Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Shootings Near Thunder's Arena Follow Win Over Lakers

Recap, Part 2: Rockets Spoil Martin's 45, Kindly Hand Over A Win To Blazers, 103-100

To those of you who chose to remain at Toyota Center for the final fifteen seconds of Wednesday night's game when the Rockets were only down by three, because, pending a legitimate excuse (for instance, child labor), I don't feel like writing to the low-lifes who inexplicably fled the premises early*:

Put the "big picture" thinking on hold for a second. Forget the gauntlet of a schedule that lies ahead of the Rockets, forget their disastrous start to the month of January, forget how this affects who gets traded and whatnot -- just forget all of that for a second.

Let's talk about Wednesday night's stunner, because it was a fantastic way to lose a basketball game.

Star-divide

Really, I couldn't have drawn it up any better myself. And it didn't just come down to the final few plays, when the Rockets didn't get the whistles that had actually brought them back into the game minutes earlier. No, this was a process. It was a feeling. You could sense it, with six minutes left, right after Portland took advantage of back-to-back miscues by the Rockets defense, nearly to the point where you said it out loud: this game is far from over. 

Surely this could turn into a "Kevin Martin isn't a closer and yada yada yada" argument -- which would be a fair discussion, given Martin's late-game points came courtesy of whistles -- but we're not going there. Not when KevMart dropped 45 points on the Portland Trail Blazers. Not when he did it on a mere eighteen shots, proof that his teammates were the ones that dropped the ball. This wasn't a Kobe-fest, in which Martin would have hogged the rock and forced up enough bombs to eventually reach a high scoring output. In fact, this was the polar opposite. I don't think it's possible to be any less selfish and score 45 points, actually.

He did it on eighteen shots. That's mind-boggling. Doesn't Michael Beasley -- the future scoring champ, according to Doc Rivers -- average 21 points per game on eighteen shots? Kevin Martin more than doubled that output without taking any more attempts from the field. Jee-zus.

Let's talk about who screwed up. There were many screw-ups, but let's address some of the worst.

Rick Adelman screwed up. If a team without a closer fails in the final minutes of a game, it's too easy to pin the loss on the coach, but I really think Adelman deserves it this time. Normally a mastermind in designing out-of-bounds plays, Adelman dropped the ball on the game's last possession. The Rockets declined to use two screeners on Kevin Martin's man, which allowed the Portland defender to deny Martin the ball on an inbounds play clearly designed for him. This forced Shane Battier to lob a cross-court pass to Courtney Lee and say a prayer. The play was too easily dismantled, and to be blunt, it was a case of Houston screwing with themselves far more than Portland playing impenetrable defense.

Adelman also chose not to double LaMarcus Aldridge for much of the game, which proved to be a costly decision as LaMarvelous dropped 27 points on 11-18 shooting against the helpless Jordan Hill. Not only did this give Aldridge an easy bucket nearly every time down the floor, but it also handicapped an already lousy defensive rebounder in Hill (who has apparently never been taught the art of the box-out). If a shot was missed, Aldridge was able to keep the play alive many a time. He pulled down five offensive rebounds in total.

Courtney Lee screwed up. If you didn't watch the game, the Rockets performance from beyond the arc -- 11 for 20 -- seems impressive. But it should have been two better, as Lee missed two WIDE-OPEN three-pointers that could have easily slowed Portland's 8-0 run and lessened the Rockets' deficit entering halftime. Instead, the Blazers racked up points in bunches while the Rockets missed the gimme's. Yes, I'm being this picky.

Brad Miller screwed up. Miller tried to play point guard again late in the fourth, drove hard towards the basket, threw up an awkward shot that missed and didn't get the foul call that he wanted. This prompted him to angrily toss the ball away from the referees after a timeout was called, which, under the new rules, warranted a technical foul. If there was any specific momentum shift aside from the Blazers' back-to-back threes, this was it.

Luis Scola screwed up. The twelve rebounds are nice, but you can't miss an easy bucket two feet away from the basket after you decline to pass to an open three-pointer. His brick with about six seconds left didn't end the game, but if it weren't for a ridiculous three-pointer for Kyle Lowry, it would have.

