Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

To all who watched last night's HOU/PHX game: Do Not Blame the Referees

Yes, I know Patrick Patterson was not even close to touching the ball on the rim.

Yes, I know Courtney Lee did not actually foul Hakim Warrick on that "and-1" drive in the 4th Q.

Yes, I know that Chase Budinger was hit on the elbow or forearm every time he tried a jumpshot.

I DO NOT CARE.

(The Suns have an equally just argument about the lack of quality in last night's officiating crew.  They were terrible... but they were consistently terrible.  It just happens that the good guys got the worst of it at the end of the game -- when the Rockets should have already built an insurmountable 20 point lead.)

Now, if I am not blaming the referees... who am I blaming?  For someone is inherently at "fault" for not bringing home a W last night, right?  Well.......... where to begin?


1.  Was Kevin Martin high last night?  The last four games?

Speed Racer has never looked more completely out of it on the court.  He looked like he was auditioning to host next year's Academy Awards (hello, James Franco!).  Twice Martin fumbled or kicked the ball away when he was leading a one-on-none fast break.  He dropped passes left and right.  He took ill-advised jump shots all night.  Normally this is in the flow of the offense, but last night Kyle Lowry was in the f--kin' ZONE and the Rockets made no attempt to pass him the ball with any regularity.  Then again...

2.  It's still on Rick Adelman

60% of the Rockets' starting lineup ate ass.  I still do not know why Jordan Hill got the start over Patrick Patterson.  PatPat has done nothing but prove he deserves as many minutes as he can play.  Whereas Hill has only proven that he's prone to toking it up with Speed Racer.  Hill played 5 minutes in the first quarter and looked absolutely lost.  Then again, so did Robin Lopez.  Maybe it was something in the water?  Maybe the Phoenix medical staff gets everyone high so that they do not feel their injuries?  (Hey!  That would explain *so* much!)

opium, ftw?

But Adelman still must account for why Chuck Hayes continues to play so many minutes... especially when playing games like last night where a 6'5" slow center with limited offense is a bad matchup... why Jordan Hill continues to be put in position to fail (instead of letting Patterson go into beast mode)... and why he did not immediately remove Martin and let Courtney Lee play more.  I mean, I am a huge Kevin Martin fan, but even I was demanding that he be removed from the game last night.  And when Chuck Hayes tried to emulate Hakeem Olajuwon on a 1st Q post move that resulted in an air-balled jump hook from 5 feet out... well... it was enough to make LeBron James and Dwyane Wade cry.

Lebron-and-wade-both-think-its-their-turn-to-be-it_medium

But that is not even the worst transgression... which leads me to:

3.  Why is Brad Miller trying so hard to make me dislike him?

Granted, it's not his fault that he's washed up.  It's also not his fault that Adelman continues to run him out there to be exposed.  He's a good guy and he's a professional.  Brad Miller will bust his butt as much as he can to win a game.  I'm not suggesting that he's dogging it by any means...

But at some level, you simply cannot continue to keep playing the Hayes/Miller duo when you might possible have an actual center on your bench.  And we'll never know what we have with Hasheem Thabeet until someone gives him a legitimate chance to play meaningful basketball against the big boys.

One thing is for certain:  Thabeet wouldn't have thrown an outlet pass to the other team with 20 seconds left in the game and the Rockets within striking distance.  That one cut me deep, Mr. Miller.  That hurt bad.

---

Now -- after last night, can we all agree that the Rockets are better off giving extended time to the young guys?  The supposed "playoff push" is drifting farther and farther away -- no matter how much kick-ass basketball Kyle Lowry continues to play.  Meanwhile, Patrick Patterson is tearing things up.  The old joke was that only Dean Smith could stop Michael Jordan.  At this point, only Rick Adelman can stop Patrick Patterson.

But do not blame the referees.  It's tired and cliche for one.  For two, the Rockets should have had such a big lead in the third quarter last night that it would not have been a factor.  But coaching and/or a case of the munchies is why the Rockets came up three points short in the end.  Not the zebras.

Comment 161 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from The Dream Shake

TDS Writer Roundtable 3-On-5

May 2012 by BD34 - 2 comments

TDS Writer Roundtable 3 on 5

May 2012 by BD34 - 126 comments

Comments

Display:

I dont blame the refs for making calls one way or the other

I just blame them for messing up the flow of the game. The first half was great, everything was flowing well for the Rockets. The second half….well the refs decided to swallow the whistle for a while then go crazy with it after.

It was ugly to watch the second half. I bunch of bad calls both ways, sloppy play, and no flow. I think that was the big disadvantage for the Rockets.

Who also said Steve Nash should have been better than Lowry??? And to quote myself from the preview post.

Im worried about Hill and Carter. One of them two is going to have a great game.

I guess it was Carter last night shooting lights out and carrying the team on his back when they needed him the most. Adelman should have taken Martin out and put Lee on him much sooner.

Also, does everyone now agree the Dragic trade was a good one??? LOL. Goran raped Brooks last night! Steals, drawing fouls, behind the back pass for a dunk….what else could you have asked for?

by Texas08 on Mar 9, 2011 9:26 AM CST reply actions  

Please

let’s not start a Lowry vs. Nash argument. I love Lowry, but Nash is undeniably the better point guard.

Bleeding red since 2004, when we changed our team colors. But only since then. It was an amalgamation of blue and pinstripes before that.

by bk219 on Mar 9, 2011 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't think that's his point

I think he just means to say that he called Nash not being the one to kill us last night.

How many Biletnikoffs does he have? NOT TWO!

by ak2themax on Mar 9, 2011 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

This is why I love you, Dave.

There’s not a damn thing in this article I disagree with. Time to this fan base to man up and accept that the playoffs won’t toughen a mediocre roster. The best option is to develop the youth, take a good hard look at who is worth keeping on the roster for the rebuilding effort, and see if we can’t accelerate some development in the good ones.

I do still have faith in Jordan Hill mostly because in his limited minutes he has played the post game that is asked of him but the more I see him the more I think he needs to be a bench guy to develop himself well.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 9:30 AM CST reply actions  

I agree with you on Hill

Adelman keeps yanking him around… how’s he supposed to react? Calm, cool and collected? I think not.

by grungedave on Mar 9, 2011 9:42 AM CST up reply actions  

Not me

I don’t see it that way at all. Adelman gave him the start in Scola’ absence, despite strong play lately from Patterson. That’s a vote of confidence. He gave him nice minutes in the first half too, but the guy didn’t get it done. He looked lost out there. All a coach can do is give a guy a chance. Once it’s given, the player has to produce, and if he doesn’t, you can’t just leave him out there.

by ElocFSU on Mar 9, 2011 10:14 AM CST up reply actions  

I'll have you run a maze once or twice quickly

Then beat the living shit out of you if you don’t do it flawlessly the third time. Then you’ll know what you’re expecting out of Jordan. In his spot minutes he has done exactly what he needed to do. He knew his defined role. The problem here is inconsistency from the coach coupled with lack of guidance by him for the player. Jordan can put it together and has flashed some brilliance, he’s had no consistent chance to work it out though.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 10:17 AM CST up reply actions  

Brilliance

Like that dunk attempt off the break? Not-Top-10 action right there.

by ElocFSU on Mar 9, 2011 10:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Dude

This aint Hill’s third or even forth time to start. He has been with the team for over a year now. He isnt looking like the guy a lot of us were hoping for.

