The Dream Shake's 2011-2012 Houston Rockets Preview
We may not have a season, but gosh durnit, we're still rolling out season previews! Hope you enjoy my contribution to Jeff Clark's annual basketball preview jamboree.
Team Name: Houston Rockets
Last Year's Record: 43-39
Key Free Agents: Yao Ming, Chuck Hayes
Team Needs: A center, a firm plan for the future and better attendance in the lower bowl, you lazy, rich season-ticket holders.
1. What are Houston's biggest needs this offseason?
Little Mindy ran home from Sunday school and posed this exact question to her Grandma Sue before they both broke down laughing and simultaneously exclaimed: "Gah! The Rockets STILL don't have a center!"
True story. The Rockets remain center-less. In two years, the most Daryl Morey has come up with is Hasheem Thabeet, a lottery bust whose time could be better spent constructing tree houses.
I'm picturing Richard Karn on Family Feud, saying the following to the studio audience:
"All together now, folks: name the missing piece for Houston in the past three years!"
"ANY RECOGNIZABLE FORM OF RIM PROTECTION!"
The front office has spent countless nights on the patio star-gazing like a bunch of Newtons and it hasn't gotten them anywhere. Stars aren't coming to Houston. They had their chance. It was the free agent equivalent of Orion's Belt in 2010, and the Rockets came away with casual hunter Brad Miller.
It's not as if Morey hasn't tried to bring in a skyscraper. Remember, Dallas basketball's Lord and Savior, Tyson Chandler, was on his way to Houston before a physical drove a proposed trade into the ground. Once Chandler left the market for the Mavericks, the options dried up. Legitimate centers are as difficult to find as ever. It is the reason Kevin Martin-for-Marcin Gortat offers exist in the realm of sanity, at least to one South Floridian team.
On the micro-scale, the Rockets need help in the middle. On the macro-scale, the team needs a new young star, and of course, it would be just fantastic if the Rockets could kill two birds with one stone. Unfortunately, Morey hasn't solved even the micro-level problem since Yao Ming took his tumble against the Lakers in 2009, so it's time he makes it his priority. If the Rockets want to win, they must shore up the paint.
Now, does that mean the Rockets should go spend a bunch of money to lure Chandler, a free agent, away from Dallas? No, probably not. There is a middle ground to be found in this process, and it lies somewhere between Chandler and Thabeet.
2. What are the Rockets' biggest strengths & weaknesses?
Strengths -- Houston's backcourt is its engine and its driving force. Point guard Kyle Lowry will be on a quest to prove his breakout season wasn't a fluke. Goran Dragic is the backup, a sharpshooter with a knack for being a really good bench player without possessing the true credentials to keep Lowry on any form of a hot seat. Third stringer Jonny Flynn will get his chance to play outside of the triangle offense for the first time in his young career, a move many think will help place him on the right track.
Shooting guard Kevin Martin gets his first mention nearly ten paragraphs down -- a fitting designation for a player often overlooked. Martin stepped his game up in 2010, playing in 80 games while showering opponents with flowers of efficiency. He averaged 23.5 points on only 15.8 shots per game, but at the same time, he only played 32 minutes per game. I like backup Courtney Lee as much as anyone, but Martin will need another five minutes on the floor each night for the Rockets to have more success.
The Rockets are loaded at forward, more so with bodies than with actual talent. But the talent remains a strength, led by power forward Luis Scola. All Houston eyes will be on 2011 lottery pick Marcus Morris as soon as a season appears. Morris was a productive college player who will be making the switch to small forward in all likelihood, especially given Houston's depth at the four. Fellow rookie Donatas Motiejunas figures to garner intrigue at the PF position; he will play behind standout rookie Patrick Patterson, who will be looking to improve on a solid first season.
In all, Houston can shoot and score and they can do it fast, ranking among the league's best in first-quarter scoring. But there's a catch.
Weaknesses -- Houston ranked dead last in fourth-quarter points allowed last year. Many confused Houston's fourth-quarter deficiencies for a lack of shot creating ability on the other end, but it was the defensive side of the ball that yielded to the late-game collapses.
So, about that center problem. We've been over that. It exists.
