Chase Budinger: The Forgotten One
As the last of three second round picks the Rockets acquired in the 2009 Draft, little was expected of Chase Budinger. He was deemed to have mediocre ball skills, a lack of passion for the game, and suspect defense, three factors that contributed to his fall from the 7th highest rated college recruit in the loaded 2006 class to the 44th spot in the draft.
Still, in his rookie year he wowed Rockets fans as a spark plug off the bench, scoring in bunches and specializing in spot up opportunities, earning a spot in the rotation. After a horrible start to the 2010-11 season as his shot failed him, he managed to rally down the stretch with an impressive run as a starter, averaging 14 points and 4 rebounds in 32 minutes per game.
Some fans are still ready to move on from the Chase Budinger era. It's easy to label an awkward looking white guy who likes to shoot jumpers a one-dimensional player and deem him unworthy of a shot as a long-term starter, but the numbers simply tell another tale. Chase Budinger isn't a throw-in piece into any trade like some would hope, he's a player that the Rockets ought to hold onto because he can be a tremendous role-player on any team.
The biggest criticism of Budinger is his defense. To be perfectly fair, he is likely still a below average defensive player. Despite exceptional leaping ability, Budinger lacks top-notch lateral quickness and can be beat off fakes from time to time. However, he at least appears to be improving. Here's what John Hollinger had to say in his annual player profile:
Defensively, Budinger doesn't look like much but his statistics last season were dramatically improved over his rookie campaign -- both his Synergy stats and his on-court vs. off-court differential were very solid, and according to 82games.com opposing small forwards had a 12.7 PER against him. I think those numbers overrate him, but sometimes long defenders are better than they look, and Budinger tends to lay off opponents and let his length and leaping ability do the work. He lacks strength and nobody will confuse him with Bruce Bowen, but if he maintains last season's numbers he's a very solid two-way player.
To echo what Hollinger said, Budinger is no longer the defensive liability that he was his rookie year and clearly has room to improve because of his length and huge vertical. The Rockets don't need him to become a Shane Battier-type, but even if he improves marginally over what he did last year he can be a positive influence for this defense.
The other major critique of him was that he was a one-dimensional player on offense, only spotting up and slashing instead of helping improve the offense as a whole. The stats tell a different tale. Coming out of college, Budinger was hailed as a jack of all trades and that profile did not necessarily come through during his rookie year. Last year, on the other hand, he fulfilled this potential by affecting the game all across the board.
Among qualified small forwards (playing 60 or more games), Budinger found himself in the top 12 in points, rebounds, and assists per 40 minutes while also rating in the top 10 in assist/TO ratio. Efficiency-wise, Budinger was almost exactly average, but that should improve assuming he doesn't suffer another monster slump next year.
Add on the fact that the has among the best contracts in the league (about $1.9 million over the next two years), and you have a tremendously valuable piece. When I say piece, I mean as a player, not as a trade chip. I'm not going to say that he should be untouchable because clearly no players on this squad are, but he needs to be more appreciated than he has been.
In my eyes, he's a solid starting forward at the age of 23 with two more years at an extreme discount. To call him a throw away part of any trade would be a disservice to him.
Sure, Terrence Williams and his enticing athleticism and passing package are appealing, but he has never been able to overcome his extreme propensity for turnovers and his horrible shooting. I'm all for giving T-Will a shot in the rotation, but those who laud him as the next starter at that spot are seriously overrating him.
The Rockets are in a bit of a holding pattern right now but they appear to be headed towards a rebuilding effort. To fully rebuild, they need to assess which young players are good enough to keep around. Unless they can land a star with Budinger, he looks to be a keeper.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bud is solid
But his shooting is a bit overrated (maybe because he’s white?). He is better slashing and cutting and coming off screens. His defense is solid and if he continus to play smart on D then he will be fine.
T-Will is going to have a break out season and it will cause one of our wings to get traded. Terrence will have a better season than Bud in my opinion. He does everything better than Chase except shoot. He will show more of these thingsin tonights game against the Spurs. Watch and see.
I hate david stern!
I think you're opinion on T-Will is innacurate
Because as of now it’s not fair for anyone to have an opinion on him, he’s virtually only played in one game, which was a preseason game, and after a rough first half played very well.
Yeah Buds a nice player, but he isn’t going to get much better than he is right now, Terrence Williams could be an all star.
Dwyane Wade can’t shoot, LeBron was a bad shooter for a lot of his career, Derrick Rose is turnover prone.
Also T-Will has been working on his shot a lot so I don’t know if we should call him a shooter just yet, but like I said it’s way to early to judge him considering he’s only played virtually one game in a Rockets uniform.
And like Daryl said during the game
He is one of, if not the, best wing rebounder in the league to add on to his potential to be a defensive stopper. I think the biggest knock on T-Will is his attitude, but when was the last time he acted out? Yeah maybe a few angry tweets when he wasn’t getting PT last year, but I think that could be expected a little.
From the looks of things Terrence worked incredibly hard this offseason and really wanted to impress the staff and so far I believe he has.
by James Schmidt on Dec 21, 2011 1:54 PM CST up reply actions
His shooting is spotty, he turns it over a ton, and his shot hasn't been falling
Oh and I’ve yet to see the defensive stopper potential people love to talk about. He loses focus, settles for jumpers, and his talent has translated. At least Bud has shown us what he’s got, I’m not ready to crown T-Will anything til I see it.
Check out The Dream Shake.
by Patrick Harrel on Dec 21, 2011 2:11 PM CST up reply actions
I'd just like to reiterate this.
He’s played one game as a Rocket. One game. He played very well during the second half of that game. Bud has shown us he’ll be a decent backup small forward for the rest of our career.
