Recap, Part 1: Burning Pain - Rockets Lose To Blazers
Well, just got home, and I have to say, there may not be a cocktail that really answers this defeat. Perhaps something from Dr. Kervorkian, just an aperitif, as I'm not ready to go to the light, but the lounge outside that hallway? Maybe. Depends on the music, really. But I do have a recipe for defeat below.
I'll offer an assessment on what I think The State of The Rocket is later this week that includes much of this, but I'm too wrecked to do that now, and it'd just sound like a particularly tedious Goth Lad. (Rivers of ash flow through the crumbled stone of my heart...)
So. Another winnable game. An epic comeback? Wasted. 45 points from Kevin Martin? Squandered. Joey Crawford? Reliable as ever.
If there's some pissed off here talking, oh well. I try to be measured, I don't always succeed. This isn't a public trust, it's a blog. Moreover, it is a Houston Rockets blog and a labor of love.
Amidst our hand-wringing, give the Blazers some credit. They built a lead, lost it, got it back and made the plays down the stretch when it counted. They played their game, with their slow but effective sets, good defense and Celticesque possibly, just potentially, moving screenry. Yes, everyone does it. Usually not 3-4 times every 18 seconds of offense. It's better than Yet Another Roy Iso, I guess.
Also, Blazers, please stop tossing the ball hither and yon after a made shot to slow down the Rockets. Nate may tell you to, but Nate isn't a sporting gentleman obviously. It's not funny when Rajon Rondo does it, it's certainly not funny when you do, Portland. Also I'm so glad that Australian Patty Mills has taken up Brandon Roy's crown of Rocket Killer. Can't be without one of those.
Rudy Fernandez (the Flying Squirrel) made a crucial shot after a largely forgettable night to help seal the Portland victory. Everytime I see The Flying Squirrel he's leaping about, or being flung about, and landing in pain, crumpled like a Kleenex. Often The Squirrel appears to be in life-threatening pain, but like the footballers his nation is famous for, he somehow gets up from his obvious death-wound and plays on. Honestly, he just may be too slight to ever play more than about 20 minutes a night in the NBA.
When Portland started to come back they hit a number of threes in a row. That three barrage might have been a good time for a TO, but ah well.
After the massive, inspiring, comeback in the 3rd this was the Rockets game to win and they didn't. Of course I'm sure Kevin Martin will somehow be blamed for this loss. It happened in Sacramento, it's happening here, and it's tiresome. 45pts are 45 points. 45 points on 18 shots? Complaining about that is churlish. At the end of games it is the job of the rest of the offense to get the shooter his shot. Yes, if you have a rugged scorer like LeBron, or perhaps Kobe, no, you don't have to do that, you can stand around and watch the magic happen. When you have a pure scorer who isn't so rugged you get him his shot. How? Consider using 3-4 moving screens...
Anyhow, if the rest of your team can only manage 55 collectively, who is to blame? Probably not the guy who scored 45% of your points on 26% of your attempts.
At the heart of things, though, is the fact that the Rockets lack a defensive center. Anyone miss the Immovable Object, Chuck Hayes tonight? I think he makes the difference in this game. The Rockets margin for error with any player missing is slim. Maybe it shouldn't be, but it is. For example do you think Aaron Brooks' shooting might have been a nice complement to Martin in the 4th? It's not like Lowry was stopping Patty Mills from draining 3s. Still, Chuck Hayes isn't the true answer. He's an excellent defensive power forward (which was called for tonight) and a passable defensive center.
At the risk of being completely obvious, the Rockets need a rugged defensive big man in the middle. None of the patches are working. With one, I think this team makes the playoffs and is dangerous once in them. Without one, I'm highly dubious. Scoring isn't the problem. Repeat that to yourself, scoring isn't the problem. And if "closing" is a problem, I say the "closing problem" lies on the defensive end. Demanding one of your players make a tough shot every time down the floor in a closely contested game is something that probably 3 players in the league can do with any regularity. They don't play for Houston. They're not going to, either, so another solution must be found. In the past that solution has been defense, but no truly dominant defense is possible with some sort of big man.
It's simply not reasonable to expect even the best offense to always answer with points against a defense that's clamping down, and referees swallowing their whistles. Stops are required. The difference tonight was that Portland got the stops it had to have in 4th, and the Rockets didn't. It is possible to blame the offense, but it's already an effective unit. Expecting the scoring to always pull out a game is the Houston Texan gameplan, and it's a loser.
