The Dream Shake: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Deadline: Who is available around MLB?

Game 67 Recap: Rockets Lose to Celtics 94-87

Pay no heed to the "Boston isn't a title contender" talk. All that ever matters in the playoffs is one's ability to make it to the next round, not whether or not you can beat the best team in the next conference, or even the best team in your own. The Celtics can beat great teams, they just haven't been pulling it off recently, and so the NBA sphere wants to write them off.

So it shouldn't be surprising that the Rockets lost last night. The Celtics can beat great teams, and the Rockets aren't a great team. They're a team with a high-scoring backcourt and some significant defensive issues. The Celtics, on the other hand, boast one of the best point guards in the game, a collection of aging-but-not-dead talent, and (most importantly) the strongest defense in the league, built on the contribution of guys like Rondo, Perkins, and Garnett.

And Boston matches up well against the current Rockets squad. Rondo and, surprisingly, Allen pulled off an excellent defensive game against Brooks and Martin, keeping both from getting off shots for most of the night. Their interior defense was just too strong for Scola and Co. to do much against, though their efforts were generally more effective than those of their backcourt counterparts.

Speaking of the frontcourt, I think this game showcased this team's need for Yao pretty spectacularly. On the offensive end, the Rockets needed someone to throw the ball to in the low post, and Scola and Hill were largely getting pushed out of the paint by Davis and Perkins.

The need for Yao on the defensive end is a little more glaring, I think. Sure, there's the rebounding issue - everyone gets pushed around while trying to box out, and while Yao was never the best rebounder, he took up a lot of space and that means a lot. Even this late into the season, the Rockets still get burned on pick-and-rolls. It's as if Brooks gets hit with a pick, looks at the ball handler streaking towards the basket, and says to himself, "Fuck it. It's the frontcourt's problem now." Screw fighting through the pick, because one of the big guys will handle it.

A year ago, that worked. Brooks could fail to fight through the play, and the giant Chinese guy would move towards the basket. It wasn't the best move to keep Yao out of foul trouble, but it helped create one of the best defensive teams in the game.

Okay, so that's the problem - 7'6" Center is no longer there. But it's freaking game 67, right? Everyone should have adjusted by now.

Well, the issue is twofold. First, I think that, to whatever degree, these are just the players we have. Brooks is probably never going to not get totally burned on defense. That's just who he is. I doubt the coaching staff has failed to adjust their schemes, and we know they've played some great defense at times, so it has to come down to the players.Second, Boston is just such a physical team, and I imagine that this upset the Rockets quite a bit, even on defense. Particularly when they pressure the ball enough to generate 16 turnovers and outscore the Rockets on the fastbreak.

In the end, the Rockets just weren't able to execute their offense, nor were they able to maintain any sort of defensive discipline. Boston was just too good on the defensive end for the Rockets to get anything done without a stronger low-post threat, and the bench simply wasn't able to make it up.

Star-divide

Three Up:

Chuck Hayes - Continues to be a one-man army on defense, played Garnett well, and contributed elsewhere. Nice to see him come back from a series of poor games. Led the Rockets in free throws, in another oddity.

Luis Scola - Houston's big guys weren't able to get too much done, but they contributed a lot more than most of the other players. Scola's double-double certainly helped keep this from being a blowout. I might as well mention Jordan Hill here, too. His numbers don't look great, partly because he kept on ending up with the ball at the end of broken possessions, forcing him to throw up prayers. Not a bad night outside of that, however.

Kevin Martin - Okay, Speed was shut down for a good part of the night, thanks mostly to Ray Allen and Michael Finley managing to stay in front of him (Drexler kept complaining about hand-checking on AB, but there was certainly some questionable contact here, too. Whatev). But he turned it on in the third quarter, and wound up with a fairly strong game, just not one strong enough to carry the team. More is expected of him, but so few other had good games that this is enough, I suppose. Still, 17 points on 12 shots isn't bad or anything. And he was hurt too, so he's got that martyr angle going for him.

 

Three Down:

Aaron Brooks - bad night on defense, bad night on offense. The defensive stuff's been discussed, but Rondo pulled off a great game against one of the NBA's hottest shooters. AB only tried one three all night, and Rondo kept Brooks from finding a shot most of the night. Couldn't even get it done against Nate Robinson, though, and that's inexcusable. Rondo might have only scored 2 points, but the 10 assists were partly AB's doing, too.

