Scouting The Rockets During The First Three Days Of The NBA Summer League
Some thoughts on each player that I observed in three games of Rockets Summer League actions (with accompanying "grades" - take those with a grain of salt).
Patrick Patterson -- A-
Patrick Patterson is far more athletic than I ever thought him to be. He can guard the perimeter and run the floor like a small forward. He also showed off his outside shot quite a bit in his first three games, perhaps a bit too much. As Daryl Morey noted in his in-game discussion with NBA TV's Matt Winer and Brent Barry, the Rockets would like to see Patterson emphasize his inside game rather than hover outside. However, if Patterson happens to be on the elbow, he runs a terrific pick and roll, something that Rick Adelman will surely take note of.
Patterson showed a very polished set of tools in the post. He has great hands, phenomenal footwork for a rookie (his up and under move in the first game made me get out of my deskchair) and possesses quick, decisive post moves. He also showed that he can defend one-on-one in the post. His help defense leaves a little to be desired and he hasn't exactly mastered the art of taking a charge yet, but these things will only improve with time.
The main thing that separates Patterson from Jordan Hill thus far, among other things, is his attacking mentality around the rim and on the block. Upon receiving the ball in the post, Patterson would take one power dribble, set his feet and go right at his defender with a quality jump hook. He also elevates immediately once he catches a pass under the basket. On the other hand, Hill kept fading away with his post moves and hesitated many times upon catching a pass. As a result, my fingernails are now a shell of what they once were.
I like nearly everything that I have seen from Patterson thus far. He may have declined slightly in his last two games, but he continued to show flashes of intelligence and athleticism. This is one of those times that being called a "jack of all trades but master of none" is ideal - he can already do a whole bunch of things and has plenty of time to improve. Big fan of Patty Cakes (too soon?).
Jermaine Taylor -- A
Jermaine Taylor at times continues takes one dribble too many, but it didn't hold him back in his first three Vegas contests. He blew by defenders as if they were trees. His jump shot and outside shot look much improved and his defense looked better as well. Taylor appeared to be a capable passer in last year's Summer League, or at least he was willing to be. This go-around, he has caught a severe case of tunnel vision, though I can't fault him for looking to score whenever possible. Perhaps he could dish the ball off here and there, but for the most part, Taylor has looked very impressive. He'll be on the game day roster many-a-time this season, but with a deep roster, he may not find room to stay permanently. Either way, he looks to be a "lightening scorer" off the bench much in the way that Von Wafer was two years ago.
Chase Budinger -- B+
If there's one player on the Rockets' Summer League roster who has the least to worry about, it's Chase Budinger. Yet, that hasn't stopped Budinger from being aggressive and attacking the rim. His decision making has been shaky at times, but this is the rare time that we'll see Budinger act as the point guard on more than one occasion. His overall ability is about the same as where it was at the end of last season, but his confidence level looks to be quite healthy and his jumpshot hasn't gotten any worse. So that's nice.
Jordan Hill -- C+
I'm concerned. Not because I think Hill is on his way to becoming a failure or anything like that, but because he has yet to get over his tendency to hesitate around the rim. He ducks underneath defenders far too often and tries to pump fake unnecessarily. Although he is limited by his average leaping ability, Hill needs to be able to go up to the rim with some explosiveness. He also needs to quit spinning or fading away from the basket with his moves, as he continues to settle for fadeaway hook shots. On ocassion, Hill will take a power dribble, step into his defender and create nice separation, but he needs to be able to do this more often and with more precision. Surprisingly, he does have plenty of polish and coordination with his hands (his rebounding has been fantastic, as usual), but he doesn't appear to have much coordination when it comes to making a direct post move.
So far, Hill has also failed to provide much help on the defensive end, constantly allowing guards to get around him en route to a layup. He's not the shot blocker that many here perceive him to be. His athleticism is unquestioned but his ability to properly time his jump to block a shot isn't all that impressive. This was the perfect time for Hill to come out and show that he can do more than just rebound and run the floor. At this point, though, he's looked more raw than he did during his appearances last season in real games.
Hill certainly has plenty of time to work on these things, but we all thought that he would be a little further by now if the particular faults in his game are to be improved upon. Also, it would be nice if he could set better screens. He left Budinger out to dry during the second game on a dribble drive.
From here on out, I'll just randomly list some thoughts that I have for each player.
Ish Smith -- B-
Good fluidity on offense, good vision, doesn't try to do too much, manages the game well. Doesn't posses a great outside shot, appears to have fallen in love with an average floater, has gotten beat on defense constantly, needs to work on his passes on the drive and on his overall defensive game in general.
Maarty Leunen --B+
Very aware. Willing passer, good outside shot, seems to be in the right place at the right time. I'd love to have him on the team if he was an imposing defender. Sadly, he seems destined for Europe once again. Great player.
