Recap, Part 2: Rockets Spoil Martin's 45, Kindly Hand Over A Win To Blazers, 103-100
To those of you who chose to remain at Toyota Center for the final fifteen seconds of Wednesday night's game when the Rockets were only down by three, because, pending a legitimate excuse (for instance, child labor), I don't feel like writing to the low-lifes who inexplicably fled the premises early*:
Put the "big picture" thinking on hold for a second. Forget the gauntlet of a schedule that lies ahead of the Rockets, forget their disastrous start to the month of January, forget how this affects who gets traded and whatnot -- just forget all of that for a second.
Let's talk about Wednesday night's stunner, because it was a fantastic way to lose a basketball game.
Really, I couldn't have drawn it up any better myself. And it didn't just come down to the final few plays, when the Rockets didn't get the whistles that had actually brought them back into the game minutes earlier. No, this was a process. It was a feeling. You could sense it, with six minutes left, right after Portland took advantage of back-to-back miscues by the Rockets defense, nearly to the point where you said it out loud: this game is far from over.
Surely this could turn into a "Kevin Martin isn't a closer and yada yada yada" argument -- which would be a fair discussion, given Martin's late-game points came courtesy of whistles -- but we're not going there. Not when KevMart dropped 45 points on the Portland Trail Blazers. Not when he did it on a mere eighteen shots, proof that his teammates were the ones that dropped the ball. This wasn't a Kobe-fest, in which Martin would have hogged the rock and forced up enough bombs to eventually reach a high scoring output. In fact, this was the polar opposite. I don't think it's possible to be any less selfish and score 45 points, actually.
He did it on eighteen shots. That's mind-boggling. Doesn't Michael Beasley -- the future scoring champ, according to Doc Rivers -- average 21 points per game on eighteen shots? Kevin Martin more than doubled that output without taking any more attempts from the field. Jee-zus.
Let's talk about who screwed up. There were many screw-ups, but let's address some of the worst.
Rick Adelman screwed up. If a team without a closer fails in the final minutes of a game, it's too easy to pin the loss on the coach, but I really think Adelman deserves it this time. Normally a mastermind in designing out-of-bounds plays, Adelman dropped the ball on the game's last possession. The Rockets declined to use two screeners on Kevin Martin's man, which allowed the Portland defender to deny Martin the ball on an inbounds play clearly designed for him. This forced Shane Battier to lob a cross-court pass to Courtney Lee and say a prayer. The play was too easily dismantled, and to be blunt, it was a case of Houston screwing with themselves far more than Portland playing impenetrable defense.
Adelman also chose not to double LaMarcus Aldridge for much of the game, which proved to be a costly decision as LaMarvelous dropped 27 points on 11-18 shooting against the helpless Jordan Hill. Not only did this give Aldridge an easy bucket nearly every time down the floor, but it also handicapped an already lousy defensive rebounder in Hill (who has apparently never been taught the art of the box-out). If a shot was missed, Aldridge was able to keep the play alive many a time. He pulled down five offensive rebounds in total.
Courtney Lee screwed up. If you didn't watch the game, the Rockets performance from beyond the arc -- 11 for 20 -- seems impressive. But it should have been two better, as Lee missed two WIDE-OPEN three-pointers that could have easily slowed Portland's 8-0 run and lessened the Rockets' deficit entering halftime. Instead, the Blazers racked up points in bunches while the Rockets missed the gimme's. Yes, I'm being this picky.
Brad Miller screwed up. Miller tried to play point guard again late in the fourth, drove hard towards the basket, threw up an awkward shot that missed and didn't get the foul call that he wanted. This prompted him to angrily toss the ball away from the referees after a timeout was called, which, under the new rules, warranted a technical foul. If there was any specific momentum shift aside from the Blazers' back-to-back threes, this was it.
Luis Scola screwed up. The twelve rebounds are nice, but you can't miss an easy bucket two feet away from the basket after you decline to pass to an open three-pointer. His brick with about six seconds left didn't end the game, but if it weren't for a ridiculous three-pointer for Kyle Lowry, it would have.
Whoever was guarding Patrick Mills screwed up. It baffles me how a team can allow a streaky-shooting backup point guard -- clearly on his game at the time -- to get wide-open for three of four made deep balls. There's just no excuse for it. Mills was the spark that the Blazers jumped on to spur a comeback.
