Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dissecting Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Indicators for the Impending Blockbuster Deal

[Editor's Note: From the FanPosts. Some great insight here, JSlay. -Tom]

Hi all. I have been a long time reader of The Dream Shake and finally decided to sign up for an account and make my first post. A random fact about me-- I went to high school with and wrote for the sports section of the school newspaper with ak2themax (the guy who does the previews).

I really like the Rockets roster for the upcoming season as is-- with Yao coming back next season, I love our ability to score both inside and outside, in addition to our ability to be a  solid defensive team. I also think our depth is among the best in the league.

There has been a lot of talk around TDS about what the Rockets should do to upgrade this roster in the offseason, and it seems clear that there are two dominant schools of thought: 1) We go out and sign a serviceable backup quality big man like a Brad Miller or Joel Pryzbillya or 2) We make a blockbuster trade for a premier big man like a Chris Bosh or Al Jefferson. Based both on our current roster setup and on comments made by GM Daryl Morey, it seems clear to me that the Rockets will be  going with option 2.

Let's take a look at our current roster:

Star-divide

PG Aaron Brooks

SG Kevin Martin

SF Trevor Ariza

PF Luis Scola

C Yao Ming

Bench: Shane Battier, Kyle Lowry, Chase Budinger, Jordan Hill, Chuck Hayes, Jared Jeffries, David Andersen

Last season we had Brooks, Martin, Ariza, Scola, and Battier all play 30+ minutes for this team with Kyle Lowry playing about 25 minutes/gm; While one could argue otherwise, to me these core players are deserving of similar playing time next season (perhaps slight decreases for some). Yao Ming, by the All Star Break, should also be playing around 30 minutes/gm. Budinger and Hill showed great promise in their rookie seasons and are due for minutes increases in the rotation. And then we have Hayes, Jeffries, and Andersen, all servicable rotation big men who are deserving of something on the order of 10-15 minutes/gm. Throw in the #14 pick in the draft, who also will be most likely deserving of something on the order of 15 minutes/gm.

Adding Yao to the mix will certainly scale down everyone's minutes by a certain degree, but one thing is clear given our current roster-- we have too many players who deserve significant playing time. There are only 240 (48x5) minutes to go around in a single basketball game, and doing some quick math based on the above assumptions, it seems that Rick Adelman will have a tough time constructing his rotation given the current roster situation. However, excessive depth is not a terrible problem to have and is a byproduct of excellent management by Daryl Morey.

What if the Rockets go out and sign a Brad Miller esque (deserving of ~20 minutes/gm) backup big man? What would inevitably ensue would be further roster inefficiency as talented, playing-time deserving players would just have to sit and watch on the  bench. Either that or players deserving of starter's minutes would have their playing time limited. There just wouldn't be enough minutes to go around for guys like Jordan Hill, Andersen, Jeffries, etc. not to mention whoever becomes our first round pick (likely a big man). We already have a glut of serviceable players and this course of action would only further the "problem". Being the excellent GM that he is, Daryl Morey will not allow his roster to be inefficient.

The obvious solution is to trade multiple players for one player, consolidating multiple assets into a single entity. Morey has adamantly said that Lowry and Scola will be  back next season, and given this reality, there seems to be no other feasible solution. Morey has also claimed that he plans to be a major player this offseason and that he believes most of the big name free agents will move via sign-and trade. Now, in recent days, Marc Stein has been reporting about several things that would make sense about a Chris-Bosh-to-Houston trade. All the signs, at least to me, point to this course of action.

I'm really excited for next season, regardless. I know little about team tendencies, trade rules, and our cap situation given this scenario, but let's say we could swing a deal of Battier, Hill, Jeffries, and a draft pick for Chris Bosh (if that's even a reasonable trade). Look at this scary roster:

PG Aaron Brooks

SG Kevin Martin

SF Trevor Ariza

PF Chris Bosh

C Yao Ming

Primary Reserves: Luis Scola, Kyle Lowry, Chase Budinger

Secondary Reserves: David Andersen, Chuck Hayes

Adelman could allocate minutes to this roster in an efficient way, maximizing his talent, and not being forced to sit quality basketball players. Get excited Houston, this is a championship roster! Hopefully Les Alexander is willing to shell out the cash necessary to make this happen...

