First Impressions Of Brad Miller
Brad Miller is a solid addition to the Houston Rockets. Nothing flashy, but solid nonetheless. He's the backup seven-footer we've been looking for since Dikembe Mutombo retired.
The contract? Sure, it's more than it should be (3 years at $15 million). Miller is 34 years old and for every step he takes forward, he's taking another two back. But that's not the issue, and to be fair, the third year is only partially guaranteed at $1 million. Regardless of how much they're paying him, Miller was a target that the Rockets managed to gobble up.
Miller fits quite nicely into Houston's system. He has a great relationship with Rick Adelman and has played some of his best seasons with Adelman on the bench. Back in Sacramento, Miller was a versatile option on offense. He could shoot, dribble and pass from the high post, the latter of which proved to be a key in running Adelman's cutting, ball-movement-oriented offense. Oddly, it is Miller, who has yet to be formally introduced, who might have the best grasp on Adelman's tendencies and schemes of any Rocket.
Miller has certainly regressed from his old Kings form. The shot hasn't been falling quite as frequently, and the rebounding numbers have taken a tumble. But nobody here is asking him to start - he'll fill in when need be. The limited minutes, along with the familiar system should enable Miller to play much more effectively than he did last season in Chicago.
Earlier this year on a podcast between myself, Jason Friedman and Rahat Huq, the three of us discussed Miller as an option for the Rockets. I endorsed Brad, and like a good substitute host, Friedman asked me what I thought of Miller's defense. At that point, I hadn't seen Miller's defense very much and essentially took a pass on the question. Now, after looking at some tape, I think I've got a basic grasp on it.
Miller won't impress anyone defensively, but he won't hurt the Rockets on that end, either. His footwork isn't what it used to be (in terms of quickness), but he makes up for it with his intelligence, showing patience against bad shooters and making an effort to close out or cut off dangerous players if he gets switched on a pick and roll. Most importantly, though, is Miller's height. He's much taller than Chuck Hayes. That's already a giant improvement.
The primary reason I like this signing is that the Rockets finally have a legitimate center on the roster who can step in and start games effectively if Yao Ming goes down. Should Yao suffer another injury this year, the Rockets will be in much better shape than they were last season without him.
The first question surrounding the signing relates to the roster. Who plays? It appears that the Rockets are putting a giant emphasis into the frontcourt, which is absolutely fine by me. The bulk of our guards and small forwards can play high minutes - they're younger. The froncourt was in need of extra bodies, if only because it is our most fragile portion of the team.
Here are the players who are guaranteed through next season:
That's 15 guaranteed players through next season, not including Alexander Johnson and Mike Harris, who will likely be let go (as Don points out in the comments). Can't be certain if the Rockets will decide to make another move after this, but it's possible.
We'll have more on this as the season approaches. But, for now...
Welcome to the Rockets, Brad Miller!
(and to a lesser extent, Trey Kerby!)
0 recs |
40 comments
|
Comments
why does it have to be jermaine taylor?
If we move him who will be martin’s back up?
and i know we all love chuck hayes but he wont get any playing time after this signing…we should give the spot to someone young with potential
Budinger.
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
And
Ariza can play the two if needed.
"voted for the Jazz"
ooooh, that’s like being a pedophile – it never goes away. //grudgedave//
by ressaliance_00 on Jul 17, 2010 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions
Couldn't agree more
that’s why I said “if needed”. Don’t want him at the 2 but he did play some there early last season before we got K-mart.
"voted for the Jazz"
ooooh, that’s like being a pedophile – it never goes away. //grudgedave//
by ressaliance_00 on Jul 17, 2010 8:48 PM CDT up reply actions
ha exactly!
"voted for the Jazz"
ooooh, that’s like being a pedophile – it never goes away. //grudgedave//
by ressaliance_00 on Jul 17, 2010 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions
And Lowry can play the two as well
by ClutchFanSince94 on Jul 17, 2010 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions
I thought
When Adelman plays Brooks and Lowry together he puts Brooks at the 2 to shoot and Lowry at the 1 to distribute.
