Game 64 Recap: Rockets Defeat Nets116-108, and Luis Scola shows off
The Nets are a bad team - clearly the worst in the league. Dead last in offensive efficiency, not much better on defense, and painfully slow to watch, there's not much going for New Jersey this season, and that's why they're on pace to set the record for fewest wins in a season (in a ridiculously weak Eastern Conference, at that).
The pace-adjusted stats show that they really are as bad as most people think they are, but their pythagorean record (based off of point differential) suggests that, while the Nets are really bad, they aren't historically bad, or even particularly awful in terms of the last few years: 12-54, still the worst in the NBA, but a fairly typical "worst in the league" record.
So while it was frustrating to watch the Rockets struggle to gain any sort of lead on these Nets through the first half, it shouldn't have been too shocking. Devin Harris is one of the best point guards in the NBA when he's not battling a variety of injuries, and though this has been a tough season for him, he's still capable of scoring efficiently a burning any defense in the league. He might not have AB's shooting touch from behind the arc, but he's got Brooks' speed and the finishing ability that the Rockets' starting point guard never really developed. Brook Lopez is a great young player, fully able to do the same.
But at the same time, one doesn't expect guys like Courtney Lee and Jarvis Hayes to light up your defense. Well, maybe Lee, but certainly not Hayes. And the story of tonight's game would certainly be, had a certain Argentine Slayer not exploded for a career night, of the Rockets' failure to defend properly.
On some level, I'm aware of the dangers of making any sort of "trend" based off of single-game (or multi-game, for that matter) samples. Shit happens - the tail ends of statistical distributions are bound to occur, eventually, right? But the Rockets totally failed to defend the perimeter for the first half, so that has to be their fault. Well, maybe not - the Nets are an awful team from beyond the arc. Their best three-point shooters (Yi Jianlian and Chris Quinn) stayed on the bench, and the only other "dangerous" perimeter shooter on their roster is Keyon Dooling, who decided to not shoot last night. Courtney Lee shot well last season, but he has declined this season significantly. Jarvis Hayes, who went off for 4/5 shooting from beyond the arc last night, is a career .354 shooter, but is also having a tough season.
But we should be aware that those players are capable of hitting open shots. Ariza is shooting terribly this season, but he can knock down threes like he's wearing purple and gold again when he's left open, and the same is true of most players (Rafer was, of course, the exception). So the Rox fucked up pretty bad in the first half when they kept leaving these players wide open, but even in the second half they didn't really close out like they should have.
In the end, it didn't matter. Luis Scola exploded for 44 points and 12 rebounds. He only turned the ball over twice (a nice change from some of his recent games), fouled only twice, and actually defended Lopez reasonably well down the stretch. I guess Josh Boone is considered something of a defensive player, but Scola destroyed him and everyone else Kiki Vandeweghe threw at him tonight. More on him later.
Part of what intrigues me about bad teams is that the way they lose goes beyond simple issues with not hitting shots or not defending properly. Bad teams find other ways to screw up, and the Rockets were able to exploit that last night. The Nets were destroyed on the fast break: 23 points vs only 9. The Rockets make a point to pressure the defense after every shot, attempting to run the break whenever the opposing team crashes the boards or makes a shot, and it showed. A 14-point advantage here was huge.
Turnovers, as usual, were something of an issue for the Rockets, but no more than normal. That was mitigated by massive advantages in rebounding (Jordan Hill continues to be critical here, as was David Andersen, Battier, and - of course - Scola).
Three Up:
Luis Scola - Yet another in a long string of great games from Luis, but this was obviously the best. He has really been on for the past month, basically. The increase in minutes has paid off in rare form.
Kyle Lowry - Continues to show why he's so important to the team. Plus/minus continues to be denigrated in the statistical community, but if there's one case for its truth, it might be Lowry (and Battier, too. But both look pretty good in boxscore metrics, too, so whatever). In any case, he settled down the defense and slowed down Devin Harris' initially-frantic pace. Critical, as usual.
Kevin Martin - A very quiet 20 points, but I continue to be blown away by his efficiency. Not that efficient tonight, but he kept getting to the line and didn't turn the ball over once.
Three Down:
Aaron Brooks - Unlike ak2themax, I feel pretty strongly that AB isn't Harris' equal, let alone his superior. Still, he shot poorly for much of the night, and I don't think he really made up for it elsewhere. Seven assists, though, so I might be wrong. Continued to get burned on the defensive end by screens, though that isn't really unusual. Fouling out is however, and he was clearly frustrated throughout the game. Just kinda pissed me off a little, I guess. Not particularly awful or anything, though.
Chuck Hayes - I don't know. Maybe Chuck needs rest, because he hasn't been getting it done the last few games. Weird. On the other hand, it could just be poor luck. Couldn't stop Lopez in the first few minutes and wasn't really given much of a chance to try again later. Helped get Lopez in foul trouble, though, so that was good.
Jordan Hill - Tough to criticize a 4 offensive rebound performance, but he didn't do much else, and kept trying to make tough shots early in the game. Play what you know, or at least save the experimental stuff for when the Rockets are up by 20.
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
Vs the Nets
Brooks assist total was sorta inflated because Scola wasn’t missing. Brooks racked up 3 assists pretty late passing to an open Scola who hit jumpers,two of which were simply moving the ball. On the other hand Brooks was smart enough to realize Luis was on fire and got him the ball. Brooks only passed out of a drive twice all night and one was late when he was looking for Scola on every possession.