Poll
So, which option makes more sense for the Houston Rockets?
Option 1- Go out and sign a backup bigman (a Brad Miller type)
122 votes
Option 2- Trade for a premier bigman (a Chris Bosh type)
508 votes

630 votes | Poll has closed

No cursing in title. No pirated material, such as links to online game streams. Do not cut/paste entire sections of content from other websites. Thanks.

Comment 37 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

just a magnificent post!

kudos on this 1st post its wonderful….ok down 2 business
I went with option 1 because you can never underestimate depth in this league. remember when dallas traded for Kidd? they really haven’t done anything since and their staple used to always be their depth. I would propose a minor trade for future assets to set ourselves up for the next 10 years. but at the end of the day Morey Knows Best

by batman713 on May 1, 2010 4:44 PM CDT reply actions  

true, but...

I’m not so sure we should be concerned with depth over the next 10 years. Making that big trade would create a potential championship winning roster, with an extended window of time to get it done if Yao proves to recover positively from his surgery (by the way I have the faith in Dr. Clanton’s work— I worked in his clinic this past summer!). Not to mention the fact that we would still be able to run a rotation of solid players that runs 10 deep.

by JSlay on May 1, 2010 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great post.

Though your trade will not work. Reason why: Jared Jeffries is in it. His contract won’t be very appealing. But if we got Hedo in that trade then I think we can put in Jeffries. I think a realistic trade would be:

HOU gets: Chris Bosh

TOR gets: Jordan Hill, Trevor Ariza, and maybe a draft pick.

Reason I put Ariza in there instead of Battier is because I think Morey is loyal to his main players, especially our team captain(Battier).

But then again Morey can shock us like he did with the Landry trade. I think Morey is just as loyal to Battier as he is/was to Landry. So I guess we could maybe throw in Battier instead, but his age makes him unattractive and where Ariza’s does. Toronto gets a big man with a ton of upside in return, an elite perimeter defender and good spot up shooter in Ariza, and perhaps one of the NYK first round picks we got(or the first rounder in the 2010 draft).

All in all, I would not mind giving up Battier, Ariza or Hill. We get an elite PF who is a premier scorer at his position and an excellent rebounder. Plus, he is still only 26 or 27, which is still fairly young.

So I give this trade idea the OK. Fire away Morey.

A statement to the players of the Jazz and Mavericks: Please stop flopping all over the court.

by Rockets 4 Life on May 1, 2010 7:22 PM CDT reply actions  

sure, thanks

I claim to know little about what the form of the trade should look like- just that it needs to happen in order for us to have a roster that can be used efficiently.

Thanks for the compliments guys!

by JSlay on May 1, 2010 7:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

That trade won't work because the money is nowhere close to matching up.

Battier/Scola/Jeffries in some combination of sorts are gonna have to be included to make the money work, not to mention a draft pick will be given to sweeten the deal. Hill/Taylor/Bud/Brooks, one if not two will be gone also. Something like Scola/Jeffries/Battier & Budinger & pick for Bosh/?/pick will be close to what happens. I seriously think that’s why Morey wanted STAT to trade him to Toronto for Bosh in a sign & trade straight up.

by mangelq75 on May 1, 2010 9:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah makes sense. Many players don’t want to accept diminished roles for no reason.

by VBG on May 1, 2010 8:28 PM CDT reply actions  

I still think we should trade for Tyson Chandler

Assuming he picks up his player option. I thibnk he’s a guy who’s versataile enough to play the 4, when Yao’s on the floor. Or play the 5 with Yao on the bench. And you might be able to get the deal done with some combination of, Jeffries/Battier, and draft picks.

The player I would like least at #9 would be my sister’s cat, Captain Creamsicle. She does have a great work ethic and agility, but I’m really concerned that at 9 lbs., she’s too small to play safety in the NFL. She also bites way too often on play action and is easily distracted by someone waving string in the crowd. Lastly, her wonderlic score was pretty awful, answering "meow meow meow" for most of the questions- Dr. Brackish Okun

by mob16151 on May 1, 2010 10:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Chandlers player option is big

Like 13 million dollars big IIRC. So you have to come up with salary somewhere.

