dagger to the heart is delusional.
The analysis is spot on. Not too much thinking there at all.
by erod on May 5, 2009 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're funny. You need to stick around.
Roy better than Kobe?!? Aldrige better than Gasol or Odom?!? If that was true…the Rockets would’ve lost the first round my friend!!!
I’m surprised you think so little of the Lakers’ supporting players. Oh, wait, no I’m not. Here’s a hint: basketball is a team game, and it doesn’t come down to simply the stars.
but I am seeing WAY too much thought and breakdown put into yesterday’s game
And I never saw ANY thought being put into your comments. Since when was thought a bad thing, dumbass?
If anyone heard before the game, Kobe missed Sunday’s practice and refrained from his routine pre-game warm-ups and shootaround for fatigue reasons. That might have had just a LITTLE to why he shot so poorly and was seemingly sluggish for 3/4 of the game
And you think so little of Kobe, too? Wow, man. Kobe’s a professional, and I doubt some sniffles are going to keep him out of the paint – and he didn’t seem to have any trouble doing so in garbage time, either. Face it: the Rockets kept him out of the paint for the whole game because they’re good at that.
Bynum (still trying to play with that hampering knee brace) was out of the game with early foul trouble which caused a huge difference with the flow of the Lakers offensive AND defensive strategy for Yao and Co.
Bynum – even while healthy – is not match for Yao. Yao eats centers like Bynum like he eats the heads off of drunken shrimp. He has no problem with traditional post-playing centers, and that’s exactly what Bynum is.
by Only_A_Lad on May 5, 2009 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Think they'll front in Game 2?
Rockets didn’t look as crisp as they did in Game 1 of their last series unfortunately (for both games). Yao’s strange, but I can’t argue that he’ll destroy traditional post players. It’s not impossible to stop him, but it’ll take more ‘thinking’ than Bynum’s likely to do. Rockets have a great shot at winning this series no matter what witless dbag fans think. We’ll see a lot in how they play Game 2.
Also, I can’t help thinking that playing the Blazers in round 1 was a great matchup for the Rockets not just for that series, but for this one. The Blazers are incredibly efficient offensively, just like LA. They’re not as good, but similar, sort of. It’s kind of like Houston got some practice. Does that make sense to you guys as Rockets fans? I’d like to think the Blazers helped to beat LA in anyway possible, so maybe I’m stretching.
Now, if they play like they did against the Blazers and don’t get taken out of their game, and IF the idiots don’t front Yao, it’s Rockets in 6 again. We’ll see, but either way GOOD LUCK and Beat LA!!
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
by hobobob on May 5, 2009 5:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that Portland and LA are similar (LA being the more difficult opponent)
They’re similar because if you think about it LA and Portland both have at least two 7 footers that were used on Yao and Kobe and Roy are all-stars (again Kobe is still much better, no disrespect to Blazers fans, Roy is still young though) so Artest and Shane got a chance to play against a similar talented guard. The Portland series definitely help prepare the Rockets, anyone agree with me?
by Rockets4LIFE on May 5, 2009 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
but one thing portland has that LA doesnt is someone who can consistently front Yao. Portland has LMA who is tall and athletic enough to front him for long stretches, but LA doesnt. Gasol can do it some, but Oden wont guard yao and bynum is too slow to front.
Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Rockets Lead Series 1-0
by TexasHoosier on May 5, 2009 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
oops
i meant odom not oden
Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Rockets Lead Series 1-0
by TexasHoosier on May 5, 2009 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lamar Oden
Would destroy Lebron James
by Gils_Keloids on May 5, 2009 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, yeah.
He would foul him once and Lebron would be dead.
And he WOULD foul him.
by staylost on May 6, 2009 12:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who is Lamar Oden?
Greg Oden and Lamar Odom are two different people who play on two completely diferent teams. Both of which will lose (and have already lost) to the Rockets and Yao “The Great Wall” Ming.
by Rocke on May 6, 2009 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And yeah ...
if the two of them “transformed” into one person, I also think they would destroy Lebron James. Not to mention, It would be scary as hell. And oh by the way … it’s a joke.
by Rocke on May 6, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm trying
I’ve been trying to think of a Dorsey-worthy scenario for a month now… I’m drawing blanks. Trust me, I’m trying though.
by grungedave on May 5, 2009 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
by hobobob on May 5, 2009 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
couple of blazers disses in there
just another SHOT in the gut,
but yeah, rockets for the win.