Well, enough of that. If Morey can pull a for-real defensive center out of his hat, this team has a real future this season, if not, well, the Rockets will need to integrate its young talent and become the highest scoring offense in the league - initiate the Phoenix plan - the pace itself is a defensive disruption to many teams.
Lamarcus Aldridge has become an effective inside player with the addition of a never-called, but nearly omnipresent push-off move. (NB - I was there. I saw it. I'm not making it it up.)
Here it is, then, tonight's recipe for disaster. For new readers, I've been blatantly stealing borrowing the concept from Canis Hoopus, I've taken to posting recipes, often for weird old cocktails, after particularly annoying losses. The T-Wolves fans there often do this at the half, which I'm just not prepared to do, yet. Tonight I offer chicken.
Aile de Poulet a l'Aldridge
Mise en Place
1 Lottery PF previous known for softness, nice shooting touch and heaving really long 2s.
Directions
1. Receive pass into the left block, do not allow fronting to occur.
2. Add 3 backdown dribbles.
3. Turn counter-clockwise into defender, whilst simultaneously
4. Pushing off twice with left arm.
5. Check to see if a whistle blows on defender here. If no whistle has formed -
6. Shoot.
If whistle blows, either garnish with free throws or reset play. NOTE - 3 and 4 are essential to the Aile de Poulet. Without them it's just a post move, and not all that scary.
(Calm down Blazer's fans, it's a joke. It really is. And like all jokes, has its inner truth.)
Look, I know people do it, but I've seen Scola called for it at least 10 times this season. Thanks Joey. To be fair, Aldridge's crucial shot at the end of the game didn't feature a push off.
Anyway, I'm disgusted, and not really sure where this iteration of the Rockets goes from here. If a defensive center can be obtained without absolutely gutting this unit, it's very formidable.
Ah, Yao Ming, ah humanity.
At our cousin-blog they're loving their Chicken Wings, and who can blame them?
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Agreed
It would have been a more entertaining game if the officials had called Portland for a moving screen on every possession and Houston had posted the first shut out in NBA history. Alas.
Kevin Martin just had a game for the ages. I don't know if even Roy before injuries ever recorded that kind of conversion rate.
Even without the foul shots Kevin’s game is amazing.
Proud to be a Republican.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Aldridge is a beast. You should see his rookie year pics and compare them to current ones. Also, front doesn't work
on him like it did on Yao because he has been doing this spin alley oop counter all year with Camby.
he was scoring nearly at will
sounds like at least the “spin alley oop counter” wouldn’t send him to the line every so often. it was also worth a shot; we don’t know if it would have been better or worse until we tried it out. and given how we were “defending” him, we should have tried everything out.
Thanks for the autopsy report,
somehow this was totally expected as it was really a painful loss.
If you compare Aldridge with the likes of
Hakeem who made a hall of fame career out of hooking people I think you have some overdue karma. In addition he is nowhere near the offensive offender that Dwight Howard, KG, or Amare is.
It is hard for me to feel bad at this point about injury riddled teams, because no matter who you are you have it better than the Blazers. We have lost everything in terms of our championship window, and sadly we have a very small chance of getting that back anytime soon. I do feel that after January we will have a solid lead on the Rockets, and I am not sure how Houston plans on getting a player in trade, unless they are able to use Yao’s expiring deal as part of a package. Hang in there.
OMG I just jizzed in my France
OMGrandpa
I am suprised not seeing none putting the blame on Hill
I would canned his ass if I am coach sleepy. 1. he keep getting himself in foul trouble; 2. keep missing during switch; 3, horrible at FT (go ask Chuck how it’s done, you a-hole!); 4. PAY attention to the BALL! EYES on the BASKETBALL! NOT YOUR OWN BALLS!!!
last but not least, whoever said he’s pretty strong and quick guy on offense side, I didn’t see that last nite AT ALL! he got tossed around like a doll. and his effects are worthless at my opinion. I would rather see Patman in there, at least he’s pretty even on both ends of the court, and shooting good FT, making good shot, passing the balls.
REALLY, what do you do well, Hill? DUNKS? any guy your size can do that…………
!@#$%^&*()_
don't bully me, i am from the D(etroit)!!!
