Game 34 Recap: In Holiday Spirit, Rockets Give One Away to Hornets 99-95
Happy 2010, New Orleans. Here, as a precursor to our forthcoming Chris Paul negotiations, go ahead and win tonight's game, why don'tcha?
If only that were the case. Perhaps the loss would not have been as gut-wrenching.
The Hornets closed out the fourth quarter on a 13-2 run to stun Houston, who had otherwise played well with fourth quarter leads coming into the game. Poor offensive execution down the stretch doomed the Rockets, as they failed to find anything remotely resembling an open shot.
If anything, it further illuminated the difference between featuring Chris Paul and Aaron Brooks at point guard. With about 24 seconds remaning, Paul was able to wind the shot clock down, get into the lane against Brooks, and make an easy jumper as the shot clock expired. How did Brooks answer? He forced up a contested, fadeaway three-pointer that clanked off the rim, instead of using the nineteen seconds that remained to set up a final shot that actually had a chance of going in.
Until tonight, the Rockets had rarely been forced to rely on Brooks late in games, instead deferring to Carl Landry, who is currently second in the league in fourth-quarter PPG. However, that option quickly evaporated as Emeka Okafor forced Landry into either a bad shot or a pass to the perimeter each time he got the ball on the block. If there is one defender who keeps Carl up at night, it's Okafor. He's quick enough to cut Carl off when he tries a reverse layup, and he is long enough to either block Carl's shot or alter it. It's one of those matchups that the Rockets won't win.
The most telling statistic of Landry's night is his number of free throw attempts: zero. It's only the third time all season that Carl hasn't made it to the stripe once.
Though Trevor Ariza (19 points on 7-14 FG) managed to somewhat snap his current shooting slump, he turned the ball over seven times, many of which were on forced passes or on fourth-grade dribbling moves. I'm still shocked to see how poorly he handles the ball. He must not have been forced to dribble in junior high or high school. Maybe he just stood under the basket and dunked when the ball came to him. Otherwise, I don't know how he skipped over one of the easiest elements of the game during his development. I would blame it on his length, but then Kevin Durant would laugh in my face. Actually, wouldn't that really be an accomplishment of sorts, on my part?
(Note: Just discovered that the Hoop Data boxscores were posted early tonight - nice! Let's take a look at those shot locations that I love so much...)
Interestingly enough, the Rockets shot efficiently at the rim and from three, and forced the Hornets to do the exact opposite. Normally, that would be a good thing for the Rockets - it's a big reason why they've won so many games thus far. They made 18 of 22 shots at the rim, and shot 8 of 20 from three. As for the Hornets, they shot 14-22 from at the rim, and only 3-14 from three. So, then, how did we manage to lose?
Leave it to the most inefficient shot in basketball to doom the Rockets: the mid-range jumper. New Orleans made 15 mid-range jump shots, compared to the Rockets' six. Again, this is something that would normally be a good thing, but when you factor in our sixteen turnovers, Landry's ineffectiveness, and our mere eight offensive rebounds (compared to the Hornets' ten), you discover why we lost.
I can't wait until Chase Budinger comes back. Just wanted to throw that out there. He not only rebounds and shoots well, but he really opens up things for other guys with his versatility.
New Orleans needed more than David West to beat us this time around, and they got it, especially from Okafor. For the Rockets, it's off to Los Angeles to play the red-hot Lakers, and then the Suns the following night. After that, things ease up. Hopefully we'll come back to Houston with at least one win - that would be impressive enough.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
As much as I'd hate to agree with you Tom
Ill have to. Can’t wait til Airbud gets back!
by RedRowdy420 on Jan 2, 2010 9:54 PM CST via mobile reply actions
I just wish Adelman could be more creative in the endgame.
Everyone knows we would go to AB and Carl, but please can’t we give the ball to them in easier spots and after some subterfuge.
We got our last 7pt lead off a baseline curl by Landry. I wondered why on the next play he went to the middle and got stripped as a result.
When Lowry was in, he was outsmarted by Chris Paul for an and-1. But the next play, instead of looking for AB as time was winding down, he took the long 2. Adelman got him out immediately.
We solved our 3rd quarter meltdown with some nifty passing in the paint only to suffer the meltdown in the last 3 min of the 4th!!!
We got into that deadly mode...
…where you play conservatively and hesitantly at the end and hope the clock runs out before your lead does. This time it came back to bite us. That offensive foul call on Landry didn’t help matters, either, but the Rockets put themselves in the position to lose based on bad officiating, which they can never afford to do against any team with a superstar.
yup
you play conservatively and hesitantly at the end and hope the clock runs out before your lead does. This time it came back to bite us.
