A morning Q&A with the LA Times.com (Lakers Blog) before Game 2
I'm still a little frazzled after reading today's referee assignments for the Rockets/Lakers Game 2. Yes, you read that right. Tonight's lead official is Joey freakin' Crawford. It's like David Stern isn't even trying to be subtle anymore.
Nonetheless, I did an exhange of questions with Brian over at the LA Times.com Lakers blog ... his answers are below. As for me, I just want to see if he had any good ideas for how the Lakers will try to slow down (or at least stay in front of) Aaron Brooks. For Pau Gasol has no answers...

Let's begin:
(a) After Game 1, how do the Lakers go about slowing Aaron Brooks? Do they just hope he forgets he's faster than everyone?
Normally, I'm all for a "pray for amnesia" strategy, and there have been times this season where it seems that's how the Lakers defend opposing PGs. I'm sure I don't have to tell you that this has been a problem for the Lakers all year. Despite the total lack of space constraints on the Internet, I still doubt I have the room to list all the point guards that have given the Lakers trouble this year. Basically, if they play in the NBA at one point or another they've made the Lakers look bad, so Brooks is more the rule than the exception. And there were times on Monday where I thought the Lakers did okay on the little fella, forcing him into traffic or producing poor decisions. What has to stop, though, are those Sunday strolls into the paint (particularly along the baseline). For that, it's a matter of help defense.
The Lakers are hardly unique in lacking a guard quick enough to stick Brooks. Does that guy even exist? With that in mind, it becomes an issue of help. Rotations have to be quick and decisive, and importantly, unified. It's not just the first man who cuts off the penetration, but the next in line who has to fill the vacated space. As the saying goes, it takes a village. The Lakers just have to avoid the jailbreaks. If Brooks penetrates and there's a body waiting for him, I'll take my chances.
(b) Who is going to be the difference maker in this series for the Lakers (I am sick of the term "x-factor")? Is there anyone on the Laker bench who will surprise Rocket fans?
This is a little tricky. Obviously Lamar Odom is LA's best bench player, but he's hardly the typical sixth man option, and plays more minutes than Andrew Bynum. The guy that I think they've missed is Luke Walton, who said at practice today that he'll be good to go- or at least healthy enough to play- Wednesday night. (Fortunately, Walton is slow enough that if he's limited to 80% speed, nobody will know the difference.) It's not so much that Walton himself is a world beater. Not by a long shot. But he is a consummate role guy, and his presence has a very positive impact on the rest of the bench. Walton's passing skills free up Odom to work more down low or play with greater creativity from the top of the key. It relieves guys like Shannon Brown and Sasha Vujacic from primary ball distribution and handling duties. All of this stuff matters more against a team like Houston that demand teams play with efficiency on offense.
On the other end, Walton is a bigger, stronger body than Trevor Ariza. Not a better defender, but occasionally a better option, depending on the matchup (Walton, for example, has more success against larger players like Carmelo Anthony, and could defend Artest in ways Ariza can't. Not necessarily better ways, but different, and sometimes that's enough). His 15 minutes or so a night also mean less burn for guys like Josh Powell, who works his ass off on both ends but can be a drag on the motion of the offense and, at least if you believe the numbers at 82Games, doesn't have a particularly positive effect on what happens on the floor.
He isn't a game changer, but does make that second unit much better, which obviously matters.
(c) If I put the over/under on "number of free throws Kobe Bryant shoots in Game 2" at 13.5, do you take the over or the under? And why? (*note, this answer was submitted before it was announced that Joey Crawford would be the lead official tonight. Not that I am surprised.*)
I'm going under, if only because 13.5 is a huge number, almost twice as much as his season average and more than all but a handful of his games this year, including the Playoffs. I don't think Kobe needs to get there that much... but something over the one free throw he managed before late in the fourth when the Rockets were determined not to foul (it was the only way they could lose) would be nice. The Lakers have to put more pressure on the lane and force the Rockets, and particularly Yao, to make decisions. One way or the other. Jim Cleamons (Lakers asst. coach) said today that the Lakers did a very poor job showing patience in the offense, reversing the ball, switching sides of the floor and so on. Against a disciplined team like the Rockets, that makes it too easy.
Four regular season games showed the Lakers are fully capable of operating against Houston's defense. Fundamentally, I don't think anything has changed, They just did a lousy job of it on Monday.
(d) What can we expect to see from Derek Fisher for the rest of the series? He's been slumping since late in the regular season; do you consider Game 1 to be more of the same, or a fluke?
Defensively, what you see is, to some extent, what you get. There's no way Fisher can stick Brooks (Brown struggled too, and in more minutes Farmar would as well, basically as soon as the Rockets realized he could be the single easiest guard in the Association to screen off a play), but I suspect he'll start shooting a little better. Fish hit some nice smooth J's on Monday. Where he gets into trouble is when he decides to put the ball on the floor and drive the lane. Occasionally it works, but more often than not, bad things happen. If Fish sticks more to spot up shooting, I think he'll be fine.
This certainly isn't his first go round at the rodeo, and he's had plenty of success.
(e) At what point does Phil Jackson give in and stop trying to guard Yao with only one player?
