Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Nevin Shapiro Vows To Bring Down Miami

Observations on the Offseason

Hey folks. I figured I'd draw this up as my way of giving myself closure, offering some conjecture, and hopefully stirring up some discussion. Given we've only had one summer league game some of this might be a bit ahead of time, but you never know. Long article, I now, but I think it's worthwhile.

1.) The definition of star seems to be up in the air.

The media and quite a few Rockets fans continue to tow the line that Houston still needs another star if it's going to be competitive. My question is what makes a star? Is it a certain statistical average? A certain portion of market share? A list of intangibles? A blend of them all? If it's anything other than basketball production, I'm not sold. Having said that, looking over our roster, I think our team has at least 4 stars on it, all of whom are in the starting line up. If we're looking at statistical averages to determine a star, I would assume anything near 20 points per game as a good place to make a judgment. In that case, we have 4 players on our roster who are capable of, have nearly, or have averaged these point totals. Those players being Aaron Brooks, Kevin Martin, Luis Scola, and Yao Ming. All 4 of these players can have a monster night any night and put the team over the top. With last season's addition of Kevin Martin we saw spikes in production from Trevor Ariza and Aaron was easily able to distribute and score as he wished. With all of this in mind, I find myself asking why Rockets fans still are set on the needing of another star. At what price do you pursue a star player in the NBA? Knowing that star players can move and flop, have salaries that would take at least a 3 or 4 for 1 to make it work has to be a deterrent, especially when you consider what our current roster is. I don't know if it's a lack of faith or a negative realist look at it but I'm just not convinced that this Rockets team, as build, cannot compete without adding a major ego with a big paycheck. 

2.) What makes a team good, predictability or flexibility?

This is a good follow up to number one. If we have two stars on the same team we're predictable. Everyone knows which two players are going to be the ones to get the ball and every team in the league can design a plan to guard them. The historical argument that every team has had at least two stars doesn't win me over. The Pistons show up as an anomaly but whose to say the Pistons will never happen again? A lot can be said for a team with a player like Yao Ming (Even if he comes back at less than what he was, he's still better than most are) surrounded with players who can put up star numbers but don't get the recognition. Let's face it Rockets fans, Houston gets dumped on by the media, the media anoints stars. We can't say "They don't even recognize us." Then turn around and not pay proper respects/attention to our fellas here in Houston. As assembled now, our team is unpredictable as to who is the second fiddle behind Yao (Though Martin is clearly the odds out favorite) but Luis Scola and Aaron Brooks could just as easily chip in points. Ariza went off for 30 points in a game a few times last season, even he has it in him to go off. Isn't the idea of team and cohesion what defines Houston? The idea that as a unit, any of us can step up and be the strong link? How do you game plan for a team with no clear cut number 2 option because it has 3 or 4 number 2 options? We can mismatch any position we damn well please, but for some reason people assume we won't be able to get the job done.

3.) When do I get my 3 year 20 million dollar contract and what defines collusion?

Funny enough, the biggest winner of the free agency period looks to be Joe Johnson (financially) though I read on Sports Illustrated that the Cavs and Raptors have completed sign and trades with Miami for James and Bosh (Amounting to draft pick packages) and I have to say, it sickens me. These GMs obviously want some return on their players but to have to take draft packages from a team where the draft picks will be useless is just sad. Unless the Heat manage to get their asses kicked by Orlando, Boston, LA, and Houston (The 4 teams I pick that stand the best chance to beat them) I can easily see NBA attendance or viewership plummeting from actual fans. They'll pick up some casuals but not as many as they could potentially lose for sucking competition out of the league. 

The reason I say the Magic, Celtics, Lakers, and Rockets stand the best chance to beat Miami is that Miami is going to be facing its biggest challenge out of teams that have capable wing defenders to help put locks on Wade and James and interior presence to keep Bosh and whatever corpse they trot out at the 5 in check as well. As it stands, Houston's extensive list of defensive specialists and 4's fits that bill. Boston has willing and able defenders (Though Thibodeau's departure will cause some problems) and length, Orlando, if they retain Matt Barnes should be set, and LA, come on, it's LA. 