Kyle Lowry - clearly still ailing from the series of injuries he has aggravated and reaggravated over the course of the past two months. Looked good some moments, looked bad most others.

Everyone - The Rockets needed this. They lost some games against easy opponents early this year, and that meant they needed to make it up against good teams. Instead, the Celtics' defense clearly got in their heads and frustrated them all night.

 

Next Game - @Knicks; Sunday, March 21; 12:00 PM CST

0 recs  |  Comment 33 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

One major factor to me was bench play

We rely on our bench to out-hustle our opponent’s bench and get ahead in the game, but that didn’t happen last night (ours scored 25 pts, theirs 24 pts). Rasheed Wallace, Nate Robinson and Glen Davis were very effective for them

by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on Mar 20, 2010 11:25 AM CDT reply actions  

Owch

I was watching the NCAAs last night so I didn’t see much of this game, but man, sometimes a good old fashion butt-whipping is what a team like this needs. This should prove to help keep us grounded.

I don’t want to waive a white flag or anything, but the Lowry/Ariza injury skid really hurt this team immensely. The skid without those two hurt because the Rockets lost depth and athleticism that they bring to the team. But hey, that 14th pick is going to be pretty good in what should be a deep draft this year. It won’t be John Wall, Evan Turner or DeMarcus Cousins, but I think if we can nab another big we should be in good position moving forward.

B^2
In Daryl Morey, Rick Smith and Ed Wade we (usually) trust.

by Nitroberg on Mar 20, 2010 12:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Why not just let Lowry rest his ankle until it actually heals

or just let him sit out the season since we need to re-sign him and i want a healthy Lowry, not some injury prone guy. I dont want him to reaggravate the injury.

by inquisitiveman on Mar 20, 2010 1:17 PM CDT reply actions  

I've come to realize

that what pick we get doesn’t matter. It’s going to be used in a trade anyway. Sure it would help if it was a top 10 pick, but that’s highly unlikely. Morey is going to have to ask himself, “Amare or Bosh?” Once he figures that out, he’ll have a healthy Yao with a deadly team. Next year is going to be great.

by danielcp0303 on Mar 20, 2010 1:50 PM CDT reply actions  

Is it?

I really doubt we’re going to see either of those guys on the Rockets. But who knows? I didn’t expect to see Landry leave, Martin and Hill et al arrive etc.

Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.

The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 20, 2010 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

This was absolutely a winnable game

The Celtics are terrible against quick, transition teams (aka the Rockets). The problem was we weren’t playing within ourselves. Yes, the Celtics are still a great defensive team, but when you don’t play your game, you’re not going to win.

Oh yeah, and apparently Paul Pierce is kinda clutch. Who knew you had to play defense on him?

by RedRowdy420 on Mar 20, 2010 1:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Jordan Hill

I seriously hope that the Rockets keep him, if they trade someone it should be Scola. I think that by next year he should take Scola’s spot, albeit he might have some rough patches but he’d get the hang of it eventually. Plus from what I’ve heard so far we’re looking at Amar’e or Bosh meaning they’d be the starting pf, I hope we don’t get Amar’e… I really hope that doesn’t happen. Bosh would be cool though. Then it might be worth trading Jordan Hill, but even then I’m a little hesitant.

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 20, 2010 4:20 PM CDT reply actions  

I can't see how anyone would think

that they SHOULD trade Scola. I could give a million reasons why they should keep him. If he happens to be a casualty of a trade, it’ll hurt but the team will move on. But I don’t understand how anyone would want to trade Scola. He’s the ultimate pro.

by danielcp0303 on Mar 20, 2010 7:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's actually simple

Yeah scola is good, he works hard, he doesnt bullshit. But the man is getting old. He’ll play at his current level for another two years or so. He’s likely going to want a 5 year deal which wont make it worth it. Would you trade Jordan Hill someone who can be a cornerstone for the franchise for years to come or trade Scola who will give you just solid production for two years and then you’re just paying for someone to take up bench space?

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 20, 2010 8:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

The best franchise...

I don’t know if you follow the NFL but the patriots have made the smartest GM decisions over the past decade which is why they’ve had so much success. When someone gets old they let him go no need to keep someone for what they used to be. Now yeah Scola will be able to contribute for another few years but lets say that he signs a 5 year contract he’ll be good for about half of that contract the latter years is when he’ll be making the most.