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
yup, part 2
We did the same prevent offense manuever against Dallas a few weeks ago… it’s how the game ended up in OT to begin with.
continuation calls.....
…you mean like the ones Clyde made a HOF career of?….
Game was pretty evenly matched and you guys shot much better from 3pt than we did…but don’t blame it on the officiating. It was pretty evenly called all night. Landry’s offensive foul at the end was a good call, he just got fooled my a more experienced player.
Overall, I think the Rockets have as good a shot as any to win the Southwest. My Hornets will be lucky just to make the playoffs, until they finally are able to shed some of the bad contracts they have. I don’t see the Mavs keeping up their pace all season, and once you guys get Chase Budinger back, you’ll be even better. I was hoping the Hornets would have drafted him in the first round instead of Darren Collison. He could have replaced Peja at SF, and given us better rebounding from that position as well.
best of luck to you folks as well
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
Bad call,but
Sorry,Robert but that was a bad call. I got the NO feed and the replay they had showed Posey falling before Landry made contact and the NO broadcast team,after watching,said Posey really sold the call-code for he flopped good.
On the other hand it was a badly ref’d game for both sides. And up until the end it seemed the crew would blow a call and then do an instant make-up call. It may just be me,but there have been some incredibly badly ref’d games over past week or so. Dallas has been getting incredibly favorable calls ever since their protest and the Cavs and Lakers seem to be exempt from just about any violation.
And
I also meant to say that the Rockets still had their chances but couldn’t make the plays while NO certainly did.
haha
riiiiiiiiiiiight.
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
And up until the end it seemed the crew would blow a call and then do an instant make-up call.
Yep. Trevor got mugged going to the basket, no call, and on his next trip to the hoop Emeka was handed a shitty touch foul. Silly offensive foul call followed immediately by another…
I can’t stand it when refs do this. Just get the call right the first time. If it means blowing the whistle, changing your mind, and then resetting the play clock, then that’s better than fucking with the game even more by issuing “make-up” calls.
Yeah, I thought it was a pretty obvious flop too. Though as I said above, the loss is as much on the play of the Rockets as the officials. Close games in basketball can so easily go either way—many games are won by a scoring margin of 1-3 percent. If you want to win, it’s important to do it decisively to reduce or eliminate the impact of outside factors, like bad calls. The Rockets couldn’t do that.
And yes, the Hornets deserve credit for keeping the game close and capitalizing when things swung their way.
By the way, Tom
I wanted to address one comment:
If anything, it further illuminated the difference between featuring Chris Paul and Aaron Brooks at point guard. With about 24 seconds remaning, Paul was able to wind the shot clock down, get into the lane against Brooks, and make an easy jumper as the shot clock expired. How did Brooks answer? He forced up a contested, fadeaway three-pointer that clanked off the rim, instead of using the nineteen seconds that remained to set up a final shot that actually had a chance of going in.
We have to be fair here—Brooks needed a three pointer, and CP3 did not. Also, we’ve seen Brooks make these kinds of shots before, even several times in one game; he rimmed it out, yes, but he wasn’t that far off (unlike Ariza taking a similar shot). If he had made the shot, we’d all be singing his praises right now.
I’m not saying Brooks is as good as CP3, of course he’s not, and he likely never will be. I just think he deserves a fair shake. Let’s also not forget that he has much less pro experience than Chris Paul at this point.
My point is this
If you’re Aaron Brooks, you’ve got nineteen seconds left to do one of two things:
1. Set up an open three-pointer. Doesn’t have to be you – you can drive and dish, or you can pass back to whoever sets a pick at the top of the key.
2. Grab a quick two, foul, and hope that a FT is missed (David West ended up missing his first), and then set up for a two-pointer with 8-10 seconds remaining. This comes in handy if the Hornets DON’T jump the pick, and give Brooks a driving lane to avoid giving up a three.
Brooks did neither of these things. He took a quick, ill-advised shot. Paul is far and away the better player – nobody (I hope…kg_2005) needed me to tell them that. The only reason I made that point was to show off an example of how Brooks can improve. Perhaps I could have clarified that more.
