Are the Rockets showcasing Aaron Brooks for a trade?
It all starts with Manu Ginobili.
If not for Ginobili violating about 37 unwritten rules of player conduct by undercutting a shooter on a half-court shot as the first-half was ending, ABZ would probably be in the midst of a 22ppg season and making a drive towards a long-term contract extension while the Rockets chased a playoff berth (even without Yao Ming, who apparently has been dead since 2007).
*seriously, two months later... that's still a dick move, Manu.
You owe Aaron breakfast.
Nevertheless, our favorite midget seems to be back to nearly 100% health. Yet, at the moment, he resides firmly on the bench behind Kyle Lowry. It's quite possible that Rick Adelman is unaware that this guy currently wearing the #0 jersey is the same guy who was his starting point guard back in November before that fateful day. But we'll never know because I'm too busy trying to figure out why Adelman refuses to exploit Kevin Martin's talents in the fourth quarter. It's uncanny.
While watching the Rockets recent games against the Clippers and the Mavericks this week, I noticed that Brooks is being asked to play more of a 2-guard role. Instead of being a primary ballhandler and distributor, he's roaming the court looking to be a scoring guard. I believe this plays to his strengths, because Brooks has a scorer's mentality and now that he's in his fourth NBA season, I think we can all agree that he's never going to magically develop Jason Kidd's court-vision or awareness. Brooks is not a dynamic passer, but he can be a dynamic scorer.
Relatedly........ we all know that Brooks' rookie contract expires after this season, and he'll be a restricted free agent. Meanwhile, just last summer, the Rockets matched a relatively large contract to retain Kyle Lowry. If you recall, it was a four-year deal starting out at $5.75M a year totaling up to $23.75M. That's starting PG money, my friends. Even if Kyle had never previously topped 10 ppg or 5 assists per game until this year. No way Morey puts significant amounts of money into two point guards that are not traditional point guards. That would simply be bad cap management -- and Morey is like a genius or something, so he's not gonna do that. Thus, it won't take the services of Captain Hindsight to inform the masses that the Rockets already had big plans for Kyle Lowry - and not Aaron Brooks.

This means that Aaron Brooks is most definitely on the trade block.
He has to be.
(The first person to say "Carmelo Anthony" gets stuck with a cattle prod)
Here are some more facts:
Brooks is never going to get taller than his listed 6'
His best asset is speed/quickness, but he's basically maxed that out
Brooks' shooting range begins from the parking lot, but he's also a defensive liability
The primary skill a point guard needs -- passing -- is not exactly ABZ's strength
Brooks is never going to be an NBA All-Star. He's just not.
Brooks is going to want a contract that surpasses what Kyle makes now
The Rockets are unlikely to make the playoffs this year
2011-12 is an uncertain future, and
The trade deadline is rapidly approaching and the Rockets are buyers/sellers.
Aaron did, however, attend the school that provided the reason for inventing the concept of "cheerleader" though, so he'll always have that going for him. (Seriously, click the link - it's awesome.)
Now, please do not misunderstand - I am not trying to run Aaron off. He's a very good player and he is definitely an asset to the current roster. The trick is, this roster needs an upgrade and ABZ is looked upon fondly by many other GMs across the league - namely those employed by Sacramento and Phoenix. Daryl Morey knows this. Rick Adelman knows this (or at least he should). I think this is why you're seeing Brooks used in a variety of new and different ways - with different lineups and configurations. The Rockets are trying to show the rest of the league what Aaron can do. He's being showcased. Like on the freakin' Price is Right... in exchange for giving us a legitimate center, you can get a trip to Maui, a new car, and Aaaaaaaron Brooks! Come on, down!
Fortunately for us, Aaron is a good guy and a professional. Meanwhile, we are not the Detroit Pistons, who for some reason are afraid to play Rip Hamilton because they are trying to trade him and they do not want him getting injured. That's bush-league. The Rockets are better than that, and we all appreciate that fact.
The NBA trade deadline is February 24th. We are four weeks away.
I'd say the odds that Aaron Brooks is a Houston Rocket on February 25th are less than 50%. I'm not sure if this is a good or bad thing. It just is what it is. In the interim, Brooks will continue to get a lot of court time to show off his skills, just not as the starting point guard. I'm sure that has to be frustrating for Aaron, but this is one of those situations where the Rockets' front office has to think ahead and do what is best for the long-term plans of the organization. Because Hakeem, Clyde, Robert, Sam, Kenny and Mario aren't walking through that door.