"voted for the Jazz"
ooooh, that’s like being a pedophile – it never goes away. //grudgedave//
by ressaliance_00 on Jul 17, 2010 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions
They switch on offense but Lowry plays the 2 on defense.
Brooks played a lot better last year when Lowry was on the floor as compared to Ariza + Battier with him IIRC.
yea Lowry was able to set AB up and he jus killed it
thats not Ariza/Battiers strong suit
Rockets-Texans-Dynamo-Longhorn fan.. used to be Astros too, but not sure there a pro team anymore
Yeah, that is one of the positives.
Looking forward to Kerby going nuts on Monday.
Minnesotan Rockets fan
Taylor is a better slasher
Bud is a better passer and shooter. Defensively they are about the same.
Actually have 15 players on the roster
Tom,
You can actually have fifteen players on the roster. 12 active and up to 3 inactive.
If no more moves are made, it looks as though Mike Harris and Alexander Johnson will likely be let go, I’m guessing.
All fifteen you mentioned are “good for now”.
Don
I'm aware of this
Used poor wording. Brainfart, etc.
Thanks.
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
And Andersen has a very small guarantee for 2011 – I imagine we let him go after this year, being as he’s probably 6th or 7th on our front court rotation. Chuck Hayes’ contract also expires.
by seanbergmanrules on Jul 17, 2010 8:32 PM CDT up reply actions
If we really wanted to get greedy
I wouldn’t mind going after Iggy or JOSH Smith…
by EveryHoustonTeamRox! on Jul 17, 2010 9:41 PM CDT reply actions
my wanted trade with phi
HOU gets:
Iggy
Speights
PHI gets:
Hill
Ariza
Andersen
Jeffries
Future Rockets 1st
by EveryHoustonTeamRox! on Jul 17, 2010 10:08 PM CDT reply actions
and y not?
Andersen is not getting PT. Our future First is a late 20. Hill is very nice trade bait. Ariza is solid but to get Iggy it is worth it
by EveryHoustonTeamRox! on Jul 18, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions
If you sweeten that deal anymore
I’m going into diabetic shock.
I'm always right, this isn't conjecture, merely statement of fact.
Unless we get some spectacular player that is much better than
Ariza, there is no way Morey will involve him in any trade…especially for Iggy. We just signed him last year, so unless it is a deal that really benefits us, he ain’t goin’ anywhere.
by inquisitiveman on Jul 17, 2010 10:14 PM CDT reply actions
i like it
because it cant hurt at all. please get a big defensive/possession minded G now. k, thanks.
not ^ trade, lol.
i meant the miller signing.
Roster spots
In baseball there is a 25 man roster of which a manager always sets aside a certain amount of the roster just for pitchers and then he fills the rest of the roster with players for the rest of the positions. In basketball I realize it is a little different in that you may have players that can play more than one position. That said is there any formula coaches in the NBA use to fill out their roster ie must have five forwards five guards and two centers. What I want to know is what determines who gets cut and who stays? One could assume that Yao will be backed up by Miller, Ariza by Battier,Brooks by Lowry,Scola by Patterson,Kmart by Budinger. That leaves Anderson, Jeffries, Johnson, and Hill that are 6’10" or 6’11" and Harris and Taylor 6’6" and 6’4" respectfully. There are two more roster spots available out of these six players left and five spots counting the three that are not active but I guess get a spot in the D league which leaves one as odd man out. Assuming they will keep Jeffries for his expiring contract and Hill for his potential that would fill out the 12 man roster. Of the four players left three get to stay as D league call ups and one player will be SOL
with the signing of Miller I’m assuming the Rockets have changed their mind on trying to convert Hill into a backup center. That said who has the better talent for a PF Hill or Johnson?
Which one of them is more NBA ready and could come in and contribute to the Rockets either as a 4 or 5?
One more question If a player is waived does the team that waives him still have to pay him his salary?