"Speed Baby" - GP

by tonyomo on Mar 9, 2011 1:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Jordan Hill

In my opinion, last night proves what I’ve been saying about Jordan Hill. Getting pushed around inside, committing silly fouls, fumbling rebounds and passes, looking generally lost – it was bad.

Patterson on the other hand. Wow. Bigger, stronger, better. And that shooting percentage, gotta love it.

I will certainly agree that Patterson needs more minutes. Way more. I don’t see what else the guy could do to earn them, he produces well every time he’s out there. Maybe the shift is finally on, since Patterson brought it home in the second half while Hill was on the bench.

by ElocFSU on Mar 9, 2011 9:37 AM CST reply actions  

Kevin Martin

Agreed, he just didn’t seem to be into the game last night. Lots of inconsistency lately, hope he can straighten it out. However, I do like that he can have a bad game and still get a good number of points by taking it to the basket and going to the line. I feel that if Martin was on his game last night, the Rockets would have had the big lead that you mention going into the final minutes.

by ElocFSU on Mar 9, 2011 9:39 AM CST reply actions  

really, it doesn't matter what you, me or the fanbase thinks about developing youth

adelman has his own priorities in what is probably his last season as the houston coach, and he doesn’t want to leave with a losing record. so he’s going to do whatever he can to win, even if that means playing brad miller for 40 minutes a game.

now, a definite argument can be made that adelman doesn’t realize what this team needs to win. miller’s braindeadness is not something he could predict—that’s the last thing you expect out of a veteran. in fact, he was probably signed so that when he backed up yao (and in case he was finishing games instead of yao because of injury/fouls) he wouldn’t crap out and do idiotic stuff like that.

the thabeet argument has been beaten to death. yes, thabeet probably wouldn’t have thrown that outlet pass, but he would probably have racked up more than the 2 fouls miller got and ended up sending the suns to the stripe early in the fourth (especially the way the refs were calling it). so really, thabeet for miller is not the answer.

we can keep whining about youth but if DM/Les are in the full-on rebuilding mode, they would get rid of RA, since he’s obviously not in that mindset. doesn’t matter if the entirety of TDS agrees that we should be rebuilding because the guy who matters is RA, who is still harvesting playoff hopes.

by sohum on Mar 9, 2011 9:39 AM CST reply actions  

Dragic > AB

I know it’s just one game, but wow. I haven’t seen ABs official line yet, but I’m pretty dern sure that it reads 0 points and a pretty good number of turnovers. Dragic looked a lot better. How about that behind the back pass?

All I’m saying is that last night made me even more sure that the AB trade was a good one.

by ElocFSU on Mar 9, 2011 9:42 AM CST reply actions  

agree

ABZ tried soooo hard to impress he ended up hurting his team
(another reason the Rockets should have been up 20)

by grungedave on Mar 9, 2011 9:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Refs

In principle, I agree with you – have to play the game, regardless of how bad the refs may be.

But in this particular case, I’m sorry, but I have to blame the refs to some degree. The reason? Horrible calls in close games change the outcome. Even worse in this case, since the horrible calls resulted in legitimate Rockets points being taken off the board. The Patterson no-touch was big. Those two points would have changed the dynamic of the last few minutes (i.e. 2s instead of 3s, may not have had to foul Nash, etc). Also, in my opinion, Lowry was clearly fouled on his 7th three. I’m a bit bitter that the refs effected the outcome in such an important game.

by ElocFSU on Mar 9, 2011 9:47 AM CST reply actions  

Want some cheese with that whine?

We’re just not a team that can close out games. We’ve exhibited this all season. Blaming it on the refs is copping out and crying.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 9:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Fair enough

Yea, I knew I would catch some flak for that. But I still say that there was a difference last night. We struggle to close out games, yes. But it’s not often that the refs bad calls take your hard earned points off the board. Ugh.

by ElocFSU on Mar 9, 2011 9:54 AM CST up reply actions  

It doesn't matter because last night Phoenix was the better team.

Blaming the refs is trying to diminish Warrick beating the shit out of us or Carter lighting on fire in the second half. I’m willing to acknowledge when we’ve been outcompeted. Blaming the refs ignores the benefits that we get EVERY GAME (Martin leads the league in makes/attempts).

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 9:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Spoken like a true homer.

Everything we get is earned, everything the other team gets is clearly stolen.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 10:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Not sure that's what he was saying - Martin's game is predicated on drawing fouls.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 9, 2011 3:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Not saying that the refs were the reason why we lost

I just don’t think Martin gets the benefit of the call every game because the refs are nice to him – a lot of his calls aren’t borderline, they’re him drawing the foul.

The refereeing wasn’t perfect, but the refs were making bad calls on both ends. Just because I disagree with what you said, doesn’t mean I also agree with ElocFSU’s assertion that the refereeing were the reason why we lost – I don’t think that way at all.

by B- on Mar 12, 2011 12:56 PM CST up reply actions  

The refs

are the only reason that we were in the game for the first 3 quarters, if you watched almost all the BS calls went in our favor until the very end.

by Bobbythegreat on Mar 9, 2011 9:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Pietrus

Kicking him out of the game was the easiest decision the refs made all night. What a moron. Way to pay 4,000 dollars to hurt your team!

by ElocFSU on Mar 9, 2011 9:49 AM CST reply actions  

I blame the refs when it is their fault

Last night however, was not on the refs, the Rockets did not play well enough to win and they did not deserve to win. I can’t see how Thabeet would screw up any worse than Brad Miller, and even if he did, at least it would be a young guy screwing up. When you originally said that we should give up on making the playoffs and give the young guys major minutes I said give it a few more losses , well there have been a few more losses, bring on the kids.

by Bobbythegreat on Mar 9, 2011 9:53 AM CST reply actions  

correction

I never said “give up” on the playoffs… I said that the playoffs should not be the primary goal.

Young guys can still win. It’s not “tanking” to play Thabeet.

by grungedave on Mar 9, 2011 9:58 AM CST up reply actions  

uh, yeah

It’s pretty much tanking to play Thabeet. That doesn’t necessarily make it the wrong thing to do, but taking away minutes from Chuck, Scola, or Patterson, to play Thabeet is pretty much the definition of tanking. Miller, maybe you can make the argument that he should get fewer minutes. But even then, those minutes wouldn’t go to Thabeet unless you decided to focus more on developing youth than winning (i.e. “tanking”).

I suppose this is a personal opinion, but anything done that isn’t in the best interest of maximizing wins this season is properly termed tanking. No team has the players on the floor try to lose. They just don’t put the player on the floor that have the best chance of winning.

by Metalate on Mar 9, 2011 10:37 AM CST up reply actions  

ummm

At this point, there is no way to convince me that Thabeet isn’t a better option than Brad Miller. Thabeet can at least move his feet and jump.

by grungedave on Mar 9, 2011 12:03 PM CST up reply actions  

and foul and foul.

Thabeet is not the answer and wont be for awhile

by AlDe2356 on Mar 9, 2011 12:53 PM CST up reply actions  

So he fouls out - THEN you get Brad Miller.

Brad Miller has his good nights, then he has nights where he’s literally, not figuratively, a statue. If the choice is

A. Easy layup on Brad
B. Possible block or foul from Thabeet

Why not pick B?

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 9, 2011 3:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Because its more likely to be

A. Crisp Passes on offense
B. Thabeet travels

On defense
A. Hands High in the air possibility they just miss
B. They score an extra 5 points from easy free throws and patterson gets in foul trouble trying to cover.