I’m becoming convinced Brooks has mediocre at best court vision. He never sees a play before it happens and all too often doesn’t see momentarily open Rockets.
Was interesting to watch the bench towards end of game and the love and joy they showed Scola. Don’t remember seeing that when other Rockets had huge games. Get the feeling not keeping Scola will be a bigger loss than we might think.
On Brook's Defense
Sometimes I choose a player to watch for the game. Last night I picked Brooks-should have picked Scola-oh well. Anyway, I know it’s common knowledge that Brook’s D is mediocre at best, but last night was simply awful.
The Net’s pick and roll killed Brooks. He NEVER fought over a pick, and always went under. I saw absolutely no hustle to get around Lopez or whoever come out, and by the time he got around the 7 footer, Harris had already nailed his shot. It was just an embarrassing lack of effort by Brooks.
At times he would completely loose sight of his guy and be dancing around in the paint for some weird reason. There were MANY times he couldn’t decide if he was going to double-team in the post or close out on the three-point line, and by the time he made up his mind it was too late in either case.
He rarely got a hand up, and he played Harris very loosely. I realize that you don’t want to get too close or a guy as quick as Harris will blow past you, but really Brooks? play the guy 6 feet out? When Harris decided to shot the J, Brooks was too far out to effectively get a hand up.
Last night was simply torturous to watch. There was one play when Brooks played something resembling defense and I almost jumped up and yelled at the TV-unfortunately that play was with about 3 minutes left on the clock. Brooks redeemed himself a bit in the 4th quarter, but I have no idea what he was doing the other 3. Then he fouls out?
Well anyway, there’s my little rant…I hope he can play a little better D on Monday or Billups is going to scorch him.
"What is a Laker anyway? A sub-aquatic Quaker? It doesn't make sense."
I love Aaron Brooks to death...
but he doesn’t play any kind of defense. Can’t guard the pick and roll (seems like nobody on this team can) and doesn’t close out on shots. Everyone will be better when Yao comes back because he makes up for a lot, but Brooks has to make an effort at getting better on the defensive end. Ariza and Battier can’t really do a lot if they keep beating Brooks off the pick and roll, because they have to help which leads to wide open shots. Glad Jordan Hill got a lot of minutes though, he played very well. There’s so much upside to this team that it’s scary.
I think Hill isn't up or down.
I thought he contributed a lot out there, but not much that showed up in the box score. He certainly pissed off Lopez, who had a hard time doing anything against Hill without pushing off, which he did constantly, and which never got called.
But Hill tipped a lot of balls, and kept plays going. He may not have lit up the scoreboard, but he contributed.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
Part of what makes Brooks so frustrating
Is that he doesn’t use his speed on defense. Armed w/scouting reports he should KNOW where the other point likes to go and he should use his speed to beat him there and draw the charge. Chuck,Shane and Lowry do it,yet Brooks refuses.
He can’t contest shots,he can’t fight thru picks,but he could use his speed on D and doesn’t and that irritates me no end. Stupid on my part I know,but I can’t help recalling a former quick PG who didn’t have Brooks’ talent saying he always wanted to draw at least 1 charge while he was on the court,whether it was for 30 seconds or 30 minutes.(Darryl Armstrong.)
We tend to forget Landry had training camp and half a season of tutelage before he started getting heavy rotation minutes. Hill has shown enough in a few practices that Adelman had decided to put him in his rotation. Whether Hill becomes an impact player is still to be determined,but I sure do want to see what he will look like after a summer of work w/Rockets coaches and a training camp.
As long as Lowry is healthy enough to play
the Rockets will stay in the playoff hunt. He’s arguably the most valuable player on the entire team.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 15, 2010 12:31 AM CDT reply actions
Attention OaL: We got the W, Scola had 44
Quit being such a Debbie Downer
by RedRowdy420 on Mar 15, 2010 9:05 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
this may be the first time I've been accused
of being pessimistic when it comes to the Rockets.
They played terrible defense for most of the game. Winning doesn’t change that.
Point taken
But it does change it. If we lose, and the tone of your article is depressing, then it’s understandable. But don’t knock on them when they pull out the win, by 8 at that. The Nets aren’t a horrific team, they lose mostly at the end of their games. And the Rockets are a 2nd half team (save those dry spells in the 3rd quarter).
I’m just saying, you can’t be mad when we win and we lose, otherwise you’re going to turn into grundgedave.
Devin Harris hopes Luis Scola sends him and Brooke Lopez a nice thank you note.
Maybe one with a gift certificate to Best Buy. He’s just sayin…
“…Devin Harris scoffed at the notion that Scola was “hot” Saturday night.
“Hot?” Harris said. “We gave him layups. He hit some perimeter jump shots but the majority of the stuff came off offensive rebounds, post moves, points in the paint. They killed us on the boards. Obviously he had some open looks but we can’t allow him to get two or three shots at the basket.”
From The NY Daily News
In Devin’s world only contested jumpers count for being hot. All those “post move” rebound put-backs, and “points in the paint” in general, are morally suspect. You’d think Devin would have at least respected the “perimeter jumpers” – but most of those were about 9-12 feet out, so I’m not sure what perimeter he’s talking about.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.

by 

