The next 28 days are going to be quite the adventure.
65 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rec'd.
I agree with all of your points.
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
What’s a “caddle prod”?
I’ve heard of a “cattle prod” before…
I had to stop arguing with drunks, Steeler fans, and all other fools.
It was making my brick wall jealous...
I know…
… I’m guilty of that, too…
=^)
.
I had to stop arguing with drunks, Steeler fans, and all other fools.
It was making my brick wall jealous...
by steeler-hater on Jan 28, 2011 12:32 PM CST up reply actions
Word
Manu is playing too good this year to not get injured at some point.
I hope they stay at the first seed and get knocked out in the 1st round by yours truly.
by basketball is cool on Jan 28, 2011 12:42 PM CST up reply actions
Well
Because Hakeem, Clyde, Robert, Sam, Kenny and Mario aren’t walking through that door.
If Jay-Z can do it half a dozen times, so can they.
by basketball is cool on Jan 28, 2011 12:42 PM CST reply actions
FUCK TCU
I should ban you just for the implication!
no dirty horned frog whore is better than an Oregon cheerleader. /fact
incorrect
2nd bowl in a row. We beat the F out of Nevada last year in Hawaii. Alas, lost at home to Army this year (though I saw that coming).
TCU only wishes it could match the early 80s Pony Express.
I lived in Dallas for that.
Maybe the best college backfield ever. And apparently paying them is ok now, just ask Auburn. Where was the death penalty for Auburn? NCAA is such a crass joke, and I say that as someone who basically hates Dallas and all its works.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
Only a Pony would bother to bash TCU.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
SCREW TCU! PONY UP!
SMU Cox School of Business 2011.
Is it possible...
Could they be playing AB at the 2 to see how he fits there with the intention of having that be his position moving forward (if I’m correct he has been finishing games as the 2 recently, instead of Martin)? If that is the case, could the Rockets be going into blow up mode and trading Martin with Brooks and Lee taking over the 2?
by Hawaiian Rocket on Jan 28, 2011 2:53 PM CST reply actions
that would be the smallest backcourt since the '01 Sixers
The Sixers once started Eric Snow and Iverson, so the concept is not completely far fetched, but I just don’t see the Rockets letting ABZ play the 2 spot for 35 minutes a night. Plus, he wants to be a starting PG and will probably corral a huge contract from someone this offseason that the Rockets can’t/won’t match. Better to get assets now.
Also, I think Morey likes Martin much more than Brooks.
I made the notion about the Brooks/Lowry Combo
I said that was the best backcourt in the league due to speed, defense, and all-around energy of transition basketball. I can’t remember who, but someone was knocking me for that idea but it appears every time the Lowry/Brooks combo hits the floor, the Rockets take off.
there's validity to this, but it is limited
If Lowry/Brooks play 8-10 minutes a game together, that’s one thing…
but if they played 30+ minutes a game together, they would be mercilessly exploited at both ends of the court. And we’d never find an open man because one or both would be dribbling out the shot clock.
this is a god damn curse
Every fuckin jersey I buy the guy gets shipped out. I’ve only got my Battier left. I’ve been saving up for a new jersey (got about 100$ right now, that should be enough) but im waiting till the trade deadline
If you're a fan of basketball, watch a movie called Sonicsgate. It's free, just google it.
i'd say....
The odds of keeping brooks past these last few days of the trade exception are just as bleak.
I love his game, still think that he was one of the better draft choices we’ve made but lowry has realy stepped up and we need a center.
I’m callin jefferies, brooks and the exception for dalembert at the end of the month.
by ShookednShanghaied11 on Jan 28, 2011 5:35 PM CST via mobile reply actions
by the way
The southpark reference was great
by ShookednShanghaied11 on Jan 28, 2011 5:44 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Honestly, This is a problem a lot of teams would like to have.
Having all the guys we’ve got to play the point presents us with more solutions than problems.
I despise Manu for what he did to ABZ.
But it all could have been much worse.
Now that Brooks is recovering, I think that the Rockets now have a much better understanding of their flexibility at the point, even without ABZ.
With a bumpy start, Lowry has proven he can definitely run it.
Lee can fill in, Terence Williams can do some pretty magical things with the ball, and a promising rookie in Ish Smith who’s actually faster and has better court vision than Brooks.