The player I would like least at #9 would be my sister’s cat, Captain Creamsicle. She does have a great work ethic and agility, but I’m really concerned that at 9 lbs., she’s too small to play safety in the NFL. She also bites way too often on play action and is easily distracted by someone waving string in the crowd. Lastly, her wonderlic score was pretty awful, answering "meow meow meow" for most of the questions- Dr. Brackish Okun

by mob16151 on May 1, 2010 10:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Chandler always looks great on paper...

but the last thing we need in Houston is a C with a well-documented history of injury problems.

by ghost of cassell on May 2, 2010 7:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

He also runs the floor well

Is a good rebounder, and as a shotblocker would do a lot, to keep Yao out of foul trouble.

The player I would like least at #9 would be my sister’s cat, Captain Creamsicle. She does have a great work ethic and agility, but I’m really concerned that at 9 lbs., she’s too small to play safety in the NFL. She also bites way too often on play action and is easily distracted by someone waving string in the crowd. Lastly, her wonderlic score was pretty awful, answering "meow meow meow" for most of the questions- Dr. Brackish Okun

by mob16151 on May 3, 2010 8:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hey, welcome to the board.

I like your logic, but I’ve been more inclined to ‘stock up’ on good bigs due to the experiences we’ve had with injuries, not to mention the injury woes of other teams’ bigs.

I’m curious as to why you think hashing out a Bosh trade and finding a backup big man would be mutually exclusive?

by flipasta on May 1, 2010 10:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Not mutually exclusive

I think the Bosh trade would put a bit of financial strain on the Rockets. I don’t actually know this and am making an assumption though :)

My intuition tells me that getting Bosh AND a Brad Miller type is asking for too much. With Bosh, our big man rotation is pretty solid— Bosh, Yao, Hayes, Scola, Andersen. I don’t think that area would need to be improved through free agency

by JSlay on May 2, 2010 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great stuff Jeremy

Good points. Even Lowry in the offseason said he wanted to be a starter somewhere. It’s going to be hard to get him what he wants while allowing the others in the backcourt to get their PT, too. However, trading Battier or Ariza would really hurt our backcourt. A five man rotation (Brooks, Lowry, Bud, Ariza/Battier, Martin) isn’t enough bodies, and I’m not sure JT is ready.
 
The big question really is whether Morey is willing to deal Hill. I think he understands the kid’s upside better than anyone else. I do know he’ll make the smart move, though.

How many Biletnikoffs does he have? NOT TWO!

by ak2themax on May 2, 2010 12:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Good post, hope you keep contributing.

I’d like to throw something in the mix:

It’s better to have a roster that has players capable of stepping up their minutes, and usage productively, than have one that has more built in limits.

Also, the Rockets have a great deal of player flexibility – there are different guys who do different things. You might lose some of that as well.

That is, while it looks more efficient to move several guys for one star, if that’s possible, the question becomes, how do you deal with injury, as it is like that your bench is going to get weaker overall if there is a trade.

if the Rockets draft a rookie big man, as I expect they will, and sign maybe another big man, or as I’d prefer, a big combo guard, do we need to make a trade? Maybe so, but my sense, informed by nothing, is that Bosh isn’t headed this way.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

The Dreamshake

by Xiane on May 2, 2010 1:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Of course...

This is a sacrifice we would have to make. There is no free lunch and you can’t make a roster upgrade without sacrificing SOMETHING (unless you’re the Lakers and want Pau Gasol). But I think the cost of losing this flexibility is marginal compared to the benefits of adding a superstar.

It kind of reminds me of the 2006ish San Diego Chargers, when they had bright young star Philip Rivers backing up Drew Brees, who was fresh off some seriously productive seasons. Sure, the Chargers would have preferred to have both quarterbacks, since it’s definitely a good thing to have a quality starter AND a quality backup. However, the value of your roster is not being maximized in this situation. Alas, they let Brees walk, and used the financial freedom with making that decision to build a solid roster that has contended for many consecutive years. Would they have been better off keeping both quarterbacks? That’s another discussion, but they certainly would have had a lot of money tied up at one position.

