Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Player Report Cards: Kyle Lowry

Alright, so since the Lockout is going to cause us to grind to nearly a halt I figured I’d take up one of the suggestions in the mailbag. A great deal of thanks to the submissions received there by the way. My Evidence final is over, my time has opened up, and you’ll get some time for me to actually contribute these articles and spark some discussion. So I hope you enjoy this series in player evaluations. 

The criteria used for handing out grades are weighted as such: Offensive Production (25%), Defensive Production (25%), Development (20%), Impact (15%), and Potential (15%). I’m using percentages but really I’m just firing from the hip when I hand out a final grade. People love percentages though. Grades are based partially on player comparisons and partially on the player as it pertains to only Houston.

Special thanks to NBA.com for preventing any official statistics being used and causing me to use various secondary sites. Fortunately there are stat nerds all over the internets. 

Star-divide

Kyle Lowry was the big success story from last season. Report cards will be going from the 1 position down to the 5 with an emphasis on starters then back ups at each position. So, let’s see what I saw/felt of Kyle Lowry from this season.

Offensive Production:

Kyle put up averages of 13.5PPG, 6.7 APG, and 4.1 RPG. Offensively he gave us the ball handler and distributor you like to see out of the point guard. For comparison’s sake let’s look at the production of the NBA’s favorite point guard, Chris Paul. 15.9PPG, 9.8 APG, 4.0 RPG. What we see in comparison to Lowry is a not so drastic bump in assists (if we round, only 3 per game, not as tough to achieve as it sounds) and about 2 more points per game. Kyle’s stats are not that far off from one of the best in the game, and that’s not considering solely second half play. The comparison is mostly to give fans some perspective on what Kyle actually offers and where he’s at in only his 5th year.

For me, Kyle has shown that he’s your prototypical point guard when you factor in the year. If you factor in the second half he was charging towards elite status. Given this ability to elevate his game I am going to offer him a grade that allows room for improvement but won’t punish him for not being Deron Williams or Chris Paul. Kyle can solidify a higher grade next season by proving to me that post All-Star break performance wasn’t an aberration.

Grade: B+

Defensive Production:

Defensive production is one of those wonderful metrics where you wind up having to overstate or understate a player’s performance. When it comes to defense we can look at steals, blocks, and boards but is that really a fair metric? When a player disrupts a play, gets a hand on a ball, manages to knock the ball out and force the offense to break rhythm, or otherwise impacts a play on defense they don’t tend to keep that stat easily available (Read: I don’t want to be bothered to check). So for Kyle, I will parrot out some basic stats and then some rhetoric. Kyle averaged 1.4 steals per game and .3 blocks per game. I think his .3 blocks per game puts him near the top of our blocked shots leader for this last season. Try reading that last line without dying a little on the inside.

OK, so Kyle was able to pick up 1.4 steals per game, for a point guard that’s none too shabby. We like to applaud players in the NBA as elite ball hawks when we see something like 2.4 or so (I’m looking at you Chris Paul). So what I’m seeing in that is that Kyle’s raw defensive prowess in steals is pretty sexy. It’s also appropriate to mention here that Kyle is built like a house. Strength is a factor on defense if you’re not going to be the quickest. Kyle combines them both with a big frame that can be a pain to handle and navigate. I know as a guy built like a linebacker that you can have a grace about you but no one is going to notice it when you’re up to speed. We call him a bulldog for a reason and after this season when he didn’t drive to the hoop as often it was more for his defensive tenacity and large jowls.