Whoever was guarding Patrick Mills screwed up. It baffles me how a team can allow a streaky-shooting backup point guard -- clearly on his game at the time -- to get wide-open for three of four made deep balls. There's just no excuse for it. Mills was the spark that the Blazers jumped on to spur a comeback.

The funny thing is that these late out-of-bounds plays never needed to happen. Despite all of the crap that Houston pulled to allow Portland back into the contest, the game was seemingly stuck at 97-96 for too long. The Rockets got the stops they needed, but they couldn't ice the game. Jordan Hill missed two clutch free throws and Kyle Lowry was forced to take a contested three-pointer on the next possession that clanked. Later, Martin missed on a heat-check and Hill, attempting to go for a tip-in, missed again. While he was probably fouled, the Rockets had already been granted too many foul calls for the officials to throw another in their direction. This repeated itself on the next possession, when Hill was almost certainly fouled on a turnover, but didn't get the call. Whosever fault it was, the Rockets didn't get it done when they had to. One Rudy Fernandez jumper later, they found themselves down and out for good.

Also, wasn't the Terrence Williams/Lee/Patterson/Budinger/Miller lineup the oddest you'd ever seen?

Fire away with your displeasure in the comments, but don't just lay into the referees. They missed a few obvious calls, but they gave Houston a lot of whistles that normally wouldn't get blown, either. This was as bad a loss as the Rockets have suffered all season long. They had a win within grasp -- literally perched on the palm -- but the Rockets failed to clench what could prove to be only the third of many losses this month. Get ready, Houston: it might only get worse from here.

**

*Obviously, if you weren't in attendance at all, you can disregard this statement.

Comment 79 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from The Dream Shake

TDS Writer Roundtable 3 on 5

May 2012 by BD34 - 112 comments

The TDS 2012 NBA Mock Draft, 1.0

May 2012 by Tom Martin - 46 comments

Comments

Display:

Whats up with Lowry

jacking up 28 ft three pointers the past three games and …..wait for it…. actually making them!

by vanguard117 on Jan 5, 2011 11:58 PM CST reply actions  

What's the problem?

He’s added 3pt range to his game – he’s now a complete PG.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 5, 2011 11:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Hey I ain’t complaining. Just impressed

by vanguard117 on Jan 6, 2011 12:05 AM CST up reply actions  

I dunno, being there (until the bitter end), watching LMA push off 9/10 plays was hard to watch, that's my main complaint.

And mainly because Scola has been called for it a goodly number of times.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 12:01 AM CST reply actions  

True.

By the way, added the “part” to your title just so people would be inclined to read both of these. Not that they wouldn’t, but you never know.

The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak

by Tom Martin on Jan 6, 2011 12:06 AM CST up reply actions  

Ah, you're killing me Tom

just waiting for me to post…

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 12:09 AM CST up reply actions  

But seriously, thanks for the Part 1, Part 2 - I think we both had a lot to say,

and hey, much of it different, no groupthink at TDS.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 12:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Ha, Dave and I have actually posted within a single minute before.

And yes, no groupthink. That’s actually pretty amazing given a night like this.

The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak

by Tom Martin on Jan 6, 2011 12:26 AM CST up reply actions  

I still think you're just lurking...like a post-shark.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 1:01 AM CST up reply actions  

If you can't win

Blame the refs!

"We Believe" - Rudy Fernandez

by TheGreatMon on Jan 6, 2011 12:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Yes, that's what we always do. Thanks for dropping by.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 12:36 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

As a Blazer fan

I really don’t know how they don’t call the push off for LMA. However, I do believe he learned it from Scola. I hated Scola during our playoff series for that push off. I hope both are teams can find the defense center we both need to come back strong.

by shake&blake on Jan 6, 2011 2:12 AM CST up reply actions  

Thats what pissed me off the most about the game

the refs let LMA do what he wanted while he posted up on Hill. You can clearly see on the replays a big push-off with his left forearm on everyplay!!!

by Texas08 on Jan 6, 2011 10:01 AM CST up reply actions  

What's wrong with the Bud/Lee/Williams/Patterson/Miller lineup?

They were playing quite well.

"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.

by bone31crusher on Jan 6, 2011 12:07 AM CST reply actions  

Nothing, it's just weird, mainly because of Miller.