We are in a similar situation. The chargers had limited money to allocate efficiently; the Rocets have limited minutes to allocate efficiently. While sure, it’s nice to have flexibility in case of injury, etc. sometimes you need to sacrifice a small asset to improve overall.

Like I said, I’m not sure what we need to give up to make a Bosh trade a reality, but from what I’ve read, it’s not too steep of a price. Our team would still be pretty deep, and would have top talents at all five positions.

ak2themax pointed out that our guard rotation might be a little thin given my above scenario; perhaps we could draft a shooter in the second round, or in the first round if we somehow could keep our pick (Morey is a genius after all). That roster seems pretty deep and flexible to me. Excellent backups at four positions (Lowry, Budinger, Scola, Hayes/Andersen) with a rookie project coming off the bench to deepen the guard rotation.

by JSlay on May 2, 2010 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm an economics major guys, haha

Look I know the NBA isn’t an efficient market or anything, but appeal to the intuition of value and consumption. An efficient market is one where those who value goods the most get to consume them.

Translated into basketball terms, the teams that value players the most should have those players on their team. A guy like Jordan Hill, who to me looks like he has a great future in this league, is going to be buried on our bench behind our primary bigs, Yao and Scola, while he fights for minutes with Andersen, Hayes, Jeffries, and most likely, our first round draft pick (if we keep the pick). Since he won’t get to play much on our team, his value to us is relatively low, whereas his value to a team with less depth is high.

The impending blockbuster trade is all about moving players who we can afford to lose, for a game changing all star.

by JSlay on May 2, 2010 2:42 PM CDT reply actions  

Neither

Trade for a wing, as I mentioned in my other post. Luis Scola coming off the bench if a waste of his talents and an inefficient use of money.

by OremLK on May 2, 2010 4:37 PM CDT reply actions  

maybe

but I happen to like Ariza and how he fits into our team as a guy who can hit open threes when he’s the fifth option on the court (see 2009 Lakers championship run). But that’s just a difference of opinion, and I fully respect your points.

You do have a good point though. Luis may command too much money to be an asset as a bench player.

by JSlay on May 2, 2010 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Giving up too much for tickets.

I think this summarizes the proposed trades to snag Chris Bosh. I don’t believe adding Bosh will do anything good for us when you consider what we’d have to give up. I don’t want us mortgaging our future because we want Chris Bosh to pair with Yao. He’d be nice to hold on to but I’m not going to sacrifice Hill, picks, Ariza, and Battier/Jeffries over him. Relegating Scola to the bench is spitting in the face of a man that can give you just as much production as you get out of Bosh.

Consider this:

The reason Scola is as effective as he is at his age is that he doesn’t play outside of himself. He’s preserved his body and conditioned it well and plays smart basketball. I really don’t think his window will close as fast as we generally see superstars close because Scola relies in his arsenal of smart moves, jump shots, and position defense to be effective. Yes, he has several years on Bosh but he’s in the system, can carry the Rockets if need be, and is a remarkable 4. Rear up Hill behind Yao and Scola and within the next two years I think we’ll see a beast emerge.

Our roster is pretty stacked as it is when you’re adding Yao back into the mix. Add in our Mid Level Exception and lottery draft pick, why package up rotation playerS (Please, key in on the S in that word) for Bosh? We’d throw out players who get legitimate time, contribute well, and draft picks for Bosh. I don’t like the idea of getting fleeced like that. I’m not a fan of the idea of pursuing Al Jefferson but I’d take it in a heartbeat over the Chris Bosh proposals.

I think more fans need to look at the facts of things and see just how much the Rockets have sitting in their favor and realize a trade deadline deal is the best we should look at. Playing time won’t be a huge problem considering all our bigs can play 4/5, I don’t want to mortgage our defense and youth just for Chris Bosh to sell tickets and contribute a bit. I mean Hell, just consider the fact that THIS is our starting line up if we retain free agents:

Aaron Brooks – 19PPG last season
Kevin Martin – 20PPG Career
Trevor Ariza – 15PPG (Right?) last season, became remarkably efficient in the second half of the year, can only improve.
Luis Scola – Capable of 20+ PPG on a given night, has barely ever missed a game, great rebounder, and still has at least 3 years left in him, same time left on Martin’s contract and Yao’s window of effectiveness.
Yao Ming – Enough said.