"Awesome! Totally awesome! All right, Hamilton!"
by B-ROYalty on May 5, 2009 1:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Eh we love Portland
I’m sure it wasn’t meant in a bad way
by UHoustonFan on May 5, 2009 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's sort of a shot
It’s a “Luis, you can’t play the Lakers the same way you played the Blazers” kinda shot.
by grungedave on May 5, 2009 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is why I posted this on the game thread last night.
"The Rockets gotta find a way to put up some points"
Oh gee, Doug…you mean LIKE WEVE BEEN DOING ALL GAME?!!!!
Give us SOME kinda credit!
I swear I love me some Doug Collins but last night he was getting on my nerves. If I had to go back and count how many times he said “Kobe is heating up” and “the Rockets have to find a way to score” I’d go crazy!
We were not playing a perfect game by any means yet we were still winning damnit! Ugh!
Mike Goldberg: "You know Joe, When Matt and his brother Mark Hughes were growing up, they would pound each other behind the barn."
by xFenixKnightx on May 5, 2009 1:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
He was effusive about Yao..
He looked like that he had the temerity of someone who was rooting for the underdog, but did not want to get caught doing it – should he have to save his face if the underdog did not come through. Any basketball fan would have loved to see what the rockets did yesterday with their incredible hustle and heart against a team with more talent !!
Kari
by Kari on May 5, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's because ...
these stupid announcers cannot think of anything else to say if they are not talking about the Lakers, Celtics, Cavs, etc… They are literally ESPN “brainwashed” to make everything a reference to these three teams. It drives me crazy to here them talk. The only half decent announcer is JVG and he only gives us some credit because he was our coach. It was nice watching our highlights on ESPN this morning though. We were actually the first story because of the “can you believe this” and “The Rockets shock the Lakers in game one” , and “I can’t believe they won … blah, blah, blah”. And as far as Kobe goes …. stay the hell off my man Battier. What was that shit in the first quarter? An elbow to the head and stepping on his hand after they got tangled up. Just what I would expect from Mr. Bryant. No class.
by Rocke on May 5, 2009 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent Post, My thoughts exactly.. I did not think that the Rockets played their best game
Rockets did everything right on the defensive end and on the offensive end. “Everyone knew what Rockets had to do (not to brag, OK.. to brag a little, here was my take a few days before the game)”: http://www.thedreamshake.com/2009/5/1/862221/beating-la , but few thought that they could pull it off. This Rockets team is good, and it can get better. Much of the national media does not pay attention to what Houston can do. Only those who have a first hand experience with this Rockets are the ones (e.g., JVG), are even giving them any chance.
My hats off to Yao. He is a man on a mission!
Go Rockets,
Kari
by Kari on May 5, 2009 1:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
we are still not a champ material
The Rockets need:
1, a decent backup center after Mutombo went down, ie: someone like the birdman, to grab boards and block shots
2, a 4th-quarter shooter, or just bring back Steve Novak
3, a starting pg better than Brooks, see if there’s a chance to get Kirk Hinrich
We could have them only by trading TMac. For now, we are still not a champ material.
by Old Cat on May 5, 2009 2:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No team is perfect
The Rockets have holes, so do the Lakers (PG for example)
www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer
by UofTOrange on May 5, 2009 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we're a $46m team fighting with a $78m team right now
Call me pessimistic, but there’s a slim chance into western final unless we had made the squad stronger
by Old Cat on May 5, 2009 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Payroll(s)
May I ask where you pulled your figures?
According to hoopshype…
Houston Rockets: $75,469,051
LA Lakers: $75,225,408
by Texan_Dawg on May 5, 2009 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i dont think he included mcgrady
by misterterrific on May 5, 2009 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
where's Only_a_Lad?
someone needs to post the “That’s the Joke” pic again
by grungedave on May 5, 2009 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
21 million of which is at some club in Chicago right now.
by seanbergmanrules on May 5, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trade T-Mac
I want him gone. Keep Artest (obviously) but get T-Mac the hell out of Houston
by UHoustonFan on May 5, 2009 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lakers PG holes?!