Just because he is 7’3" and athletic doesn’t mean he is capable of playing on the NBA level.
It might get you by even in college but it just doesnt work at the highest levels.

by AlDe2356 on Mar 10, 2011 7:26 AM CST up reply actions  

You make Thabeet sound totally worthless

Thabeet in the middle will no doubt result in some fouls because that’s the nature of all young big men. I’d rather Thabeet get some burn and learn how to do things rather than have Brad solve literally no problems in our offense or defense by doing what he’s doing recently.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 10, 2011 7:35 AM CST up reply actions  

brad miller does solve problems on our offense's second unit

you can’t have your second unit come out and run a completely different offense than your starters. if that was the case then budinger’s transition into the starting 5 would have been completely disastrous.

by sohum on Mar 10, 2011 9:33 AM CST up reply actions  

the offense runs through brad miller when he's on the floor

for better or for worse (of late, for worse, as he tries to thread it through multiple defenders for a backdoor cut). i guarantee you that thabeet would not be able to make that pass.

playing thabeet would be playing in a completely different offensive scheme (one predicated on pick-and-roll, instead of a lot of ball movement). not saying that scheme is worse, but that is no RA and at that stage we should be looking at getting rid of RA.

by sohum on Mar 9, 2011 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree - but the Rockets score just fine without Miller in the game too.

We have two good PGs, after all.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 9, 2011 3:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Weeellll....

in Adelman’s eyes Miller facilitates their scoring often enough to necessitate keeping him in over Hill or Thabeet. However, I think Hayes could be equally effective as a facilitator and then keep 2Pat in at PF.
I’m pretty sure Adelman is gone next year and I anticipate Houston will have a much younger coach who won’t be afraid to implement younger players.
I’m starting to look forward to that, even if it comes at the expense of losing some more games.

by Nobody is Better Than Jordan on Mar 9, 2011 5:45 PM CST up reply actions  

that's correct, but unfortunately that's not adelman's system

i think about 80% of our half-court sets begin with the center catching the ball at the top of the key. we do it with chuck in the starting line-up and we do it with miller in the second unit.

by sohum on Mar 10, 2011 12:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Adelman's not completely rigid.

That high post was a lot less common with Yao in the lineup. RA can adapt to differences in personnel.

by Metalate on Mar 10, 2011 9:40 AM CST up reply actions  

yao was yao

thabeet ain’t no yao

also, it isn’t in adelman’s best interests to develop—he’s still looking to get to the playoffs. he can hardly be blamed.

by sohum on Mar 10, 2011 11:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Miller v. Thabeet may be a reasonable debate (though I disagree with your opinion)

However, I find it really hard to argue honestly that if Miller sits, then Thabeet is the next best option to get his minutes (Miller’s only getting 17/game).

Chuck, Scola, and Patterson are all legitimately deserving, and I don’t think you can argue with a straight face that Thabeet taking minutes from any of those 3 improves the Rocket’s chances of winning games this season.

by Metalate on Mar 9, 2011 2:34 PM CST up reply actions  

The point is that at some point if Thabeet is going to be salvaged he's going to have to play.

We may not have reached that point yet, I don’t know. It might be next season, but its going to come. If we’re realistically out of the playoff hunt (rather than at 35% chance) then there should be some developmental minutes for him and Williams and, why not, Carroll.

The thing is, you wonder why anyone ever lets Rick Adelman go, and the answer is, he doesn’t like to rebuild. If that’s what you have to do, you’ve got a problem.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 9, 2011 3:18 PM CST up reply actions  

They found a gigantic gimme with Warrick's match up

Imagine that, another underutilized Memphis first rounder end up being useful, he killing us early and then VC caught on fire, not even Lee can stop him. The Suns went to the hot hand, and our last shot ended with Miller jacking it ups(Lowry was forced to pass it to him), Lowry, Patterson was on friggin fire for god sakes

I still much rather Miller be a last resort than a rotation play, I dont think Hill can fuck up or center play any more then it is, though I could be wrong. Thabeet would probably foul out but when Warrick is completely undetered going to the rim, you would think to have Thabeet just standing there would have effect on his shot

by NVP on Mar 9, 2011 9:53 AM CST reply actions  

Great points

I agree with pretty much everything you said.

Warrick – wow. He seemed like he was 8 feet tall out there. Some of those dunks were ridiculous. Shot well from outside too.

I owe Carter a bit of an apology. I was telling a buddy before the game that he was pretty much done, that it was rare that he could post 20 points these days. He was on fire. His shot looked effortless and hardly touched rim. I was impressed.

I really like what you say about the Suns going to the hot hand while the Rockets did not. Houston always seems to struggle with that concept. For the Suns, it was easy. Let VC shoot till he misses, and in the 4th quarter, I don’t think he ever did!

by ElocFSU on Mar 9, 2011 9:57 AM CST up reply actions  

I wondered if a does of TWill, who is more physically powerful than Lee, could have helped on Carter.

Probably not – these VC outbursts are like rainstorms, nothing you can do about it but take cover. They don’t last long, and you can’t rely on them.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 9, 2011 3:20 PM CST up reply actions  

I dont think so

He was on fire, there was no guarding that. Problem is we let him get comfortable enough to get there. T-will could probably be more physical on D, but the ways the fouls are called in the second half he would just give VC trips to the line

by NVP on Mar 9, 2011 4:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Knowing who is calling the game is part of playing pro ball

Ken Mauer is not a ref you want to get started. He has issues and you need to know how to avoid getting on his bad side.
That said, I think the one thing missing in this evaluation is Scola. Anyone thinking we should move him needs to remember this game. It is hard to put what he does into words, but last night was a great example of why we are better with him than without him.

by makinmajik on Mar 9, 2011 9:56 AM CST reply actions  

Yup

Good point. Watching Hayes and Hill airball awkward jumpshots from 10 and 12 feet really hurt since you know they were gimmies for Scola. What’s the word on the knee? I am hoping it won’t keep him out for long?

by ElocFSU on Mar 9, 2011 9:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Luis runs on every posession

Warrick might not have gone off like that if he had to run with him. And yes, he would have converted a lot of the paint shots we missed.

by makinmajik on Mar 9, 2011 10:13 AM CST up reply actions  

seriously though...

Was Kevin Martin high? His reaction time was equivalent to a stoner’s.

by grungedave on Mar 9, 2011 10:02 AM CST reply actions  

before the game

Did you see him before the game? He kept pointing / gesturing to something on the side of the court before tipoff? More proof that he was high. He was seeing purple dragons or some such on the bench and wondering why Adelman wasn’t putting them into the starting lineup.

by ElocFSU on Mar 9, 2011 10:04 AM CST up reply actions  

A

good excuse would be to say that he caught whatever bug that Dragic had. That probably isn’t the case, but he needs to justify it somehow.

by Bobbythegreat on Mar 9, 2011 10:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Speed does not do well on the second night of

back to back games. He is one player who would benefit from fewer minutes.

by makinmajik on Mar 9, 2011 10:09 AM CST up reply actions  

“And we’ll never know what we have with Hasheem Thabeet until someone gives him a legitimate chance to play meaningful basketball against the big boys.”

Unfortunately, I suspect Adelman knows from watching him in practice what we have in Thabeet. Does Adelman really have to give him minutes just so we can see how bad he sucks? Judging from his time in Memphis, it’s pretty clear that he currently has absolutely no skills offensively. Defensively, he struggles with pretty much everything except shot blocking. He’s not a lost cause- just not a player who should be getting minutes in any game the Rockets have any intention of winning.

by jack_ on Mar 9, 2011 10:37 AM CST reply actions  

what practice?