Then consider further development out of our young players. I think too often fans forget the lessons of greats like Red Auerbach. You take your established players, rear up young players behind them so that you can rotate them in when your old players lose their effectiveness, sell high as your established players age. Why follow the modern Celtic incarnation in mortgaging your youth for big ticket names that may only net you 2-3 years of success tops? Yea, it got them a ring, but Red’s methods got them a legacy of greatness.

But, I understand the fascination, the city is championship starved and fans are enamored with stars rather than the patient approach to keeping yourself in contention for years to come. This team is sitting pretty, I wouldn’t break the bank because I got greedy. I trust Morey won’t pull the trigger on a major deal that will hamstring us (Plus, Toronto wants OUT of Turkgolu bad, they’d try to pawn him off on us).

I'm always right, this isn't conjecture, merely statement of fact.

by BD34 on May 2, 2010 6:45 PM CDT reply actions  

Playing time WILL be an issue given your suggestions

You claim otherwise. Let me take you step my step on what I believe are appropriate amounts of playing time for the roster you hope we have going into next season. Let me know where you disagree.

Keep in mind these will be VERY conservative estimates, just to be safe.

1. The starters- Brooks, Martin, Ariza, Scola, and Yao each get starters minutes (150 minutes total)
2. The key reserves- Lowry and Battier (50 minutes total)
3. The rising youngsters, surely they deserve an uptick- Budinger and Hill (40 minutes total)
4. The MLE, why sign him if he isn’t going to play- Brad Miller?? (20 minutes)
5. The 14th pick in the draft, an interesting prospect, let’s see if he can play- Random Rookie (15 minutes)
6. The serviceable glue guys- Hayes, Jeffries, and Andersen (25 minutes total)

This clearly does not add up. The above estimates already consist of minutes being cut across the board, so someone would need to be seriously limited to make this whole thing work. In addition, some of these players would not even make the 12-man roster! Why should we not use our roster to the fullest? It seems to me we could go this way and have a VERY competitive team, but we wouldn’t be using our roster to the fullest.

I also don’t think adding Bosh limits our shot at winning a championship to just the next 2-3 years. This all hinges on Yao’s foot actually being healed, but who on our team do you see fading anytime soon. Hopefully not Brooks. Nor Ariza. Nor Martin. Certainly not Bosh. Not to mention we’ll be holding on to Budinger, Lowry, and hopefully Scola (who you said yourself will not fade with age) all guys who I see contributing for a long time.

I don’t think this big trade would be following the Celtics model, but more the Lakers model. The Lakers were a solid team, with experience and young talents. They went out and got a premier big man, Pau Gasol, who put them over the top, and they will certainly contend for years. We will definitely have to shell out more than the Lakers did in their trade, but I think we can afford it, since we just have soooo many assets.

We can both agree that Morey has done an exceptional job collecting assets. But I think we should use them to improve this team. It’s like keeping your fortune in the bank, where you collect on the miniscule interest rate. There are better things you can do with your money.

by JSlay on May 2, 2010 8:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think part of the issue for me

is the simple fact that we could do a smaller trade and not really lose much to round our roster out so that we can fit everyone. The issue I have with the Bosh trade is too much to give up to get one. Whereas we could piece together players on the fringe of the rotation for some serviceable player. Why swing for the fences when you have runners in scoring position and need a single to get the guy from 3rd over?

Morey has done a great job at collecting assets, I just don’t feel that moving multiple key rotation players, excellent young talent, and draft picks for Bosh to be the best use of our pieces. Honestly, would you want to give up what Hill can become, a good defender and blossoming wing scorer in Ariza, Battier’s leadership/contract, most likely this year’s lotto pick, and Buddinger to pry Bosh out? We lose a starter, a leader, two promising youths, and a good draft pick for Chris Bosh. Something about it, to me, just doesn’t sit right. I think standing pat really is our best option.

The only players I would call expendable:

Jeffries, Taylor, and Anderson.

There isn’t a trade market for any of these players and I really don’t think we need to find a trade market to pull any of this off. You can credit getting a healthy Yao back to at least 8 wins, which pushes us to 50, consider the development of our youngsters and such and we’re going to compete regardless of a Bosh acquisition or any other marquee player (in my opinion).