The funny thing is that these late out-of-bounds plays never needed to happen. Despite all of the crap that Houston pulled to allow Portland back into the contest, the game was seemingly stuck at 97-96 for too long. The Rockets got the stops they needed, but they couldn't ice the game. Jordan Hill missed two clutch free throws and Kyle Lowry was forced to take a contested three-pointer on the next possession that clanked. Later, Martin missed on a heat-check and Hill, attempting to go for a tip-in, missed again. While he was probably fouled, the Rockets had already been granted too many foul calls for the officials to throw another in their direction. This repeated itself on the next possession, when Hill was almost certainly fouled on a turnover, but didn't get the call. Whosever fault it was, the Rockets didn't get it done when they had to. One Rudy Fernandez jumper later, they found themselves down and out for good.
Also, wasn't the Terrence Williams/Lee/Patterson/Budinger/Miller lineup the oddest you'd ever seen?
Fire away with your displeasure in the comments, but don't just lay into the referees. They missed a few obvious calls, but they gave Houston a lot of whistles that normally wouldn't get blown, either. This was as bad a loss as the Rockets have suffered all season long. They had a win within grasp -- literally perched on the palm -- but the Rockets failed to clench what could prove to be only the third of many losses this month. Get ready, Houston: it might only get worse from here.
**
*Obviously, if you weren't in attendance at all, you can disregard this statement.
79 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"Hill (who has apparently never been taught the art of the box-out). "
Who is teaching and coaching him? Uhhhhhhhh…..
Jack Sikma, who I trust could get through to someone willing to properly listen.
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
Whats up with Lowry
jacking up 28 ft three pointers the past three games and …..wait for it…. actually making them!
What's the problem?
He’s added 3pt range to his game – he’s now a complete PG.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
I read somewhere KL has a hamstring problem starting from a couple of games ago
It has slowed him down
I dunno, being there (until the bitter end), watching LMA push off 9/10 plays was hard to watch, that's my main complaint.
And mainly because Scola has been called for it a goodly number of times.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
True.
By the way, added the “part” to your title just so people would be inclined to read both of these. Not that they wouldn’t, but you never know.
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
Ah, you're killing me Tom
just waiting for me to post…
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
But seriously, thanks for the Part 1, Part 2 - I think we both had a lot to say,
and hey, much of it different, no groupthink at TDS.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
Ha, Dave and I have actually posted within a single minute before.
And yes, no groupthink. That’s actually pretty amazing given a night like this.
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
I still think you're just lurking...like a post-shark.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
Yes, that's what we always do. Thanks for dropping by.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 12:36 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
As a Blazer fan
I really don’t know how they don’t call the push off for LMA. However, I do believe he learned it from Scola. I hated Scola during our playoff series for that push off. I hope both are teams can find the defense center we both need to come back strong.
Thats what pissed me off the most about the game
the refs let LMA do what he wanted while he posted up on Hill. You can clearly see on the replays a big push-off with his left forearm on everyplay!!!
What's wrong with the Bud/Lee/Williams/Patterson/Miller lineup?
They were playing quite well.
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
Nothing, it's just weird, mainly because of Miller.
That unit is probably supposed to include Hill.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
Uh, that's when the Blazers made their big second-quarter run.
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
Yes!
And Miller was My-back-is-killing kinda slow on rotations
by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on Jan 6, 2011 12:50 AM CST up reply actions
This isn't his kind of game.
Aldridge is too fast and passes too well, and Camby still moves pretty well to the glass, and hangs out at the high post so Aldridge can operate. He can do slow and inside, or slow and outside, but fast anywhere is a problem.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
Question
Why is Patty Mills under the impression that your team is from the WCC?
I ask myself the same thing before trying to fall asleep every night.
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
Some sort of Brandon Roy 3pt magic rubbed off on him somehow.
Maybe it was a blood transfusion. I can buy Roy as a vampire.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
Actually if any Blazer is a vampire, it's Miller
Some believe that he stays healthy by “feeding” off the health of others. Not bad statistical evidence too. That or because he never jumps, at all.
Portland could coast along with their superior talent and stay right with us. Now that Portland woke up, the hammer cometh down.