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 20, 2010 8:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying they won't trade him

I’m saying that no Rockets fan should want them to trade him

by danielcp0303 on Mar 20, 2010 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

This would be the best time to

You trade a player when their stock is at their highest (especially knowing that it will soon begin to decrease). Luis Scola’s stock isn’t going to get much higher. It’s what Morey did with Landry which was a very good deal.

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 21, 2010 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I see no reason why Scola can't play at 34 or 35, though naturally not as well.

The guy has never been athletic after all and gets by with sheer grit and craftiness – he can hit that jumper and do a mini-Dream Shake when he’s old.
Yes, his age is a factor in his contract (If Scola was 25, I’d pay 9 million or so for him), but it isn’t the end-all thing. And that’s not getting into the matters that he’s a restricted free agent, thus lowering his price, and the 5 year thing you’re discussing came out of your rear end.
If you have a chance to trade him for Bosh, do you do it? Sure. But Hill isn’t ready to be the starting PF yet, though he will be a good backup for now, and so I bet we keep him, something like 6 million for 3 years.

Minnesotan Rockets fan

by Barragan on Mar 20, 2010 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah I wouldn’t say he’d be horrible in the 4th or 5th year of his contract. but in the end he wouldn’t be worth it. Scola’s been playing professionally since he was 15 years old, his body has seen much more wear than a lot of these NBA players. Granted the European/South American league’s seasons aren’t as long as the NBA but they are certainly not what the current NBA players saw at their age; high school and college ball hardly compare to the Euroleage. Most of that stress goes to knees, its only a matter of time. The fact that he’s a restricted free agent doesn’t mean anything with all the money out there this summer no restricted free agent is safe. Also by next year Jordan Hill will be ready to take over.

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 20, 2010 9:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why do you assume

Hill will be ready to take over? He’s using his athletic skill to be productive right now. It took Sigma 3 years to get Landry ready to take over. In games Hill hasn’t been able to hit an open shot, doesn’t set screens well, and has no low post game, not even one move to go to. He will not be ready to take over next year. He’ll be that guy coming off the bench that runs and brings energy. And if the Rockets do trade for a big guy or sign one (which almost everyone thinks is what Morey wants), then his minutes would either stay the same or maybe drop a little.

by danielcp0303 on Mar 21, 2010 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sikma

not sigma….I always do that

by danielcp0303 on Mar 21, 2010 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

6 years

Everything that Jordan Hill has so far has been developed in 6 years. I mean that is astounding progress. He’s only been playing basketball 6 years and hes in the NBA that alone says so much. What he’s been bringing the past few games has been pretty good. If he played as much as Scola did, he’d be quite productive, definitely not as productive as Scola is, but kind of close. Jordan Hill has some moves and his shot is okay, with a little more practice he’ll be able to hit mid-range. You can’t judge his mid-range game if he’s only taken around 4 or 5 shots. Thats not enough evidence to make a substantial argument. You make it seem like he has no offensive repertoire whatsoever. He does, it might not be well developed but there is definitely something there. J Hill made the rotation 6 games ago. So lets look focus on that, in those six games he played 20 or more minutes 5 times. In those 5 games 4 of those he did quite well considering, he’s still a rookie, not many plays are drawn for him, and well considering that it was in just 20 (or slightly above) minutes. This guy is going to be good.

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 21, 2010 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

To clarify, he’s been playing organized basketball for just 6 years.

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 21, 2010 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

He has no post moves at all

All of his buckets have been either hustle plays, or he gets the ball right at the rim. He will be good, he a better athletic skill than Landry did, but he’s nowhere near ready to take on that huge roll. Not gonna happen. He’ll continue to get the kind of minutes he’s getting now, especially when Yao comes back and we pick up another big guy.

by danielcp0303 on Mar 21, 2010 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

He’s been scoring semi efficiently thus far, I still don’t know why you think he doesn’t have any post moves whatsoever. Chuck Hayes has no post moves whatsoever and he hustles but he doesn’t get points like Jordan Hill does. Hill has made some remarkable strides, he’ll be ready by next year if he works Sickma during the summer. Especially with Yao being there he’d make Jordan Hill’s transition much easier. Less will be asked of him.

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 21, 2010 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Since he’s been put into the rotation he’s shot 54% post moves or no post moves thats pretty damn good.