I also think Houston is realizing that the trend among point guards in addition to speed is size and strength. ABZ has great speed and quickness but he obviously lacks in size and strength. Westbrook, Rose, D-Will, Ellis, Wall, all these guys have a combination of these things to create for everybody, including themselves anywhere on the court. I still think that if he’s put with the right team and a different system, ABZ could still prove to be an elite point guard, but for now in Houston that role is destined for somebody else.
by Nobody is Better Than Jordan on Jan 29, 2011 1:33 AM CST reply actions
I think Ginobili wasn't trying to hurt anyone.
That said, yes, a complete dickmove. That’s why you don’t make the dickmove. One, it shows you’re a dick. Second, someone could get hurt.
I’d like the Spurs season to go down the drain because Ginobili knocked himself out for the year on a flop. There’s no real ill-will here – no flop, no injury. That or he’s killed by vampire bats.
As for Ish – 20,000 practice jumpers are in his near future. And another 20,000 FTS. If he can’t hit a J and can’t shoot FT he’s always going to be a 3rd PG. If CAN learn, well, that’s different.
The thing about Brooks that’s overlooked by a lot of people, is that ever sharing a lot with Lowry he nearly averaged 20pts. That isn’t easy. He’s a great shooter.
If TWilly really CAN learn to play point, and he might, he’s a nightmare, an absolute nightmare. No one in the NBA at PG is big and strong enough to hold him, except Williams, Rondo and Westbrook.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
Lay off the Spurs
Somebody needs to eliminate the Lakers. If not the Spur, then who? Dallas? Ha, ha, ha. This is perhaps the real last chance for Tim Duncan to win. Complain about Manu all you want but the guy has always played well, played hard and accidents just happen when you play hard. I admit that it is unlikely that Kevin Martin will ever injure anyone with his defense!
The Rockets are rebuilding so I wish the best for Duncan, Manu and Tony. Beat the Lakers and, please, then BEAT MIAMI.
The worst possible FINALS will be Kobe and Lebron strutting around and the media running their mouths about them being so great, blah, blah. Go Spurs, Go Celtics. Let’s see the old men in the Finals and send Kobe and Lebron on an early exit.
nah, i'd prefer celtics-lakers
i’m hoping for the spurs to have a mavs-tastic meltdown in the first round against whoever the 8th seed is.
Brooks for Nene
That works for the Rockets, but how so for Denver? What else would the Nuggets want/need in return? A lesser option is the Suns’ Eastern European center — I don’t know his name — who came from the Magic. The Rockets tried to get him before this season. He had a big game last night andis reportedly on the block again.
Regardless of what’s available, plainly the Rockets are sub-.500 because they have no goal-tender. Elvin Hayes, Moses Malone, Ralph Sampson, Hakeem Olajuwon, Yao Ming — where are these guys when you need them (again)?
Brooks for Nene doesn't work
Because Denver is simply not that stupid or that desperate. Brooks recent play if causing his value to drop. Nene’s play is better than ever. Nene is a highly ranked center (probably one of the top 5 or 6). Brooks, in reality, is only a career bench player. He had a good year on a bad team.
your evaluation of brooks is just horrible
This is a guy who averaged 20 and 5 on a 42-40 team and to you he is a career bench player on a bad team? You have ti give me some of what you smoke roy. Lowry is having a career season and we have a losing record so what does that mean to you? This is why I call you stupid. You just say some off shit.
Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.
by batman713 on Jan 29, 2011 11:31 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Career bench player
Wait and see. Brooks peaked last year.
BTW, 20 and 5 sounds good but every NBA team will average close to a 100 pts, with good players or with bad ones. And if a team gets 100 pts, they have to come from somewhere. Brooks is a scorer. I have said that many times. A good guy to bring off the bench for a few minutes, especially when the other team is getting worn down and not likely to play as hard on offense. The problem with Brooks is defense.
Ahh Roy
Your assessments rival that of the people from clutchfans. Maybe you should go over there because I promise more people will agree with you at clutchfans than here.
Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.
Well
What is the part that you disagree with anyway? Why not be specific? These extra small, quick guys that score well usually do fine coming off the bench. Look around the league and you see many examples. You do not, however, see many examples of successful starting guards that weigh 160 lb. Do you disagree with that? I said that Brooks is a scorer that doesn’t lay defense well. Do you disagree with that? I said he would be a guy player to bring off the bench. Do you disagree with that? Exactly what is it that you disagree with anyway?
gortat
Marcin gortat is the players name, he’s polish 6-11, plays great individual & team defense and not quite the offensive liability he was when we made our crazed f.a push to net him.