That unit is probably supposed to include Hill.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 12:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Yes!

And Miller was My-back-is-killing kinda slow on rotations

by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on Jan 6, 2011 12:50 AM CST up reply actions  

This isn't his kind of game.

Aldridge is too fast and passes too well, and Camby still moves pretty well to the glass, and hangs out at the high post so Aldridge can operate. He can do slow and inside, or slow and outside, but fast anywhere is a problem.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 1:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Question

Why is Patty Mills under the impression that your team is from the WCC?

by pdxblazer on Jan 6, 2011 12:35 AM CST reply actions  

Some sort of Brandon Roy 3pt magic rubbed off on him somehow.

Maybe it was a blood transfusion. I can buy Roy as a vampire.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 12:47 AM CST up reply actions  

Actually if any Blazer is a vampire, it's Miller

Some believe that he stays healthy by “feeding” off the health of others. Not bad statistical evidence too. That or because he never jumps, at all.

Portland could coast along with their superior talent and stay right with us. Now that Portland woke up, the hammer cometh down.

Bayless > Daffy Duck after 3 cans of rockstar

by Batumshakalaka on Jan 6, 2011 2:13 AM CST up reply actions  

You are right of course

Miller is the leech lord…

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 8:51 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Yes those were big

but Martin missed some, so did Patterson, Lowry etc.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 1:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Hit in the gut with this one

I don’t even wanna debate about this team anymore, just gonna wait and see what happens. Man…just tired of the bad losses over the years. 1 playoff victory I’ve actually seen with my own eyes. Dang it…sucks

by twinkilling0303 on Jan 6, 2011 12:53 AM CST reply actions  

Hang in there.

The talent is good and getting better. I think this team is one player away from a deep playoff run – and without him may be in the lottery.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 12:57 AM CST up reply actions  

this game was gut-wrenching to watch

i can’t believe we wasted martin’s 45-point game like that. anyone who says he wasn’t closing well was watching a completely different game. any time he got the ball in the second-half, he was able to get something good on offense for houston (for the most part).

what lost the game for me was:

1. ridiculous defensive plan on aldridge. we couldn’t front him. we couldn’t double him. jordan hill needs to bulk up. he’s going to be pushed around really easily by the dominant centers on the teams we play this month—howard, jefferson, o’neal & o’neal, horford, bogut, stoudemire, etc. no idea how to address this. the blazers could have broadcasted their game plan before the game and we still wouldn’t have been able to stop them.

2. absolutely mind-boggling play-calling late in the fourth. i don’t know what we were doing. kevin martin usually got the ball with between 5-10 seconds left on the shot clock. he’s not a video game player—he can’t just do a couple of triple threat moves, a pump fake and drain a shot. there were too many times when we tried passing the ball around the other side (through scola-battier-hill and back around the other way to martin). what the hell was up with that second-to-last play? down by 3 with about 15 seconds remaining… we either needed to take a quick 2 or a late three. instead lowry dribbled it around for a while before passing it in to the post which hadn’t been working all game.

3. turnovers. after going on that run to go up 13 points, we allowed the blazers back primarily through turnovers rather than missed shots.

other thoughts… i thought the defensive intensity on the t-will, lee, bud, patterson, miller was great. t-will threw a couple of great passes that weren’t hit by his teammates and there were a couple of turnovers as they tried to break. i want more minutes from t-will. he was getting into the lane at will, something NO ONE ELSE ON OUR TEAM CAN DO (except maybe lowry). think about it, our starters are lowry, martin, hill, scola and battier. battier scouts on corners. scola posts up. hill tries to post up. martin can work off the wing with his triple threat (and once he was getting doubled threw some nice passes to players waiting within the arc). but lowry is the only one who can really drive and dish. everyone else is too slow or lack ball handles.

i’m disillusioned by scola. his stat lines usually end up looking good but i think he’s really bad at some of the intangible stuff. he’s bad at rotating. he’s bad at defense in general. he’s either completely on with his array of scoops or completely off. his free throw shooting has gone down the shitter. he is liable to turnover the ball when doubled and most of his rebounds tend to land in his hands rather than him grabbing the board. he’s still has beastly nights, but there are a lot of flaws that the rest of our team is not good enough to cover up.

by sohum on Jan 6, 2011 1:00 AM CST reply actions  

You're going to see more of Williams.