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 21, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

like i said

when you’re getting dunks and layups you’re % will be good. It took Sikma 3 years to teach Landry everything. Hill won’t learn it in 1 summer.

by danielcp0303 on Mar 21, 2010 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah he will, Jordan Hill is faster learner than Carl Landry. It can be argued that it took Landry only two years to develop, due to Yao, and Scola he didn’t get a chance to show it. He was putting similar numbers his second year, there were just less shot opport opportunities unites and less pt. So hell yeah Jordan Hill can learn it, and it won’t be a summer, he’s still got another month in this season and he’s shown signs of development since he came to the Rockets.

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 21, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Coach Rick said it best

The way Hill stays on the floor and gets minutes is by seeing the ball and going up and getting it. Off and Def Rebounds, and 2nd chance points.

by danielcp0303 on Mar 21, 2010 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

For now

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 21, 2010 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Carl Landry didn't have post moves when he came to Houston.

He learned them here. So will Hill.

Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.

The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 21, 2010 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

If

Daryl Morey can get him to sign for 3 years that would be perfect, but we don’t live in fairy land. Scola wants long term money, just like anyones else.

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 20, 2010 9:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

From my understanding, he is a restricted FA

i think the most other teams can offer is 3 yrs max. The Rox do have to match the salary offers though. I’m thinking Scola will be offered no more than 5 million/yr.

by inquisitiveman on Mar 21, 2010 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

But wasn’t Gortat a restricted free agent last year and he got signed to a 5 year deal?

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 21, 2010 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

i think the mavs offered a 5 year 35 mil deal then the magic said they weren’t going to match up but ended up matching it at the last second thus keeping Gortat. but im not sure

Change is the only constant

by nick.twizzle on Mar 21, 2010 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Scola was limited by Garnett/Perkins/Wallace
Brooks was slowed by Rondo/Nate
Martin was playing extremely well but then his shoulder acted up.

Without any of those 3 scoring 20 points, we cannot beat a good team.

by VBG on Mar 20, 2010 8:10 PM CDT reply actions  

I think Yao will be good for only 2 yrs or maybe 3 only.

That is why if we can trade Hill, Battier, Jeffires and one of our 1st round picks in a sign/ trade for Bosh, we need to do it. Don’t get me wrong, Hill will be a good player in years to come, but we need to start winning now due to Yao. Plus we just don’t know if he is get injured again. If Yao was 23-24 yrs old, i say keep Hill and forget about Bosh, but he’s not.

by inquisitiveman on Mar 21, 2010 12:12 PM CDT reply actions  

I have a very strong feeling we won't get Bosh.

But why do you think Yao is going to disappear in 2-3 years? If it’s health, well, you could be right. If it’s abilities, I’m not so sure. Nothing about Yao’s game should deteriorate quickly.

Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.

The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 21, 2010 11:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Dream Shake: Dedicated to all things Houston Rockets. Past, present and future. Expect criticism, commentary and shameless promotions to get Robert Horry into the Hall of Fame.
Start posting about the Rockets »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Did Anyone Fault Magic for Playing with Kareem and Worthy?
Small
Rudy Fernandez
Brand_small
A bored hopeful trade target post....
Rockets_small
yao ming
Small
Carroll Dawson's Lost Decade?
Chuck_small
guess what happened TODAY
Chriab_small
The Real T-Mac
Hakeem_olajuwon_small
Bullet biting 101
Small
Earl Barron, a low cost, potentially high yield big man?
Small
Ouch! Lets hope it never comes to this.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBN Hoops Twitter

SBNation.com Recent Stories

 LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh of the Miami Heat speak after being introduced to fans during a welcome party at American Airlines Arena on July 9 2010 in Miami Florida.  (Photo by Doug Benc/Getty Images)

How Good Will LeBron James And The Miami Heat Be In 2011? Hint: Very Good

Lorenzen Wright 
(Getty Images) +7 updates

Lorenzen Wright's Body Found In Memphis, Police Conduct Homicide Investigation

Chris Paul LeBron James

'The Miami Model': Why Greed Is Good, And The NBA's Superteam Era Will Be Great

More from SBNation.com >


Daryl Morey Wannabes

Kurt-avatar_small grungedave

Img_4429_small UofTOrange

Photo-2_small Tom Martin

B-List Superstars

Oingo_boingo-only_a_lad_small Only_A_Lad

Guide04_small Xiane

Crabtree_small ak2themax

Contributing Writers

Tex_small Mike Kerns