He was a R.F.A before last season and morey showed up on his doorstep with a jersey and about 100000 emails from fans begging him to come. He opted for dallas’ offer and then got matched by magic.
Point being, he’d be a great addition to this team but if he’d rather go for dallas he can take it right in his commy ass.
He’d realy be most valuable behind a dalembert or nene type. That way he can either come off the bench with miller or start alongside another 7-footer to help us against l.a, boston, or s.a post presence.
We’d prolly have to give up hill, exception, picks and money to net him, which would still allow us to make a move for ‘bert.
If we got both, I put us at the 6th seed and we’d have a great chance against okc in that first round.
by ShookednShanghaied11 on Jan 29, 2011 10:10 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
How about Mozgoz
Or whatever his name is? I am talking about the big Russian guy the Knicks have. I watched him last night against Detroit and he looked surprisingly good to me. NY needs a first round pick so they can work ouit a deal for Carmelo. This Russian is big and athletic and very young. I don’t know if he is as good as he looked last night but, based on that one game, he would sure help our team.
If you are right
If they are showcasing Brooks or a trade, then do you think the strategy is working? The guy’s value seems to be dropping like a dead duck. Even on this board with all the strong Brooks’ fans, support seems to be waning away.
Too doggone short and ain’t gonna grow.
Too little too .. I bet half the guys posting here have wives that weigh as much as Brooks.
Can’t or won’t pass.
Doesn’t seem to be able to see, perhaps because he is to short to see over the other guys’ shoulders.
And as for the idea of keeping both Brooks and Lowry to form a team Philly had with Iverson and Eric Snow, I ask you the obvious question: who is going to be Iverson? Eric Snow, maybe. Iverson, never.
I agree that Houston is planning to trade Brooks. I believe they are also at least thinking about trading Martin. And for sure they are looking at guys like Nene.
Supports not eroding
it’s just pointless to keep talking about it.
I do agree that the inconsistent play is tanking any perceived value. Maybe he should pull a McGrady and announce season ending surgery just to be a dickhead.
I don't usually plan out my days because the word "premeditation" gets thrown around a lot in courts today.
Maybe he should
Actually require season-ending surgery before he announces it. Remember? McGrady was actually in need of the surgery. Brooks is in need of growth hormones.
And you constant support of AB
Is just foolish. I am only being reasonable. I am not bashing him. I say he is a very good scorer. Is that bashing him. I am just pointing out his weaknesses along with his strengths. You seem to have some kind of idea that we are all supposed to worship this guys and put on blinders so we can see no faults. What is the point of that?
The problem wasn't if it was needed
it was when it was announced. McGrady’s name was in trade rumors, didn’t like it, so he announced the surgery to insulate himself rather than allowing the club to trade him while he had value. Brooks should just announce a major surgery to tank his value worse than his current play is doing.
We all like to talk without much to say...
Why wouldn't Brooks want a trade
What you suggest seems foolish to me. Why would Brooks not want a trade? If he is as good as you and Batman think then a trade would probably send him somewhere to become an all-star PG.
McGrady didn’t get the surgery to avoid any trade. He got it because he needed it. McGrady has to look out for McGrady. For his career, he needed the surgery. He tried to play but couldn’t. He even tried to play when he probably should not have tried, when the team thought he was not ready.
So is he supposed to just sit around, with an injury that needs surgery, and wait to be traded and then get the surgery? Only a fool would do that.
We need practice on picking up sarcasm
When I said Brooks needs to announce surgery out of spite, it was sarcasm, don’t treat it as anything else and the sarcasm was pretty thick.
As for McGrady’s surgery, again, I never said he didn’t need it, I said his announcement of it was out of self-preservation. The club could have gotten more out of him had he not gone ahead and announced he was getting his surgery after he found out his name was in trade talks that were getting serious. Defend the necessity all you want, that’s not the issue at hand.
We all like to talk without much to say...
The issue at hand
Has nothing to do with McGrady and it wasn’t me that brought up McGrady in the first place. But, seriously, you act like McGrady should not have announced the surgery so that it would help the Rockets trade him. That doesn’t make a lot of sense. Why? If that gave the Rockets an advantage, as you claim, wouldn’t it be a disadvantage to the team getting McGrady (which would be McGrady’s new team)? Should McGrady screw his new team to help his old team?