My collusion statement. It's rumored, and I think it's even been stated, that in 2008 Lebron, Wade, and Bosh all discussed this. They structured their contracts to orchestrate it, and as it stands now, it happened. Stern is all too happy to slap NBA clubs with fines for any transgression, nailing Mark Cuban for saying "I'd like Lebron on my team." an innocent statement, but what about three players changing the competitive landscape of your league over the course of 2-3 years? That's just fine and dandy? They can all collude to go to whichever club can afford them but a player can't say they want to see a marquee player on their team? Please, Mr. Stern, this is weaker than your investigation of the refs post-Donaghy where you swept it under the rug. I understand, it's good for business if your manufactured cocksuckers stars win rings and create dynasties but you're killing your option to build a successful and competitive league that values players facing off to see who is the best over who draws the most merchandise payoff. 

Milicic and several other players this offseason have banked in pretty well. It makes perfect sense, clubs cleared out cash and they're expected to use it. Because of that, I can't fault players for getting paid. The owners, will though. The next CBA is almost guaranteed to be a lockout. I'm actually mixed on this. On one hand, I see teams going out and taking on bad contracts to make a run this year (Especially 2 year deals out there if I don't have to pay the 2nd year due to lockout happy birthday to me). Which I think will make it an exciting finish. Houston is poised to fleece a team at the deadline but I'd only expect to see that if we're struggling.

4.) Our youngsters were worth holding on to.

Striking out on Chris Bosh and the high asking price for "stars" is the best thing that could happen to the Rockets. Summer League yesterday showed Patterson just could be the real deal. Jordan Hill, once he calms down, has shown to be a player developing quickly. When Hill made his moves and got up defensively players took notice and changed their shots. After a quality game Patterson came out and said he needs to work on his defense and that he was disappointed in his. I LOVE that in this kid. To look at a reporter and tell them "I have to keep working on the defensive end." is not something most youngsters will cite and actively work on. I'm looking forward to him cracking into the rotation. 

Speaking of rotation cracking. We need a back up 2 guard and Jermaine Taylor player like a man out of his mind knowing that he has to make the best of his chance. His defense looked much improved over last year too. Houston, I think we found our back up 2 guard to mix with Buddinger. 

Also worth noting, by holding on to our youth, we're no longer a tiny team. Before the trade deadline last year we had more in common with the Lollipop Guild than we did an NBA club. Now we can sport a lineup where our smallest guy is 6'0" (Brooks) and our average height parses out above 6'5" (Martin, Buddinger, Ariza, Patterson, Hill, Jeffries, Yao, Hayes, Anderson, etc...). We can play "Small" if we want by sliding Hill to the 5 and running too! Get pumped.

5.) This season is going to be a great one for the Rockets.

I can't wait to see who we pick up as a free agent off the MLE. I just have a strong feeling that this is going to be Houston's season. Call me crazy if you want but I'm not satisfied with a post season run. I'll be satisfied when I see Yao's beaming smile hoisting the Larry O'Brien Trophy over his head to a screaming crowd in Houston. Brooks bouncing around in excitement and Trevor Ariza's lanky ass holding his kid all huddled around that trophy. Believe in Clutch City, believe in your team, believe in the heart of a champion. THIS IS HOUSTON'S YEAR, BOYS!

No cursing in title. No pirated material, such as links to online game streams. Do not cut/paste entire sections of content from other websites. Thanks.

Comment 18 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

it'll be inexcusable if

the Heats dont win a championship next year

all 3 took a pay cut, with Lebron and Bosh due to make 14.5 million and Wade to make 14 Million, that leaves the roughly 9 million under the cap with Chalmer and 21 million under the luxury tax level(because both arriving via trade with bird rights)

now doesnt NY feel foolish for giving Amare 20mill a year

by NVP on Jul 10, 2010 1:48 PM CDT reply actions  

The definition of star in my humble opinion

Is the guy whos job it is to make buckets when no one else is.
The guy who takes over games.