Bayless > Daffy Duck after 3 cans of rockstar
by Batumshakalaka on Jan 6, 2011 2:13 AM CST up reply actions
You are right of course
Miller is the leech lord…
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 8:51 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I wouldn't blame C.Lee as much as I blame
JORDAN HILL and MISSED FTs!
by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on Jan 6, 2011 12:51 AM CST reply actions
Yes those were big
but Martin missed some, so did Patterson, Lowry etc.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
our free throw shooting in the last week and a half has been atrocious
everyone’s been missing.
Oh and Brad Miller
Point Forward of the future
by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on Jan 6, 2011 1:05 AM CST up reply actions
I'm think JHill is a power forward - if he's the last line of defense, at least right now, its a problem.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
Hit in the gut with this one
I don’t even wanna debate about this team anymore, just gonna wait and see what happens. Man…just tired of the bad losses over the years. 1 playoff victory I’ve actually seen with my own eyes. Dang it…sucks
by twinkilling0303 on Jan 6, 2011 12:53 AM CST reply actions
Hang in there.
The talent is good and getting better. I think this team is one player away from a deep playoff run – and without him may be in the lottery.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
this game was gut-wrenching to watch
i can’t believe we wasted martin’s 45-point game like that. anyone who says he wasn’t closing well was watching a completely different game. any time he got the ball in the second-half, he was able to get something good on offense for houston (for the most part).
what lost the game for me was:
1. ridiculous defensive plan on aldridge. we couldn’t front him. we couldn’t double him. jordan hill needs to bulk up. he’s going to be pushed around really easily by the dominant centers on the teams we play this month—howard, jefferson, o’neal & o’neal, horford, bogut, stoudemire, etc. no idea how to address this. the blazers could have broadcasted their game plan before the game and we still wouldn’t have been able to stop them.
2. absolutely mind-boggling play-calling late in the fourth. i don’t know what we were doing. kevin martin usually got the ball with between 5-10 seconds left on the shot clock. he’s not a video game player—he can’t just do a couple of triple threat moves, a pump fake and drain a shot. there were too many times when we tried passing the ball around the other side (through scola-battier-hill and back around the other way to martin). what the hell was up with that second-to-last play? down by 3 with about 15 seconds remaining… we either needed to take a quick 2 or a late three. instead lowry dribbled it around for a while before passing it in to the post which hadn’t been working all game.
3. turnovers. after going on that run to go up 13 points, we allowed the blazers back primarily through turnovers rather than missed shots.
—
other thoughts… i thought the defensive intensity on the t-will, lee, bud, patterson, miller was great. t-will threw a couple of great passes that weren’t hit by his teammates and there were a couple of turnovers as they tried to break. i want more minutes from t-will. he was getting into the lane at will, something NO ONE ELSE ON OUR TEAM CAN DO (except maybe lowry). think about it, our starters are lowry, martin, hill, scola and battier. battier scouts on corners. scola posts up. hill tries to post up. martin can work off the wing with his triple threat (and once he was getting doubled threw some nice passes to players waiting within the arc). but lowry is the only one who can really drive and dish. everyone else is too slow or lack ball handles.
i’m disillusioned by scola. his stat lines usually end up looking good but i think he’s really bad at some of the intangible stuff. he’s bad at rotating. he’s bad at defense in general. he’s either completely on with his array of scoops or completely off. his free throw shooting has gone down the shitter. he is liable to turnover the ball when doubled and most of his rebounds tend to land in his hands rather than him grabbing the board. he’s still has beastly nights, but there are a lot of flaws that the rest of our team is not good enough to cover up.
You're going to see more of Williams.
You’re not going to see him when he goes off the reservation. Williams is going to have to combine his explosiveness and passion with discipline. If this wasn’t a problem NJ would never have let him go. He’s special, but he’s also his own worst enemy. And he needs to be a better shooter.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
Williams can prove his value if he's given more minutes.
He would be the perfect compliment to Lowry and Martin because nobody can play loose on any of them. That would eventually free up Scola and/or the yet to be determined dominant center Houston so desperately needs to acquire.
by Nobody is Better Than Jordan on Jan 6, 2011 1:41 AM CST up reply actions
I agree. IN fact when the blazers were doubling KM in the 4th, we could have used TWill
to break down his defender and create shots for his teammates.
It’s clear we don’t have any game plan for when Kevin is doubled.
Yes we do
The plan is to take a contested three point shot and hope we get a rebound
by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on Jan 6, 2011 10:34 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Maybe
But at this stage of the game, I’m hardly convinced that Williams is a reliable 4th-quarter option. If they’re doubling Martin, then someone must be open. If you run the offense effectively, someone should get a good shot. Drawing a double-team every time down should be all you can ask of a star.