What Brooks should do is play as well as he can play, like he did against the Lakers last night. That helps his current team (the Rockets) and it also helps Brooks (his value). It doesn’t hurt the team getting him either.
There is a chance that Brooks is moving on so Brooks should do everything he can to get the best deal he can for Aaron Brooks.
Your example is a moot point
because you’re shifting which team gets screwed in your scenario and assuming it makes you right in some way, shape, or form, and it simply doesn’t.
We all like to talk without much to say...
I agree
It is just too bad that he isn’t playing worth a crap right now. I think we need to move him but it would be nice if his value were higher. Brooks will make a very good backup PG (or even SG) somewhere. He should not be a starting player because he just cannot defend starting NBA guards. But for a guy to come off the bench, to play when the opposition is getting tired, to be a spark plug on offense … that is what Brooks should do very well.
So let me get this straight
If you have trouble defending your position then you should be on the bench? Ok i get it! Scola and Martin should only come off the bench for the rest of their careers! Someone call Rick Adelman!
Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.
Yes, you finally understand
Man, I thought you’d never get it. If you cannot play better than the guy behind you, offense or defense, then you need to hit the bench. Scola and Martin play better than any options Adleman has, so far as I can tell. So he starts them. Adleman thinks that Lowry plays better than Brooks (currently) so he starts Lowry. Is that confusing to you?
Starting PG is critical. Brooks is just not good enough unless he is all you have. Brooks is not, IMO, good enough for our starting PG. I would be very happy for him to remain as backup, to be somewhat like Nate Robinson at Boston. But for the Rockets to contend, we need a serioius upgrade at PG, a real PG, bigger and better than Brooks.
You mention Scola and Martin but, to be realistic, if the Rockets are going to contend with those guys starting then we need a very big upgrade at PG and C to cover up for them on defense. To be championship quality, the rest of the Rockets have to improve to a level where Scola and Martin are the weak links.
3 way trade suggestion
With Portland and San Antonio. I’m a Blazer fan and I would LOVE to see Brooks in Portland.
The 3 way trade would center around Camby to San Antonio, Tiago Splitter going to Houston, and Brooks coming to Portland. Filler is necessary, forcing McDyess and Bonner to come to Portland, and C.Hayes (expiring) to come to San Antonio. Portland would send a late 1st to San Antonio, and a pair of 2nds to Houston.
BTW the Oregon Cheerleaders have their own reality show on local TV here.
I would hate to see Chuck play for the spurs
I would be forced to hate him.
Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.
For a change
I agree with Batman. I would hate to see Chuck Hayes go. I would like to get Tiago Splitter but not if we lose Hayes.
On second thought
I change my mind. I refuse to agree with someone with the I.Q. of a rock.
Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.
Well
I don’t change my mind. I wasn’t wrong in the first place so there is no need to change. Batgirl, on the other hand, doesn’t know what he is taking about and flip flops back and forth.
only way that works
Is if we get camby. A magically uninjured 10yrs younger camby.
Even with that we are not giving hayes up for anything short of an all-star.
Brooks and hayes for splitter and 2nd rounders would get morey attacked by some fanatical fan.
Its a good deal for portland though.
If the rockets trade with portland it’d be for l.a and portland’s front office would havta need crack money for them to let him go for anyone on our roster.
I wish scola and brooks with picks would get us aldrige but it won’t.
by ShookednShanghaied11 on Jan 29, 2011 11:50 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
no thanks on splitter
the guy, or what i have seen of him so far, seems kinda lost on the basketball court more often than not. probably still undergoing an nba adjustment or something.
How about Morgov.. or Mozgor
I am talking about the big Russian center for the Knicks. I had never heard of him until last night, I watched the NYK vs Detroit game. The guy is pretty athletic and plays well (or at least played well in that one game). He is young too.
The Knicks want Carmelo. To get Carmelo, I think they need a 1st round pick. Houston could do that for them. Maybe we could get them to take Jeffries back and one pick for the Russian center. He is 3rd string for them so might be expendable, especially if it meant they could deal for Carmelo.
Russian
Mozgov scored 20 last game. Before that he has had about 35 for the whole season
Yeah
But he sure looked good in that one game. That is the only time I have seen him play. I still think he has some potential. He is pretty athletic and he is young. Not scoring much doesn’t mean much since he wasn’t playing much either. He might not be the best fit for that fast-paced NY style. Watch him if you get the chance.
