I’s take Derek Fisher with Jordan Farmar and Shannon Brown anyday for my PG line-up…let’s not forget that Odom and Kobe bring it up the court pretty damn well too!
by C Peezy on May 5, 2009 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fish and Brown are your weak spot
This is not news to anyone.
by grungedave on May 5, 2009 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If only Odom brought it up the court more often
the Rockets would have to really run…. right back on the fast break. That dude’s got handle in the half court against PFs and big SFs, but he gets TORCHED by anyone with decent speed and fingers on their hands.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
by hobobob on May 5, 2009 5:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You would? Why?
Because they suck
www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer
by UofTOrange on May 6, 2009 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trade Brooks?!
I am on a blog role now…Trade Brooks?! Arguably the MAIN reason they pulled off the win last night…and he’s an alma mater of my High School in Seattle…anyway, there is no way that the Rockets will be getting rid of Brooks, matter-of-fact, don’t be too surprised when he signs a BIG contract extension this off-season.
by C Peezy on May 5, 2009 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yao went Stallone on L.A. last night
I think that’s one of the main reasons we won the game
by UHoustonFan on May 5, 2009 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
not trade him, just better have another starter
He’s been doing well and keeps improving, there’re just too many good pg in the west, and his size and game-reading are always problems.
If only we could assemble Arron and Kyle into one person!
by Old Cat on May 5, 2009 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
WHAT???
The only, and I repeat, ONLY, problem with Brooks is confidence. Being a playoff noob, he just has to get used to this environment.
Expect us to keep him, and he will be tearing teams up for years to come.
Also, get really worried if he looks relaxed out there, cause he rains 3’s like it’s el nino.
by texasag on May 6, 2009 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why do we need a 4th quarter shooter??
I feel like we are doing the baseball thing, 4th quarter by committee. When we dont have one guy that we are relying on to score late in games, it takes pressure off whoever is shooting. We are able to run better plays because our opponent doesnt know who is going to shoot it.
And seriously, get rid of brooks? Where are you getting that from. Yes he struggles on defense but we would not have won yesterday without his offense. He was aggressive in the 3rd and 4th and our offense played the best then. He has an extremely sick handle, a great shot, and knows how to fill the basket when he’s close. He still has room for improvement, but he is our PG of the future, like it or not.
Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Rockets Lead Series 1-0
by TexasHoosier on May 5, 2009 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A championship team is only defined after the fact.
One thing that’s common to most championship teams is D. They usually have one of the best if not the very best defenses in the league. Houston has the best defense in the league. It may not show in the numbers, but it’s the best.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
by hobobob on May 5, 2009 5:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed on the "perfect game" point

we did get to the line, though. but if the Media’s perception of a perfect game for Houston is an ugly game that features those stats, well they’re obviously wrong.
This game was a lot more perfect than last night’s game.
and it reflects in the numbers, too.
looking forward to game 2!
by misterterrific on May 5, 2009 2:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Perfect Game for Houston only factors Yao
The playing of Yao defines a perfect game for us.
If he plays good, then the team played perfect. Have no doubt that mos of those ESPN jacko’s only expect Artest to throw a punch, Battier to break an ankle chasing Kobe, and Bynum to outscore Yao.
Should we actually play a “perfect game” they will not call it that. It will be a fluke where battier hit double figures and brooks had 30 and was unstoppable.
by texasag on May 6, 2009 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
HELLL YEAAAAAA ROCKETS
Good work. You guys must be so freaking stoke. Hell, I’m not even a Rockets fan and I’m stoked for you. Nothing makes me feel better than seeing the Dbag (I live in socal) L* fans skulk.
I knew it’d take some sweat, but had no idea it’d take so much blood. Good on you Battier. If I were in his position, I would have flicked the blood at the official.
Beat LA!!!!!!
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
by hobobob on May 5, 2009 5:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of mainstream media writers...
this snippet from Adande’s analysis on the game.