I think you make a huge and false assumption on how much actual practice takes place this late in the season. Beyond low-exertion shoot-arounds, there isn’t much actual “practice” being done. Certainly no up-tempo scrimmages.

by grungedave on Mar 9, 2011 12:04 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

yeah, this is definitely correct

Thabeet will have to find ways to get his 5-on-5 practice in during the offseason, cause he ain’t gettin’ it now.

It’s really the only legitimate argument for how players can be hurt by leaving college early. Thabeet may have been better served with another year at UConn. (Though if you’re going to be 2nd pick, it’s pretty hard to turn down that much big money. It’s probably only late first rounders who won’t get PT in the NBA for whom this is a legit consideration. And of course everyone thinks they can play right now…)

Why doesn’t the NBA allow D-league assignments for non-rookies? Seems to me like they’re only hurting the players.

by Metalate on Mar 9, 2011 2:40 PM CST up reply actions  

I didn't get to watch the game,

but I watched the highlights, including a youtube video of Brad Miller’s 30 seconds of what-the-hell. Usually I’d get enraged at those kinds of plays to blow the game, but… I wasn’t even mad, I was just incredulous. That really happened?

All right, later dudes. S you in your A’s, don’t wear a C, and J all over your B’s.

by hornedfrogrocket on Mar 9, 2011 11:24 AM CST reply actions  

I'm with ya, Dave

I even tweeted it in the closing minutes of last nights game. You can’t put this one on the refs. Sure, they made bad calls but they made them on both sides. No, the refs didn’t allow Vince Carter to do the Time Warp to 1999 or let Warrick look like Kobe-Lite. You aren’t going to win when those two guys are shooting 70%.

by Mike Kerns on Mar 9, 2011 11:26 AM CST reply actions  

Look at it this way

If the Suns make the post season then we get their first pick. If not then we get Orlando’s. If we both make it to the playoffs and NYK has a worse record than our we get to switch. We could make noise in the draft with 3 picks in good spots.

Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.

by batman713 on Mar 9, 2011 11:45 AM CST reply actions  

We have Phoenix/Orlando's pick

and the right to swap with New York. Those are our firsts and I don’t count seconds as “good spots”, what glue are you huffing?

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

What is with you?

I count second rounders as good because we regularly do well with them.

Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.

by batman713 on Mar 9, 2011 12:20 PM CST up reply actions  

What is with me responding to you?

You posted a comment and I disagreed. First round draft picks have a better success rate than second rounders.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 12:21 PM CST up reply actions  

What is with the "what glue are you huffing" comment when you know you would get your panties in a twist has someone dared to ask such a thing to the Almighty BD34?

Of course 1st rounders have more success. Most our picks no matter where they are seem to work well. That is my opinion and we will not agree.

Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.

by batman713 on Mar 9, 2011 12:25 PM CST up reply actions  

So because someone disagrees with you again you get upset and start blowing up.

Your attempts at “being the bigger man” are pretty sad dude.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 12:40 PM CST up reply actions  

No, your attempts at belittling facts are sad

This is what I’m talking about. You take things in your own BD34 way and assume that whatever you are thinking is what was meant by the person saying it. All I did is tell you the same things about yourself that many of us on this board have tried to tell you and you ignore them because you feel like you are almighty. That high horse you are riding will either toss your ass off or just die then you will finally see yourself on the same level as everyone else.

Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.

by batman713 on Mar 9, 2011 12:55 PM CST up reply actions  

There's plenty of people I talk with just fine here.

Seems like just you and a handful of other twats can’t seem to fathom I actually am an affable person who can carry on a meaningful discussion.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 12:57 PM CST up reply actions  

You can until you start your useless insults

You insult people without warrant and you ignore the fact that you do it. You still haven’t acknowledged the fact that you belittle when someone makes a good point against you. And just because someone doesn’t like you it doesn’t make them a twat. That is the kind of shit I am talking about. The worst part is you get mad when some does those exact same shit to you.

Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.

by batman713 on Mar 9, 2011 1:12 PM CST up reply actions  

I am a Rocket Fan!

And I have my opinions and have been on Dreamshake for sometime now. But when I voiced my opinion the other day, BD34 thought it sounded like a CF and I got my opinion removed. Why is it that I can’t have my opinion voived like I am use to doing. The blogs have gotten so serious and a ‘matter of fact’ now that it has lost it’s fun, played in part by just went on above. (Not you Batman713)

Just say’in!!

by kmbrly429 on Mar 10, 2011 8:26 PM CST up reply actions  

I say

Les fires Morey and Adleman! Hire BD34 cause he knows “EVERYTHING!”

"Your girlfriend is into them gangstas, and me being a gangsta, i get into your girlfriend"

by marcd on Mar 9, 2011 2:38 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Oi! Did you miss the "tone it down" part?

Don’t start anything up please.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 9, 2011 3:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Did I

say something bad?

"Your girlfriend is into them gangstas, and me being a gangsta, i get into your girlfriend"

by marcd on Mar 10, 2011 2:49 PM CST up reply actions  

OK, the obvious question:

If 2nd-round picks are “good spots”, then what picks are “bad spots”?

by Metalate on Mar 9, 2011 2:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Because of the first round contract?

Just curious as to what your thinking is.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 9, 2011 3:21 PM CST up reply actions  

exactly

The first pick in 2nd round is 100x more valuable to teams than the last pick in the first round. For example……. our buying of the Carl Landry pick in 2007.

by grungedave on Mar 9, 2011 3:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Landry and his agent negotiated well

He only signed a 1 yr deal,gambling he could play well enough to get a better deal as an early FA.
The Rockets seem to have learned a lesson and followed the Utah Jazz in giving subsequent 2nd Rd picks 4 yr deals at very modest salaries. Dorsey,Taylor,Bud all got 4 yr deals,giving the players confidence the team would take a hard look at them,while giving the team the option of cutting them loose each yr. Even undrafted Ish Smith got a 2 yr deal.
A better comparison is Bud will get about $2.4mil over his first 3 yrs to Tucker’s $2.9mil. And Bud is locked in at less than $1mil for hs 4rth yr and if Tucker had been able to get his 4rth yr option picked up he would have been pd @ $1.7mil.
Complicating matters is First Rd picks often get signing bonuses and as we saw in the Xavier Henry fiasco,performance bonuses that may or may not show up in salary databases. And how do you factor in the price of buying a pick? First Rd picks traditionally sell for $3mil,while until recently-thanks Pat Riley for overpaying for Chalmers-Seconds went for about $250,000. Now we’re seeing teams paying well in excess of $2mil for them. It won’t be until Bud’s fourth yr that his salary will exceed what the Rockets pd for his draft rights.
In the current NBA,is it better to have a late First and pay a little more in salary,or pay $2-3mil to buy an early Second?

by Tisbee on Mar 10, 2011 11:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Quite a bit of second round magic recent years

look at Carl Landry, Chase Budinger, and Jermaine Taylor all broke and stay in rotation,

Big baby integral for Boston, Dejuan Blair starting this year, Landry Field this year looks great. Jordie Meeks is starting for Philly, Sam Young for Grizzles, Jonas Jerebko was awesome last year, DeAndre Jordan, Omer Asik, Goran Dragic, Marc Gasol, Gortat, Monte Ellis, Ersan İlyasova, Lou Williams, Blatche, Milsap, Ramon Sessions, CDR and LMM for Milwake, Patty Mills out killing ABZ whenever he can

All in the past 5 years

by NVP on Mar 9, 2011 12:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Landry sucked in Sacramento and isn't ripping it up in New Orleans

Budinger is doing well, Taylor is a garbage time all star. Most of the guys you mention later were picked in a deep draft or were playing overseas for a year or three of professional experience. It’s stretching it to call that proof of a point.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 12:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Why not?

this draft is full of international and while there are no clear cut stars doesnt mean it’s not deep

by NVP on Mar 9, 2011 12:46 PM CST up reply actions  

The drafts tend to be unusually deep regardless of conjecture.