I'm always right, this isn't conjecture, merely statement of fact.

by BD34 on May 2, 2010 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ripoff Trade

We better not give up Ariza, Battier, Hill, Budinger, AND a lottery pick!!!! That would be highway robbery. We better be getting Lebron James for that package. If you noticed, the trade I was proposing gave up 3/5 of the above.

50 wins sounds like losing in the first round in the West to me.

by JSlay on May 3, 2010 12:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

You are making too many assumptions

JT played all of 303 minutes in 31 games…
What makes you think our new draft pick will get any playing time at all?
My guess is he’ll be sent down to RGV

Not all players will get PT in every game, depends on the match-ups… I don’t expect JJ or Andersen to play much next season unless there are injuires

by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on May 2, 2010 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

JT

was also not picked 14th overall. Most lottery picks get some playing time, but that’s not even the point. the point is a lottery pick SHOULD get playing time. He wouldn’t on the extremely deep roster. I don’t expect JJ or Andersen to play much next season either. That’s my point. They SHOULD play, that is, they are good basketball players and should play on good basketball teams.

Making a trade improves the team because everyone gets their appropriate number of minutes. That’s my opinion at least. There have been some good counterarguments, and like most debates, the truth of “the best course of action” probably lies somewhere in between both sides.

by JSlay on May 3, 2010 12:54 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Awesome

I love that last line. I think a trade is neccesary as well. But we shouldnt have to break the bank like some of you are saying. Go ahead and look back at almost every sign and trade and see if it was an even trade. Better yet, look at Toronto’s specifically! Vince Carter anyone? If we could get him for Hill, Battier (To be Bought out), Jeffries, and a future draft pick, then we should do it. Your essentially trading Jordan Hill for Bosh. It would be cheap because its a sign and trade, all of this hinges on Chris Bosh picking us.

Did you know Eric Berry was asexually produced by Chuck Norris?

by darwithabar on May 7, 2010 1:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

I love how u think, however, I don’t see this happening without Budinger being involved. He’s cheap, talented, and contractually controllable, all things Toronto would want. Hill, Budinger, and Jeffries is realistic and something I would do. However, the Rox shoud balk at including a pick if Bud is involved. The Knicks will still be terrible when their picks become ours.

by cnyroxfan on May 2, 2010 9:35 PM CDT reply actions  

I prefer a deep bench myself given our history of injuries

When will guys like Jordan and CBud get playing time? When Yao and KMart are injured or need to rest their aching bodies. I really admire what Pop did with Duncan in the regular season and now the Spurs are peaking at the right time because sometime in the regular season, either forced by injuries or by design, Parker, Manu and Tim had a stretch when they could rest.

For Bosh, I prefer to give up only Hill, either Battier or Jeffries, the draft and the picks. No way I’m giving up CBud, he’s our insurance when KMart is out or not playing well. Nor am I giving up Ariza who we need to shore up AB and KM’s defense. Otherwise, no Bosh and we go for a defensive-minded center.

by RoxBeliever on May 3, 2010 5:56 AM CDT reply actions  

definitely true

It worked out for the Spurs this year.

However, it’s a definitely a risky strategy to rest your stars during prolonged stretches of the season. The Spurs had the same record as the Thunder, and by virtue of a tiebreaker, just barely avoided having to play the Lakers in the first round. You can forget about a deep playoff run if they had drawn the eight seed which they almost did.

It’s pretty important to sport a good record in the regular season if you want to win a championship. It’s no surprise that pretty much every year, a one seed takes home the title. (Except of course your 1995 Rockets are the huge exception to that!)

by JSlay on May 3, 2010 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hope it happens

I like all these suggestions that puts Bosh with the Rockets and keep Scola too. I hope it can happen. What I don’t understand is what is in this for Toronto. They seem to end up with a team full of average joes. I mean, if the Rockets send them 3 or 4 guys like Battier, Ariza, Jeffries, Hill, Bud, etc then what do they do with them? These guys are all okay but??? What would the starting Raptors team look like? It would be like some summer league team.

by Gulder_Roy on May 3, 2010 7:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Bosh is a free agent, so...