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
lol and.....
to kind of show me up. its all good, CP3 had the better game this time in the end. and im sure your going to take this and run with it as far as you can. which further leads me to think you were head of the warning committe, which is sad, really sad. but it wasnt too long ago that the roles were reversed and ABZ was the one finishing the game off and your precious chris paul was the one looking from this planet and missing open shots. i mean did you see the half pass/half shot “pass” to songaila? what was that? oh yeah, evidence that the man is HUMAN. and songaila was WIDE open under the rim.
so some gas tends to run out of the tank with AB, i mean damn, he’s the reason we stay competitive in games when we need the points. the better player CP3 is, but by far and away?? there was times that abz was running circles around cp3, notice all the open drives to the whole, i did. try to remember your still a rox fan when we play the hornets. and ill say this, the reason the hornets do lose is b/c cp3 cant come through when everybody knows hes gonna have the ball, keep the ball, and force up something. your basic premadonna. and when he does give up the ball and the player doesnt make a shot, he starts to bitch and moan, something i dont think would mesh well with our TEAM CHEMISTRY. ill agree that chris paul is the better player, but not by much at all, brooks is right on his heels. and it shows when they go head to head, when lowry comes in, abz is still the one guarding paul. why? b/c he can, and the coach allows him to because of this. numerous times brooks has blown by chris to the rim, guess somebody needs to tell him he aint the only one that can get to the rim. i guess all im really saying is that if CP3 happens to wear a rox jersey one day, then great, but im fine with what we have at point guard. especially if that means we dont have to give up a good portion of our team to acquire him.
AARON.FUCKING.BROOKS
VY (to all his haters/doubters): "I love ya'll too!!"
"Titans & Texans fan, dont bug me w/your petty b.s., life's confusing enough."
and throughout all of this....
no “hey aaron played a great game” or “thanks aaron for scoring points for us in critical times” none. just more of how he doesnt do this like chris paul, he doesnt do that like chris paul, etc. its just sickening as a ROCKETS FAN.
VY (to all his haters/doubters): "I love ya'll too!!"
"Titans & Texans fan, dont bug me w/your petty b.s., life's confusing enough."
That's like saying LeBron is human
I think we all know he’s some type of futuristic android
by RedRowdy420 on Jan 3, 2010 2:33 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
lol good. but plz
dont compare lebron to CP3. now THAT is a far and away difference. yeah paul may look super human against lesser teams, but against us he looks pretty normal, a very good team. that is still young in terms of playing with eachother, who will continue to get better, just in time for yao’s return. i just dont want to break up what we have for 1 player and bad baggage. when we would have to give up very good key players. yeah ppl see the stats, but how many of them points are coming from bs superstar calls that not alot of other players playing the game hard dont get?? that’s how point totals get so high, but when you break it down that’s not basketball, when your looking to get bailed out instead of looking to put in the hoop. when you break it down and the majority of the points are coming from the superstar call, you take that away, and the man looks HUMAN. from a stat point, which gets alot of ppls mouth watering im sure. hope your not takin all this personal rowdy, just good convo.
VY (to all his haters/doubters): "I love ya'll too!!"
"Titans & Texans fan, dont bug me w/your petty b.s., life's confusing enough."
Don' t worry, we won't give up more than T-Mac and Cook
I don’t see the Rockets giving up more than these two players for anyone unless they get some ‘Superstar’ like players in return. I think Adelman and Morey like the chemistry right now. They also don’t want to take on long term contracts in a trade unless the players have respectable salaries…which means they’re not making zillions per year, thus allowing them to be tradeable down the road should we need to make a trade.
by inquisitiveman on Jan 4, 2010 12:48 AM CST up reply actions
"dont compare lebron to CP3. now THAT is a far and away difference."
No it isn’t.
CP doesn’t have the athletic gifts of Lebron – the 6’8 height and crazy build and length, but when it comes to pure basketball skill – CP is quite comparable in fact he’s probably better in that regard. He’s not just the best point guard in the game he’s one of the absolute best players period.
Just thought I’d throw that out there.
Aaron Brooks is great though… I really like watching him play.
Um...
“the reason the hornets do lose is b/c cp3 cant come through when everybody knows hes gonna have the ball, keep the ball, and force up something. your basic premadonna. and when he does give up the ball and the player doesnt make a shot, he starts to bitch and moan, something i dont think would mesh well with our TEAM CHEMISTRY”
What in god’s name are you talking about? Do you actually watch Hornets games?
You’re describing CP as if he’s AI or Larry Hughes or something….
CP is probably the most willing passer in the league, certainly he is the most willing passer among superstars. There’s a reason he gets 10+ assists a game.
The guy only takes 14-15 shots a game, and they are rarely poor or forced… which his sky high FG% attests to. Most Hornets fans want CP to shoot MORE.

by 



