The Rockets' biggest weakness may not be known at this point. Whatever it is, it could surface once the season begins under new head coach Kevin McHale. It's no knock on the former Boston Celtics great -- I'm in the crop who thinks McHale was a strong hire and fits the current Rockets mindset.
The aforementioned catch: We're about to find out how great an effect former coach Rick Adelman had on the team. Did his famed genius offense turn Houston's big scorers into overachievers, or did it simply tamper the defense?
We don't know yet, but odds are, there will be a significant drop off, at least to start. A changing of the guard will provide fresh look at the roster and at the true talent the Rockets possess.
A final issue is a possible lack of continuity, which is always difficult to measure from the outside. Morey's trigger-happy nature and penchant for labeling his players as "assets" must leave players feeling in limbo whenever they have a bad game. Kevin Martin even mentioned as much to the press. The roster is in its makeshift stages, meaning that more changes are on the horizon. The players know this, and it should only make it harder for them to band together comfortably.
However, at the end of the day, as fans, we can only guess the real impact this has on professional athletes, especially those who are currently in a battle not about basketball, but about business.
3. If there is no season in 2011-12, how is Houston set up for 2012?
Oddly enough, the Rockets could actually benefit from a missed season. Nobody is going to retire from this squad any time soon. It's not even a finished roster. Unlike with Dallas or San Antonio or other veteran teams, Houston is in no rush to win championships. Extended time off and another shot at landing a dynamite draft pick only help the Rockets.
Houston's "veterans" are still in their primes and are signed on through the 2012 season. Only Courtney Lee and Dragic will be free agents. Morey's power-forward-ridden roster could is nowhere near its completed stages, so if basketball isn't in session, Morey can look to shift parts without possibly ruining team chemistry during the season.
The Rockets are in good shape financially. Aside from maybe Luis Scola, they aren't scared of aging. A lost season wouldn't be much fun, but then again, for a team whose attendance constantly underwhelms, perhaps Houstonians could use a wake-up call to see what they'd really be missing.
4. If you could make one change the NBA's new CBA, what would it be?
I won't shame myself by trying to answer this blindly, so I'll keep it simple: small market teams need help. If that means revenue sharing, so be it. If that means a hard cap, so be it. (Though as SB Nation's Tom Ziller writes, a hard cap may do more harm for small market teams than good). I've always stuck to the idea that the NBA thrives on its big cities and on its star players, and to a large degree, it does. But where has it gotten them? Hasn't business tanked? There is a need for parity in basketball, and while I'm not sure it will solve the league's problems, given the sad state of its business side, there has got to be a leveling of some sort.
5. How do the Rockets escape The Middle?
For the past two years, Houston has been just good enough to make a playoff run, but just bad enough to ultimately miss the postseason. How do the Rockets get out of this predicament?
The simple answer: lose. This team isn't good enough to win deep into the playoffs, so why not tank and hope for a Tim Duncan scenario? Doesn't that sound just peachy?
For those who missed it, I elaborated on the subject in my recent email exchange with Red 94's Rahat Huq:
Trading Scola and Martin makes sense on the surface, but the return package is the key. Martin could probably score Houston a lottery pick, but it's risky: for every Yao Ming lingers a Kwame Brown or even a Jay Williams. And what would Scola bring to Houston? Another batch of mediocre semi-veterans or a few early burnouts like Jonny Flynn? Been there, done that. Would he procure a lottery pick? Certainly not. So then, I wonder: what's the point?
The point. Hmm. The point, sadly, is to lose. The point is to get rid of winners and those who best contribute to winning - i.e. Scola and Martin. The point is to do that and then to run the young, crazy, off-the-wall talent onto the court with the hope that they'll turn into studs, but secretly, we kind of hope they'll stink so we can move on and select Andre Drummond or some other incoming draft dynamo with our first overall pick. We did it with Yao Ming. We also basically did it with Steve Francis. That's the flawed, stupendous point.
So again, is it that easy? Tank, lose, win? No, not really.