Blake Ahearn -- C
Just don't see it with Ahearn. Obviously can shoot it. Not a great manager with the ball, tends to end up on the baseline too much and leaves himself with little options. Subpar defender, doesn't do a whole lot in the lane or on the drive. He hasn't played to the level that Smith has.
Alexander Johnson -- B+
Gets to the free throw line. Smart, energetic player - knows how to draw fouls. Can run the floor and finish inside, good hands. Good, not great defender with good footwork. He's an NBA player, but perhaps not with the Rockets.
Gary Forbes -- C
Hasn't done much of anything. Slow first step, not too athletic. Then again, he's very comfortable on the drive and is able to corrall himself in order to put up a basket. I'd like to see more from him in these last two games.
Dwight Lewis -- B-
He's there to score, nothing else. Good finisher around the rim, very athletic, decent outside shot.
-------
As for everyone else, they must not have caught my eye. I'm not about to make up thoughts about a player that I didn't particularly notice.
0 recs |
49 comments
|
Comments
I agree with you on this
but on Hill I guess I have a bit more leeway with him. He’s in a new position and supposed to take on the primary responsibilities that come with that position. By that I mean as a Center, he’s asked to be a standalone imposer at the basket. Which I recall in his first Summer League game his timing was pretty good and he altered a few shots by going up. He hasn’t done it consistently as you said, but he did show in a few flashes that he can do it.
Let’s not forget that the graces of the PF Position that Hill is used to playing is that you can be a good help side defender and get blocks off that.
I’m in complete agreement about his offense. He looks like he comes out with way too much energy and way too much excitement that he needs to learn to calm it down. His best production has come on set jump shots, that baby hook of his (That he developed over last year), and strong catches beneath the basket. I would like to see him improve on that post game, and I think his issue is just a mix of overenthusiasm and a new position. We all saw the Hell being a 2 guard did to Ariza until we slotted him to the 3 and saw his production drastically improve (That Kevin Martin fella had something to do with it too, but still).
I think I’d go with a B or so for Hill because he’s now starting to put to practice an entirely new game that he didn’t have to before. Certainly he’ll continue working with Sikma and they’ll address the tape and work on his timing.
I'm always right, this isn't conjecture, merely statement of fact.
I agree with most of what you said, Tom
But I think people are being too rough on J-Hill. Which is probably because they have it in their head that he is going to be so good eventually. We’ve seen him play better in NBA games, so I’m not going to get concerned about him, especially his defense, when he is very obviously playing out of position (Center).
I don’t understand people that are putting down JT. He does everything that people loved about Von Wafer; he brings instant offense. I think being Kevin Martin’s backup is an ideal role for Taylor. I think he’ll get minutes, but mostly because Kwiki-Mart is going to miss about an average of 20 games per year with injuries. That’s right, I said it.
Pat-Patt has exceeded my expectations for sure. No idea he had that kind of outside shot. I think him on the floor at the same time as Yao is going to create serious match up problems. If he improves his defense, surefire starter one day.
Von Wafer....
was a blackhole. I wasn’t a big a fan of him, maybe if he made some plays for teammates I woulda liked him. But he was shoot only player.
Great breakdown on Patterson.
Hi, All. UK fan here and I just wanted to stop by and say "hi".
I’ve been reading you all ever since you drafted our dear sweet Patrick and although I’m not really a Rockets fan as I already follow an NBA team (chosen because of my dad, so you can blame him), I am a huge Patterson fan and I look forward to keeping track of him and his NBA career with ya’ll.
Oh, and about that little up and under move of his, well, I didn’t see this particular move or the game to which you are referring, but that move of his has certainly made me get up out of my chair in the last three years, also. Good stuff.
Patrick is the goods personality-wise as well as basketball-wise and you all will really enjoy him in the coming years just like we did, I’m sure of it. Not sure about the nickname "Patty Cakes", though. That sounds kind of soft to me, and well, Patrick is anything but soft, what else have you got? ; )
Also, just a quick question — when does the Rockets game schedule usually come out? I have looked on the official Rockets website, but no go as of yet. My sister-in-law happens to live in downtown Houston and we usually go down to see her either in the fall or early spring and would love to plan our next trip around a Rockets game or two.
Oh, well,
I really wasn’t trying to bait you. Heck, I don’t even like fishing. : )
Although I didn’t grow up in California, my dad lived in LA for a while in the early 70’s (before I was born). He raced cars, chased women and consequently, fell in love with the Lakers, so they are the NBA team that I was raised on. Kareem, Magic, et all were to be revered at my house and it just stuck with me into my adult life, I guess you could say. And after all, isn’t that how most people pick teams, either based on where they reside geographically, who their parents were fans of, etc, etc.?