You’re not going to see him when he goes off the reservation. Williams is going to have to combine his explosiveness and passion with discipline. If this wasn’t a problem NJ would never have let him go. He’s special, but he’s also his own worst enemy. And he needs to be a better shooter.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Jan 6, 2011 1:10 AM CST up reply actions  

Williams can prove his value if he's given more minutes.

He would be the perfect compliment to Lowry and Martin because nobody can play loose on any of them. That would eventually free up Scola and/or the yet to be determined dominant center Houston so desperately needs to acquire.

by Nobody is Better Than Jordan on Jan 6, 2011 1:41 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree. IN fact when the blazers were doubling KM in the 4th, we could have used TWill

to break down his defender and create shots for his teammates.

It’s clear we don’t have any game plan for when Kevin is doubled.

by RoxBeliever on Jan 6, 2011 9:34 AM CST up reply actions  

Yes we do

The plan is to take a contested three point shot and hope we get a rebound

by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on Jan 6, 2011 10:34 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Maybe

But at this stage of the game, I’m hardly convinced that Williams is a reliable 4th-quarter option. If they’re doubling Martin, then someone must be open. If you run the offense effectively, someone should get a good shot. Drawing a double-team every time down should be all you can ask of a star.

And really, that should have been the case at the other end in the 4th. You double LA, stay home on the 1-2 shooters on the court, and you make Cunningham or Batum beat you.

by Metalate on Jan 6, 2011 10:46 AM CST up reply actions  

the problem when they were doubling martin

was that he was getting it right at the end of the shot clock. not enough time to swing the ball around to find the open shooter. not really a case to be made for t-will here, imo.

compare this to portland, whose first offensive move was to get the ball to aldridge. and our doubling and rotations were so weak that he could just toss it over the doubling defender and find the open guy in the corner.

by sohum on Jan 6, 2011 10:56 AM CST up reply actions  

sure,

But “If you run the offense effectively” sort of implies moving the ball to a productive place on the floor before there are 5 seconds on the clock.

by Metalate on Jan 6, 2011 11:39 AM CST up reply actions  

TWill would have posed another problem for the Portland defense to solve which would make life a little easier for Martin and the rest.

The team didn’t want to give the ball right away to KM because they knew he was covered. But no one also could break down anyone’s defense also.

by RoxBeliever on Jan 6, 2011 11:19 PM CST up reply actions  

yeah i'm all for t-will playing

basically i’m getting annoyed at adelman

by sohum on Jan 7, 2011 10:07 AM CST up reply actions  

lets trade brooks to the kings

Package ab, buddinger, hill and battier for dalembert, landry and casspi.. Trade jeffries to the pacers for tj ford and even though this trade doesn’t get us a superstar we still get better as a team plus dalembert does block shots and rebound something we really lack.. Line-up lowry/martin/williams/scola/dalembert bench ford/lee/casspi/landry/miller I think this team can make the playoffs and once chuck returns replace him with miller and let t-will develop.. him and martin on the wings would keep the opponents on there heels.. Thoughts?

by rocket2789 on Jan 6, 2011 1:25 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

forget the rest.

Just give me cousins.
Brooks battier, hill, jeffries
for cousins and landry

by AlDe2356 on Jan 6, 2011 1:40 AM CST up reply actions  

That is about as bad a trade as could possibly get made

You can get much MUCH more for AB, Bud, Hill and Battier

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Jan 6, 2011 7:13 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

agreed

As one who has been a huge (-ly irrational?) Landry proponent, I see no benefit to this trade. Dalembert is going to be the difference-maker? Really? i wouldn’t trade Chuck Hayes straight up for Dalembert! He’s almost 30, has had 10 rpg exactly once in his entire career. This year, his offensive numbers (in similar minutes) are no better than Chuck’s, and for all his deficiencies, you can’t convince me that, of the two, Chuck isn’t more valuable on the defensive end.

by Metalate on Jan 6, 2011 10:26 AM CST up reply actions  

103-100 was the final score...