Depth is important
baseball is set a certain amount of roster for pitchers because Greatest defensive factor is pitching, and that’s the position that is most likely to wear out, good pitching can pretty much overcome anything even moderate offense. Basketball is far more physically demanding. Most teams for better or worst need a back-up in every position, but dependent on talent, some player dont get extended PT and are only there for brief relief of starters. 15 man roster but only 12 are active for game, other 3 cant play the game and usually teams have a 8-9 man tight rotation because of position fluidity, some teams are more confident of depth and can play an extended period with a second unit, some are less and only expand the rotation up to 7(JVG pretty much had a shorten bench). as far as composition goes, it usually depend on starter strength and front office philosophy. Better starter you have, usually you dont need to audition as many backups, so some team has less of. Swingmen are in fashion since Jordan and Forward-Centers has become popular since NBA has adapted to a faster pace and guard centric rules.
You can count Johnson and Harris out because we wont be picking up there contract, Andersen is expandable and will probably be inactive for most games, I’d wager the same for Jefferies(though he is less expandable in financial sense) I hope we do play Taylor a lot more, but we certain could play without him
If i have to guess, I say Hill starts the season as back up 4 for his experience and knowledge of the playbook. Also D-league play isnt as beneficial development for center play as it is for guard due to the general lack of size, so even if we want to develop Hill as a 5, we’d do it with the team where he gets to practice with Yao, Miller and Chuck. Patterson probably wont get PT unless he really impress, which is not out of the realm of possibility, or he can get a d-league assignment because we can do that
also you have to pay a waive player, you can get relived if another team signs him, but only for the amount that the other teams signed him for, you can also waive a player to not have it count against the luxury tax, but you still have ton pay him
Andersen, Jeffries and Hayes
Will be inactive with “misterious injuries” for most of the season
Also, DM might get rid of Andersen before the season starts
by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on Jul 18, 2010 12:18 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Eh
I personally think it will be more of
Hays Hill and Anderson.
Jeffires is better than hill. And hill can go to the d-league so he wouldnt be just sitting out.
Hayes isn't going anywhere.
He is a very good low post defender and takes alot of charges. Adelman really likes him. Unless we get a deal we can’t refuse, Hayes is staying put.
by inquisitiveman on Jul 18, 2010 4:58 PM CDT up reply actions
The deal is aiight.
I could see Miller playing heavy minutes off the bench. Hopefully, that will improve Yao’s health and effectiveness.
One of the most unsung assets Miller brings to the table
is his mobility. He is a great passer in the high post, but the fact that he can both shoot from just about anywhere AND put the ball on the floor makes his game versatile enough to both keep the Gasols and Nowitzkis and Duncans of the world on their toes. His defense isn’t stellar, but like the Phoenix Suns of old, you can wear down an opposing defense with a versatile and diverse offense. This isn’t to say defense isn’t important (it certainly is), but he can make up for his defensive inefficacy with his presence on the floor. To me, this and his passing is what Adelman means when he suggests that B-Rad makes everyone around him better.
Being a bearded man, I’m also excited to have a fellow beardie on the team.
Wafer . . . again. (Marv Albert, HOU v. CLE Feb 2009)
-one of the FEW at Toyota Center who has the Wafer jersey
Its a good pick,
he knows how to fit in this system. Andersen must be on the move, because he will get 2.5 mill as a third string center.
by since86rocketsfan on Jul 19, 2010 11:30 AM CDT reply actions
Love the Move
The 2nd unit just got a lot better with Lowry running the breaks and Miller running the half court its a move that made our 2nd unit harder to deal with.
Another good reason that i don’t really seeing anyone talking about is that we now have a natural center who is tall and can play defense and why is this good apart from the game benefits. We have a 7’6" tall center who is coming back after a year off he’ll need someone to practice with someone who knows how to defend the paint and is tall with Miller i think it’ll help Yao not just in playing time but helping him in practice like Deke use to.

by 


