Jordan Hill Experiment
I think maybe the Jordan Hill experiment is not working out too well. The guy looks like he should be ab le to play. He makes you think that he just needs playing time to develop. Then he doesn’t seem to improve. I realize that he is a bit lighter than Aldridge but Hill is still a pretty big boy.
Why not send Hill down to the minor leagues for a while? It seems to have helped with Pat. Or that dog Jeffries? He never plays so why not send him down t the border for a while. These guys need to play to improve, don’t they?
rule said you can only send 1st & 2nd year rookie to D-Leauge
so Jeffries don’t fit the scenario (or we would send Brian Cook down there, and let me tear up the D-Leauge rim)…
don't bully me, i am from the D(etroit)!!!
I get frustrated as well but he just needs time...
To me this is still his rookie year because he didnt play in NY, and only played some after being traded to Houston last year. Its a lot to ask a PF rookie to play C, and to outplay opponents that are way better and smatter than him.
Im not a big Jordan Hill fan, but I have to remind myself he is still a rookie in my eyes. Give him a couple more years before writing him off.
On the other hand I still think coach RA should start Patterson at center. He is smatter and more reliable than Hill. Hill is more effective as a PF coming off the bench right now.
start a rookie at center is a gamble
and we all know how coach like to play with his cards, gamble isn’t in his mind anywhere & anytime.
don't bully me, i am from the D(etroit)!!!
The interior defense is just plain bad.
I remember a recent post where someone claimed Scola was clearly a better PF than LA. Can you really claim that after last night?
only if that someone is a Rockets fan
I think LMA is more physical compare to Scola. Scola is a good GREAT mid-range shooter, but his feet aren’t that quick compare to LMA.
Haven that said, I am a Rocket fan, and a Scola fan, I said Scola is a better PF than LMA. HAHA!
don't bully me, i am from the D(etroit)!!!
Sounds to me like someone lost a bet somewhere
Look, Hill has these flashes of greatness but he’s a SECOND YEAR player who was criminally shorted on minutes on a team that isn’t going to make it into the playoffs without a decent sized makeover. At the end of the day, he screwed up pretty bad, there’s no denying that, but there’s no reason to fly off the handle like you did in your post man.
We’re losing again so I expect to see more flip outs like that because this board turns in to ClutchFans when we hit a skid.
I don't usually plan out my days because the word "premeditation" gets thrown around a lot in courts today.
Why don't we just start Brad Miller?
He is the only true center left on our team. I think Hill/Patt would make a dynamic duo off the bench. Sure, they may need a bit more experience, but this is a really desperate situation. At least it is a better scenario than where we are now. Everyone is suggesting starting Patt out of position even though he hasn’t even reached double digits in NBA games played…..it makes no sense to me.
Nice recap! Hill was abused in the paint..
Hill is full of energy without knowing what to do or where to be on the floor.
Get New Coach Fast ..... And Save The Season !!!!!
I Think it’s clear that the real PROBLEM is The COACH " RICK OLDEMAN " ……. This is a new type of Game in this Era of Basketball !!!! It’s not the players – we have a good strong talented core of players…. It’s the coach with his Poor System – " the pick and roll game left with Karl Malone and John Stockton " - Poor Strategy, Poor Subsitution Patterns, Poor Experimenting Ideas during the Game,, Everything he’s done has been Poor !!! This is What Practice is For.. Rick !!! We need a New Young Coach!!! This team is way to talented not to be playin ..500+ .. basketball. We play with No Passion and No Attitude and that the coaches jib to teach the players these tools,,,, 95% of Basketbal is Mental !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I know everyone loves Chuck Hayes, Shane Battier, Aaron Brooks, but it’s about Winning!! Shane contibutes nothing at all and he to old for this style of basketball era, Aaron is a ball hog who only wants self glory instead of being team player,,, use that speed to break down defense and get team mates involved!!!! Chuck Hayes is to short, to slow, can’t score, can’t rebound, Chuck just Can’t Cant CAN’T — his name should be Can’t Hayes
Terrence Williams, Ish Smith, Chase Bud, Courtney Lee, Louis Scola, Jordan Hill are ready to be Good Players and maybe Superstars if given the opportunity!!!!! They have Length, Athletism, toughness, and they fit this new era of basketball !!
What are we Committed to People we like or Builiding the Right Organization of Winning Spirit ????

by 






















