New Years Eve Was All About Patrick Patterson
I don't mean to put down Carl Landry when I say that Patrick Patterson could develop into the better player of the two.
It is an easy comparison, admittedly. As finally evidenced in last night's win over Toronto, Patterson has bits and pieces of Landry-ness etched into his game. He is jumpy and not afraid to bang inside, but perhaps most pleasing is that he is not full of himself. As such, if there is an offensive rebound to be had, you'd better believe Patrick Patterson will be gunning for it with everything that he has got. He possesses the same hustle-or-die attitude that Landry brought to the court. Though he does not lack confidence, Patterson looks nervous here and there, nearly to the point where it appears he might shake himself out of his shoes.
But that's a good thing. I want Patrick to be nervous (he even admitted his jitters following the game). I'd rather him be wary of making a mistake than than have him bring an apathetic and indifferent mindset to the court. Mistakes are good for rookies who respond to them appropriately. All indications are that Patterson took his demotion to the D-League in stride -- he clearly responded to coaching and improved during his stint in Hidalgo -- and that's the proper way to go about it. As a result, he looks very mechanical and robotic at times, trying to do what the coaches have told him to do and be where the coaches have told him to be. But this isn't a sign of fear, only that of a student trying to get better in a whole bunch of areas all at once.
At this point, Patterson is likely to screw up and do something against the will of the coaches, sure. But you'd better believe that he doesn't need any coaching to knock someone on his face going for a loose ball. He's a talented overachiever, and if there is one thing that all overachievers have, it's confidence. Thankfully, his confidence is a controlled confidence. It's confidence in his own ability, but not to the point where it slithers into his ego. Having talked to him face-to-face at the NBA Draft, having been present for his first press conference as a pro and having seen him play during the summer and in the preseason, it's clear that Patterson does not feel that he is anywhere near his peak as a basketball player and that he's willing to do whatever it takes to get better.
That might seem like a backhanded compliment, until you realize how polished Patterson already appears to be. This, in my mind, is what separates him from Landry.
Patterson can do things that Landry spent three years working to implement into a regular season game. Chief of his advantages over Landry Year One is his jump shot. Patterson took and made three-pointers in college, and while that won't be a primary focus of his in the NBA -- at least not to start -- it proves that he is not only capable of making an eighteen-foot jumper, but that he is comfortable taking one during games as well.
We didn't see any special technical revelations from Patterson during his performance, as nothing really wowed us besides his leaping ability and intensity. He didn't do much on the block or in isolation, either, but that's because he's not supposed to yet. For him to hustle and create second chance opportunities like he did last night is the most we can ask of him right now.
A double-double is a heck of a way to start a career. The numbers may not stay consistent with that mark from here on out, but that's not what matters. I'm glad Patterson is trying hard, that he is happy to be on the court and that his head is in the right place. Those three benchmarks should make everything else come much easier with time.
(Also, Patrick: it might be time to grow out the Swagger Afro. Just saying.)
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He's more athletic than I thought
and looks like he is a very smart player. I still worry about how this team will rebound and defend the paint, but what a pleasant surprise. And I think that from what we’ve seen these last couple of years, PP and others are the reason why the Rockets can build a championship team. They could trade away half of the roster for an elite player, and Morey and his staff would find players. These next few games are huge, although I guess they all are. 2 out of the next 3 against the Blazers.
by twinkilling0303 on Jan 1, 2011 10:39 AM CST reply actions
Defensive rebounding
Still think Landry was/is more explosive and Landry was/is much more aggressive going for offensive rebounds.
OTOH,Patterson already looks to be a much better defensive rebounder and shows better fundamental defensive abilities.(Watched quite a few Sac games this yr and Landry has been just awful on the defensive glass.)
All things considered,rather have Patterson than Landry.