My main sports passion, however, is college basketball and my Kentucky Wildcats, so that kind of makes is it hard on a fan once you get to the professional level. I love the Lakers as a team, but also feel a sense of loyalty to the boys who once wore the blue-and-white (once a Wildcat, always a Wildcat), and even though they have moved on, I can’t help but be interested in where they are playing professionally, hence my perusal of your lovely blog here.
Oh, and, Moondebah, thanks for the schedule info. We are planning on going down to Houston for the Final Four in April, so it would be oh-so-wonderful if I could somehow coordinate a Rockets game into that trip. Basketball, basketball and more basketball — I just love the game of basketball. : )
It's okay
I get the same shit from people in Houston for being a Braves fan. Truth is, I was born and raised in Atlanta. Didn’t move to Texas until 1993. So, stay loyal. No matter how much it pisses someone else off. And trust me, being a Braves or Lakers fan pisses people in Houston off.
lol...i'm a laker's fan as well
I live in LA
but i was born in H-Town…
i guess i’m a fan of both
ROCKETS!!!!!!!!!!!!
all three of you should be tarred and feathered and driven out of town on a rail!
I mean really…what kind of communist subversives are you guys striving to be? I guess Atlanta is ok in all but LA and Oakland, you guys really should get your heads checked.
Just kidding…I am really bored at work.
isnt that just the definition of heaven and hell
God, Raiders are just unwatchable for almost the past decade
Nope
Try being a Bills fan. ;-)
The player I would like least at #9 would be my sister’s cat, Captain Creamsicle. She does have a great work ethic and agility, but I’m really concerned that at 9 lbs., she’s too small to play safety in the NFL. She also bites way too often on play action and is easily distracted by someone waving string in the crowd. Lastly, her wonderlic score was pretty awful, answering "meow meow meow" for most of the questions- Dr. Brackish Okun
You might find following the Rockets suits you.
I was going to say because of your love of Wildcat ball, since the Rockets play a very sound game, and basically have no obvious jerks or egomaniacs on the team. I’m not sure about this new 1-and-done KU though.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
ya'll are very sweet.
well, all except the poor sap that was stuck at work and was bored so he wanted to tar and feather a few people. ; )
The Rockets are sort of one of those teams that you don’t really hate as far as I’m concerned. I don’t love them (yet ; )), but I certainly don’t hate them as there is really no good reason for me to. They just kind of go about their business, seem to have a well run organization and are pretty clean cut. So, you may be right about me finding the Rockets as a second NBA home. Well, you and the Kings, of course. After the addition of their recent draft choice they aren’t too bad, either, really. ; )
Thanks -great to have you here!
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
Hill is looking very Arizaish
But I’ve seen better so i think he will be fine. He along with Taylor were said to have been in the gym more than anyone else, Taylor’s hard work are just showing more (maybe because he was the man in college and he is used to wrecking).
GO ROCKETS, GO TEXANS, GO ASTROS (EVEN THOUGH THEY SUCK)!!!
The biggest problem I see with Hill is that he hasn't boxed out the opposing player very well
If you notice in all his games so far, the centre from the opposing team has the inside position most of the time, the problem is I noticed this on BOTH sides of the court. He needs to work on getting better position, which is correctable. I’m not too concerned about him though because last year he did really well I hope he picks it up tomorrow.
Every day that passes by
with Scola and Lowry not getting any offers, makes me feel really good about this team. While Hakim Warrick and Darko are getting big deals, Scola is just waiting by the phone. Lowry is watching Farmar and Felton get big money while he gets prepared to make a playoff run. You can bet that Scola and Lowry will make teams pay, but only on the court. Not only will we get them back at a lower price then what we all thought, but they will also be motivated. I might not feel good about the bench players like Taylor, Hill, Anderson…but with Lowry pushing the pace and our starting 5, Damn it’s gonna be fun to watch. (If Yao comes back at full strength)
Im a little surprised at the Felton Farmar action and no Lowry offers.
Fortunately most of the teams savvy enough to really want Klow already have PGs. Same for Scola. Because who wants boring old effectiveness when you can have, well, whatever it is Jordan Farmar offers
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Totally agree
I don’t understand how people have jobs in basketball when they want players like Farmar, Felton, Ridnour, Warrick, Darko, and Haywood over Scola and Lowry. I guess I shouldn’t be complaining because it’s great for us, but I could take the job in Minnesota and be 1000 times better
by danielcp0303 on Jul 12, 2010 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions
They probably know that we really like them and will match most offers (unless its rediculous) for them so the didn't even bother.
Being a RFA agent chases teams off
They figure why put the manpower into a guy that the other team will just match.
I hope you didn't freakin jinx us just now with your good feelings
not to screw lowry or scola, they are worth their weight in gold but it would be nice to keep some cap space there to do a big deal if we get the chance
so NO MORE JINXing
We have no cap space no matter what
at least not this year. Probably only be a little bit under the luxury tax
by danielcp0303 on Jul 12, 2010 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm very pleased.