Grade: A

Development:

This is where it gets tricky to separate from impact but for Kyle it’s not so bad. Kyle’s production last year was quality back up production. His development this season is going to be drastic. 9.1 PPG, 4.5 APG, and 3.6 RPG in 24 minutes a night as a back up was pretty nice. He tacked on ten minutes per game as a starter for 71 games and wound up adding 4 points, 2 assists, and half a rebound per game to his total. So for ten minutes, I wouldn’t mind seeing a bit more by way of assists but ya know what? It’s pretty damn good as it is. I’m hoping Kyle’s ferocious second half play will maintain but his responsibilities, expectations, and role increased in a huge way and to handle it as well as he did off the heel of an injury, I like it. He started off the season tentative due to the injury and we saw the impact, a bad jumper he relied on too much. As he came around he pushed through it and showed us why he wanted to be a starter in this league. Perhaps the greatest indicator of this was the development of his three point shot. Early in the season teams could cheat in on Scola and try to key in on Martin. Thankfully Lowry elevated his three point percentage to 37% on the season, higher in the second half, as most of his stats were. But what this gave us was a guard who could keep defenses honest. The loss of Aaron Brooks was particularly critical for Lowry to develop a three point shot.

This grade will again allow room for improvement heading into next season because I don’t want to declare him fully developed just yet.

Grade: B+

Impact:

Here lies Kyle’s best grade in my eyes. Much like my feelings in school that when I hit up mock trial or trial advocacy that there will be an A, you had to assume when you read Kyle Lowry and Impact an A would be sitting there waiting for him. Why the confidence? If all your strengths or capabilities and results lend themselves well to success in one particular area, you’re sitting pretty. Kyle entered the year as the presumed backup and then sprained ankles spread throughout the team likes venereal diseases in a brothel. Kyle suffered but fortunately he got his shot of penicillin and returned to action (Let me know when this comparison wears thin). He hit the floor and was a bit slow to work the rust off but once you get positions down they’re hard to forget. He came back with a vengeance when he was healthy and unseated incumbent starter Aaron Brooks and his ankle, which I assumed exploded given how he never really recovered.

Kyle’s emergence allowed the team to focus on flow of offense, removed primary scoring from the point guard and placed the emphasis on the shooting guard and power forward position, allowed some more flexibility in the half court sets due to defensive prowess, and really changed the prospects of this team going forward. What we now have in our hands for a young rebuilding team is a point guard who showed in the second half he could hang with elite guards and provide a reliable shooting touch. This further emphasizes Kyle’s impact in that he supplanted Brooks (With better distribution and eventually a reliable three pointer), changed the offense away from run and gun (as the only option), and gave us flexibility for rebuilding. Kyle enabled the acquisition of Goran Dragic, which had a huge impact for this squad.

Only a douchebag could give Kyle anything less than an A + here.

Grade: A

Potential:

This section will be like a midget rolling in sugar, short and sweet. Kyle has shown a huge burst in development and that’s to be expected changing roles like he did. Your minutes and importance shoot up. What made it more interesting was the tentative growth process within the season. We saw a stumble at the beginning, some mediocrity in the middle, and then a hellish flurry at the end. Teams weren’t mailing it in when Kyle turned it on and further, Kyle was aggressively pursuing his improvement and that increase in quality. So when I look at it, the second half of the season provides the most promise but it’s guarded optimism. I think of rookie flashes of brilliance in their first season being mostly contingent on lack of scouting. It’s why Chase did so well last season, increased roles with no frame of reference. I can’t in good conscience give him anything less than a B and I’ve got some guarded optimism.

Grade: A-

Overall Grade: B+/A-

Kyle’s in that range where we have a very strong player and if he cashes in on his potential to develop and shows me consistent play closer to what he gave us in the second half of the season I'm willing to call him an A or A+ elite point guard.

Comment 41 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from The Dream Shake

TDS Writer Roundtable 3-On-5

May 2012 by BD34 - 9 comments

TDS Writer Roundtable 3 on 5

May 2012 by BD34 - 126 comments

The TDS 2012 NBA Mock Draft, 1.0

May 2012 by Tom Martin - 46 comments

Comments

Display:

Nice post BD!

I like Kyle, he just needs to work on his shooting and confidence. When Aaron Brooks was injured, he stepped up because he was the number one point guard on the Rockets at the time. When he’s starting, hes a monster. When someone is starting over him, you can just tell he grows jealous and has no confidence.