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jan 6, 2011 1:42 AM CST reply actions  

Great recap, both part 1 and part 2

Very disappointed by this team. Expecting change.

by HM-rockets on Jan 6, 2011 9:00 AM CST reply actions  

There was talk that the Rockets were gonna pursue Kendrick Perkins

in the summer when he is free agent. They mentioned the Thunder also looking to get him.

by inquisitiveman on Jan 6, 2011 10:24 AM CST reply actions  

we need something now, though

unless we’re trying to blow it up and land a lottery pick, something i don’t think morey ever aims for

by sohum on Jan 6, 2011 10:57 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't doubt your credibility

But could you post a link confirming this?

Wafer . . . again. (Marv Albert, HOU v. CLE Feb 2009)
-one of the FEW at Toyota Center who has the Wafer jersey

by olivarezq1 on Jan 6, 2011 10:59 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

An excerpt relating to Rockets and Thunder:

Perkins, 26, is from Beaumont, Texas, and figures to draw interest from the Rockets and Thunder. Still, he’d prefer to return to the Celtics, whose payroll for next season is already projected to be about $74 million, provided Allen and Shaq don’t opt out of their contracts.

"I will show that I’m back and there are no issues with my knee," said Perkins, who is making $4.4 million this season. "I will have a bright future as far as free agency. We will see how this season turns out and how it goes from there.

"I want to be with the Celtics, but I got to think about my future."

by inquisitiveman on Jan 6, 2011 11:09 AM CST up reply actions  

I think this is who the Rockets end up with

IF the Kings continue to not win AND the Rockets can come out with at least 6-8 wins this month and still remain somewhat in the playoff race come trade deadline.

I see a 3 team deal in the making…
Houston gets: Dalembert, Landry, 2 1st Rd Picks
Kings get: Yao’s Contract, AB
Third Team gets: Casppi, J. Jeffries

We make the playoffs in the 7th or 8th seed and get knocked out in game 6 of the first round. Then during the off season we over pay Marc Gasol, and resign Yao for cheap with Brad Miller filling in until Yao returns. Make couple more moves to improve the backup PG position and let T-will come into his own…. then we would have a complete team for once….

by Texas08 on Jan 6, 2011 4:49 PM CST up reply actions  

same here

if we’re giving up brooks, we need to get a quality big. that doesn’t mean dalembert. landry isn’t going to help us since frontcourt offense is not what our problem is, frontcourt defense is.

of course, with brooks being undervalued, this is going to be tough to match contracts up.

by sohum on Jan 7, 2011 10:08 AM CST up reply actions  

Lamarcus Push-offs

I see the push offs, but the complaints should really be lobbed at Hill and the others defending him. If Lamarcus is doing it every time he posts up, one of those guys has to do a better job selling the foul. Because although LMA is pushing, if the defender doesnt sell it then it doesnt look like anything more that regular contact in the paint.

Look at the way the Flying squirrel or Kevin Martin appear to be shot by 12-guage rifles at the slightest amount of contact.

Any defender on LMA might have to flop and give up one or two easy buckets before the refs get it right, but eventually he will have to stop if guys sell the push and he gets called for it.

Would any of you care to part with kevin martin?

Hi fans it Brandon Roy.
And ME.....LaMarcus Aldridge

by Derftron on Jan 6, 2011 11:25 AM CST reply actions  

don't know

Martin straight up for LA?

by Metalate on Jan 6, 2011 11:43 AM CST up reply actions  

this imo is why officiating is broken in the nba

why do players have to “act” like they have been fouled to get a foul. if anything, we should be getting rid of flopping and acting. i would be totally in favor of stopping the play on every single offensive foul opportunity, going to the replay and assessing a technical foul if a player was found to be flopping. yes, that means players like scola, hayes and lowry would probably be getting a few T’s. but i’m tired of basketball where players have to dive all over the place.

yes, that’s probably an overreaction. refereeing in the nba must be hard, since it’s probably the only sport where the refs have to maintain concentration every second, unlike something like football where most of the time is spent looking for penalties that happen before the ball is in play (and of course there is no real notion of a foul by contact, unless it’s illegal contact). but honestly, the state of fouls and refereeing in the nba is at an all-time low. and this is not just a reaction from this game (where i thought the rockets actually were the benefactor of the calls, tonight.)