I’ve thought the Rockets looked really good except for being tired and flat on game 3/day 3. It happens, particularly when you’re playing essentially pick up ball, and you don’t have a plan for what to do when things go wrong (eg Yao, or Scola in the post or a AB0 drive).
Can I just get this out of the way now? Jermaine Taylor is a BETTER player than Von Wafer. Listen, I loved watching Von, loved the dunks, the cold blooded 3s. JT is better. Why? Well, he can score more ways. He can create good looks off the dribble, he can draw fouls in traffic and still score with the contact. He is willing to play D, when the willingness is there, the results will come, at least at an average level. He can pass very well when motivated, I am not sure I ever saw a Von assist, let alone a pass that didn’t come because he was either in trouble or Battier looked like he might kill him if he didn’t give the ball up. We all loved Von, but I think Taylor is a guy who could go 18/6/5/1 in starter minutes and wouldn’t kill you on D. I’m willing to bet after these games that Morey has gotten a couple of contacts saying “Hey, do you guys have any plans for JT? this year. If you don’t….” Wes Matthews just got a $30 million offer – is he better than Taylor?
As for Hill – give him time. Big men, especially Rockets centers, aren’t created overnight. Hill is having to learn a very different sort of game from his one at AZ.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
True all day long..
JT looks like he could become a very complete player somewhere down the line. Of course, he’ll have to if he wants to make a roster long term as he strikes me as the classic “not great at any one thing” type of player.
I was never as high on Von as other people because he was such a rebounding liability. In fact, he was the exact opposite of Shane. Shane’s rebounding totals belied the fact that he would often block out the David Wests and Kurt Thomases to allow our bigs to snag the ball.
In contrast, Von would find ways to let a mediocre offensive rebounder that he should have boxed out get second chance opportunities. He’d make Eddie House look like Dwight Howard. Great way to give me a heart attack.
"The French Army: Better defender than David Lee" - JE Skeets, in response to David Lee getting a vote for Defensive Player of the Year.
i concour.
Like i wrote up top, i never really liked von wafer. No defense, no intangibles, just wanted to shoot whenever he got the ball.
By the way
Not trying to have a one way conversation, that is just how it is playing out with my net access
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
by Xiane on Jul 13, 2010 1:08 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
hmm
JT showed that he deserves to play but it will be up to the rockets on how they will use him. The worst thing they could do is let him go to another team cuz I think he will be one of those players that will bite the rockets in the ass if he plays against them.
by KrisD on Jul 12, 2010 4:09 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Looks like Al Jefferson won't be a Rocket
ESPN.com sources: MIN/DAL talked Al Jefferson trade all weekend and moved closer to deal. But NO done deal yet as Wolves also in talks w/UTA
Marc Stein twitter
I thought the cavs
wants a piece of that Al Jefferson pie?
I wasnt sold on Al Jefferson, but hate to see him becoming a Mav though
who are the mavs gona give up for him tho?
Marion and ????
From what Stein says
It’s Dampier’s contract, Stevenson and Carroll
by danielcp0303 on Jul 12, 2010 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't know which team I want to miss getting Jefferson
Utah or Dallas?
by danielcp0303 on Jul 12, 2010 6:10 PM CDT up reply actions
i wish him on utah
His bloated contract, injury history and redundant presence next to millsap would surely make a jazz rebuilding very difficult in light of Boozers absence.
Wafer . . . again. (Marv Albert, HOU v. CLE Feb 2009)
-one of the FEW at Toyota Center who has the Wafer jersey
by olivarezq1 on Jul 12, 2010 7:09 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
screw al jefferson
seriously
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
seriously people
GTFO Jefferson’s nuts, he brings NOTHING to the team we don’t already have. Couple that with questionable knees, no less.
Wafer . . . again. (Marv Albert, HOU v. CLE Feb 2009)
-one of the FEW at Toyota Center who has the Wafer jersey
by olivarezq1 on Jul 12, 2010 7:06 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Not on his nuts
just don’t see why there is so much hatred
by danielcp0303 on Jul 12, 2010 7:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Not hatred for the man
Hatred for the fact there are guys on the board who think the idea of getting him is the most genius thing in the world, and even go so far as to make a fanpost about it.
I actually was thinking about making a fanpost about how using significant salary on a PF/C who cannot contribute to paint dominance on the defensive end actually lowers your teams ceiling and “Basketball-Referencing” the past ten years of NBA Finals rosters and their attributes to illustrate my point…
But I’m too lazy (and there are guys on this board who understand what I just said better than I do). But if I can organize and present it properly, I may do it.
"The French Army: Better defender than David Lee" - JE Skeets, in response to David Lee getting a vote for Defensive Player of the Year.

by 


