Another testament to the RGV system
After being the man at the Vipers, He comes in and fits in like a glove. Very good in transition and man defense. He was out of position sometimes(Like defending the pick n’ roll in the first half, but he quickly adjusted that in the second half, I was very impressed), but he was never far from the correct rotation. Did not see him on doing much post moves, so he might not be quite the go to scorer Landry is, but he did try to post up and also get some looks out of the high post(though since he ran with old man Miller, he didnt get to run much of any plays out of that position)
This is his Landry game though, making a statement to the coach "Hey man, I’m pretty good, and I can score AND DEFEND. Can Haz PT? " I may be making this statement prematurely, probably need another 2 games to truely call him a stout pro defender(after all, he defended only Joey Dorsey and Amir Johnson)
He’s still attack more from range than from the post, which still concerns me, I want him to use that Al Horfordesque body on O as well(He already uses it very well in positioning on D)
Great use of minutes
I had high hopes for a kid that finished college in three years. As Ron White says, “you can’t fix stupid”! I was worried about spending extra for lower bowl seats last night till the subs came in and got to work. This kid can play! Great sense of where he needs to be on the floor. Athletic and smart, he is destined to play some minutes for us.
Off topic,but
If Morey got into Les’ leftover champagne and traded away his season starting PG,SG,SF,PF for nothing but draft picks the Rockets would be “left” with:
Lowry,Smith
Lee,Williams
Bud,Jeffries
Hill,Patterson
Miller,Hayes,(Yao).
Might not win a huge amount of games,but would be competitive and still be better than 5-6 teams in the League.
Would be nice...
If he could play some 3. He has a nice jumper, can obviously post a smaller guy, and is an inch short for an NBA power forward. Key would be foot speed/ lateral movement.
Followed the kid at UK; we are going to like him. Smart kid who is going to improve.
With the current "situation" at 3
There’s no reason to want Patterson playing 3, no real advantage there for him either
He is by no means a high flyer athlete. In fact in today’s NBA, I’d wager he’s only slightly above average if not average. Joey Dorsey, Jordan Hill are easily more athletic
he does move his feet very well in post defense but probably not gonna be able to beat the quick first steps of a lot of 3s, if you watched yesterday’s game, he hesitates on outside defense on switches as if he’s not sure how much space he should leave the player.
What he does have is an excellent understanding of how to use his body, He is quite built, actually surprisingly wide as well, and has a 7-2 wingspan. I think he could be a fearsome defender if he goes through some films with Chuck Hayes
by NVP on Jan 1, 2011 4:20 PM CST up reply actions
In defense of Landry
…despite any technical weakness in one area (defensive rebounding, spot up shooting, whatever…) Landry’s biggest asset in my mind was his drive/energy he brought to the team. He and Lowry together on the second unit were simply like adding nitro to the team’s performance and rallying everyone to work their buts off. (that and his offensive skills in the paint are pretty awesome)
I have yet to see PP play, and not that he can’t bring that as well to the team, but he seems like a more thoughtful player (more mental analysis of where he should be, what he should be doing) then simply just outworking the opponents. Not that those aren’t great skills (Battier-esque perhaps) but that is just different than what Landry brought.
So I know next to nothing about PP’s game, so this is a bit of talking out my ass…but that is my defense of Landry. I miss him.
Exactly....couldn't have said it better myself...the kid seems to be pretty smart and mature
in his young career…more methodical kinda player…personally, i think he is already better than Hill.
by inquisitiveman on Jan 1, 2011 10:27 PM CST up reply actions
That...
and at one point, we were more surprised when he missed shots in the post than when he made them. That was how refined his post game was.
and i do think that he needs to be freed from sactown.
not necessarily by us, but he still needs to be freed. I do think they’re ruining him.
Starting to look like the team we had envisioned before the season started....
Unleash Williams
Ketchup & Mustard BABY!!!
by Start the Bench on Jan 1, 2011 10:42 PM CST reply actions
landry is like hedo turkoglu with the raptors
Good plugin player just not star talent. I think that sacramento was expecting something else. But he definetely needs to be freed. I think his contract is up this year
by Big_T on Jan 2, 2011 6:29 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I really like PP
He had a nice first game in summer league and is now contributing in the season. Hopefully he continues to play some D and get some rebounds because that’s what is going to get him on the floor with Adelman coaching.

by 




