And really, that should have been the case at the other end in the 4th. You double LA, stay home on the 1-2 shooters on the court, and you make Cunningham or Batum beat you.
the problem when they were doubling martin
was that he was getting it right at the end of the shot clock. not enough time to swing the ball around to find the open shooter. not really a case to be made for t-will here, imo.
compare this to portland, whose first offensive move was to get the ball to aldridge. and our doubling and rotations were so weak that he could just toss it over the doubling defender and find the open guy in the corner.
TWill would have posed another problem for the Portland defense to solve which would make life a little easier for Martin and the rest.
The team didn’t want to give the ball right away to KM because they knew he was covered. But no one also could break down anyone’s defense also.
yeah i'm all for t-will playing
basically i’m getting annoyed at adelman
lets trade brooks to the kings
Package ab, buddinger, hill and battier for dalembert, landry and casspi.. Trade jeffries to the pacers for tj ford and even though this trade doesn’t get us a superstar we still get better as a team plus dalembert does block shots and rebound something we really lack.. Line-up lowry/martin/williams/scola/dalembert bench ford/lee/casspi/landry/miller I think this team can make the playoffs and once chuck returns replace him with miller and let t-will develop.. him and martin on the wings would keep the opponents on there heels.. Thoughts?
by rocket2789 on Jan 6, 2011 1:25 AM CST via mobile reply actions
forget the rest.
Just give me cousins.
Brooks battier, hill, jeffries
for cousins and landry
Problem is Sacramento appears to have suddenly grown more fond of Cousins now.
He’s back in the starting lineup and he’s doing good.
by Nobody is Better Than Jordan on Jan 6, 2011 1:46 AM CST up reply actions
That is about as bad a trade as could possibly get made
You can get much MUCH more for AB, Bud, Hill and Battier
www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer
by UofTOrange on Jan 6, 2011 7:13 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
agreed
As one who has been a huge (-ly irrational?) Landry proponent, I see no benefit to this trade. Dalembert is going to be the difference-maker? Really? i wouldn’t trade Chuck Hayes straight up for Dalembert! He’s almost 30, has had 10 rpg exactly once in his entire career. This year, his offensive numbers (in similar minutes) are no better than Chuck’s, and for all his deficiencies, you can’t convince me that, of the two, Chuck isn’t more valuable on the defensive end.
103-100 was the final score...
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
There was talk that the Rockets were gonna pursue Kendrick Perkins
in the summer when he is free agent. They mentioned the Thunder also looking to get him.
we need something now, though
unless we’re trying to blow it up and land a lottery pick, something i don’t think morey ever aims for
I don't doubt your credibility
But could you post a link confirming this?
Wafer . . . again. (Marv Albert, HOU v. CLE Feb 2009)
-one of the FEW at Toyota Center who has the Wafer jersey
by olivarezq1 on Jan 6, 2011 10:59 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
An excerpt relating to Rockets and Thunder:
Perkins, 26, is from Beaumont, Texas, and figures to draw interest from the Rockets and Thunder. Still, he’d prefer to return to the Celtics, whose payroll for next season is already projected to be about $74 million, provided Allen and Shaq don’t opt out of their contracts.
"I will show that I’m back and there are no issues with my knee," said Perkins, who is making $4.4 million this season. "I will have a bright future as far as free agency. We will see how this season turns out and how it goes from there.
"I want to be with the Celtics, but I got to think about my future."
by inquisitiveman on Jan 6, 2011 11:09 AM CST up reply actions
Dalembert seems to want out of Sac too...he also has expiring deal...maybe
we can trade Yao’s expiring with his
I think this is who the Rockets end up with
IF the Kings continue to not win AND the Rockets can come out with at least 6-8 wins this month and still remain somewhat in the playoff race come trade deadline.
I see a 3 team deal in the making…
Houston gets: Dalembert, Landry, 2 1st Rd Picks
Kings get: Yao’s Contract, AB
Third Team gets: Casppi, J. Jeffries
We make the playoffs in the 7th or 8th seed and get knocked out in game 6 of the first round. Then during the off season we over pay Marc Gasol, and resign Yao for cheap with Brad Miller filling in until Yao returns. Make couple more moves to improve the backup PG position and let T-will come into his own…. then we would have a complete team for once….