I wish returning to prominence were a quick and simple process, but it's not. This isn't a video game: this is a business. If Houston were to take such a risk as to trade away its fan-favorites and best players with the hope that they could score a franchise player in the draft... it could lose them their precious attendance numbers and ultimately could cost front office folks their jobs. But alas, what alternative is there?
The roster complicates the problem. It presents little to no ideas for a direction. It's a giant contradiction. In its most basic sense, the problem is that the roster is:
A) Young... but not elite in potential.
B) Experienced... but not in playoff games.
C) Filled with players who need more minutes than their roles might suggest.
D) Dependent on Terrence Williams... but not dependent on Terrence Williams.
E) Perhaps one star player away from serious contention. Just one.
Does Morey risk his job to fully rebuild -- not reload, but rebuild -- when he could fix everything with one single trade? That's the million dollar question. We'll likely find out by the end of next season after a year under McHale. Make no mistake: the Rockets will try to win games. No question about it. It is each player's and coach's job to win games. No matter the situation, everyone will try for victories.
Yet, if the season proves unsuccessful, perhaps that will green light Morey and Alexander to rebuild. On the flip side, an overachieving year and another mid-conference finish could make matters worse for a team looking for a direction and a sign.
As fans, we face a challenge: we want to root for a team who could possibly benefit from losing. But that doesn't mean we should encourage losing. There is a way to go about rebuilding: it lies in development and in progress. If Houston wins a lot of games and if its young players contribute to that success, that's fantastic. If the young players sit while the veterans lead the Rockets to 45 victories, I might have a problem with that.
If you couldn't tell, this is the season of questions marks for Houston, ironically in the midst of the question-markiest year the NBA has seen for some time. If a season is indeed played, expect the unexpected, but don't think Adelman's exit won't hurt the win total.
Predicted Record: 36 -- 46
26 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm against tanking
I believed in last season’s Rockets, and I’d like to believe in this season’s as well. As far as the glaring hole in the middle (we’re talking 7’6’’ size hole) is concerned, just use your peril-sensitive-sunglasses.
Houston needs to get lucky in the next draft…
.
I had to stop arguing with drunks, Steeler fans, and all other fools.
It was making my brick wall jealous...
.
Dedicated to the "Pride of the Steelers"
.
Quibbling here
Play Kevin Martin 36+ minutes a game and he ends up getting injured.
During the last minute Playoff push Martin was played extensively and his numbers,esp shooting % and FT attempts dropped noticeably.
Gortat,a First and Vince’s decomposing,$4mil buyout this yr,body for Martin and Jefferson? A starting C,a First and cap relief for a starting SG…I’d have done it.(For all Martin’s scoring ability,the Rockets have not exactly been Play-Off participants while he’s been here.) But that’s me :)
I would so like to be wrong about Flynn,but watching him play in Minn on League Pass,there’s nothing that screamed NBA Player! during his time on court. Injuries,bad coaching,wrong system,OK,but he made the most bone-headed plays on the fast break,and would routinely pass it to no-one or dribble the ball off his foot. Ish Smith was a better PG than what I saw of Flynn the past two seasons.
To be honest,I could live w/Chuck as the starting C,so long as a rim-protector was playing next to him-either Patterson or a motivated Hill. But a Hayes/Scola frontcourt,please G— no.(And I love Scola,just don’t want to see the two together as our starters.)
Here’s where the lock-out hurts the Rockets. The team could have used the camp to determine if Hill was capable of being the starting C. If so,then team looks a lot better,if not Morey has to justify the big bucks and get a C.(And not the Hill for Robin Lopez deal that’s almost inevitable.)
The only good thing that can come
from missing the whole season is that Yao will finally be healthy enough to make his last comeback attempt. It is hard for a team that plays with heart and hustles to try and tank a season. With the lottery balls even if we finish bad we are not promised a nimber 1 pick. Morey has tried the last four years to move up in the draft and failed, and teams could want to keep there picks and pass on Martin. To me at this point our only option is to compete and make that trade or trades to get a star.Scola may be the main piece to get us that player, but he needs to be moved to free up playing time for the other forwards and to save money. We may also have to take on a player that we do not want in the trade to get that star. Parsons,Flynn, i just do not see how they will get any minutes and hope these are not two more wasted picks.
by since86rocketsfan on Sep 14, 2011 12:06 PM CDT reply actions
Minnesota fan, not wanting to be a smartass at all,
and the McHale hiring is among the most interesting storylines out there right now. Kevin McHale is like Daryl Morey’s goateed evil twin in a few different ways, and it’s very cool that after he lapped the league in conducted interviews Morey went this way. Truly interesting.