Call me crazy, but I don't have a big problem with how the Lakers defend Yao. Six of his points came on free throws in the last two minutes of the game, two of his buckets came on 18 footers, and looking at the shot chart, he only had only a few chippies. Had he just thrashed them by the rack I might feel differently, but that's not really what happened. Most of his makes were in the neighborhood of 10 feet, or beyond. Meanwhile, the Lakers were able to generate a few turnovers, whether on Yao himself or by disrupting passing angles into him (Pau Gasol had some success in varying his coverages and poking a few balls away, for example). Through the season, the Lakers have had success with smart pressure on players in the post, bringing doubles where appropriate but not committing to full time extra attention.
The real key, I think, is limiting the time he spends on the line. If he makes about half his shots but doesn't live on the stripe, that's fine. I think they could do more damage, though, by consistently bringing help to the post and opening up lanes around the floor.
But maybe that's just me? And by the way, you guys love the "Eat the head!" commercial as much as I do, right?
55 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Brooks
LA,tell you guys a way to defence Brooks, double him. He get a light-speed,what do you gonna do with that speed? Game 2 is Rockets’s!
How typical of grungedave...
Bitching and moaning about the officials before the game even starts. That way you have a premade excuse. “we didn’t win because of ‘x’ official” or “we won despite the horrible officiating”. What a freakin whiner.
"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler
Noone said anything about the officiating.
They just said they hate Joey Crawford. Not in a biased way, just as a terrible official.
It's motherfucking joey goddamn crawford!!!!
Do you even watch the NBA? The man is the one of the two-or-three worst lead officials in the game.
Yeah I get it. He sucks.
But don’t think that every other team doesn’t have to deal with his dumb ass. It’s not like he is targeting your team.
"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler
You are bitching and moaning about him officiating the game tonight like he is going to screw you over
"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler
That tends to be the trend with bad officiating
it most negatively affects the visiting team. It’s not like Crawford has something against the Rockets, he’s just a bad official. And that’s different from “targeting.”
We are bitching and moaning
because we are going to have a referee who will try to take over the game for himself and in the process slow it down and make terrible calls. not just for us, but for the other team as well.
The Dream Shake
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
Shouldn't you be getting ready for your second round game?
Oh, that’s right. We knocked yall out of the playoffs. My bad.
It figures...
that a disgruntled Blazer fan gets on the Rockets board to talk about one of our guys predicting some bad officiating from someone KNOWN to make questionable calls. You lost, get over it, but congrats on making the playoffs. Too bad you got in the way of the BIG RED MACHINE.
by bigalshouseoflove on May 6, 2009 11:14 AM CDT reply actions
It's not just that he is bitching...
it’s that he claims to be a knowledgeable NBA fan. If you have been around the game long enough you will realize that there is always going to be a few bad calls here and there and there is no sense in bitching and moaning about it. Yeah there were a few calls I didn’t agree with during the first round but I’ve accepted the fact that the Blazers didn’t lose because of the officiating. They lost because they ran into a team that wanted it more and played with a greater sense of urgency. It will be the same in this series. The better team will win on merit and not shady officiating whether that team is the Lakers or the Rockets. Get over the officiating and talk about what your team has to do to win.
"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler
15%
only around 15% of that entire lengthy post even revolved in the slightest around officiating. I think the point was to acknowledge that Joey Crawford reffing tonight just upped the “crazy call” ratio for both teams. Because he is legit crazy. Not because Grungedave is a whiner. Try again.
by bubblescreen on May 6, 2009 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions
This is the guy who ejected Duncan for laughing at him.
From the bench. Sitting down.
He’s one of the worst refs in the league. No one with any sense would argue this point.
So, when we get assigned one of the worst refs in the league in a game LA simply MUST win, do you expect us to be happy about it?
If the Rockets just play their game
and don’t let the refs get into their heads, they should have a good chance to beat the Lakers tonight. I don’t see that happening but if they just play their game they have a decent chance.
"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler
No doubt.
Alll grungedave is saying is that we’re going to be in for some WTF calls by Joey Crawford.
"I am from one of the top 15 cities in the world. Buffalo, New York." - TrentEdwardsHoF2018
Dave didn't come out and say it, but I will:
this is exactly what the NBA does EVERY TIME they need the home team to win: they put crap refs out there – the ones who are easily influenced by the crowd and just love to make some home cookin’. Steve Javie, Joey Crawford, and Salvatore shouldn’t be reffing playoff games, but the NBA assigns them anyways.
No, the Lakers don’t need “help” to win. They’re a great team. But the NBA is trying to make sure that the series has the best chance of going to 7 games.
If they wanted this series to go to seven games...
don’t you think that they would have pulled some bullshit calls in game one so the Lakers could win and have the home team win all their games. Because if the home team wins each game, the series will last seven games. Think before you speak. Dipshit.
"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler
they'd prefer
to do things naturally – nobody likes seeing bullshit calls, and you want to keep it to a minimum. They probably expected the Lakers to take both games at home fairly easily. But the Rockets threw a wrench into that plan.
Oh, and fuck you, retard.