But I just don’t deem picking a guy 50th in the draft and stashing him internationally for 3 years “proof of quality in the second round” because by the time the guy comes over, he would have been a lottery pick.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 12:48 PM CST up reply actions  

That's only Marc and Erson

Jonas played right away, so did Dragic and Asik
and Stashing international prospects is a legit strategy, just because team doesnt have the foresight to draft the guy when he declared, doesnt mean its not quality, and a good amount of the guys are homegrown too.

I am not sayin second round is just as good, but good scouting goes a long way

by NVP on Mar 9, 2011 1:35 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I think the point is fair - 2nd round is 2nd round. Saying "well it's overseas" or "he's had a down year"

doesn’t mean that the value wasn’t good for what the pick is typically worth.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 9, 2011 3:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Not exactly magic

How many of those guys are really difference-makers? How many could you build a team around or think of as one of the 3 or so pillars of your team? Gasol, Ellis, maybe Milsap. That’s about it, yeah?

We don’t need a solid 7th man. We have 9 guys now who would be great as 7th men.

As nice as some of those players are, very few really much different than a baseline NBA player. I think Landry is above baseline, though I’m not as sure anymore, and I hope Bud is, but he ain’t there yet.

by Metalate on Mar 9, 2011 2:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Well compare to years past when most 2nd rounder literally do nothing

I think the teams has done a much better jobs overall scouting and finding useful player, and you are talking about finding star, then no, because there is a reason they are second rounders, physically or skill wise they are flawed in one way or another, but it doesnt mean they are not talented. The chance of an ultra talent that develops right falls to you is rare, but finding starter on the cheap is not something to sneeze at. It’s stacking talents. He ask about good spot, but I think once you hit second round, it’s where scouting shines and position matter some but not much.

Heck Scola and Manu were both second rounders, as well as former Laker and rocket Arizas. I think a good amount of those player are either starters or play starter minutes in the league, and that means something to me. SA surrounds one aging superstar with a couple above average players but fill the rest up with baseline players as well, still best in the league. Not everyone can be Miami or New York or OKC with full of 1st round picks

by NVP on Mar 9, 2011 5:20 PM CST up reply actions  

You forgot Ramon Sessions, who was drafted with a pick originally owned by the Rockets.

Fire Johnson and hire Brown - I'm telling you Thorn was smoking somethin' when he let Brown slip away in the night.

by diehardNFFLbarnone on Mar 10, 2011 9:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Hate to interrupt a great rant,but

“But Adelman still must account for why Chuck Hayes continues to play so many minutes… especially when playing games like last night where a 6’5” slow center with limited offense is a bad matchup"
Chuck 25 minutes
Miller 24 minutes
Patterson 28 minutes

After a stretch in early Feb where Chuck ave’d 39.5 minutes,Rick has greatly reduced his minutes.
Starting Feb 12,the Rockets have played 12 games and Chuck is averaging 25 minutes. Only 4 times in that span has Chuck played over 30 minutes,and coincidentally the Rockets won all four games.

That said the Center position is a disaster for the Rockets.
When Cs go,they go fast and no one expected that Miller was done,pretty much everybody thought he had a yr or two left. Oops.
At beginning of Season plan was Yao plays his 20-odd minutes,Miller gets most of rest,Chuck sees spot minutes and Hill is under development as the future back-up C. That fell to pieces almost immediately w/Yao going down,Miller still recovering from his injury and Hill was thrown in at the C waaaay before he was ready.
Now we’re stuck w/Hayes as the best option at the C. Altho as wretched as Miller has been,it’s kinda remarkable how good Patterson and Hill earlier look when teamed w/him. He’s like some bizarre PF Whisperer.
And as much as I like Patterson,I don’t want him getting beat down playing C.Let him grow into our future PF.(Altho it will really hurt to see Scola leave.Perhaps he will accept a Manu role as the Rockets third big.)

As for Martin,I firmly have,do and will believe he can be a great scorer-for somebody else.

by Tisbee on Mar 9, 2011 11:53 AM CST reply actions  

I still take the approach

Miller fucking things up as a veteran could easily be replaced with Thabeet fucking things up and getting experience/working on his game.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 12:02 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

and I firmly believe

That anything more than 15 minutes a night from Chuck is detrimental to the team.

Chuck Hayes is GREAT – but only if used in small doses.

by grungedave on Mar 9, 2011 12:06 PM CST up reply actions  

But this yr,who plays the other 30?

Miller? Hill? Thabeet? T-Will?
If the Rockets best option at C next yr is Chuck,I will become a modern day Cato,ending every comment w/ Morey delenda est!

by Tisbee on Mar 9, 2011 12:12 PM CST up reply actions  

The fundamental problem is that everyone sees this team as something better than what it is

When what really needs to happen is we need to choke down some losses and develop/evaluate young talent.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 12:20 PM CST up reply actions  

The problem that I see is that we're seeing two things.

People are seeing the team as better than it is because in some ways it is a truly elite team – it can really score the ball, and when the shots are falling it’s just devastating.

But there are holes, particularly the Yao sized hole in the middle. Despite whatever efforts may or may not have been undertaken, that hole remains, and it is killing us.

Also, the team has been playing great lately. Dropping road B2B isn’t usually fatal, but the awful awful start we had means we can’t do that and hope to make the post-season. The thing is, young players ARE getting PT, just not all the young players. Miller needs to make way for Thabeet. Budinger needs to be spelled some by TWill. Don’t tell me TWill couldn’t have made Carter’s life miserable last night, because he could have.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 9, 2011 1:51 PM CST up reply actions  

TWill

would’ve punched him in the face

by fanoflosingteams on Mar 9, 2011 9:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Cato (younger? elder?)

may have been many things – a post defender? No.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 9, 2011 2:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Large doses are ok if he's making Blake Griffin's head explode.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 9, 2011 1:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Large doses rarely

I don’t think the problem is that Chuck is best as a choice against selected teams, much like Deke was in Houston toward the end.

Against NYK, where you can shut the whole team down if you can shut down Amare? I want Chuck playing 38 minutes. He’s just amazingly valuable in that situation. Same is true against Memphis (Randolph) and several other teams.

But against PHX, who have no post game whatsoever? Chuck just doesn’t contribute enough. You’re wasting the man’s talents to have him go stand next to Gortat for 24 sec. every time down. Ideally, I could see chuck playing 32/night half the time, and 8/night the rest.

by Metalate on Mar 9, 2011 2:56 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree.

Chuck is a specialist player who is stretched as a starter. He’s like your 4th OF – great in 275 PAs, not so good in 600. Does that make him a bad player? Not at all. It makes him a 4th OF.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Mar 9, 2011 3:25 PM CST up reply actions  

My response to the questions are:

1. Dunno. Bad game from getting player of the week. Part of it was that he wasn’t getting the calls he usually does, which is frustrating, but not much you can about it. Also, that wrist problem does not seem to be helping.