McHale is going to have a tonic effect on the confidence of young players, at least at times. As coach in Minnesota – he spent parts of two years in the role – he seemed to be able to frame players’ expectations and efforts pretty well. Tactically he was pretty patchy. You’d expect that given the lack of due paid as an assistant.
The basic picture I imagine is that, at some point during the year when you’re tearing your hear out because of a late-game breakdown, Kevin McHale will say something really smart and pithy that will lift Hasheem Thabeet’s spirits.
I hope
you are right and Thabeet only has motivation problems^^
Heh. Thabeet mostly has foul problems.
If he could stay out there, that’d be enough.
McHale was originally a sort of de facto assistant coach in Minny, working with bigs on their positional game. Throughout his GM time here he worked with centers and anyone else into posting up. He spent at least a full season doing various stuff to get Rasho Nesterovic to play more aggressively. There was a big cardboard dummy thing that Rasho had to dunk over. Kevin Mac also loved Luc Longley; when Longley got dealt to the Bulls for Stacey King, whom McHale (rightly) thought of as lazy, that was one of the things that goaded McHale into a real position.
He definitely had a tendency to get emotionally invested in his chosen players, and sink time into them. Others, like King, he shipped off without getting great value back. They were bad apples, and he wanted nothing to do with them.
36-46
So we go 43-39 with a young roster and with tons of shakeups throughout the year last year and you think we’ll lose 7 wins off our total last year? If anything, Budinger, Hill, Patterson, Flynn (Thabeet and T-Will?) should be expected to take steps forward, and grow while we ditched deadweight in Brad Miller. Our point differential indicated that we in fact got unlucky last year (first five games were a pretty good representation of that), and I’d fully expect that we’ll improve in 2011-12, especially if we land a Jordan, Nene, or Chandler (unlikely though).
Like I told you on Twitter
Adelman’s effect on the team can’t be overstated. The Rockets were efficient, effective first quarter scorers, yet lost steam as the game went on, more so than any other team. This tells me that Adelman’s repetitive, predetermined sets (often used early in games) were a little more responsible for the high scoring than the players themselves.
He’s just a great coach and it was obvious to me that he got more out of his roster than most could, McHale included.
The Dream Shake ...on Twitter.
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak
Those points are fair
But I think the improvement to this team from the growth of youngsters, the addition of Morris (though I doubt he’ll have a big impact in his rookie year), and going into this season knowing that Yao is not in the picture will help this squad tremendously, enough to outweigh the loss of a damn good coach. It’s all just speculation at this point as neither you nor I knows what the squad is going to look like when they finally suit up, but I’m inclined to be optimistic. Maybe that’s a leap that I should be careful with, but it’s one I’m comfortable in.
by Patrick Harrel on Sep 14, 2011 8:55 PM CDT up reply actions
Speaking of Bud
From the things you think of for no reason department,
Bud had an excellent rookie season,and he was part of a Second UNit that Lowry was the PG of.
Last season Lowry started off hurt then moved into starting spot while Bud was really struggling on Second unit.
Battier gets traded and Bud starts alongside Lowry and he plays very well.
Coincidence? Or just very good chemistry and fit between a PG who passes and gets out and runs and a SF who is best on the break and raining 3s w/his feet set.(Behind this,will Bud struggle w/a shoot-first PG_Dragic-or will any passing PG get him going?)
Great Preview
The player I want to see in action is Donatas Motiejunas, with McHale’s guidance. He’s already a Bargnani-lite type of player; if his offense is sparkling, it’ll probably get the Rockets some highlights on SportsCenter (Just don’t imitate Bargs on reb/def, please). Otherwise, I find it hilarious that the Rockets could trot out a completely pure 2009-draft team with all the right positions in the form of Flynn, T-Will, Bud, Hill, and Thabeet.