If they don’t trade him, then they get nothing in return if he decides to sign with another team. The Rockets have been identified as a possible trading partner because we could actually send a few useful pieces back to Toronto.

by JSlay on May 3, 2010 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Getting a 'bosh-type' would be nice for the Rockets...

…so long as it isn’t Bosh himself, as he sucks and will need to be massively overpaid.

"I’m tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok." ~Shaq

by Max_in_Missouri on May 4, 2010 7:57 PM CDT reply actions  

That's a good point.

At the top level of FA there are no types, only individual talents.

I’m not even sure the NBA supports the sabremetric “replacement player” concept. The “free talent” level of the NBA is the a D-League player, I would say, or a minimum contract player. Even they are so individual that some of them end up being very valuable NBA talents (Morrow on GS, Matthews on Utah for example).

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

The Dreamshake

by Xiane on May 4, 2010 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Breathe

I believe that if the rockets get Bosh then they will be trading Aaron Brooks to get him. With Lowry running the point, Martin at the two, Ariza at 3, and then Bosh and Yao respectively the Rockets will be on point. With Lowrys ability to run the offense and get to the basket and draw fouls, that will be a best possible situation. They could sign another backup in the offseason like Luke Ridnour and I think they will be in business. I know some people will cry about Brooks leaving, but if it equals a championship, then so be it.

by trophic on May 6, 2010 11:38 AM CDT reply actions  

Im on board with dealing Brooks

The good thing is Toronto may look at Brooks and be willing to deal Bosh for Brooks straight up (Of course fillers, I know the rules). Brooks is gonna be pretty over paided next year and the Rockets shouldnt be the one doing it. Id rather have Lowry running the point anyways, with a back up like Ridnour or Eric Bledsoe (14th pick).

Did you know Eric Berry was asexually produced by Chuck Norris?

by darwithabar on May 7, 2010 1:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Welcome J Slay

I know we have been over this before, but that was when we thought the salary cap would be around $50 mil. Now that we know the cap is around $56 mil is it possible for us to straight up sign Chris Bosh?? Morey has said he is going after a top 5 free agent which makes me think we do have the money and are willing to pay the luxury tax.

I say we sign Bosh and be done. Battier is losing it because of his age and injuries and I think Ariza and Budinger will be able to replace him. I dont think Yao should get near 30+ minutes per game in the regular season which will allow Bosh and Scola to play together and get their chemistry down. With Battier playing less and Yao getting around 20-25 min a game there will be enough minutes to go around between Brooks, Lowry, Martin, Budinger, Ariza, Battier, Scola, Bosh, Hill, Hayes, Andersen, Jeffries.

To all Houston sports fans, Houston is the 4th biggest city in America, there will be traffic on the way to your respective sports game. Come Early, Be Loud, Stay Late.

by TexasHoosier on May 8, 2010 3:50 PM CDT reply actions  

not possible

the numbers just wont add up. re-signing Scola and Lowry will eat up all our money except I believe a MLE.

by joshsm07 on May 8, 2010 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Dream Shake: Dedicated to all things Houston Rockets. Past, present and future. Expect criticism, commentary and shameless promotions to get Robert Horry into the Hall of Fame.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hunter-s_small
Blazers Fan Here: Kevin Love Is A real Jerk!
340x_small
Anyone Here Interested In Wilson Chandler?

Recent FanPosts

Guide04_small
Love requited - Greg Smith Signs with The Rockets
Small
So you are an NBA owner and have 60 mil in cap space THIS year….
Yaoface_small
I'm just gonna leave this here
340x_small
Would You Do a Martin-Noah swap?
Megaman_small
KAMAN
Rockets_small
Whats wrong wit da rockets...
Small
Beasley discovers hidden basketball talent to help Wolves take down Rockets 120-108
Images_small
Rockets Interested in Kaman??
Small
2012 Free Agents: It's Never Too Early For Plan B

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBN Hoops Twitter


Editor

Picture_47_small Tom Martin

Daryl Morey Wannabes

Kurt-avatar_small grungedave

Img_4429_small UofTOrange

Cat_small Only_A_Lad

Guide04_small Xiane

Screenhunter_01_dec Mike Kerns

Crabtree_small ak2themax

Awesome_small BD34

Tds_small Patrick Harrel