The best example is kobe. He may have games where he scores no more than 8 points. But those 8 points will come when the team is falling apart and the game is on the line. The star takes the team on his shoulders and keeps the game from slipping away. Its the guy who is the leader on the floor and pushes the others on his team to get better.

Heck I would even consider Fisher a star. He doesnt score that much, but in the playoffs he came up with big shot after big shot which basically killed any chance for momentum the other team might have had.

Kevin Martin, Battier, Scola.
All of these guys are terrific basketball players but i dont think they are quite cut from the same stock as some stars.

Brooks showed some flashes of being that type of player but he still has a ways to go.

Lowry, and some of our other players are still young so their star potential may still be waiting to be discovered but by and large I dont think we have anyone with that mentality on the team. And when push comes to shove that will show up.

by AlDe2356 on Jul 10, 2010 3:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Can't agree

I think you will see the maturity in AB, Lowry, and Yao take over in the clutch. Battier’s presence in the locker room and the unabridged enthusiasm the rookies bring will make us quite dangerous

by mjdinhouston on Jul 10, 2010 3:29 PM CDT reply actions  

What makes a star you ask??

1.)Rings

2.)Stats

3.)A GOOD TEAM

4.)A RENOWNED COACH

Kobe,I am looking at you.

by HoustonRockets4Eva on Jul 10, 2010 8:22 PM CDT reply actions  

Added more

5.)Playing hard

6.)Skills

7.)Media

9.)A franchise with a long history of winning and winning rings.

by HoustonRockets4Eva on Jul 11, 2010 5:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Looking at your criteria

luck seems to have more to do with luck rather than full on skill when you consider 5 out of the 9 things are your list can be attributed to things an individual has no power over. However, given Houston has the other 4, we seem to have plenty of stars that no one wants to recognize.

I'm always right, this isn't conjecture, merely statement of fact.

by BD34 on Jul 11, 2010 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

rec'd

post was a bit long but i have been thinking the same thing for a while now.

GO ROCKETS, GO TEXANS, GO ASTROS (EVEN THOUGH THEY SUCK)!!!

by batman713 on Jul 10, 2010 9:11 PM CDT reply actions  

we are going to be good...no question

what makes a star…hell, I don’t know. I would say a star is a player that may have an occasional bad night but one that, no average, has great nights or can have great nights if necessary 75% or more of the time. You are right the Scola, Brooks, Yao and Martin all have the ability to take over games. However, only Yao really consistently can take the team on his back IF he is healthy.
I do think the Pistons were successful because they played as a team, which we do, and they had enough solid stars that someone or two players could be a star in any given night. They had enough guys that averaged, say around 60% than 75%. You add enough of those guys together and you have Detroits old team.

Now…we have a great team for sure, but something about the pre-FA and FA period that strikes me funny: the old investment principle risk and return. Chicago, NJ, NY, Miami all took huge risk to land the big boys and Miami was really the only team that really won. We didn’t take any risks….but we have been as operationally superior to almost every other team in the league. We didn’t get the big return. It may be that on our current trajectory we end up being one of the most consistent playoff team for years. With strong management that always has both good starters and good young subs…but at some point it may not be enough. At some point we are going to have to take a big risk to go over the top. If that means trading Bud and Patterson and draft picks for Granger or Josh Smith etc…then we may have to do it.