So much is subject to change. The Lakers’ outside shooting won’t be as woeful. Yao Ming might not be as dominant as he was in Game 1, when he scored 28 points and grabbed 10 rebounds.
Uh… dominant? He shot 9-17? He’s better than that.
"I'm just looking forward to something great happening in the city of Houston" - Tracy McGrady
Still waiting...
by DreKeem on May 5, 2009 6:01 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
please dont quote Adande
he’s tha biggest fuckin Lakers homer around
You're not foolin me Kerry Collins.
by TitanFan2K on May 5, 2009 11:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing about Pau Gasol
And kobe took over 30 shots…
very good signs for the rockets
by PaintItBlack on May 5, 2009 6:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah but what's the Lakers record
When Kobe takes 40 or more shots?
by Gils_Keloids on May 5, 2009 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I looked it up and I'm pretty sure Houston has NEVER beat LA
when Kobe has taken 60 or more shots. Just don’t tell Kobe.
by staylost on May 6, 2009 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't agree with the headline of the post
Neither team can play any better than they did in Game 1.
by Gils_Keloids on May 5, 2009 7:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
odd
The headline said nothing about game 1.
by grungedave on May 5, 2009 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm
I’m thinking when you wrote
one team can play better in Game 2You meant better than in Game 1 (as opposed to better than in Game 6 against Portland).
Unless you just meant “better”, in which case, that is just wrong. You need to compare it to something.
by Gils_Keloids on May 5, 2009 10:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fisher stat from that Bill Simmons story
“Dating back to Game 74 of the regular season, Fisher has missed 33 of his past 40 3-pointers.” I used to be scared whenever Fisher shot tha ball cuz he was such a good open shooter, but now I openly root for him and Ariza to shoot.
You're not foolin me Kerry Collins.
by TitanFan2K on May 5, 2009 7:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Kobe.....Kobe.....Kobe....

Can’t blame him for having nightmares.
by texasag on May 5, 2009 9:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Throw in that sick new 'do
and youve got a recipe for horror
Game 1 100-92 Rockets
Rockets Lead Series 1-0
by TexasHoosier on May 5, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Scoop Jackson is the biggest moron of all time
Here is the proof
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=jackson/090504&sportCat=nba
and
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=hill_jackson/090504&sportCat=nba
Is he the biggest Lakers Homer of all time??
by DREAM34 on May 6, 2009 1:48 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=jackson/090504&sportCat=nba
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=hill_jackson/090504&sportCat=nba
by DREAM34 on May 6, 2009 1:49 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm telling you, they're reading from a script
The NBA marketing staff… whoops I mean announcers. Look, some of these guys are very smart, many have experience playing at a very high level; but there is one basic job — promote the high-dollar NBA brands, like the Lakers, and like Kobe Bryant.
I think it’s partly directive (teleprompter), and partly subconscious. Either way it sucks. This is the NBA PLAYOFFS — I want analysis of every man on each team — all freaking 24 men.
It’s very frustrating. Of course the Rockets didn’t play a perfect game. They didnt play anywhere near as well as the played game 1 of the Portland series.
What’s also ridiculous is this idea that the Lakers had an “off night” offensively… that didn’t have anything to do with Kobe frustrated by the Rockets defense, nooooo.
I prefer watching local broadcasts. Even if the announcers are homers, at least they’re up front about it, and they generally comment on a wider variety of players. the NBA announcers, and halftime show commentors, suck major balls.
by NeoSabonis on May 6, 2009 4:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually.....
The Rockets are the BIGGEST brand in the NBA. The only problem is that the majority of Rockets fans don’t speak English.
You can probably bet that chinese announcers talk up the Rockets like ESPN ones do LA. If only more people in China spoke English, then Stern would fire anyone at ESPN that didn’t give the Rockets an equal chance of winning it all.
Rockets do have the biggest fan base in the NBA after all.
by texasag on May 6, 2009 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with u 100% sabas, the national announcers need to understand the rockets didn't play close to their potential
Point in case, scola I don’t believe had one of his better games.
if brandon roy played for toronto he'd be brandon waaaaah
by R1cEbUrNeR on May 6, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

