-Armin's lil bro

by rk2themax on Jul 30, 2011 11:21 AM CDT reply actions  

Thank God

Hopefully this means we actually can have regular posts for a while

Check out nickandroll.blogspot.com

by n1ck34 on Jul 30, 2011 12:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Well

It’s hard during a lockout. We’ve already covered said lockout and the Yao Ming retirement (ad nauseum I think). Notice there haven’t been too many fanposts either. When there’s something to talk about, it will be discussed.

How many Biletnikoffs does he have? NOT TWO!

by ak2themax on Aug 1, 2011 12:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

I understand it's tough

not trying to sound critical

Check out nickandroll.blogspot.com

by n1ck34 on Aug 4, 2011 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gotcha

We’re cool. I wish we had regular posts too. But life happens. Or in this case, a lockout.

How many Biletnikoffs does he have? NOT TWO!

by ak2themax on Aug 4, 2011 8:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gotta agree with all of the analysis.

One thing that I may have read wrong, regardless of if I did, made me laugh. You say “Only a douchebag could give Kyle less than an A+ here”. You gave him an A. Hmm…….

Good post, I look forward to all of them. Just remember that I can and will find where you live if Chuck Hayes gets less that an A+. You have been warned.

"You know how Einstein got bad grades as a kid? Well, mine are
even worse! " ~Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes

by TheChuckwagonisrolling on Jul 30, 2011 1:29 PM CDT reply actions  

You read it correctly, I tried to pepper in some humor since you fine folk have waited patiently for new content.

Also, I would welcome you to DC, it would be extremely manly and there would be drinks at the Iron Horse (Motorcycles all over the place, chill bar, fun place).

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Jul 30, 2011 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would if I could, but sadly, being a poor starving college student does not allow for trips beyond the local McDonalds on special occasions.

However, should work lead me there, I shall certainty hit you up and we shall show DC what being manly actually looks like.

"You know how Einstein got bad grades as a kid? Well, mine are
even worse! " ~Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes

by TheChuckwagonisrolling on Jul 30, 2011 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

KLOW Vs CP3 gives something else

Games = 14
Wins +6 CP3
MPG +9 CP3
FG% 46 vs 44 CP3
3P% 42 vs 30 CP3
FT% 89 vs 77 CP3
ORD + 0.7 KLow
DRB + 1.3 CP3
AST + 5.1 CP3
STL + 2.5 CP3
BLK + 0.2 CP3
TOV + 0.6 CP3 (advantage KLow)
PF + 0.8 KLow (advantage CP3)
PTS + 11.0 CP3

The content of the text above is provided for information purposes only. No claim is made as to the accuracy or authenticity of the content. The troll does not accept any liability to any person for the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) which is provided in the text above.

by craigj007 on Jul 31, 2011 4:56 AM CDT reply actions  

But

Most of those 14 games happened when Kyle wasn’t a starter, correct?

How many Biletnikoffs does he have? NOT TWO!

by ak2themax on Aug 1, 2011 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Lowry started 6

The content of the text above is provided for information purposes only. No claim is made as to the accuracy or authenticity of the content. The troll does not accept any liability to any person for the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) which is provided in the text above.

by craigj007 on Aug 1, 2011 3:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure what your original post above is meant to prove.

The real question for Lowry is whether his leap in the 2nd half is real. If it is, he’s an elite PG.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Aug 2, 2011 2:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just stats of Lowry VS Paul

I don’t share your belief that Lowry is elite. A tough all round ball player – yes, but elite would be a CP3 or Nash a couple of years back.

The content of the text above is provided for information purposes only. No claim is made as to the accuracy or authenticity of the content. The troll does not accept any liability to any person for the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) which is provided in the text above.

by craigj007 on Aug 2, 2011 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a skewed sample size to prove a point.