On another note: Not to be nitpicky, but K-Mart was mentioned about 5-6 paragraphs down with the Martin-for-Gortat trade proposal. Just saying.
I just don't know what to expect
Too many damn variables. I just hope for the best.
Me against the world is a mismatch in my favor.
I would like to see what our final roster is before we do any season previews – otherwise known as MOREY WILL SIGN CHUCK HAYES ON THE FIRST DAY OF FREE AGENCY OR I WILL COME FOR HIS SOUL.
Minnesotan Rockets fan
by Barragan on Sep 14, 2011 8:29 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
You'll have to beat TCWIR
He might get there first. He might pull a Morey and knock on his door at 12:01am on the first day of free agency.
How many Biletnikoffs does he have? NOT TWO!
Was too far to huck a beer at a Stro’s player as per bone’s request. Jess (girlfriend) said I was too far, I said challenge accepted, a security guard said guess again.-BD34
I will break him
"You know how Einstein got bad grades as a kid? Well, mine are
even worse! " ~Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes
by TheChuckwagonisrolling on Sep 19, 2011 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions
If a season is missed
How would they do the 2012 draft. Draw names out of a hat?
"Stability is a factor in teams that win the championship. But if you stabilize on a team that's going to end up short of that, then all you're doing is spinning your wheels in the 45-win range."-----Daryl Morey
by fanoflosingteams on Sep 14, 2011 10:08 PM CDT reply actions
To draw attention back to NBA
After losing a year,the NBA would be pretty desperate to regain attention so I’d suggest…
A true Lottery Draft. 30 Lotto balls,1 for each team’s First Rd pick and just keep drawing them until every ball is gone. A team could get the first pick,the last pick,or anywhere in-between.
What Hockey did was weigh based on past few yrs
So Rockets would prob end up sending their First to NJ and having the Knick pick being somewhere around 10.
And for those who like to dwell on disaster
The NBA weighs picks and still does Lottery.
The Rockets’ own pick ends up being #16 and goes to Nets.(23 in 09,then 14,14)
The Knick’s pick should have been 10,but “wins” in Lottery and becomes the #2 pick and the Knicks get to keep it as it’s top 5 protected.
The Rockets are shut out of possible great Draft.
Chasing after just a center is fool's errand. it's the difference between lottery and 1st round exit
Until we have that superstar, I’d rather we toil in the lottery than getting our butts kicked by a 1 or 2 seed every year.
I don’t care if the Rockets tank or pull of a miracle trade or somehow convince a star that Houston is the coolest city in the world. But the star comes first. Until then, I prefer higher draft picks.
I would expect a similar record to last year, certainly not 7 games worse
Talent wise we’re a better team than last year. Coaching wise we probably aren’t, though that is still up to debate (I recall countless occasions of poor substituting patterns, not playing the younger, talented players, the fact that we were a much better team defensively after the trades). I’ll just say these two factors neutralize so we end up with a similar record, and we’ll once again compete for a 7-8 seed.
by goingforthecorner on Sep 17, 2011 1:52 PM CDT reply actions
Give the Rockets credot where credit is due
They had no center and a team with no real elite players yet managed to remain in playoff contention until the very end. They also managed to tab a 43 win season, an improved from the previous season. Call me either optomistic or delusional, but with San Antonio’s decline last post season, New Orleans losing its second best David West to free agency, and Dallas’ advancing age, the rocket can have a slight chance to take the division.
They may have a problem concerning Memphis, as they too are a up and coming team, but the Rockets do have a chance of finally make the playoffs after a two or three year draught. I do take exception with your view of Hasheem Thabeet. the reason why he has been considered a bust is because Memphis never used him, intead favored Marc Gasol at the starting center spot. With Kevin McHale as his coach, I think Thabeet might surprise you as mchale, oneof the greatest post plaers in his generation, will put hasheem under his wing as he did with Kevin Garnett in Minnesotta. Thabeet will be my pick for the most improved player award—you’ll see.
by Jeffrey Thompson on Sep 27, 2011 10:49 AM CDT reply actions

by 






