2. I’m guessing Hill started to avoid disrupting the bench rotations – just like DeShawn Stevenson starts in Dallas even though Terry is about 9388 times better. Really, who starts doesn’t matter, who finishes the game does And Patterson was in the game at the end.
And that’s ignoring the claim that Hayes is more than a situational player, which I don’t agree with at all. He’s a bad matchup against players who don’t create for themselves but just rebound or catch passes from the best passing PG in the league, but he’s incredibly useful and valuable to this team. I really wouldn’t have a problem dumping giving him 5 million+ for a couple of years next season.
3. Massively disagree on Miller, as outside those plays at the end, he really didn’t have a bad game. Phoenix did a very good job cutting off the passes that he normally makes, and he had a few good jumpers. This offense massively, massively uses the high post a lot, a center who at minimum has to know what the f is happening on offense, especially since last night we couldn’t just dump the ball to Scola and tell him to tango.

I will be quite blunt in saying that I genuinely do not care about Thabeet, especially for this year, and especially because I think development for the last 15 games is pointless especially since our playoff hopes are not dead yet. ( And you play to win the game, and this is what a winner like Rick Adelman will do. Otherwise, watch Kurt Rambis. I do that enough to see that I do not want to see that here). Thabeet’s chance will be in the summer and in training camps next season. Right now, as far as I am concerned, he has the playing value of Cook.

Minnesotan Rockets fan

by Barragan on Mar 9, 2011 12:35 PM CST reply actions  

B-Mills didn't do anything wrong...

Give the guy a break.

"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.

by bone31crusher on Mar 9, 2011 2:38 PM CST reply actions  

agreed the refs were bad to both sides

Not there fault they do have a tough job the game last nite was fast and they couldnt keep up thats all.

But dealin with the whole playin young guys is really startin to annoy me. The old guys are miller, scola, martin and i think hayes and lowry are around the same age? Everyone else is young and is getting time.

cannot continue to keep playing the Hayes/Miller duo when you might possible have an actual center on your bench

That is one big might. Thabeet clearly is not ready to play or not good enough as judged by rack and all the coaching staff. Even if they are wrong he wont get playing time till the end of the season so can we drop it? Please? On the other side of the coin i think TWill should maybe get a few mins a game at least coz Bud is playin too many mins for my liking even tho hes doin well.

exciting game to watch tho feel bad for brooks i liked him ha

by IrishThrasher on Mar 9, 2011 2:54 PM CST reply actions  

Grant Hill was fouling our jump shooter all night on the elbow. It's tough to make those shots!

Let see we loose by 3 and we all know that Patterson’s put back should have counted. We also know that Vince should not have received foul shots for head butting K-Mart, rather it should have been an offensive foul or a travel. Did the Rockets play poorly yes, but in the end when it counted, those three points would have meant a tie game! There is no way to deny that those two simply wrong calls cost us.

I don’t ever complain about the calls they don’t see, only about the calls that they make and could not have seen because they simply did not occur.

by jase32 on Mar 9, 2011 3:24 PM CST reply actions  

yes, but

What about the 10 calls the Rockets got in the first half that were HORRIBLE calls that went against the Suns? Did that not change the outcome of the game, too?

by grungedave on Mar 9, 2011 3:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Kevin owes us pt 1

Rick has some responsibility for the rest.
One thing that bothers me is;
Hakeem Warrick dunks, dunks and dunks the players should know that you push him away from the basket. Paid millions for coaching come on.

The content of the text above is provided for information purposes only. No claim is made as to the accuracy or authenticity of the content. The troll does not accept any liability to any person for the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) which is provided in the text above.

by craigj007 on Mar 9, 2011 3:52 PM CST reply actions  

Thank you, Dave

"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous? " ~Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes

by TheChuckwagonisrolling on Mar 9, 2011 4:24 PM CST reply actions  

Um.. one thing is wrong with the whole thing
One thing is for certain: Thabeet wouldn’t have thrown an outlet pass to the other team with 20 seconds left in the game and the Rockets within striking distance.

Ok, maybe not, but he would likely dribble it off his foot or travel with it. Your constant hate for Miller is getting a bit annoying, especially since he’s played pretty well this season. He’s putting up 15, 9 and 5.6 per 40 minutes, is the best passing big on the team (even better than Chuck), and while not a good defender, is decent against other slow big centers. Have you even seen Thabeet play? Yes, he’s 7’3", but he’s done absolutely nothing at all to merit any playing time anywhere. You think that just because he’s really tall that his glaring lack of strength, his inability to catch anything, and complete and utter lack of basketball IQ doesn’t matter. It’s not like Adelman has a vendetta against the guy, he just isn’t good at basketball.

I also don’t buy the argument that he was in a bad situation in Memphis. He was given every opportunity to earn significant minutes the last 2 years, and has been completely unable to do so. The coaches watch practice and see him, it’s not like because he hasn’t played nobody knows anything about him.

by Patrick Harrel on Mar 9, 2011 5:41 PM CST reply actions  

This is what I've been trying to say about thabeet

Ultimately it’s up to the player to put in the work and become a superstar. Coaches or no coaches. Dream or no dream.

The guy doesn’t seem to want it.

And I don’t blame miller or the refs. I Blame Rick adelman

by AllenOU on Mar 9, 2011 7:07 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

So, because Thabeet is not naturally Olajuwon, he is pure shit.

How long have you been a Conservative that there is nothing in this world that can’t be done with a bit of “can do” attitude? Coaches and workout sessions make worlds of difference or else they wouldn’t be here.

As for Patrick, you say Thabeet hasn’t shown anything, he hasn’t been on the floor, so how can you make that assessment? His 2 minutes of garbage time where he blocked a shot and positioned himself well on defense? He’s in Houston now, Memphis is drastically different and the personnel are different, if you want to argue that he’s going to be exactly as he was in Memphis then we almost have to assume a trade never happened and that Memphis is a top tier organization with a bad draft pick.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 9, 2011 8:37 PM CST up reply actions  

You act as if basketball isn't basketball in Memphis

While playing in a different system may make a difference if you’re a decent player, if you’re completely useless somewhere, you’re probably going to be completely useless the next stop you make. I’m not saying that he’s going to suck forever, but I generally side with the coach in the top 10 for wins when it comes to making basketball decisions. Give him a summer in the gym with Carroll Dawson (it might just be June if there’s a lockout), and we can talk. But right now, I don’t see anything outside of shot-blocking and maybe rebounding that is an NBA-level skill.

by Patrick Harrel on Mar 9, 2011 9:11 PM CST up reply actions  

There's the discussion of rawness and need for development that went ignored in Memphis

So I don’t entirely buy the useless argument. If he needed work and went somewhere where the proper amount of work and attention is available it only follows that it won’t work out, does it not?

As for a coach like Adelman, I would not trust his judgment on a young player as he tends to stick to vets or guys he’s had a long look at, Thabeet does not qualify as either of those.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 10, 2011 7:09 AM CST up reply actions  

I dont think these guys realize your point really.