I don't see us wanting to get Landry again and i don't see us giving up Brooks for Dalembert
or Landry..
by inquisitiveman on Jan 6, 2011 10:16 PM CST up reply actions
same here
if we’re giving up brooks, we need to get a quality big. that doesn’t mean dalembert. landry isn’t going to help us since frontcourt offense is not what our problem is, frontcourt defense is.
of course, with brooks being undervalued, this is going to be tough to match contracts up.
Lamarcus Push-offs
I see the push offs, but the complaints should really be lobbed at Hill and the others defending him. If Lamarcus is doing it every time he posts up, one of those guys has to do a better job selling the foul. Because although LMA is pushing, if the defender doesnt sell it then it doesnt look like anything more that regular contact in the paint.
Look at the way the Flying squirrel or Kevin Martin appear to be shot by 12-guage rifles at the slightest amount of contact.
Any defender on LMA might have to flop and give up one or two easy buckets before the refs get it right, but eventually he will have to stop if guys sell the push and he gets called for it.
Would any of you care to part with kevin martin?
Hi fans it Brandon Roy.
And ME.....LaMarcus Aldridge
this imo is why officiating is broken in the nba
why do players have to “act” like they have been fouled to get a foul. if anything, we should be getting rid of flopping and acting. i would be totally in favor of stopping the play on every single offensive foul opportunity, going to the replay and assessing a technical foul if a player was found to be flopping. yes, that means players like scola, hayes and lowry would probably be getting a few T’s. but i’m tired of basketball where players have to dive all over the place.
yes, that’s probably an overreaction. refereeing in the nba must be hard, since it’s probably the only sport where the refs have to maintain concentration every second, unlike something like football where most of the time is spent looking for penalties that happen before the ball is in play (and of course there is no real notion of a foul by contact, unless it’s illegal contact). but honestly, the state of fouls and refereeing in the nba is at an all-time low. and this is not just a reaction from this game (where i thought the rockets actually were the benefactor of the calls, tonight.)
star players get special treatment. it may be that the nfl stars are more distributed or that star players don’t have the ball in their hands as often, but the referees call it by the book there, not by the name or number on the jersey.
the refs are too obsessed with evening out calls. so many times i’ve seen a shit call at one end and immediately after they try to balance it out by another bad call.
the last time anyone wants to see when they go to a basketball game is players shooting free throws.
the problem with that
is that there is so much contact allowed down in the post. so unless you want a whiste every 20 seconds, players are going to have to sell the fouls to get them. you have to allow contact down there, and unless a player sells it, it will be impossible to see/ call a foul
Hi fans it Brandon Roy.
And ME.....LaMarcus Aldridge
This team needs Brooks back in top form in a bad way
When Martin leaves the court, it’s tough to generate offense. (I guess either Portland did a great job on Lowry or he didn’t play very well offensively, since he has been doing this better of late).
Once again
offense is not the problem, we should be able to win every game scoring 100 points, or at least we used to
by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on Jan 6, 2011 3:32 PM CST up reply actions
agree
the cold truth is that all you have is Hill and Patterson trying to defend the paint.
we at least have length with Camby and lamarcus. once przybilla gets back, we might be in decent shape down low.
Rockets need some paint help in a major way…….can we interest you in a former #1 pick?
Hi fans it Brandon Roy.
And ME.....LaMarcus Aldridge
OK, if you’re saying AB won’t turn this team into a contender, fine. But asking for Brooks to get healthy is a bit more likely than Bill Russell circa 1961 materializing from this roster or showing up out of thin air. If I had said “we need to trade for Melo to get a second creator next to Martin” then I would see your point. (And I’d agree with it as well.)
I think it's time for Houston to go out and get themselves a shot-blocker.
We seriously need a big in that that can guard the 5. Hill is good with the 2nd unit, he looks totally outmatched with the first.
How much of Chuck’s lower body strength would have helped in this game? Plus, he is making his FTs and the layups.
The only player who i know on top of head that is on the trading block
and is a shot blocker , still young, and who plays excellent low post defense would be Andy Verejao.
by inquisitiveman on Jan 6, 2011 10:11 PM CST up reply actions
seriously we needed this a year ago
and here we are, still doing nothing
Good, insightful recap!
If Hill was so abused by LMA, I dread facing Orlando!
When is chuck back?

by 





