Yeah the Rockets sure did.
And it was a great game to watch.
Oh, and Fuck you too, faggot.
"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler
Don't come at me with "over the line"
comments when it was you who started the unnecessary insults. Are you really that sensitive? Fucking idiot.
"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler
You're gone.
What the hell were you thinking?
The Dream Shake
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
I created a new account just to say this...
I know i may have offended some people with the “faggot” remark and I can’t say as I’m too sorry about it seeing that I was being attacked and called a retard. I happen to have a family member with downs syndrome and the retard comment really offended me but does Mr Tom Martin care? No. If you are going to ban me for my remarks i expect to see a few others banned for their comments. Also I know you can’t see it anymore but the esteemed Mr Tom Martin left a nice little note after my post of “Fuck You” I know I will probably be banned again for sticking up for myself again but I really don’t give a shit. I probably won’t be back anyway. With that said, Fuck you very much and have a shitty day.
by new_screen_name on May 6, 2009 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions
well...i had no choice
you clearly broke the rules. and you obviously don’t like being here very much. so if I were you, I would accept the banning and move on.
The Dream Shake
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
I actually did enjoy talking basketball with what seemed to be an intelligent fan base.
But if someone calls me a retard, I am not going to take it lying down. From what i am seeing though you clearly don’t like my opinions and found your chance to ban me without it seeming like you did it for no reason. Also do the same standards not apply to the Houston faithful. I mean come on, calling someone a fag is the same as calling someone a retard. Why don’t you ban only_a_lad.
by new_screen_name on May 6, 2009 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions
our rules are clear
You can call someone a retard, but not a faggot.
You knew it, and you broke it anyway. Don’t blame us.
They are our rules, not yours
They can be as rational or irrational as we want them to be. And you crossed over the line with that at anyone’s site, not just ours. We’re really lax about everything, but come on, racial or personal biggotry is idiotic
www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer
it wasn't necessarily the faggot comment
it was the “Dipshit.” We don’t allow cussing unless it is out of frustration about a game or unless it is witty. Calling someone a “dipshit” isn’t wanted around here, especially when all OAL did is make a point – he never directly referred to you.. OAL is not banned because he simply responded. He was not going to take it lying down.
And to be frank with you, it is certainly one thing to have an opinion and state a point, but what you did was straight up immature – you made yourself come off as an asshole. Why not state your opinion by saying something like “Come on Dave, you know the officiating won’t make a difference. That’s not a very good argument,” rather than calling him a whiner. That isn’t what got you banned, because the next post was clearly worse, but people don’t like other people who are like that. It sounds like you’ve got plenty of basketball knowledge, but you should reconsider how to make a point without pissing people off.
And if the “retard” comment offended you so much, then you should have said something about it before coming back with more insults. I didn’t like OAL’s word choice either, as I have an autistic cousin, but you didn’t handle it very well.
If you would like to keep reading, then do so, but for now, I don’t want to see comments such as yours.
The Dream Shake
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
by Tom Martin on May 6, 2009 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Sounds fair
Sorry about the dipshit comment. I can see how that would come off as condescending.
by new_screen_name on May 6, 2009 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions
If it wasn't for that, it would have been for the bigotry
Like I said, we’re pretty lax, but the rules we have are : Don’t cuss AT someone, and don’t use racial or personal slurs. Come on, it’s really, really easy. The first will get you warned typically but banned if warranted, the second will get you banned automatically
www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer
Yeah, I was totally offended by that!!
It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!
wow
Ron Burgundy: Boy, that escalated quickly… I mean, that really got out of hand fast.
Champ Kind: It jumped up a notch.
Ron Burgundy: It did, didn’t it?
Don't forget
Brik killing a man with a trident!
It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!
well
I did bate him with the “do you even watch the NBA?” line. But it was a legit question, I think.
incorrect
they mostly frequent ClutchFans, where their opinions about “lol daryul MORAN” won’t be mocked viciously.
How can anyone hate Morey?
My God, our 2nd round picks are legit NBA players. We got a world-class PF for free. WTF.
We have so much more talent now, it’s not even close. Our bench grinds teams down, maybe even the Lakers.
Just thinking about the Rocket's draft picks before Morey...
The only year they didn’t botch was with Yao at #1, and 3 of the top 6 picks that year aren’t even in the league anymore.
"Hip-Thrust!" - Hard Gay
In case you're wondering, Hard Gay is married.
So...
Pau Gasol is basically equal to Pryzbilla(spelling)
It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!
Well here's one major difference.
Pau Gasol receives his instructions from the creature that lives in his beard.
But are looked upon....
By most Rocket fans with equal……..Distaste.
Basicaly they both suck on gorilla nuts.
It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!
I am quite offended by that statement.
My pet gorilla is going to kick your ass.
The Dream Shake
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
I didn't think of it that way.....
That is an obvious slight on all primates worldwide because of my blanket statement. I will clarify in that they both suck on Carlos Boozer’s pet Gorilla’s nuts while he Boozer takes pictures. That should about sum it up, now please call off your gorilla!
It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!

