They are trying to say Thabeet hasnt shown anything to prove he deserves minutes but this “unknown” is what further proves YOUR point of the fact that just as much as we dont know how bad he is we also dont know how good he CAN be. Its like saying a 2nd string QB hasnt shown he can start in the league when he has never started a game. Its almost funny….. using the fact that someone hasnt “shown” something as proof of it not existing. Arent you a lawyer? Someones sig on here used to say it: “The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” Just because he hasnt shown it doesnt mean its not there, its up to our caoching staff to help bring it out. NO ONE is saying he can be an elite talent, but you will be hard pressed to tell me a guy that is 7’3" that played ball in one of the most prestigious college programs in the nation and was able to play at a level that earned him the 2nd overall pick in the NBA draft is absolutely USELESS. I can almost guarantee our staff can AT LEAST convert him into a serviceable, defensive minded back-up, maybe even starting caliber center in this league….. face it might never have a great offensive game but thats not what this team even needs so we are all good there. Right?

by theSpaceCityKid on Mar 10, 2011 9:01 AM CST up reply actions  

I wanna see more Thabeet bad

and far less Brad Miller. I dont care what his stats are because he could go 5/6 shooting and that one miss would be some ridiculous 3 pointer or him driving from the arc when we really needed a bucket to close out a game. On the other hand isnt this going to be the first real homestand since the trades? I could be wrong about that but if it is I am really hoping the coaching staff was just waiting for a chance to get home to work with Thabeet a little more and it might result in some minutes.

by theSpaceCityKid on Mar 10, 2011 9:17 AM CST up reply actions  

"2nd overall pick in the NBA draft is absolutely USELESS"

Well, you put a lot of restrictions on that, but Sean Bradley was pretty close to fitting that description.

by Metalate on Mar 10, 2011 9:44 AM CST up reply actions  

"Just because he hasn't shown it doesnt mean its not there"

So… Why isn’t DeSagana Diop considered in the category here? He’s been given plenty of opportunities the last 2 years in Memphis—this is the issue with the argument. People act as if he hasn’t been given a chance to play at all, but he got plenty and fell on his face in Memphis. He needs practice time with the before he is even close to being ready for game time, and right now he has had next to none of it. He got the 2nd overall pick because he was tall and had great timing on blocking shots. Now that players are craftier and stronger, his complete lack of offensive game and strength are being exposed. Take Miller out and that second unit’s flow gets a lot worse. Who knows though, I could be wrong, but I’m tired of people saying that his history in Memphis should just be thrown out completely.

by Patrick Harrel on Mar 10, 2011 3:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, he doesn't play the young guys

Budinger, Hill, Brooks, Landry, and Scola can all attest to that.

And if you don’t trust Adelman’s judgement, who do you trust? Your own eyes?

Minnesotan Rockets fan

by Barragan on Mar 10, 2011 9:04 AM CST up reply actions  

Don't parse my words if you want to be accurate, please.

“doesn’t play young guys he’s had a long look at.” was my exact words. He’s had long looks at Budinger, Hill, Brooks, and Landry before they saw time and if you’re calling Scola a young guy then clearly we’re not able to have a conversation about this because our definitions of young and veteran are drastically different (I don’t consider 30 year olds “young guys”).

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 10, 2011 9:09 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm talking when he was a rookie - he wasn't young, but he didn't have NBA experience.

And um, yes. Coaches generally like to take a look at players and see what they can and cannot do in practices and scrimmages before they are played. This is common sense.

Minnesotan Rockets fan

by Barragan on Mar 10, 2011 9:13 AM CST up reply actions  

The point was made earlier about the fact that practices now are really just shoot arounds and goof offs.

So if you’re thinking a serious look in practice is going to take place you may have another thing coming. As far as time on the floor, again, I pose the question, would you rather Brad Miller pass the ball to Steve Nash and open the lane for uncontested layups or would you rather Hasheem Thabeet foul (possibility of only giving up 1 instead of 2 points on a lay up) and threatening to block shots.

Luis’s experience practically excludes him from the rookie conversation considering he had what, 8 years of international experience with an Argentinian team that was more like an NBA team than a national team.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 10, 2011 9:56 AM CST up reply actions  

You're looking at one play.

To play that card, I would rather see Brad Miller make a nice dish to Martin as he cuts toward the basket as opposed to Thabeet dropping the ball or generally making Chuck Hayes look like an offensive juggernaut.

I’ll admit, I obviously don’t know how NBA practices, but color me more than a bit skeptical on the idea that they don’t work on defense or plays in general, especially since we do know that Battier and Hayes among others had extensive preparations, the team as a whole should have some.

I’ll also pose a question that I’m sure you’ll find ludicrous, but I’ll fire with anyway.

How is Thabeet a better defender than Miller?
He’s not faster. He’s not stronger. He doesn’t know the defensive rotations or plays better. He doesn’t know how to play defense better in general. The only thing he has on Miller defensively is three inches – and if that was an indication of defensive prowess, Hill would be a better defender than Hayes.

I’ve said earlier. As far as I’m concerned, for this year, Thabeet is the new Cook. Next year, with the summer, training camps, etc, there may be something there, though I doubt it. But there’s no value in just dumping him the ball in the game and telling do something. After all, did Hill understand the game mentally after his period of starting any better than before?

Minnesotan Rockets fan

by Barragan on Mar 10, 2011 10:07 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm looking from limited play and dissecting it as best I can, you're correct.

I think Miller clearly should be the more plugged in guy to the offense since his golden years were in that offense. He also has several years of experience on Thabeet. Your speculation on Thabeet is just as thorough as my positive speculation on him, so I guess at this point we’ll have to concede that neither of our premises are more valid than the other.

As for the practices, they execute some basic sets but it’s far more scrimmage and shoot around because the bodies have been taxed pretty hard between training camp and over 60 games already.

I don’t find that question ludicrous but I do disagree with your analysis of the issue in part. While Thabeet doesn’t strike me as faster or stronger, I do think his defensive positioning and awareness is inherently better than Miller’s. You don’t amass the blocks and game he did in UConn without a keen awareness. In his limited time he showed he can get his defensive positioning, which is more than Miller can claim with his “stand still and hope to block it with your face” tactic.

As for the Hill comparison and understanding issue, Dave stated earlier and I agreed with it, that Hill has been yanked around more than Ron Jeremy (my wording) and establishing anything with consistency is going to be difficult. Regular minutes will tend to yield regular results, Hill hasn’t seen those and I truly believe that if this coaching staff and general Rockets staff is half as good as we would like to believe, then they could help guide Thabeet. I feel as though experience sooner rather than later, in a legitimate game situation makes more sense for this team. I think this line of thinking gains some weight when you consider there could be a lockout next year so you lose an entire year of game development for a guy who sorely needs it.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 10, 2011 10:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Believe it or not, I agree with BD34 though

At this point, you know what miller can do, and who he is.

I firmly believe thabeet is worthless, but what the hell do I know

We aren’t going to the playoffs, so he should be playing 15-20 minutes a game from here on. Have to see if he can give you ANYTHING, and if not, we can move on sooner or later.

by AllenOU on Mar 9, 2011 7:11 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

We can do that next year.

Call me foolish, but I’m not finished with this season yet.
Besides, I don’t see what just throwing Thabeet in there accomplishes anyways. Just having five guys run up and down the court isn’t development, it’s tanking. And there’s no point in tanking at this point.

Minnesotan Rockets fan

by Barragan on Mar 9, 2011 7:18 PM CST up reply actions  

And what would the second unit look like w/Thabeet?

If he takes Miller’s minutes our second unit is Thabeet and Patterson up front. 2 Rookies teamed w/a PG who just came over in a trade and has little clue about the offense.(If you rewatch the Phoenix game Lee was acting as the PG in Second Half stint w/Dragic.)
For those who want chaos on the court,2 rookie bigs and a PG who doesn’t know the offense will surely deliver.Sprinkle in some T-Willfullness and hilarity/face-palming will ensue.

by Tisbee on Mar 10, 2011 11:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Thabeet ain't a rookie

Unless you are taking into consideration that he is treated like one.

Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.

by batman713 on Mar 11, 2011 12:23 AM CST up reply actions  

Oops,my mistake

It’s so easy to think of him as one,but you’re right.

But the argument that the Second unit would be full of players still learning the NBA and the Adelman offense and defense remains.(Damn the facts for getting in the way of a good argument!)

by Tisbee on Mar 11, 2011 9:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Most rookies have gotten more burn already than he has though

You are right about the second unit. Nobody gets experience without getting experience.

Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.

by batman713 on Mar 11, 2011 10:26 AM CST up reply actions  

How many is too many

The Rockets are currently developing:
Lowry as a starting PG
Patterson in his first yr
Bud in his second yr
Hill in his second yr
Williams in his second yr,first w/team
Lee in his third yr,first w/team

by Tisbee on Mar 9, 2011 9:48 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

We are

We have 7 players still on their rookie deal and 1 who just got off of his but is still just 24 years old. Add the players we draft this summer and we could potentially have 10 players on rookie contracts barring a trade. We are a very young team and when we put it all together we will be a scary team.

Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.

by batman713 on Mar 9, 2011 10:29 PM CST up reply actions  

In the next couple of years I could see

Lowry Martin bud Patterson as our starting 1-4

Bud and pat will need to keep improving.

That’s PLENTY of offense

We need to find that impact 5. Anywhere from a dream scenario of getting Dwight howard to finding a euro or young talent in the draft. Realistically somewhere between that.

That could get you possibly to the second round of the playoffs IMO

by AllenOU on Mar 9, 2011 11:48 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I really want to see

Williams, Lee, and Dragic on the floor together at some point

Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.

by batman713 on Mar 10, 2011 1:20 AM CST up reply actions  

Or just develop Thabeet into a defensive machine

sure he cant catch the ball on the block nor have any post moves…. but can he be 7’3" in the lane? yes. Can he match up with other bigs to keep Chuck/PPat lockin down the PF? sure can. I dont see how we cant think we can get enough of WHAT WE NEED out of Thabeet to immediately make our team better.

by theSpaceCityKid on Mar 10, 2011 9:06 AM CST up reply actions  

I wouldn't say we're developing Lowry

he has improved his game but his minutes aren’t development minutes, they’re legit starter minutes.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 10, 2011 7:11 AM CST up reply actions  

Lowry Just needs

to continue to be polished and tweek minor things

by fanoflosingteams on Mar 10, 2011 8:45 AM CST up reply actions  

Boy did he bring that 3 game around

and it really rounded him off as a starting PG

by theSpaceCityKid on Mar 10, 2011 9:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Which is the point

Lowry went from being pretty much a career back-up to a starter.
Different mentality,more responsibility. That does take some work.

One of the more revealing comments from Ish was when he mentioned what Adelman was teaching him in their private sessions in Rick’s office. Adelman spends a lot of time w/his points and apparently relishes working w/young ones.(Note the distinct lack of vet PGs brought in over past few yrs.)

by Tisbee on Mar 10, 2011 9:57 AM CST up reply actions  

I wouldn't be so bold as to say Lowry went from being a career back up to a starter based on development minutes.

Lowry’s major weakness in his career has been his shooting and he clearly has been working on it. Being a career back-up, to me, just means you’re not that good or you’re one dimensional, Lowry defends, dishes, and drives, and now, after work, shoots. You don’t learn shooting in game time but in your practice time.

I do think it’s kind of cool that Rick spends time with young points in his office though, that was an interesting tidbit I didn’t know before.

TDS's resident dickhead.

by BD34 on Mar 10, 2011 10:17 AM CST up reply actions  

Which might explain Brooks' long leash when he was struggling

When Brooks walked out on the team,I thought Rick’s tone was odd,until I recognized it as a disappointed father after his son had done something really stupid.
I wonder if Adelman’s time w/PGs leads him to look on them as maybe not exactly sons,but favorite nephews.It could partly explain why Rick kept trying to get Brooks going,when his struggles were hurting the team.

by Tisbee on Mar 10, 2011 11:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Lowry's minutes need to be scaled down...he can work on his jumper during the summer..

He is already proven, thus we need to see more of the other guys….especially Thabeet!

by inquisitiveman on Mar 11, 2011 6:18 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm also going to look at my argument against playing Thabeet

By looking at two scenarios for Adelman.

1. If Adelman leaves. If Adelman is planning to head out at the end of last year, why should he be more interested in developing players as opposed to attempting to make the playoffs one final time. He wants to win, and I don’t think he would want to end his career just tanking and throwing out Thabeet in the name of development.
2. If Adelman stays. The Adelman offense, more than basically any other, requires a center who knows what the heck is going on in the offense, where the cuts are, what the plays are, etc. etc. Hayes can do this. Miller can do this. Hill demonstrated when he was starting that he has no concept of this whatsoever, which was one reason why we were so goddamn awful when he was starting. Thabeet’s basketball IQ, from virtually every single report we’ve seen out there, is even worse than Hill’s.
The greatest development that would be possible for Hasheem Thabeet is knowledge. Knowledge of plays, knowledge of what players like to do, etc. etc. This is not knowledge that can be easily picked up in the chaos of a game, if at all. This is something which you need practices for, scrimmages, training camps and such. If your response is “well, what about defense?”, Thabeet needs a lot of work on defense that has nothing to do with playing the game. He has to get stronger, he has to actually know how to play defense, which is more than just waving your arms as Chuck Hayes proves.

Bottom line is I sincerely believe that throwing Thabeet out there, when he has no knowledge of Rockets basketball, will accomplish jack. We’ll be worse out there as the offense will stagnate, he won’t develop much if at all, and we’ll just piss off players like Scola and Hayes whom would actually want to win. If you’re planning to tank for a high pick and completely dump the vets, great strategy. We’re not.

Minnesotan Rockets fan

by Barragan on Mar 10, 2011 9:25 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

Yoa starts running in 2 months

Why cant he play in a chair? He shoots high %.

The content of the text above is provided for information purposes only. No claim is made as to the accuracy or authenticity of the content. The troll does not accept any liability to any person for the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) which is provided in the text above.

by craigj007 on Mar 11, 2011 12:31 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Dream Shake: Dedicated to all things Houston Rockets. Past, present and future. Expect criticism, commentary and shameless promotions to get Robert Horry into the Hall of Fame.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
Trading for an All-Star
Images_small
No Sympathy For Teams With Injuries
Small
European NBA Scout Compares Vassilis Spanoulis To Jeremy Lin - Says Jeff Van Gundy Did Not Give Him A Chance
417645_122115147913687_122115027913699_63363_1431084468_n_small
Houston Rockets Re-Brand
Small
Free Agency and Draft Hopes
Images_small
Best Wishes For Jordan Hill
Images_small
With the 14th and 16th pick, who would you take?
Small
My dream offseason (quasi realistic at least)
Tricampions_small
GET UP ROCKETS
Sonic_brian_small
Chin up Rockets fans, all hope isn't lost

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBN Hoops Twitter


Editor

Twitter_small Tom Martin

Daryl Morey Wannabes

Kurt-avatar_small grungedave

Img_4429_small UofTOrange

Cat_small Only_A_Lad

Guide04_small Xiane

Screenhunter_01_dec Mike Kerns

Crabtree_small ak2themax

Awesome_small BD34

Tds_small Patrick Harrel