I have been with BD34 this off season about not giving up too much for Bosh. Bosh to me seemed like a lesser version of Gasol (and more than just the worse hair). A great player for sure but I wasn’t convinced he would have taken us over the top. He has no background of winning when it counted or leading his team…I guess that is why he is a follower (bitch) of Lebron and Wade. But at some point we will have to pull the trigger and go for gold: CP3 maybe? CP3 and Granger? Who knows but Miami and LA now are damn fierce looking and to compete we may eventually have to take a huge risk to try and match them.

by John P on Jul 11, 2010 12:01 AM CDT reply actions  

wouldn't mind

rockets2010 being referred to with the old pistons championship team. Then we can say, we won the championship the way basketball is supposed to be played. Yeah, looking forward to october. BELIEVE!

by raong on Jul 12, 2010 2:35 AM CDT reply actions  

Stars

Stars are just like the ones in the sky,they have the ability to stand out when the support around them don’t shine.For instance, Karl Malone was a star but never got the ring,and still stands out after the fact.Always giving his best win or loose,character makes the star who can live with himself successfully when it’s all been said and done. Many STARS have come through the league,but most did’nt get rings or chapionships.This League is a business,it’s about your money not the sport.

by Greg Cain on Jul 12, 2010 6:31 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

As good as I think the teams is, we are not championship caliber.

So far Morey hasn’t made the big splash we’re waiting for & when Feb. comes hopefully we pull a big trade but who’s out there now? If we let the contracts expire & take the money to sign players, there are no good free agents to spend it on next year, Melo & that’s it. Hills progress is average at best so far. He still needs to beef up to play center. If (when) Yao goes down again we’re left with the same team as last year plus Patterson. That’s not gonna get us passed the 1st round if we make the playoffs & I think we will but we can’t contend with the flakers, much as I hate to say that. I bleed ROCKETS red but can’t help but hope Morey upgrades so we can legitimately be looked at as a championship caliber team & not just playoff caliber. Other teams are making moves & I’m definitely not saying move players just to move them but I see the players that moved recently & its rare when they get moved again so soon. Most of the players moved were these star quality players. Maybe on their previous teams they couldn’t win but for a team one player away from championship caliber like the rockets they were pieces we could have added to complete the puzzle that forms a championship trophy.

by mangelq75 on Jul 13, 2010 12:07 AM CDT reply actions  

One thing I emphasize

that I’m not sure why no Rockets fan can seem to fathom it is that consistency can take parts that are underrated and turn them into a powerhouse. Continuity builds titles, especially amongst teams that play, yet for some reason, Rockets fans CONSTANTLY want to see a major trade come through that jostles the rosters, changes the rotation, and all for the sake of a big name. When the PIstons were winning their titles as a team, how many major trades did they pull? The Lakers and Celtics, after they made their trades, how many major trades did they pull? The Lakers have been roughly the same for the last 3 years and they have consecutive titles to show for it.

This is perhaps one of my biggest gripes. I consistently see it that Rockets fans don’t want something to gel, they don’t want to let the team come together and improve off of chemistry and development. Hill’s progress is a bit slow but all big men progress slowly. Patterson is showing he can step right in and be a rotation player, Jermaine Taylor has stepped right up to show he’s legit, we’re close on Brad Miller, and this will be the first full season this team could be together. The notion that “we’re one piece away” is ludicrous because it’s entirely speculation. We can look at a team on paper and make our judgments (As the one piece away argument does) or we can see how this Rockets team consistently exceeds those expectations. As I’ve asked before, how long does it take to exceed what is expected of you before you admit that your team actually is good?

Thank you Phil:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVca1DOskEw

Also, the star discussion, I’m loving because in pretty much every regard, the Rockets have them, just no one wants to call them that. We have the qualifications on this team but most of what I’m seeing is rationalization to say we aren’t. It’s like being well hung and never making a casual mention of it because you want to be modest. Let it hang out boys.

I'm always right, this isn't conjecture, merely statement of fact.

by BD34 on Jul 13, 2010 7:40 AM CDT reply actions  

The name is not what we need, we need the talent.