You used 14 games, 8 of which Lowry was off the bench for head to head comparisons. This skews contributions, win share, and actual competitive balance analysis.

It’s like people who point to the last 7 years of championships to suggest parity but ignore the fact that if you go back 10 or 25 or even 30 years you widen that field by roughly 3 teams or so and prove that parity is a joke.

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Aug 2, 2011 7:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

nothing is skewed that is the sample size

The content of the text above is provided for information purposes only. No claim is made as to the accuracy or authenticity of the content. The troll does not accept any liability to any person for the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) which is provided in the text above.

by craigj007 on Aug 3, 2011 2:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

You clearly don't understand how skewing works then.

Because you didn’t justify how it’s not skewed.

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Aug 3, 2011 8:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pearson’s coefficient of skewness = < 0.5

therefore;
H0 Null hypothesis is accepted and I reject the H1 Alternative hypothesis.

The content of the text above is provided for information purposes only. No claim is made as to the accuracy or authenticity of the content. The troll does not accept any liability to any person for the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) which is provided in the text above.

by craigj007 on Aug 3, 2011 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

English please.

I’m saying what AK said below. You’re taking a sample where more than half the games played by one guy were off the bench, the other 6 were H2H at best.

It’s the functional equivalent of me using the amount of reps you could do with a 150 pound lift at the age of 5 and now and compared them to a bodybuilder’s reps in his prime. Incongruous comparisons won’t do much but field you a skewed perception.

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Aug 3, 2011 6:10 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

The sample itself is skewed

Not so much the size. We’re never going to have 1000 head-to-head matchups between Lowry and CP3. But, it’s unfair to count Lowry’s games off the bench towards these totals. Not only was he getting fewer minutes (thus discarding all cumulative totals), he probably wasn’t playing much against CP3, but rather his backup.

I understand the point you’re trying to make, but we’ll get a better feel for CP3 vs. Lowry this year.

How many Biletnikoffs does he have? NOT TWO!

by ak2themax on Aug 3, 2011 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey BD

I think you’re the one who watches a lot of Buffalo Bills games…what’s your scouting report on Whitner?

by danielcp0303 on Jul 31, 2011 9:14 AM CDT reply actions  

Whitner is an overrated safety in the NFL.

The switch to the 3-4 and the weak run defense of the Bills didn’t help his image. If anything he’s an average safety drafted too highly. He was seeking 6 mil a year but no interest is in the league concerning signing him. Buffalo hasn’t changed their offer to him, it’s there if he wants it, and he most likely will wind up back in Buffalo for lack of a better offer. He can lay a nice hard hit but he’s not really all that worth having. The thinking in Buffalo is that if he wants 6 million you can go out and sign a mediocre safety for half that and get Whitner’s production.

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Jul 31, 2011 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks man

I don’t see the Bills much…seemed like he was good in the box, but I don’t know about coverage.

by danielcp0303 on Jul 31, 2011 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm a lifelong Bills fan.

When it comes to that secondary the best cornerback we had was Drayton Florence and the best safety on the roster is Jairus Byrd. Byrd is improving, Whitner is convinced he’s better than he is.

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Jul 31, 2011 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

really good post thanks

i was lookin at doin abit of a stistical analysis of Pattersons numbers but ill assume ul get it done better.

and Defence Production:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBakZRXpvwY

by IrishThrasher on Jul 31, 2011 10:36 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm not a huge stat guy, so if you wanna do it, I say go ahead in a fanpost.

I’m mostly looking at averages and what I recall from games about impact for players. It’ll be a bit til I get to Patty. I leave for LA in 5 days, when my girlfriend is at work I’ll be typing and saving the articles to release them on an every 3 day basis or so.

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Jul 31, 2011 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

hahaha

‘like a midget rolling in sugar, short and sweet.’

I love it :)

by zwilko360 on Aug 1, 2011 6:21 AM CDT reply actions  

Good post on Lowry.