Maybe we should see what T-will can show us, he is freak athlete and has the potential to be an all star. Bud has nearly reached his ceiling.
Also shot selection will come with experience, as we all saw when he takes it into the lane good things happen. He is the most talented player on our team and has the largest upside on our team. You want to let a white boy who’s not going to get much better eat up his playing time?
by James Schmidt on Dec 21, 2011 2:50 PM CST up reply actions
Did everybody forget who Bud played for.
I saw post after post last year about how Rick wil not give young guys a chance. Bud started off with barely any playing time but just played smart and worked hard and Rick played him. Same thing with Patrick. T-Will did not for whatever reason. I think it was atitude and work ethic but I was not at practice. I see T-Will has a lot of potential and am really hoping he turns potential into results. But we should not sell Bud short. He has worked hard and seems to be a team 1st player by doing whatever is asked of him.
Did you forget just what opened up playing time for Budinger and Patterson?
Injuries and lack of alternatives forced them to get playing time. Williams got boned on attitude alone, not talent.
Yes but the same situation was there for T-Will.
Give Bud and Patterson credit instead of making excuses for T-Will. I still believe you have to EARN your minutes. All three are about the same age and T-Will makes almost as much as both Bud and Patterson together. Just say good job Bud. Good job Patterson.
Bud had a great
half a season last year. He really struggled early but improved alot by driving in more instead of just taking the outside shot. His defense also improved, but can he really play d good enough to be on the court in crutch times. Gay,Ariza,Marion, possibly Odom as well will all give him trouble on d and thats just our division. Lets not forget Durant, Wallace,Batum maybe even the rookie from Minny, the thing in common is they are all taller and bigger then Bud. He is a good backup, who will be valuable off the bench.
by since86rocketsfan on Dec 21, 2011 2:06 PM CST reply actions
Odom at the SF is a nightmare for lots of teams.
Rudy Gay is very difficult to guard, the best way to handle him is a Battier type technique when you let him have his worst shots and hope for the best. Ariza worries me not at all, and Marion could hurt him by posting up. But that’s part of why we have Morris.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
"Solid" does not equal "keeper"
I like Bud’s game. I really do. And I think he has considerable potential to improve. But if you’re trying to land a star, you’ve got to give up something, something that the prospective trade partner wants. So if you can trade for a star—or even somebody who can be the 2nd or 3rd best player on a championship level team—you include Bud, because I don’t think he’s that. Bud represents a position and skill-set Morey could probably replace with the 14th pick in the draft every season, so that’s why he’s not a keeper.
I like bud. He is only 23, has a tremendous contract and i dont think you can get equal value for him
The only way I can see him traded is as part of a package with a other players. He is athletic, young, and already has two years of experience. He is a very good shooter. I also like the fact that when talking about him, you can rely on what he has already done instead of having to rely on the term “potential”
We seem to forget
that a lot of the early minutes Bud got were at the two. It presents a different set of challenges for him, (guarding quicker guards and such), but he had some good stretches at the two. I think that having him be able to play both is valuable.
Something tells me we will see a lot of combinations on the floor this year. Having players like Bud, T-Will, Lee, Dragic, etc that can play in more than one spot will be a plus. If he wanted, McHale could go big with T-will, Bud, Morris, Hill & Thabeet.
One positive for this season is we could have break-out games from a number of players this year. Add that to the flexability we have next off-season and it will be fun to watch. Not saying Bud might not be traded at some point, but I hope we get to see what he can do first.
T-will, Bud, Morris, Hill & Thabeet.
That lineup would have the most turnovers per minute the league has ever seen.
by Christopher Dion Harris on Dec 21, 2011 3:32 PM CST via iPhone app up reply actions
Maybe. For the first few games it would anyway.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Whats funny is that people are throwing bud under the bus for fullfilling his potential
It seems better to be a limited player with potential than be a good player whose potential is reached.
There's still room for growth in his game.
Around 26 is when players don’t really add that much more usually. This is one way lots of analysts drive me crazy. They say “Well, we’ve seen two seasons, so that’s it. That’s all there is.”
Well, yes, if those seasons are 25, 26 they’re probably right. If the seasons are 21,22 the analysts are much more likely to be wrong.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Nice write up Patrick.
I really don’t think that Budinger’s value for money can be overstated. You’re talking about what projects to be an above average SF this year (ie top 15, even if no one knows it) for less than 1 million a year.
If I have any complaint about Budinger its this – he doesn’t possess an elite skill. He’s good at a lot – shooting, scoring on the drive, passing, rebounding, better than you think at D. If he could shoot the three at a 40% clip he’d be a top 10 SF.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
dalembert agrees to 2 yr deal with houston
by HTown80 on Dec 21, 2011 4:19 PM CST via Android app reply actions
Just saw that
Interesting to see terms.
Check out The Dream Shake.
by Patrick Harrel on Dec 21, 2011 4:22 PM CST up reply actions
probably ridiculous
however, hadn’t sac pulled their offer?
by HTown80 on Dec 21, 2011 4:25 PM CST via Android app up reply actions
If T-Will can get his act together mentally,
he’ll eventually be the starter.
The only jump shot I want him taking is the catch and shoot 3. If he can do that and still attack the basket consistently, he’ll have a break out year. His defense and rebounding are sure-things, but if he stops taking bad shots, look out.
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
Since the Chuckwagon rolled on (Get well soon!), Budinger has graduated to one of my favorite Rockets. It’s hard not to root for him, and he looks like he’s having a lot of fun out on the court. Basketball is a business, but I hope he sticks around for a while.
The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.
by Stupendous Man on Dec 21, 2011 4:55 PM CST via mobile reply actions

by 






