Pau Gasol wasn’t a big name but add him to Kobe and its championship caliber. Its more the right pieces that we need. Continuity, consistency all these are fine but step outside the Rockets box and tell me if what you see on the roster now is going to win against the best in the west or east for that matter. If Morey himself thought that, he wouldn’t have been willing & trying to trade away our “consistency”. If the man that made those great moves for Mac/Landry sees that the roster needs improving & said we will be active then I gotta believe he knows what hes talking about. Developing talent Im all for but if you’re building around a 7 footer that has been injured the passed few years, consistently I might add, then the clock is ticking against you.
  Patterson is ready, at least hes ready while hes playing against D leaguers /roster invitees/ undrafted free agents. I think he’ll be a good addition but right now being a rotation player, hell he’s only a year apart from our other rotation players he should be able to crack it otherwise he’d be a bad pick at 14. We’re good no doubt but there’s no trophy for 2nd.

by mangelq75 on Jul 13, 2010 7:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Two problems with your response

other than that, entirely valid point that hopefully this season addresses.

1.) Pau was a big name, he was the sole reason Memphis made it to the playoffs year in and year out (Not a single win, but still). Let’s also keep in mind that Gasol was CLEARLY a big name given Kobe’s demands.

2.) “the man that made those great moves for Mac/Landry…” How’d TMac work out for us? I’m just wondering how much pressure the organization feels from the outside about the whole “z0mg get big name pl0x!”

I'm always right, this isn't conjecture, merely statement of fact.

by BD34 on Jul 13, 2010 9:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

No way Gasol was a big name but he was a good player, he was an all star once, a year before being trade, nice try though.

Tmac did nothing but a few highlights for this team thats why I meant MOVING Mac not getting him, Morey did not bring Tmac in but he shipped that contract out with a pretty good return as far as assets for the trade deadline goes.

by mangelq75 on Jul 14, 2010 3:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

OK

when you mentioned McGrady i was like “Wait, are we talking things Les Alexander did?”

I still am of the mindset that Gasol was a big name pre-trade, I mean, he certainly was the only thing on Memphis you had to legitimately fear (And this was back when Posey and J-Williams were relevant.

I'm always right, this isn't conjecture, merely statement of fact.

by BD34 on Jul 14, 2010 7:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Detroit's team played fantastic

defense. But Rasheed came in a trade from Atlanta. Hamilton was traded over from Washington. Billups was let go by Orlando to sign Tmac, and he signed with Detroit. Wallace also signed after leaving Orlando. Prince was the only drafted starter. The Laker made a major trade to get Gasol, which led too 2 titles in 3 years. Boston got Allen, and Garnett. Adding Gasol with Kobe turned them into title contenders. Injuries has played a major role in our team lately, and you cant be scared to make a trade to improve. Its not about the big name its about there superior level of play. The great teams have big time players, who hit or create big time shots.

by since86rocketsfan on Jul 13, 2010 8:44 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Dream Shake: Dedicated to all things Houston Rockets. Past, present and future. Expect criticism, commentary and shameless promotions to get Robert Horry into the Hall of Fame.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hunter-s_small
Blazers Fan Here: Kevin Love Is A real Jerk!

Recent FanPosts

Small
Lowry+Dalambert for Rajon Rondo
Small
Linsanity
Olajuwon_jersey_small
Second unit point production
Guide04_small
Love requited - Greg Smith Signs with The Rockets
Small
So you are an NBA owner and have 60 mil in cap space THIS year….
Yaoface_small
I'm just gonna leave this here
340x_small
Would You Do a Martin-Noah swap?
Megaman_small
KAMAN
Rockets_small
Whats wrong wit da rockets...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBN Hoops Twitter


Editor

Picture_47_small Tom Martin

Daryl Morey Wannabes

Kurt-avatar_small grungedave

Img_4429_small UofTOrange

Cat_small Only_A_Lad

Guide04_small Xiane

Screenhunter_01_dec Mike Kerns

Crabtree_small ak2themax

Awesome_small BD34

Tds_small Patrick Harrel