star players get special treatment. it may be that the nfl stars are more distributed or that star players don’t have the ball in their hands as often, but the referees call it by the book there, not by the name or number on the jersey.

the refs are too obsessed with evening out calls. so many times i’ve seen a shit call at one end and immediately after they try to balance it out by another bad call.

the last time anyone wants to see when they go to a basketball game is players shooting free throws.

by sohum on Jan 6, 2011 1:52 PM CST up reply actions  

the problem with that

is that there is so much contact allowed down in the post. so unless you want a whiste every 20 seconds, players are going to have to sell the fouls to get them. you have to allow contact down there, and unless a player sells it, it will be impossible to see/ call a foul

Hi fans it Brandon Roy.
And ME.....LaMarcus Aldridge

by Derftron on Jan 6, 2011 3:24 PM CST up reply actions  

This team needs Brooks back in top form in a bad way

When Martin leaves the court, it’s tough to generate offense. (I guess either Portland did a great job on Lowry or he didn’t play very well offensively, since he has been doing this better of late).

by Metalate on Jan 6, 2011 11:31 AM CST reply actions  

Once again

offense is not the problem, we should be able to win every game scoring 100 points, or at least we used to

by Carlos_HoustonSportsFanatic on Jan 6, 2011 3:32 PM CST up reply actions  

agree

the cold truth is that all you have is Hill and Patterson trying to defend the paint.

we at least have length with Camby and lamarcus. once przybilla gets back, we might be in decent shape down low.

Rockets need some paint help in a major way…….can we interest you in a former #1 pick?

Hi fans it Brandon Roy.
And ME.....LaMarcus Aldridge

by Derftron on Jan 6, 2011 3:34 PM CST up reply actions  

and brad miller is waaaaaaashed up

Hi fans it Brandon Roy.
And ME.....LaMarcus Aldridge

by Derftron on Jan 6, 2011 3:35 PM CST up reply actions  

OK, if you’re saying AB won’t turn this team into a contender, fine. But asking for Brooks to get healthy is a bit more likely than Bill Russell circa 1961 materializing from this roster or showing up out of thin air. If I had said “we need to trade for Melo to get a second creator next to Martin” then I would see your point. (And I’d agree with it as well.)

by Metalate on Jan 6, 2011 11:06 PM CST up reply actions  

I think it's time for Houston to go out and get themselves a shot-blocker.

We seriously need a big in that that can guard the 5. Hill is good with the 2nd unit, he looks totally outmatched with the first.

How much of Chuck’s lower body strength would have helped in this game? Plus, he is making his FTs and the layups.

by Mitul V. Patel on Jan 6, 2011 4:10 PM CST reply actions  

The only player who i know on top of head that is on the trading block

and is a shot blocker , still young, and who plays excellent low post defense would be Andy Verejao.

by inquisitiveman on Jan 6, 2011 10:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Dream Shake: Dedicated to all things Houston Rockets. Past, present and future. Expect criticism, commentary and shameless promotions to get Robert Horry into the Hall of Fame.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
Trading for an All-Star
Images_small
No Sympathy For Teams With Injuries
Small
European NBA Scout Compares Vassilis Spanoulis To Jeremy Lin - Says Jeff Van Gundy Did Not Give Him A Chance
417645_122115147913687_122115027913699_63363_1431084468_n_small
Houston Rockets Re-Brand
Small
Free Agency and Draft Hopes
Images_small
Best Wishes For Jordan Hill
Images_small
With the 14th and 16th pick, who would you take?
Small
My dream offseason (quasi realistic at least)
Tricampions_small
GET UP ROCKETS
Sonic_brian_small
Chin up Rockets fans, all hope isn't lost

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBN Hoops Twitter


Editor

Twitter_small Tom Martin

Daryl Morey Wannabes

Kurt-avatar_small grungedave

Img_4429_small UofTOrange

Cat_small Only_A_Lad

Guide04_small Xiane

Screenhunter_01_dec Mike Kerns

Crabtree_small ak2themax

Awesome_small BD34

Tds_small Patrick Harrel