I’d give him the A- because of his second half.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Aug 2, 2011 2:25 AM CDT reply actions  

Remember at the beginning of the year with Lowry?

This piece from Mike summed it up perfectly.

And that’s not to jump on Mike. Xiane and I had had made similar statements, and the belief was prevalent around TDS. Lowry wasn’t just bad. He was losing games by himself. What’s incredible to me is that he turned it around. He’s clearly in the second tier of point guards now. And he’s banging on the door. That’s not something we thought could happen at the beginning of the year, or even a couple of months into the season.

How many Biletnikoffs does he have? NOT TWO!

by ak2themax on Aug 2, 2011 9:10 PM CDT reply actions  

It's really the putrid start of the season that keeps me from saying A.

A few people have voiced thinking he’s in that A- range but that’s primarily based on the second half of the season and I can’t reward 41 games of an 82 game season. I want to see continued work next season.

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Aug 2, 2011 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Too bad it just takes

you so much longer to see the whole picture. Since AB started and Kyle backed him up i always said that Kyle was better and the most complete out of the two. I did not know he was going to have that kind of year last year after his injury, but i knew he had the potential too. Even after Kyle was playing at a high level you insisted that AB should start because he can only play good as a starter which i still cant understand that reasoning, but it is not the first time and know it wont be the last. When Kyle got his new deal I knew AB would not like it and that one would be moved, but you said AB would not be a problem, you were wrong again. You also thought that Ariza was a better fit then Lee, but i will just stick to Lowry and AB.You were so caught up in AB’s quickness and ability to score that you overlooked his mediocore defense,how he turned the ball over too much, and how one game he is hot and the next game he can’t hit anything.

by since86rocketsfan on Aug 3, 2011 10:15 AM CDT reply actions  

Most of us knew AB wouldn't be a fan of Lowry's contract

among other things you’ve mentioned. No one likes it when their backup makes more than them. And Lowry got the salary indicative of Morey’s approval of him. Add in the fact that AB pouted about not receiving an extension last offseason, and we all had that feeling of trepidation.

And AB’s ability to score was what the Rockets used in crunch time. Remember all year when everyone was saying, “We don’t have a closer” or “We don’t have someone that can create their own shot.”? That’s still true, but lots of people were worried when AB went down and then came back as a bench player. And to be fair to AB, he was trying to do so much in such a little time. It was a contract year and he was desperate to earn some money. Can you blame him? I would have been frustrated, too.

How many Biletnikoffs does he have? NOT TWO!

by ak2themax on Aug 3, 2011 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why can't people blame Brooks when he seeks special treatment?

You can agree or disagree with Morey’s policy of not extending our young players during his tenure. But Morey was never unfair. Landry became a FA and had to seek an offer before the Rockets matched. Lowry became a FA and had to seek an offer before the Rockets matched. Heck, even Scola had to ask around first before Morey gave him a deal.

Why should Brooks be the only one who get locked up beforehand? If Brooks think he’s worthy of the Rockets begging him for an extension like the way OKC was to Kevin Durant, then Brooks has way too high an opinion of himself.

by baubo on Aug 4, 2011 10:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree completely

I’m fine with the not extending, and the Rockets have set the precedent that they won’t extend. Fine. That’s their policy.

But at the same time I do feel for AB. Doesn’t mean I’m on his side. I was a fan of the trade.

How many Biletnikoffs does he have? NOT TWO!

by ak2themax on Aug 5, 2011 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Gonna be nice and give you a couple of options here.

Either one, you start framing your comments constructively and conduct conversation like and adult or two, your content gets deleted when you pull that shit.

Simply put, I’m tired of you being an asshat.

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Aug 3, 2011 12:27 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Morey gave Lowry a fair deal

mainly in how other teams wanted him. He played last year before his deal and did not force Morey too choose one and was rewarded.Even after he gave Lowry his deal he also told him Brooks still starts, but that wasn’t enough for Brooks. Our last coach wanted us to draft AB, and Morey liked Lowry so when Alston was traded we aquired Lowry soon after. If Lowry plays this year like he did after his injury he will be actually worth more then 5 mill a year. Please brooks did not win that many games at the end, and Landry had emerged as our go to guy, which led to him being doubled alot, and we did not even make the playoffs. If Lowry had came in and play bad then maybe worry about AB, but the pg play was not our problem.

by since86rocketsfan on Aug 3, 2011 12:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Health concerns aside, no PG in today's NBA belongs in the same breath as CP3

I’m cautiously optimistic about Lowry. I think if he develops, his peak can reach along the lines of a Derek Harper or Mark Jackson. Really good, but not quite elite.

If CP3 actually wants our money next year, I’d trade Lowry away in a second. CP3 is basically the dream point guard who does everything right and put his teammates in the best position to succeed. It’s no coincidence that every year he’s in the league, he and the Hornets are always among the best in clutch time. Lowry’s great and all, but I just don’t see that surgical precision in him running the team the way I see Chris Paul do.

by baubo on Aug 4, 2011 10:10 PM CDT reply actions  

100% correct on CP3 but peak on Lowry stat wise would be around Isiah Thomas with bit more rebounds.

also;
David West shits on most (especially our Scola head to head) and they have a Center.

The content of the text above is provided for information purposes only. No claim is made as to the accuracy or authenticity of the content. The troll does not accept any liability to any person for the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) which is provided in the text above.

by craigj007 on Aug 5, 2011 5:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is not a comparison

between the Lowry and Paul. Lowry’s game is just evolving into more of an offensive player, after finally getting solid minutes which leads to more shot attempts and more confidence. Paul has to score more for his team to win, and saying that he still has not lead them to the western conference finals. We have no superstars so i can’t see Paul even wanting to play for us, and with him minus Lowry and others will we improve that much, i say no. If you think he will just sign with us, then you are offbase, our only way to get those type of players has been through trades. And with Morey trying over and over with trade exceptions,draft picks, players with expiring contracts, and trying to move up in the draft, and being unsuccesful that leads us one option, to try and be a rebuilding team to finally land us a top five pick. The only thing wrong with that theory is our team now is not bad enough to get us a top five pick unless of many injuries or just giving players away.

by since86rocketsfan on Aug 5, 2011 2:20 PM CDT reply actions  

Lowry's competitiveness AAA+

He’s the last person out there to give up. Just luv him to death for that.

There have been games where he has infuriated me for taking too many 3s, esp. when he’s not shooting a good percentage, but I’ll take the good with the bad, because he is our leader.

by RoxBeliever on Aug 10, 2011 8:30 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Dream Shake: Dedicated to all things Houston Rockets. Past, present and future. Expect criticism, commentary and shameless promotions to get Robert Horry into the Hall of Fame.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
Trading for an All-Star
Images_small
No Sympathy For Teams With Injuries
Small
European NBA Scout Compares Vassilis Spanoulis To Jeremy Lin - Says Jeff Van Gundy Did Not Give Him A Chance
417645_122115147913687_122115027913699_63363_1431084468_n_small
Houston Rockets Re-Brand
Small
Free Agency and Draft Hopes
Images_small
Best Wishes For Jordan Hill
Images_small
With the 14th and 16th pick, who would you take?
Small
My dream offseason (quasi realistic at least)
Tricampions_small
GET UP ROCKETS
Sonic_brian_small
Chin up Rockets fans, all hope isn't lost

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBN Hoops Twitter


Editor

Twitter_small Tom Martin

Daryl Morey Wannabes

Kurt-avatar_small grungedave

Img_4429_small UofTOrange

Cat_small Only_A_Lad

Guide04_small Xiane

Screenhunter_01_dec Mike Kerns

Crabtree_small ak2themax

Awesome_small BD34

Tds_small Patrick Harrel